Austin, TX
Texas HB 8 funding is here. Here’s what it means for Austin Community College, others.
Texas community colleges are getting millions in additional money as the state rolls out its new model for financing the higher education institutions.
Under House Bill 8, which was signed into law in June, the state’s 50 community college districts will move to merit-based funding — shifting away from the previous enrollment metrics model — and receive state money based on how many degrees, certificates, transfers and “credentials of value” they award.
After a dizzying summer of preparing for the change and the first state payments deposited in the fall, Texas is in the program’s implementation stage, but it’s “already driving these new dollars to community colleges,” Harrison Keller, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board’s commissioner, told the American-Statesman.
“The governor asked me how it’s going, and this is sort of the year of rulemaking … each (board meeting) will have a lot of rules we will have to adopt,” he said.
The state budget is allocating $683 million in additional money to community colleges under the new funding model. Under HB 8, Austin Community College is receiving an additional $6.8 million, almost doubling its net revenue, according to an announcement during the college’s December board meeting.
In total, community colleges were awarded 23.3% more in formula funding for fiscal 2024-25 compared with the previous biennium, for a total of $2.3 billion, according to the coordinating board’s website.
How is HB 8 affecting Texas?
Keller said the Higher Education Coordinating Board was able to fast-track the first funding allocation to community colleges because of the strong relationship and trust between the Legislature and higher education leaders.
Emergency rules enabled the board to allocate the funding Sept. 1. This month, the board plans to adopt its final rules for fiscal 2024. In April, it plans to adopt the final rules for fiscal 2025.
Ray Martinez, the president and CEO of the Texas Association of Community Colleges, said the coordinating board will distribute the funding in three payments, the first of which was sent in mid-October.
“There’s been a lot of work and still more to come,” he said.
The Legislature drafted and adopted the bill after the Texas Commission on Community College Finance approved recommendations for success-based funding. The bill seeks to address workforce and community needs stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the important role community colleges play in Texas.
“It’s a game changer, not just for bottom line revenue that will come to our colleges, which is sorely needed, but it is a game changer again because it will really allow us to focus on what we’re really there for and that is to serve the students that grow in our colleges,” Martinez said.
HB 8 is also designed to better support smaller and rural-serving community colleges. In addition to performance-tier funding, colleges can also receive additional base-tier funding if revenue from tuition, fees and local taxes do not meet their basic instruction and operations costs. For smaller, rural colleges that don’t make as much revenue from property taxes, this bill is a “welcome change,” Martinez said.
Additionally, colleges are also being offered incentives to focus on workforce needs and equity. The bill allocates more money to schools that graduate students with degrees in high-demand fields and when they enroll students who are 25 or older or who are economically or academically disadvantaged, as defined by the coordinating board. Colleges also are rewarded for the number of high school students who complete 15 semester credits of dual-enrollment courses.
Austin Community College
At ACC, the additional money will be invested to support students to graduation and funnel more money into high-need and high-success programs, officials said.
Jenna Cullinane Hege, ACC’s vice chancellor of institutional research and analytics, serves on the advisory committee for HB 8. Cullinane Hege has been involved in hosting “Roadshow” sessions at ACC to educate the community about the new funding model. She said the bill is a “major shift” in funding, but that the outcomes-focus model already reflects ACC’s mission.
“People are excited about the opportunity,” she said. “When we have $6.8 extra million, that allows us to be creative and thoughtful and strategic to invest in the things that are going to be most helpful for our students, most helpful for our community, most helpful for the state.”
Neil Vickers, ACC’s executive vice chancellor of finance and administration, said ACC is in brainstorming mode right now, collecting data to find successful programs for students that are scalable, and prioritize those in the budget.
“I think you’ll see more innovation from community colleges that are reaching out there and trying to find new ways to move these needles, knowing that there’s dollars available if you’re successful doing that,” he said. “And that’s definitely one of the things that ACC will be doing.”
Cullinane Hege said ACC has been strong in transferring students, which is also a fundable outcome under HB 8, but also has successful outcomes in the health sciences and advanced manufacturing areas.
HB 8 also reinforces work that ACC is already doing to support students. In October, ACC opened three centers to help connect students to more resources such as food, housing, child care and community, with the goal of helping them stay and finish in school.
In Vickers’ more than two decades at ACC, this is the most positive energy he has seen around state appropriations, he said. The bill signals to him that the state sees the value of community colleges in addressing state workforce needs, and he said that ACC will live up to the task.
“Even just that messaging by itself is really important for everybody, including community colleges. We need to hear that, too, from time to time that we’re valued,” he said. “It’s all being viewed as opportunities and positive challenges for us to do better, and to make sure that we’re serving our communities.”
Austin, TX
Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State
AUSTIN, Texas – Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.
What we know:
In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.
“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”
Nelson has served in the role since 2023.
Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.
View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)
What they’re saying:
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.
“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”
Dig deeper:
According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.
Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.
The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.
Austin, TX
Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election
Michael Dorman
Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system.
Processing Content
The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.
“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”
A bond election would
The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year,
On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds.
The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.
Rich Saskal
The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds.
An ordinance approved in October
The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds.
“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).”
A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.
Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed
The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism.
The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program.
Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.
A
The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.
A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.
City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes
Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process
ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.
“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.”
Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations.
“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.
Austin, TX
Texas commission on law enforcement head testifies in Austin, creates controversy
AUSTIN, Texas (KTRK) — Does the state of Texas have too many law enforcement agencies? That was a topic of discussion at a Texas House Committee meeting on May 28, which focused on police standards and policy.
It was comments from TCOLE Deputy Chief TJ Vineyard that drew the attention of unions and lobbying groups representing law enforcement across Texas.
“We’re starting to look now at encouraging the consolidation of agencies,” Vineyard said during the nearly eight-hour-long hearing.
The response was almost immediate from groups representing various aspects of law enforcement.
One social media post on Facebook from the Texas Law Enforcement Association proclaimed concern about the future of smaller departments across the state, despite an exchange later in the hearing between the committee chair, State Representative Cole Hefner, and TCOLE’s Executive Director, Chief Gregory Stevens.
“We’re not taking police off the street?” Hefner asked. “We’re making sure that we have qualified people that are equipped and trained.”
“One hundred percent,” Stevens said.
According to TCOLE’s own numbers, there are more than 2,700 accredited agencies and some 83,000 peace officers.
The chair asked whether 2,700 was a good or bad thing, given that Texas has more agencies than the next four largest states combined.
“There is a lot of duplicative coverage,” Stevens said, “overlapping coverage. When it comes to resources, it can be inefficient.”
Also speaking on the panel was Jennifer Szimanski with the Combined Law Enforcement Associations of Texas (CLEAT), which also posted on social media about the hearing. While the group wouldn’t comment directly about consolidation, Szimanski told ABC13 that “consolidation is not the legislative intent for TCOLE” and that “we should be forward-looking and raising standards”.
But in a conversation with ABC13, Stevens said targeting smaller departments is not their intent. TCOLE wants every department, regardless of size, to comply with the higher standards implemented in 2023.
“Some of the things that are out there surfing out across social media and on other platforms is that TCOLE wants to shut down small agencies and let sheriff’s offices take over, and that’s absolutely not true. It couldn’t be further from what we’re doing,” Stevens said. “It doesn’t matter about the size of the agencies, and I want to be really clear on that point. TECOL is not out to shut down or to make life hard on a small municipal agency, a school district, police department, or what have you.”
But the larger conversation is not limited to the state of Texas.
Harris County is home to more than 60 agencies. In the last major study on overlap in 2018, Rice University’s Kinder Institute found that consolidation could help address inefficiencies. Kyle Shelton, now at the University of Minnesota, co-authored the report eight years ago.
“It’s really just an opportunity to look at how regional governments, which are often overlapping, best coordinate and collaborate on the services that they’re providing,” Shelton told ABC13.
Whether it’s Harris County or the state of Texas, the cost of funding and maintaining law enforcement agencies is getting more expensive. While consolidation may not be the answer, it is part of a conversation in which Kyle Shelton says governments should be engaging.
“It’s not a quick band-aid to pull off and say, ‘Hey, look, we fixed the budget crisis, or, you know, addressed some efficiencies here in a nice, neat three-month process,” Shelton said. “You know, it likely takes years and a lot of trust building, both with residents and the agencies.”
Texas does have more law enforcement agencies than the next four largest states combined, according to TCOLE.
Copyright © 2026 KTRK-TV. All Rights Reserved.
-
New Hampshire1 minute agoThe Dip | River House Restaurant Concert Series
-
New Jersey4 minutes agoJustin Murphy wins New Jersey’s Republican Senate primary
-
New Mexico9 minutes agoDeb Haaland Wins New Mexico Democratic Primary For Governor
-
North Carolina16 minutes agoGreenville Police Department Join Effort Promoting Safe Firearm Storage
-
North Dakota19 minutes agoToday in History, 1971: Rugby repeats as North Dakota sand greens golf champion
-
Ohio24 minutes agoU20 World Team decided at U20 World Team Trials in Geneva, Ohio – WIN Magazine
-
Oklahoma31 minutes agoOklahoma data center boom sparks backlash as Yukon leaders, residents raise concerns
-
Oregon34 minutes agoTimeline video traces SB 1008’s impact on Oregon juvenile justice, viewers can watch now