Connect with us

Austin, TX

Rainy Austin Portends Major Upsets On The Professional Pickleball Association Tour

Published

on

Rainy Austin Portends Major Upsets On The Professional Pickleball Association Tour


The Professional Pickleball Association made a quick jaunt down the heartland of the country for a fast turnaround/back-to-back from last weekend’s event, and is in Austin, Texas for the third year running. This year’s Veolia Austin Open is being held once again at the Elevation Athletic Club, a former Tennis only club that is embracing Pickleball like many of its fellow Invited clubs are. Veolia is the PPA’s sustainability partner, and recently signed on to be the title sponsor for several upcoming PPA
PPA
events.

The tour visits one of the biggest Pickleball cities in the country. Thanks to Dreamland and Austin resident Steve Kuhn’s initial vision for the sport, there’s a massive contingent of pros who call Austin and the surrounding area home. Among the area’s residents include the Johns brothers, Julian Arnold & Lauren Stratman, Dekel Bar, Stefan Auvergne, John Cincola, Vivienne David, Vivian Glozman, Lea Jansen, Hunter & Yates Johnson, A.J. Koller, Jack Munro, Zane Navratil, Rob Nunnery, Lina Padegimaite, Thomas Wilson, DJ Young, and a few others I’ve probably forgotten. Imagine the pickup games these pros can put together…

Advertisement

Austin is a 1,000 point-level event, which means it uses the conventional “play the whole division in one day” format instead of the “play one round a day for a week” progressive format. Selfishly, I like the old-school format from a coverage perspective (it’s much easier to write up a whole division at once), but as a fan I prefer progression for the match scheduling and ability to see all three disciplines each day.

Unfortunately for all parties involved, the weather really wreaked havoc on this event, causing most of Saturday’s matches to get moved and even some finals to get postponed until Monday. The tour used Steve Kuhn’s Dreamland for some of its matches over the weekend, an interesting development given the frosty relationship between the tour and Kuhn and the latter’s resignation from MLP last September.

Perhaps because of the weather, or perhaps because something else was in the air in Austin, we got perhaps the most unexpected set of results in at least a couple years on tour. Read on.

Click here for the PickleballBrackets.com home page for the event.

Advertisement

————————

Men’s Pro Singles Recap

The PPA had to cap the qualifiers for the Men’s singles, but still had 61 players competing for eight spots. The most “famous” name to have to survive qualifying was probably U-Texas star Jack Munro, who made a splash in Mesa and who just took a bronze on the APP last weekend. He survived a tiebreaker to get into the main draw. He survived one round, upsetting #22 Michael Loyd, but fell to #10 Quang Duong in the 32s.

#1 Ben Johns, who has been feeling the pressure from #2 Federiko Staksrud, survived his typical slow start (#28 Phuc Huynh took him to three games in the round of 32) to cruise past #23 Wyatt Stone and then #5 JW Johnson in the quarters to get to the semis. There he got a juicy match against none other than Jack Sock, who survived his own slow start to cruise past #7 Pablo Tellez and #13 Hayden Patriquin (who shocked last week’s finalist Garnett) in the quarters.

In that highly entertaining semi, Sock demonstrated his new two-handed backhand roll dink to go along with his powerful ground strokes and un-readable inside-out forehands to impress early, jumping up to an 8-3 first game lead. Then Johns ran off eight straight unanswered to win 11-8 and have Sock shaking his head. Sock roared back in game 2, whipping passing shots and quickly pushing for a breaker. But the tiebreaker was one-way traffic, with Johns just putting on a pickleball master-show, even playing (and winning) one point left-handed. Johns wins the first of perhaps many matchups versus Sock in three to move to the final.

Advertisement

A side note on Sock, who a pundit postulated of being “overrated” in a social media post this past week. In his first four pro events as a full-time touring pro (Palm Springs, Mesa, Lakeville, and now Austin) he has three semis and a quarter in singles. That’s him quickly rising to the top of that discipline, and you’d be hard-pressed not to claim he’s already one of the four best singles players on tour. His results in Gender doubles (three 16s plus this weekend’s round of 32 loss) and Mixed (three qtrs plus this weekend’s update round of 32 loss) aren’t as immediately impressive, but most would agree that it is much more difficult to move forward in doubles in pro pickleball, even if you’re playing Mixed with Parenteau. It has become relatively clear quickly why the PPA invested in Sock for the future, and his combination of athleticism, showmanship, and shot making is nothing but a positive for the sport.

Meanwhile, the lower half of the draw played out almost entirely according to seed. Without having to deal with Cason Campbell, #9 Collin Shick cruised into the quarters before running into #2 Staksrud, who crushed him 4,2. There, Federico met #4 Christian Alshon, who dropped the first game in his quarterfinal versus #6 Dylan Frazier, but came back to take the tiebreaker 11-9 to setup a solid semifinal from the lower half as well. In the second semi, Staksrud made it five-for-five in making Men’s Singles finals in 2024 with a comprehensive 5,7 win over his up-and-coming singles rival Alshon.

In the final, it was #1 Johns versus #2 Staksrud, and Johns showed why he’s still number one with a 5,7 win. Johns takes back some of the seasonal points advantage Staksrud had claimed over the year’s first three months. The Bronze medal match between Sock & Alshon was cancelled.

Gold: Ben Johns. Silver: Federico Staksrud. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Advertisement

Women’s Pro Singles Recap

Word came out at the beginning of Thursday that #1 ranked and #1 seed Anna Leigh Waters was withdrawing from the event. Social media reports that she was suffering from a slight knock, and the loss of the dominant ALW (who has just 6 career losses in Pro singles since turning pro full time in May 2021) opened up the draw considerably.

The player to take the most advantage was clearly #16 Kaitlyn Christian, who got an easy win over #32 Katherine Allen in the 16s instead of a likely defeat to ALW to move on. In her quarter, she faced #7 Brooke Buckner, who has been incredibly impressive on tour after giving birth late last year. The pair split games and Buckner was well ahead in the tiebreaker, but Christian mounted a furious comeback to win 11-9 in the third and advance to the semis. The other semifinalist from the top half was #21 Parris Todd, last week’s silver medalist, who cruised through four rounds and three top 16 seeds to get to the semis without dropping a game. For those who thought Todd was a shoo-in were mistaken, as Christian ground out a 12-10 game one win then cruised into the final 10,3.

Advertisement

From the bottom half, #10 Jorja Johnson (fresh off a Triple Crown last weekend in Sacramento) topped #10 Dominique Schaefer in the 16s to face off against #2 Catherine Parenteau in the quarters. The pair then played one of the odder matches in recent memory, splitting donuts in games one and two before Jorja cruised to an 11-5 game three lead and a spot in the semis. Final score: (0),0,5. There she faced off against #4 Judit Castillo, a two-game winner over #17 Jamie Haas in the quarters. In that semi, the ladies again split games before Castillo took out the Florida teenager to earn her first PPA gold medal match.

The final guaranteed a first-time PPA singles winner, and it was Judit Castillo who seized the opportunity, coming back from a game down to claim the title. It is just her 3rd ever PPA medal (she has two golds and multiple singles medals on the APP). Parris and Jorja’s bronze medal match was cancelled.

Gold: Judit Castillo. Silver: Kaitlyn Christian. Bronze: Cancelled.

————————

Mixed Pro Doubles Recap

Advertisement

Mixed Pro Doubles kicked off Friday Morning with a couple of round-of-32 shocks. #6 Jack Sock & Catherine Parenteau continue their streak of not living up to their seeds, falling to Sock’s doubles partner/training partner Collin Shick & Brooke Buckner in two. Shick & Buckner may be seeded 26th, but they’re quality players and this isn’t necessarily a “bad” loss other than the fact that Parenteau’s team should be making medal rounds consistently (she owns 23 medals on tour, 7 of them gold).

Another underdog run came from #23 Parris Todd & Hunter Johnson, who took out #16 Jade Kawamoto & Connor Garnett primarily by overpowering the lefty Jade on the court. They could do little against #1 Waters & Johns in the 16s though, falling 0,3. The biggest shock of the draw was John Cincola, playing with former Michigan Tennis star and PPA signee Kate Fahey. The pair, seeded 47th, got a solid round of 64 win over Vich & Mary Brascia, then ground out a 2-game win over Lindsey Newman and Hewitt to reach the 16s. They played #2 seeds tough in the round of 16 but fell 10,4 to end their run.

#1 Johns & Waters cruised into the final from the top half as expected, taking out #5 Alshon & Irvine in the semis. The bottom half featured a small upset, with #4 Anna Bright & Andrei Daescu making a statement in toppling last week’s champs #2 Thomas Wilson & Vivienne David 9,9 to earn the final and Daescu’s first PPA mixed medal.

Advertisement

In the final, Daescu & Bright handed Johns & Waters just their third ever defeat together, and rather handily with a 3,9,3 set-back. The Bronze medal match between Sock & Alshon was cancelled. It is Bright’s first Mixed gold since last April, and Daescu’s first on the PPA.

Gold: Bright & Daescu. Silver: Waters & Johns. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Men’s Pro Doubles Recap

The Men’s Doubles draw in Austin was very favorites-driven, with just two upsets in the round of 32 (both by withdrawals of the higher seeds), and then just one upset by seed in the round of 16. However, that one round of 16 upset turned out to be rather notable. #9 Zane Navratil & Christian Alshon topped #6 Julian Arnold and last week’s finalist Tyler Loong 11-8 in the breaker, then turned around and shocked the Johns brothers in the quarters 11-6, 15-13. Alshon won a gold in doubles a week ago, and Navratil took a bronze in early February, so these are no strangers to the podium, but a win over the #1 team in their hometown is notable (to be fair, it’s also Navratil’s home town). The pair took out #3 Staksrud & Tellez in the semis as well to secure a gold medal appearance from the top side of the draw.

Advertisement

From the bottom side, James Ignatowich’s replacement Daescu turned out to be just as valuable in Men’s Doubles as he is in Mixed. Playing with Matt Wright, the #4 team cruised into the semis, then survived a donut 11-0 first game loss against the #2 team of Johnson & Frazier to advance to the final.

In the final, Daescu & Wright dominated #9 Navratil & Alshon to win in straight games 4,9,4 to claim the gold. It’s Wright’s first gold since he played with Ben last August during Colin’s ankle issue, and its Daescu’s first PPA gold (and his second on the weekend). Daescu, as he’s done so many times on the APP, takes the “double double” by winning both Men’s and Mixed gold. The Bronze medal match between the #2 and #3 seeds Johnson/Frazier and Staksrud/Tellez was cancelled.

Gold: Wright & Daescu. Silver: Navratil & Alshon. Bronze: cancelled

————————

Women’s Pro Doubles Recap

Advertisement

As with the Men’s Doubles draw, there were very few upsets to be discussed in the early rounds of the Women’s Pro Doubles draw. The round of 32 featured just one upset by seed (and another by withdrawal), and the round of 16 resulted in just one top eight seed eliminated (#6 Jade Kawamoto & Andrea Koop, who fell to #10 Jesse Irvine and Rianna Valdez in two).

The quarters went chalk, but the three of the matches went breaker. #1 Anna Leigh Waters & Catherine Parenteau were uncharacteristically stretched to a third game by #8 Johnson & Pisnik, not necessarily surprising on paper given the talent of those two players. Waters & Parenteau returned to form, heavily winning their semi 2,1 over #4 Kawamoto & Kovalova, putting themselves in line for another gold medal match.

The only top-4 seed to advance cleanly out of the quarters was #3 Anna Bright & Rachel Rohrabacher, who blitzed #10 Irvine & Valdez in a portend of things to come. They ground out a 7,9 win over #2 Meghan Dizon & Etta Wright to return to the gold medal match and ensure their 4th medal together since pairing up to start 2024. That medal turned out to be gold, as the former Orlando Squeeze MLP teammates came out firing against the #1 seeds 11-4, then rebounded from an 11-3 second game loss to win in four. Bright secures the “double double” on the weekend, having taken the Mixed title earlier.

It is the first time Waters & Parenteau have lost playing together, and the loss ensures that Waters fails to secure a gold medal in a PPA tournament for the first time since the Las Vegas PPA Championships in October 2021.

Gold: Bright & Rohrabacher. Silver: Waters & Parenteau. Bronze: Cancelled

Advertisement

————————

Senior 50+ Pro Competition Quick Recap

  • Men’s Champions Pro Singles: Craig Bobo took the draw as the #2 seed without dropping a game.
  • Men’s Champions Pro Doubles: Altaf Merchant & Steve Deakin gave up a combined 12 points across three full matches to blitz the field and take the gold.
  • Mixed Champions Pro Doubles: The Mixed senior open division was cancelled halfway through due to rain and the weekend running out.

————————

The Pro Pickleball Medal Tracker has now been updated with these results; check out this link online for a complete pro medal history for all tours and all pro events.

Next up on the Pickleball Calendar? According to my Master Pickleball Schedule, the 3/24 weekend is packed: there’s an APP Signature event in Miami, the Seniors are in Las Vegas for the SPT stop, DUPR is hosting an intercollegiate regional event at my home club in Richmond, and DUPR is also hosting a Junior event in Tempe.

Next up for the PPA tour? April 7th in Cary, North Carolina for a rare Mid-Atlantic event close enough for yours truly to drive to it to cover it.

Advertisement



Source link

Austin, TX

Austin’s Star Is Still Shining Bright: Venture Funding To City’s Startups Hits All-Time High

Published

on

Austin’s Star Is Still Shining Bright: Venture Funding To City’s Startups Hits All-Time High


At the height of the pandemic and the global shift to remote work, tech founders and investors alike flocked to Austin, Texas, drawn to a more business-friendly environment, relatively lower housing costs, and the city’s hip reputation.

Venture firms that set up shop in the Texas capital city included Bedrock Capital, Breyer Capital, and 8VC 1, among others. Elon Musk famously moved Tesla’s headquarters to Austin in 2021, while also purchasing a house and establishing a residence there.

But as more employees returned to in-office work, Austin slowly seemed to fall out of favor with the tech community, some of whom said it had been overhyped as a startup hub.

Advertisement

There were reports of tech workers who had moved to the city during the pandemic and claimed to regret it, saying they were going back to places like the Bay Area. Musk relocated Tesla’s engineering headquarters back to California in 2023.

Funding tops pandemic peak

Undeterred by the “tourists,” the startup and venture community in Austin kept plugging away. And those efforts are reflected in a surge in funding to startups headquartered there last year, with 2025 posting an all-time high for Austin venture investment, Crunchbase data shows.

Investment into Austin-based startups spiked 64.8% to $7.19 billion in 2025 as more investors poured money into companies based in the region, according to Crunchbase data. That’s compared with the $4.37 billion raised by Austin-area startups in 2024 and tops even the $6.1 billion raised in 2021, at the height of the venture funding frenzy.

Notably, deal counts actually decreased from 312 in 2024 to 272 year over year, signaling an increase in later-stage deals. Indeed, the data corroborates that with $4 billion of the total raised in 2025 classified as late-stage rounds.

Last year’s totals were also more than double — 130% higher — than the $3.1 billion raised in 2023. That money was raised across 403 deals, signaling much smaller round sizes at the time and a more mature market.

Advertisement

A tech scene decades in the making

Morgan Flager, managing partner of Silverton Partners, doesn’t believe that the Austin funding performance in 2025 was anomalous.

Rather, he calls it “the payoff from decades of compounding.”

“Talent density in venture categories such as software, fintech, health tech, defense and  robotics has reached a critical mass, driven by waves of Bay Area relocations, both full HQ moves and satellite offices, that brought technical, product and operational talent into the market,” Flager said.

That talent eventually left to build new companies, he said, and the cycle repeated.

Advertisement

“On the capital side, the stack has matured across all stages, from pre-seed through growth, with local firms that have now cycled through multiple funds and understand the market deeply,” Flager said. “Layer in a business-friendly regulatory environment, a relatively lower cost of living, as well as a lower effective tax rate, and Austin becomes an attractive place to start and scale a company.”

Former Austin Mayor Steve Adler saw so much potential in the city’s startup scene that he began a career in venture investing after his tenure ended in early 2023. (He now works for New York-based Commonweal Ventures).

Part of the city’s success as a startup hub stems from its reputation as a haven for mavericks and risk-takers, Adler has said.

“Most cities in the world, you try something, you fail; it’s hard to have access to the capital the second time,” he told Zillow co-founder Spencer Rascoff in a podcast interview in 2022. “In Austin, the civic folk heroes are the people that tried something and it didn’t quite work out and they worked on it until it did.”

 

Advertisement

Pat Matthews, founder of Active Capital, a solo GP venture firm based in nearby San Antonio, said that it feels like Texas and the Austin metro area specifically are becoming more attractive to manufacturing- and engineering-heavy businesses.

 

“Some of that may be thanks to Tesla, and some of it may simply reflect the physical advantages of the state,” he told Crunchbase News. “Either way, this [surge in financing] feels less like hype returning and more like capital concentrating around a narrower set of serious, technically differentiated companies.”

Deal sizes grow

That diversity among funded startups is reflected in last year’s investment totals for Austin, which were boosted by several large, late-stage deals across a broad range of industries.

 

Advertisement

The largest was a $1 billion Series C round for energy provider Base Power in October. New York-based Addition led that financing, which valued the 2-year-old company at $4 billion.

 

Looking back, February in particular was a busy month for venture funding. That month alone saw the second-, third- and fourth-largest rounds in Austin for the year. They included:

 

  • A February Series C round in which autonomous surface vessels maker Saronic raised $600 million at a $4 billion valuation. Elad Gil led the round for the defense tech startup.
  • Also in February, NinjaOne, which provides endpoint management, security and monitoring, raised $500 million in Series C extensions at a $5 billion valuation — more than doubling its value from just 12 months prior. The funding came in separate tranches led by Iconiq Growth and Google’s CapitalG, with participation from other investors.
  • Robotics company Apptronik in February raised $415 million in Series A financing led by  B Capital and accelerator Capital Factory. (A $520 million extension to that Series A was raised in February 2026, taking the total round to over $935 million.)

 

The findings correspond with Flager’s observations.

Advertisement

 

“A good chunk of the capital raised in Austin was driven by several large deals. Similar to what we saw across the U.S. in 2025, venture funding in Austin was more concentrated than it has been in the past,” he told Crunchbase News. “Roughly 38% of the capital deployed went to the top five venture financings in Austin. I believe the top 10 deals nationally accounted for more than 40% of the capital raised last year. We’ll see if this trend continues into 2026 and beyond. The start of the year suggests it will.”

 

Krishna Srinivasan, founding partner of Live Oak Ventures, agrees, noting that from a dollars perspective, the surge in financings was driven by a handful of outsized capital-intensive deals in newer categories such as defense and deep tech.

 

Advertisement

“These companies require a combination of technology, land for manufacturing facilities, and talent for manufacturing tasks. Austin has unique skillsets for that,” he said. “It has a density of three things: talent in deep tech with The University of Texas, and many others moving to Texas in light of favorable business conditions with expertise in these industries; expansive land around Central Texas that is inexpensive, especially compared to California; and lower cost manufacturing-related labor especially given the surge in manufacturing jobs such as at Tesla in recent times.”

Burgeoning industries

Once upon a time, Austin was better known as home to software and CPG companies. And while those types of companies certainly still exist, a number of other industries are growing increasingly robust, as the local investors have pointed out.

 

As with many top tech markets, Flager said Austin has long been strong for application and infrastructure software, which is currently being challenged by AI. In his view, that talent has migrated to building “quality” vertical agentic software and AI-native businesses.

 

Advertisement

“We are seeing these companies grow quickly and build scale, while using less capital — which is exciting,” he added. “The domain experts who built and scaled application software companies here over the last two decades are spinning out to build the next generation of native AI businesses.”

 

The market overall is also broadening in interesting ways. Defense and autonomy have emerged as breakout categories, with Austin becoming one of the stronger markets in the country for dual-use and autonomous systems companies, noted Flager.

 

“The combination of software and hardware skills now in Texas, along with a business-friendly regulatory environment, has allowed Austin to take a leadership position in these important and developing markets,” he said. “Energy tech is also a natural fit given Texas’ grid scale and the surging power demands of AI infrastructure.”

Advertisement

 

Finally, robotics and advanced manufacturing are also gaining momentum, driven by deep engineering talent and the ability to scale manufacturing near Austin cost-effectively, allowing engineers, executives and other factory employees to coexist and collaborate in close proximity.

 

Srinivasan noted that his firm is seeing strong activity in vertical AI companies, or companies that serve vertical markets with AI that is tuned on specialized proprietary vertical data, often targeting the services and labor expenditures by their customers.

 

Advertisement

“These companies deliver ‘Services as Software’ with close to software gross margins and pricing models that are based more on usage and outcomes as opposed to the traditional seat-based models,” he said.

 

Srinivasan also expects the city to continue to see large funding deals in defense and deep tech, given the combination of local strengths and robust global demand for such products.

 

Continued momentum

Investors and companies continue to be drawn to Austin. In late December, San Francisco-based venture firm Craft Ventures signed a lease in the city. One of the firm’s founders, David Sacks, also announced that he had personally moved to Austin. The firm’s other founder, Bill Lee, had lived and worked in the city since 2022.

Advertisement

 

In late March of this year, Musk announced plans to build two semiconductor factories totaling 100 million square feet in Austin to supply advanced chips for SpaceX and Tesla. The venture, known as Terafab, aims to manufacture 1 trillion watts of computing power per year, he said. Media outlets valued the initiative at nearly $25 billion.

 

Also this week, Barcelona-based AI health tech startup Biorce announced it will open an office and hire in Austin.

 

Advertisement

CEO Pedro Coelho told Crunchbase News that with the company’s New York office already established, the next step was not just expansion, “but choosing the right place to build.”

 

“And we chose Austin for one reason above all: talent,” he said. “As an AI health tech company, our success depends on attracting exceptional people across engineering, data and life sciences. Austin has rapidly become one of the most competitive talent markets. The city is one of the fastest-growing in the United States. This brings together deep tech expertise, entrepreneurial energy and a growing concentration of healthcare innovation. Ideal for our goal of building an R&D hub. “

 

Coelho also points out that Biorce has witnessed a “trend” of people moving from the Bay Area to Austin, noting that “the quality of life has gained notoriety.”

Advertisement

 

“But for us, this isn’t about following a trend,” he added. “It’s about building where the best people are — and where they want to be.”

Related Crunchbase query:

Related reading:

 


Stay up to date with recent funding rounds, acquisitions, and more with the
Crunchbase Daily.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Rainbow Kitten Surprise at Moody Amphitheater in Austin, TX – Loud Hailer Magazine

Published

on

Rainbow Kitten Surprise at Moody Amphitheater in Austin, TX – Loud Hailer Magazine


On a warm March night, alternative-indie rock band, Rainbow Kitten Surprise, thrilled eager fans with their return to Austin, TX.

Rainbow Kitten Surprise is known for their eclectic influences and unique sound. They are made up of musicians Ela Melo (vocals), Darrick “Bozzy” Keller (guitar/vocals), Ethan Goodpaster (guitar), and Jess Haney (drums). They have been making music since 2013, and their most recent release was a single titled “Sixteen.” In total, they have five studio albums and are hopefully working on another.

 

Opening for Rainbow Kitten Surprise is Southern California-based band Common People. The band consists of members Nicky Winegardner (vocals/guitar), Konrad Ulich (vocals/bass), Cormac Cadden (drums), Asher Thomson (guitar), and Sam Belzer (guitar). Their garage-rock sound caught the eyes of Red Light Management, and in addition to Rainbow Kitten Surprise, they have opened for big-name artist Cage The Elephant. Their debut single “Thank You” gained traction last year, in 2025. Since then, they have released a few more singles, but fans are still eagerly waiting for an EP or debut album.

Advertisement

 

Common People came onto the stage with great energy. They performed their song “Ready or Not,” along with a few other originals. Mid-set, they took a second to thank and praise Rainbow Kitten Surprise for having them join them on tour. Sadly, Austin will be their last stop on Rainbow Kitten Surprise’s tour. Following, they performed an awesome cover of The Pixies’ “Where Is My Mind?” At around the 40-minute mark of their set, they closed with their newest single, “Dear Worry.”

Rainbow Kitten Surprise opened their set with “Hell Nah” from their most recent album, bones (2025), and “Our Song,” a single from 2020. Many fans at the barricade held signs that applauded the band. They also waved LGBTQ+ and Transgender Pride flags. Ela announced to fans that this would be the last stop on their 2026 bones Tour before they took a well-deserved break. At the end of May, Rainbow Kitten Surprise will pick back up their tour in Europe and before returning to the US for a few more shows. Their set continued, and they played songs such as the newer 2025 single “Espionage” and the throwback “All’s Well That Ends.”

 

Before beginning their latest single, “Sixteen,” Ela introduced it as the most emo song they’ve ever made. Towards the end of their show, they performed a quick three-song acoustic run of “Texas Hold’em,” “Bare Bones,” and “First Class.” As the night came to an end, Rainbow Kitten Surprise shut it down with an encore of the closing track from bones, “Tropics” and “It’s Called: Freefall,” their 2018 top-hit from the album How To: Friend, Love, Freefall.

Advertisement

Fans can expect their favorite band to come to Austin sometime soon, as it seems Rainbow Kitten Surprise tours here pretty regularly.

RAINBOW KITTEN SURPRISE
Website  Facebook  X

COMMON PEOPLE
Website  Facebook

MOODY AMPHITHEATER
Website  Facebook  

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

A 104-Year-Old Woman Sold Them Their Austin Bungalow. Now, It’s Ready for Another Century.

Published

on

A 104-Year-Old Woman Sold Them Their Austin Bungalow. Now, It’s Ready for Another Century.


Holly Beth Potter and her husband Matt, 35, an entrepreneur, admired the historic Rosewood neighborhood of Austin, Texas, for years until they finally purchased a 1930s-era Victorian-style bungalow that was owned by a 104-year-old woman.

“She lived in the house for more than 70 years, and her ‘kids’—who are in their 80s—sold it to us instead of a developer because we told them we loved the character of the house and wanted to restore it,” said Holly Beth Potter, 33, a former EMT who’s now an interior designer. When the Potters purchased the house in 2019, they hoped to have children and now they have three—ages four, three and seven months.

MORE: ‘Little Yellowstone,’ a Wyoming Ranch Once Asking $85 Million, Sells for the First Time in 130 Years

“We knew the house needed work, especially since not all of the plumbing was functional,” Potter said. Once they brought in Side Angle Side Architects, however, it was clear they faced a full-blown renovation. “After the project started, they discovered rotting wood, broken windows and a dysfunctional roof structure, plus when we pulled off the skirting under the house it revealed that we needed a new foundation and new framing.”

Advertisement

The Potters pulled back from that renovation to build an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on the property, a two-bedroom, two-bathroom house they lived in while the main house was rebuilt. Now the ADU serves as a guest house for friends and family.

“They basically had to take apart the main house piece by piece and put it back together, but they saved as much as they could of the wood and trim and reused it,” Potter said. “It probably would have been easier to tear it down, but we wanted to preserve the character as much as we could. They reconfigured the original house on the same footprint, moving the kitchen between the living room and dining room on one side of the hallway, with the primary bedroom and a second bedroom on the other side.”

The dining room has the original shiplap from the old house and original wood pocket doors. The new kitchen and living room are open to each other, with a hemlock wood ceiling overhead. The architects took some space from the central hallway to create a mudroom, closet and pantry.

An addition, which doubled the living space from 1,800 square feet to about 3,600 square feet, includes an office, a family room with a loft and the children’s bedrooms.

“Our goal with the addition was to deliberately design it in a different architectural style,” Potter said. “Sometimes people ask me if this is one house or two.”

Advertisement

MORE: ‘Shiplap in Nearly Every Room.’ Inside Empty-Nesters’ $1 Million L.A. Home Renovation.

The Potters declined to comment on how much the renovation and addition cost. Construction took about 21 months.

The collaboration between Potter and Side Angle Side Architects on the house was so successful that her company, HB Studio, is now part of Side Angle Side.

Advertisement – Scroll to Continue

Potter and the Side Angle Side team offered more insight into the renovation process:   

Advertisement

I would describe the aesthetic as… “timeless,” Potter said. “I chose furniture that felt contemporary, while also leaning into tones and patterns that were warm and romantic to create an overall feeling of timelessness.”

My advice to others… “is to let the old house tell you what to do,” said Annie-Laurie Grabiel, co-founder of Side Angle Side Architects. “In this case, it was important to let the original home be the star of the show. We figured out that the best way to add onto the house without compromising its integrity was to essentially build a separate building next to it and connect the two as minimally as we could. The new addition almost stands alone and connects to the old house with a lower roof that just tucks under the existing roof eave.”

From Mansion Global Boutique: The Spring Cleaning Checklist: What You Need to Get in Gear

My favorite post-renovation feature is… “the way we embraced indoor-outdoor living,” Potter said. “We preserved this big tree in the backyard and built the courtyard and pool area around it. We can open all the doors and windows around it, so you feel like you’re outside even when you’re indoors.”

The biggest challenge… “was working with the existing house,” said Arthur Furman, a co-founder of Side Angle Side Architects. “The clients loved the character of the old home, and we were determined to keep it as a central aspect of the new design. However, the wood framing was compromised from water damage and rot. In the end the house had to be reframed, but we matched the original footprint and proportions. We salvaged and reinstalled as much of the interior woodwork as we could, including the wood floors, interior doors, window trim and base boards.”

Advertisement

The most dramatic change was… “the new kitchen,” Grabiel said. “The original kitchen was small and dark and didn’t have a strong connection to the outdoors. We relocated [it] to the heart of the interior and opened it up with access and views to the back porch and pool deck.”

The biggest surprise was… “that some of the best elements weren’t part of our pre-construction plans,” Furman said. “When the roof was being reframed, we looked up at the treetops through the rafters and we thought how nice it would be to open up a skylight and experience the natural light right when you enter the home. Also, we had always planned the kids’ loft area, but then one day the clients had the idea to add the netting to extend the loft space and create more connectivity between above and below.”

Favorite materials we discovered during the process… “include the natural materials for the walls, floors and bathrooms,” Potter said. “In the living room we installed a hemlock wood ceiling and a plaster fireplace wall, and we used quartzite counters in the kitchen and bathrooms.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending