Connect with us

Austin, TX

Rainy Austin Portends Major Upsets On The Professional Pickleball Association Tour

Published

on

Rainy Austin Portends Major Upsets On The Professional Pickleball Association Tour


The Professional Pickleball Association made a quick jaunt down the heartland of the country for a fast turnaround/back-to-back from last weekend’s event, and is in Austin, Texas for the third year running. This year’s Veolia Austin Open is being held once again at the Elevation Athletic Club, a former Tennis only club that is embracing Pickleball like many of its fellow Invited clubs are. Veolia is the PPA’s sustainability partner, and recently signed on to be the title sponsor for several upcoming PPA
PPA
events.

The tour visits one of the biggest Pickleball cities in the country. Thanks to Dreamland and Austin resident Steve Kuhn’s initial vision for the sport, there’s a massive contingent of pros who call Austin and the surrounding area home. Among the area’s residents include the Johns brothers, Julian Arnold & Lauren Stratman, Dekel Bar, Stefan Auvergne, John Cincola, Vivienne David, Vivian Glozman, Lea Jansen, Hunter & Yates Johnson, A.J. Koller, Jack Munro, Zane Navratil, Rob Nunnery, Lina Padegimaite, Thomas Wilson, DJ Young, and a few others I’ve probably forgotten. Imagine the pickup games these pros can put together…

Advertisement

Austin is a 1,000 point-level event, which means it uses the conventional “play the whole division in one day” format instead of the “play one round a day for a week” progressive format. Selfishly, I like the old-school format from a coverage perspective (it’s much easier to write up a whole division at once), but as a fan I prefer progression for the match scheduling and ability to see all three disciplines each day.

Unfortunately for all parties involved, the weather really wreaked havoc on this event, causing most of Saturday’s matches to get moved and even some finals to get postponed until Monday. The tour used Steve Kuhn’s Dreamland for some of its matches over the weekend, an interesting development given the frosty relationship between the tour and Kuhn and the latter’s resignation from MLP last September.

Perhaps because of the weather, or perhaps because something else was in the air in Austin, we got perhaps the most unexpected set of results in at least a couple years on tour. Read on.

Click here for the PickleballBrackets.com home page for the event.

Advertisement

————————

Men’s Pro Singles Recap

The PPA had to cap the qualifiers for the Men’s singles, but still had 61 players competing for eight spots. The most “famous” name to have to survive qualifying was probably U-Texas star Jack Munro, who made a splash in Mesa and who just took a bronze on the APP last weekend. He survived a tiebreaker to get into the main draw. He survived one round, upsetting #22 Michael Loyd, but fell to #10 Quang Duong in the 32s.

#1 Ben Johns, who has been feeling the pressure from #2 Federiko Staksrud, survived his typical slow start (#28 Phuc Huynh took him to three games in the round of 32) to cruise past #23 Wyatt Stone and then #5 JW Johnson in the quarters to get to the semis. There he got a juicy match against none other than Jack Sock, who survived his own slow start to cruise past #7 Pablo Tellez and #13 Hayden Patriquin (who shocked last week’s finalist Garnett) in the quarters.

In that highly entertaining semi, Sock demonstrated his new two-handed backhand roll dink to go along with his powerful ground strokes and un-readable inside-out forehands to impress early, jumping up to an 8-3 first game lead. Then Johns ran off eight straight unanswered to win 11-8 and have Sock shaking his head. Sock roared back in game 2, whipping passing shots and quickly pushing for a breaker. But the tiebreaker was one-way traffic, with Johns just putting on a pickleball master-show, even playing (and winning) one point left-handed. Johns wins the first of perhaps many matchups versus Sock in three to move to the final.

Advertisement

A side note on Sock, who a pundit postulated of being “overrated” in a social media post this past week. In his first four pro events as a full-time touring pro (Palm Springs, Mesa, Lakeville, and now Austin) he has three semis and a quarter in singles. That’s him quickly rising to the top of that discipline, and you’d be hard-pressed not to claim he’s already one of the four best singles players on tour. His results in Gender doubles (three 16s plus this weekend’s round of 32 loss) and Mixed (three qtrs plus this weekend’s update round of 32 loss) aren’t as immediately impressive, but most would agree that it is much more difficult to move forward in doubles in pro pickleball, even if you’re playing Mixed with Parenteau. It has become relatively clear quickly why the PPA invested in Sock for the future, and his combination of athleticism, showmanship, and shot making is nothing but a positive for the sport.

Meanwhile, the lower half of the draw played out almost entirely according to seed. Without having to deal with Cason Campbell, #9 Collin Shick cruised into the quarters before running into #2 Staksrud, who crushed him 4,2. There, Federico met #4 Christian Alshon, who dropped the first game in his quarterfinal versus #6 Dylan Frazier, but came back to take the tiebreaker 11-9 to setup a solid semifinal from the lower half as well. In the second semi, Staksrud made it five-for-five in making Men’s Singles finals in 2024 with a comprehensive 5,7 win over his up-and-coming singles rival Alshon.

In the final, it was #1 Johns versus #2 Staksrud, and Johns showed why he’s still number one with a 5,7 win. Johns takes back some of the seasonal points advantage Staksrud had claimed over the year’s first three months. The Bronze medal match between Sock & Alshon was cancelled.

Gold: Ben Johns. Silver: Federico Staksrud. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Advertisement

Women’s Pro Singles Recap

Word came out at the beginning of Thursday that #1 ranked and #1 seed Anna Leigh Waters was withdrawing from the event. Social media reports that she was suffering from a slight knock, and the loss of the dominant ALW (who has just 6 career losses in Pro singles since turning pro full time in May 2021) opened up the draw considerably.

The player to take the most advantage was clearly #16 Kaitlyn Christian, who got an easy win over #32 Katherine Allen in the 16s instead of a likely defeat to ALW to move on. In her quarter, she faced #7 Brooke Buckner, who has been incredibly impressive on tour after giving birth late last year. The pair split games and Buckner was well ahead in the tiebreaker, but Christian mounted a furious comeback to win 11-9 in the third and advance to the semis. The other semifinalist from the top half was #21 Parris Todd, last week’s silver medalist, who cruised through four rounds and three top 16 seeds to get to the semis without dropping a game. For those who thought Todd was a shoo-in were mistaken, as Christian ground out a 12-10 game one win then cruised into the final 10,3.

Advertisement

From the bottom half, #10 Jorja Johnson (fresh off a Triple Crown last weekend in Sacramento) topped #10 Dominique Schaefer in the 16s to face off against #2 Catherine Parenteau in the quarters. The pair then played one of the odder matches in recent memory, splitting donuts in games one and two before Jorja cruised to an 11-5 game three lead and a spot in the semis. Final score: (0),0,5. There she faced off against #4 Judit Castillo, a two-game winner over #17 Jamie Haas in the quarters. In that semi, the ladies again split games before Castillo took out the Florida teenager to earn her first PPA gold medal match.

The final guaranteed a first-time PPA singles winner, and it was Judit Castillo who seized the opportunity, coming back from a game down to claim the title. It is just her 3rd ever PPA medal (she has two golds and multiple singles medals on the APP). Parris and Jorja’s bronze medal match was cancelled.

Gold: Judit Castillo. Silver: Kaitlyn Christian. Bronze: Cancelled.

————————

Mixed Pro Doubles Recap

Advertisement

Mixed Pro Doubles kicked off Friday Morning with a couple of round-of-32 shocks. #6 Jack Sock & Catherine Parenteau continue their streak of not living up to their seeds, falling to Sock’s doubles partner/training partner Collin Shick & Brooke Buckner in two. Shick & Buckner may be seeded 26th, but they’re quality players and this isn’t necessarily a “bad” loss other than the fact that Parenteau’s team should be making medal rounds consistently (she owns 23 medals on tour, 7 of them gold).

Another underdog run came from #23 Parris Todd & Hunter Johnson, who took out #16 Jade Kawamoto & Connor Garnett primarily by overpowering the lefty Jade on the court. They could do little against #1 Waters & Johns in the 16s though, falling 0,3. The biggest shock of the draw was John Cincola, playing with former Michigan Tennis star and PPA signee Kate Fahey. The pair, seeded 47th, got a solid round of 64 win over Vich & Mary Brascia, then ground out a 2-game win over Lindsey Newman and Hewitt to reach the 16s. They played #2 seeds tough in the round of 16 but fell 10,4 to end their run.

#1 Johns & Waters cruised into the final from the top half as expected, taking out #5 Alshon & Irvine in the semis. The bottom half featured a small upset, with #4 Anna Bright & Andrei Daescu making a statement in toppling last week’s champs #2 Thomas Wilson & Vivienne David 9,9 to earn the final and Daescu’s first PPA mixed medal.

Advertisement

In the final, Daescu & Bright handed Johns & Waters just their third ever defeat together, and rather handily with a 3,9,3 set-back. The Bronze medal match between Sock & Alshon was cancelled. It is Bright’s first Mixed gold since last April, and Daescu’s first on the PPA.

Gold: Bright & Daescu. Silver: Waters & Johns. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Men’s Pro Doubles Recap

The Men’s Doubles draw in Austin was very favorites-driven, with just two upsets in the round of 32 (both by withdrawals of the higher seeds), and then just one upset by seed in the round of 16. However, that one round of 16 upset turned out to be rather notable. #9 Zane Navratil & Christian Alshon topped #6 Julian Arnold and last week’s finalist Tyler Loong 11-8 in the breaker, then turned around and shocked the Johns brothers in the quarters 11-6, 15-13. Alshon won a gold in doubles a week ago, and Navratil took a bronze in early February, so these are no strangers to the podium, but a win over the #1 team in their hometown is notable (to be fair, it’s also Navratil’s home town). The pair took out #3 Staksrud & Tellez in the semis as well to secure a gold medal appearance from the top side of the draw.

Advertisement

From the bottom side, James Ignatowich’s replacement Daescu turned out to be just as valuable in Men’s Doubles as he is in Mixed. Playing with Matt Wright, the #4 team cruised into the semis, then survived a donut 11-0 first game loss against the #2 team of Johnson & Frazier to advance to the final.

In the final, Daescu & Wright dominated #9 Navratil & Alshon to win in straight games 4,9,4 to claim the gold. It’s Wright’s first gold since he played with Ben last August during Colin’s ankle issue, and its Daescu’s first PPA gold (and his second on the weekend). Daescu, as he’s done so many times on the APP, takes the “double double” by winning both Men’s and Mixed gold. The Bronze medal match between the #2 and #3 seeds Johnson/Frazier and Staksrud/Tellez was cancelled.

Gold: Wright & Daescu. Silver: Navratil & Alshon. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Women’s Pro Doubles Recap

Advertisement

As with the Men’s Doubles draw, there were very few upsets to be discussed in the early rounds of the Women’s Pro Doubles draw. The round of 32 featured just one upset by seed (and another by withdrawal), and the round of 16 resulted in just one top eight seed eliminated (#6 Jade Kawamoto & Andrea Koop, who fell to #10 Jesse Irvine and Rianna Valdez in two).

The quarters went chalk, but the three of the matches went breaker. #1 Anna Leigh Waters & Catherine Parenteau were uncharacteristically stretched to a third game by #8 Johnson & Pisnik, not necessarily surprising on paper given the talent of those two players. Waters & Parenteau returned to form, heavily winning their semi 2,1 over #4 Kawamoto & Kovalova, putting themselves in line for another gold medal match.

The only top-4 seed to advance cleanly out of the quarters was #3 Anna Bright & Rachel Rohrabacher, who blitzed #10 Irvine & Valdez in a portend of things to come. They ground out a 7,9 win over #2 Meghan Dizon & Etta Wright to return to the gold medal match and ensure their 4th medal together since pairing up to start 2024. That medal turned out to be gold, as the former Orlando Squeeze MLP teammates came out firing against the #1 seeds 11-4, then rebounded from an 11-3 second game loss to win in four. Bright secures the “double double” on the weekend, having taken the Mixed title earlier.

It is the first time Waters & Parenteau have lost playing together, and the loss ensures that Waters fails to secure a gold medal in a PPA tournament for the first time since the Las Vegas PPA Championships in October 2021.

Gold: Bright & Rohrabacher. Silver: Waters & Parenteau. Bronze: Cancelled

Advertisement

————————

Senior 50+ Pro Competition Quick Recap

  • Men’s Champions Pro Singles: Craig Bobo took the draw as the #2 seed without dropping a game.
  • Men’s Champions Pro Doubles: Altaf Merchant & Steve Deakin gave up a combined 12 points across three full matches to blitz the field and take the gold.
  • Mixed Champions Pro Doubles: The Mixed senior open division was cancelled halfway through due to rain and the weekend running out.

————————

The Pro Pickleball Medal Tracker has now been updated with these results; check out this link online for a complete pro medal history for all tours and all pro events.

Next up on the Pickleball Calendar? According to my Master Pickleball Schedule, the 3/24 weekend is packed: there’s an APP Signature event in Miami, the Seniors are in Las Vegas for the SPT stop, DUPR is hosting an intercollegiate regional event at my home club in Richmond, and DUPR is also hosting a Junior event in Tempe.

Next up for the PPA tour? April 7th in Cary, North Carolina for a rare Mid-Atlantic event close enough for yours truly to drive to it to cover it.

Advertisement



Source link

Austin, TX

Venezuelan oil reboot not expected to spur windfall in Texas

Published

on

Venezuelan oil reboot not expected to spur windfall in Texas


With former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro out of power, President Trump said he wants to reboot the oil industry in Venezuela. 

That idea has raised questions about whether it could cause a price spike at the gas pump and a downturn in the Texas oil patch region. 

Advertisement

Now, a spike at the pump and a production slump in the Texas oil patch may not happen this year, but with oil prices down, a budget crunch for state lawmakers may be waiting when they return to Austin in 2027.

What they’re saying:

Advertisement

The situation in Venezuela is creating a lot of political uncertainty, but a Texas energy expert said he is not expecting that uncertainty to cause an oil patch crash or a gas pump pike in 2026.

Prices at the pump are low and despite some recent big swings, up and down, analysts say 2026 could see the lowest prices since the pandemic. That prediction has people like Dale Owens cautiously optimistic.

“Things change so drastically nowadays. I mean, look what’s happening with the government, so anything can affect the price. But right now I’m really happy that it’s stable,” said Owens.

Advertisement

There are big reasons for that local gas price stabilization, and it predates the leadership change in Venezuela, according to Ed Hirs, an Energy Fellow at the University of Houston.

“The first is that the president has asked MBS (Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman) and OPEC nations to continue pumping a pace. Number one. Number two, this helps hamstring the Russian economy and its war effort. And that’s also one of the goals of not only the European Union, but of the Trump administration. And number three, we’ve got the midterm elections coming up,” said Hirs.

Advertisement

The price of a barrel of oil is expected to increase slightly because of the uncertainty regarding Venezuela. Texas crude oil production, according to an update released Monday, was stable in December, but state data also showed drilling permits for 2025 were at 369 and that’s down from 459 in 2024.

“When President Trump took office, oil was about $80 a barrel, today it’s under $60 a barrel. We are the high-cost producers in the global commodity oil market, and the cost of drilling these wells has gone up by between 5% and 12%, primarily because of Trump’s steel tariffs. Not only does the imported steel now cost a lot more, but domestic producers raise their So the producers in West Texas and across the Permian Basin are getting squeezed by much lower revenues, $20 a barrel less and much higher cost. It’s not a good capital investment for Wall Street,” said Hirs.

Dig deeper:

Advertisement

The oil industry remains a big part of the Texas economy and the state budget. State lawmakers will return to Austin in 2027 to crunch numbers for a new two-year budget.

“I think they need to be looking at the budget. So the state comptroller needs to be running the numbers now based on lower oil revenues, not only for state lands, for example, for the universities, but for the state tax receipts. And that applies to the counties and cities that rely on these revenues to keep their budgets balanced. It’s going to be lower for longer,” said Hirs. 

Advertisement

There are also doubts about whether the Texas refineries will get a financial windfall if the Trump Administration is able to reboot the oil industry in Venezuela. There are about six refineries in Texas and Louisiana that can process the heavy crude that is located in Venezuela.

“Well, it might help keep them open. But Lyondell just closed down a 100-plus-year-old heavy crude refinery on the Houston Ship Channel because it just doesn’t make any sense to reinvest in it. And it was going to require $750, $800 million of new capital investment just to keep the plant operating at par,” said Hirs.

What’s next:

Advertisement

Stocks for several oil companies did increase on Monday. Chevron, at one point, had a 10% stock price surge, mainly because Chevron is the only U.S. company operating in Venezuela. Other energy-related companies also saw an increase, like Exxon, as well as industry suppliers like Baker-Hughes and Halliburton. 

The action on Wall Street came after President Trump said he wants energy producers to pay for the oil production rebuild. Hirs described the administration’s plans as being “naive.”

Advertisement

Past attempts to rebuild another country’s oil infrastructure seem to back up the doubts raised by Hirs. In 1989, after the Soviet Union collapsed, companies like Exxon went in to rebuild — only to get kicked out later by the Russians. Hirs also noted the rebuilding effort in Iraq, started by President George W. Bush, hasn’t returned production there to pre-war levels. And it’s the same story for Libya, which was done under President Obama.

The Source: Information from interviews conducted by FOX 7 Austin’s Rudy Koski and previous coverage

AustinTexas PoliticsDonald J. Trump
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Homes are selling fast in Austin — but two Texas cities are faster

Published

on

Homes are selling fast in Austin — but two Texas cities are faster


A “for sale” sign is displayed near a home on April 24, 2025 in Austin, Texas. The Texas capital had one of the highest home turnover rates among U.S. metros between September 2024 and August 2025.

Brandon Bell/Getty Images

Even as the average U.S. home turnover rate remains at its lowest since the 1990s, Texas remains one of the leading states for new residents. An August 2025 study deemed Austin the biggest boomtown in the country, with significant jumps in population, housing units and gross domestic product (GDP) growth.

A new analysis by Realtor.com identified the top 10 U.S. metros with the highest real estate turnover rates in 2025 — and nearly half are found in the Lone Star State.

Article continues below this ad

Advertisement

But why is a high turnover rate a good thing? Hannah Jones, a senior economic research analyst at Realtor.com, breaks it down.

“Markets with higher turnover tend to function more fluidly than markets with lower turnover, with a healthier balance of active buyers and sellers,” Jones said. “The markets with the highest turnover are typically more affordable and supported by robust for-sale inventory, particularly from new construction.”

Here’s a look at the four thriving Texas cities.

4 Texas metros among top 10 with highest turnover

Advertisement

Among the top 10 U.S. metros with the highest turnover were San Antonio, Dallas, Austin and Houston — but such healthy growth didn’t happen overnight.

Article continues below this ad

“Metros like San Antonio, Dallas, and Austin have seen significant building activity over the past five years, which has helped temper home price growth and expand options for buyers, ultimately encouraging more frequent home sales,” says Jones.

Here’s what local real estate professionals had to say about each city:

No. 2: San Antonio

Advertisement
Downtown San Antonio
San Antonio Express-News file photo

Daniel Cabrera, owner and founder of Sell My House Fast SA TX, attributes much of the area’s high turnover to job relocations and “equity unlocking.”

Article continues below this ad

“Corporate hiring and military rotations provide constant job openings,” he said, adding, “People in San Antonio are monetizing appreciation and resetting life logistics, not panic selling. They are selling to repay debts, relocate for their relatives, and escape the commute for more space.”

Sain Rhodes, real estate expert for Cleve Offers, also emphasized the relationship between demand and sales.

“San Antonio is a city where sellers are riding the wave of demand,” Rhodes said. “Last quarter, I personally relocated clients from high-tax states like California to San Antonio. Sellers are taking advantage of this window of opportunity and not waiting around.”

No. 5: Dallas

Advertisement
Dusk view of the skyline in Dallas, where the pandemic-era shift to remote work exacerbated already-high office vacancy rates. The same is true in other Texas metros.

Dusk view of the skyline in Dallas, where the pandemic-era shift to remote work exacerbated already-high office vacancy rates. The same is true in other Texas metros.

Photo by Carol M. Highsmith/Buye/Getty Images

Harrison Polsky, director of luxury sales at Douglas Elliman in Dallas, observed how rising home values were enticing homebuyers in DFW.

Article continues below this ad

“In Dallas-Fort Worth, we’re seeing a healthy increase in homeowners putting their properties on the market, which reflects strong buyer interest and vibrant market activity,” Polsky said. “Many people are taking advantage of rising home values to move into larger homes, upgrade to newer properties, or relocate closer to family or work.”

No. 7: Austin

Advertisement
The Austin Skyline from the campus of the Texas School for the Deaf, Oct. 7, 2025.

The Austin Skyline from the campus of the Texas School for the Deaf, Oct. 7, 2025.

Sara Diggins/Austin American-Statesman

Speaking of rising home values and job relocation, those are also among the factors driving turnover in Austin — according to local real estate broker Noá Levy, of The Boutique Real Estate powered by eXp Realty.

Article continues below this ad

“During the [COVID-19] pandemic, Austin experienced rapid price appreciation, and many buyers moved here quickly and for many reasons,” Levy said. “In the last couple of years, political reasons, cost of living, desire to return to their previous areas, and even job relocation have been a factor in deciding to move away from Austin and Texas in general.”

Even those who bought before the pandemic maintain big equity.

Advertisement

“So people feel maybe now that interest rates came down a little bit, it may be the moment to take advantage of gains from the appreciation we saw from 2020 to 2022,” Levy added.

No. 9: Houston

The downtown Houston skyline is photographed from Sabine Street Bridge Thursday, Oct. 6, 2022, in Houston.

The downtown Houston skyline is photographed from Sabine Street Bridge Thursday, Oct. 6, 2022, in Houston.

Yi-Chin Lee/Staff photographer

Down in Houston, the factors contributing to high turnover seemed much the same, according to HoustonHomeTools.com founder Ahmed Harhara.

Article continues below this ad

Advertisement

“A lot of people bought homes during competitive market conditions, and now that lifestyles or budgets have changed, they’re adjusting by relocating sooner than planned,” Harhara said. “Turnover doesn’t necessarily reflect dissatisfaction; it reflects how dynamic the market has become.”

Heather Shepherd, a real estate agent at Douglas Elliman in Houston, listed off the reasons she’s repeatedly heard from those selling: rising homeowners insurance premiums and property taxes; commute fatigue; lifestyle upgrades; and new-construction pressures.

“Some older neighborhoods feel squeezed or overshadowed, and builders are starting to buy the older homes for new construction,” Shepherd said.

Top 10 US metros with the highest turnover

The following table shows the 10 metros with the highest turnover between September 2024 and August 2025.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

Rank Metro Median list price Turnover rate
(per 1,000 housing units)
1 Kansas City, Mo. $380,000 45 sales
2 San Antonio $329,000 45 sales
3 Indianopolis $320,000 45 sales
4 Las Vegas $471,975 43 sales
5 Dallas $425,000 42 sales
6 Nashville, Tenn. $536,739 42 sales
7 Austin $489.859 42 sales
8 Charlotte, N.C. $438,348 42 sales
9 Houston $358,000 40 sales
10 St. Louis $295,900 39 sales



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Texas Tech lands K-State LB Austin Romaine out of transfer portal

Published

on

Texas Tech lands K-State LB Austin Romaine out of transfer portal


The Texas Tech football team landed its first commitment out of the transfer portal on Sunday.

Kansas State transfer linebacker Austin Romaine announced his commitment on social media. A second-team all-Big 12 selection this season, Romaine joins Texas Tech with one year of eligibility plus a redshirt year available.

The 6-foot-2, 245-pound linebacker has been a fixture in the middle of the Kansas State defense since his true freshman season of 2023 — when he earned five starts and was named Big 12 defensive freshman of the year, an award he shared with his new teammate Ben Roberts. He started all 12 games in 2024 and had 66 tackles, six quarterback hurries, an interception and a fumble recovery in 2025.

Advertisement

What Kansas State transfer Austin Romaine brings to Texas Tech football

Romaine will likely be seen as Jacob Rodriguez’s replacement as the other starting linebacker next to Roberts next season. It would also indicate John Curry will remain at the STAR (the hybrid linebacker-safety position) in which he excelled this season.

For his career, Romaine has three forced fumbles (all in 2024) and had his first career fumble recovery and interception in 2025.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending