Connect with us

Austin, TX

2025 March Madness: Women's NCAA tournament schedule, dates, times

Published

on

2025 March Madness: Women's NCAA tournament schedule, dates, times


The 2025 NCAA DI women’s basketball tournament bracket is here.

You can find the 2025 women’s tournament bracket and schedule below. You can also see the interactive version here and the printable tournament bracket here.

Updated women's basketball national championship bracket

Here’s the complete schedule:

  • Selection Sunday: 8 p.m. ET Sunday, March 16 on ESPN
  • First Four: March 19-20
  • First round: March 21-22
  • Second round: March 23-24
  • Sweet 16: March 28-29
  • Elite Eight: March 30-31
  • Final Four: Friday, April 4 at 7 p.m. with the second semifinal starting 30 minutes after the first game ends. Both will be at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida
  • NCAA championship game: Sunday, April 6 at 3 p.m. ET on ABC, hosted at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida

2025 NCAA women’s tournament schedule, scores, highlights

All times ET

Friday, April 4 (Final Four in Tampa, Fla.)

Sunday, April 6 (National championship game in Tampa, Fla.)

Advertisement

Wednesday, March 19 (First Four)

Thursday, March 20 (First Four)

Friday, March 21 (First Round/Round of 64)

  • (6) Michigan 80, (11) Iowa State 74
  • (4) Kentucky 79, (13) Liberty 78
  • (9) Indiana 76, (8) Utah 68
  • (3) Notre Dame 106, (14) Stephen F. Austin 54
  • (5) Kansas State 85, (12) Fairfield 41
  • (4) Baylor 73, (13) Grand Canyon 60
  • (2) TCU 73, (15) FDU 51
  • (1) South Carolina 108, (16) Tennessee Tech 48
  • (10) Oregon 77, (7) Vanderbilt 73 (OT) 
  • (4) Ohio State 71, (13) Montana State 51
  • (5) Ole Miss 83, (12) Ball State 65
  • (7) Louisville 63, (10) Nebraska 58
  • (8) Richmond 74, (9) Georgia Tech 49
  • (5) Tennessee 101, (12) South Florida 66
  • (2) Duke 86, (15) Lehigh 25
  • (1) UCLA 84, (16) Southern U. 46 

Saturday, March 22 (First Round/Round of 64)

  • (6) Iowa 92, (11) Murray State 57
  • (2) UConn 103, (15) Arkansas State 34
  • (5) Alabama 81, (12) Green Bay 67
  • (2) NC State 75, (15) Vermont 55
  • (6) West Virginia 78, (11) Columbia 59
  • (3) Oklahoma 81, (14) FGCU 58
  • (1) Southern California 71, (16) UNC Greensboro 25
  • (10) South Dakota State 74, (7) Oklahoma State 68
  • (4) Maryland 82, (13) Norfolk State 69
  • (3) North Carolina 70, (14) Oregon State 49
  • (7) Michigan State 64, (10) Harvard 50
  • (9) Mississippi State 59, (8) California 46
  • (8) Illinois 66, (9) Creighton 57
  • (6) Florida State 94, (11) George Mason 59
  • (1) Texas 105, (16) William & Mary 61
  • (3) LSU 103, (14) San Diego State 48

Sunday, March 23 (Second Round/Round of 32)

Monday, March 24 (Second Round/Round of 32)

Friday, March 28 (Sweet 16)

Advertisement

Saturday, March 29 (Sweet 16)

Sunday, March 30 (Elite Eight)

Monday, March 31 (Elite Eight)

These are the sites for the women’s tournament in 2025:

2025 Regional ROUND SITES      
Round City Venue Dates
Sweet 16/Elite Eight Birmingham, Alabama Legacy Arena March 28-31
Sweet 16/Elite Eight Spokane, Washington Spokane Arena March 28-31

Here are the future sites and dates for the Final Four:

Advertisement
Year city venue dates host
2025 Tampa, FL Amalie Arena April 4 & 6 University of South Florida, Tampa Bay Sports Commission
2026 Phoenix Footprint Center April 3 & 5 Arizona State University
2027 Columbus, OH Nationwide Arena April 2 & 4 The Ohio State University, Greater Columbus Sports Commission
2028 Indianapolis Gainbridge Fieldhouse March 31 & April 2 Horizon League, IUPUI, Indiana Sports Corp
2029 San Antonio Alamodome March 30 & April 1 University of Incarnate Word, UTSA, San Antonio Sports
2030 Portland, OR Moda Center April 5 & 7 University of Portland, Sport Oregon
2031 Dallas American Airlines Center April 4 & 6 Big 12 Conference, Dallas Sports Commission

Here is the complete list of teams who have won the DI national championship:

NCAA DI women’s basketball: Champions, history

YEAR CHAMPION (RECORD) COACH SCORE RUNNER-UP SITE
2024 South Carolina (38-0) Dawn Staley 87-75 Iowa Cleveland, Ohio
2023 LSU (34-2) Kim Mulkey 102-85 Iowa Dallas, Texas
2022 South Carolina (36-2) Dawn Staley 64-49 Connecticut Minneapolis, Minn.
2021 Stanford (31-2) Tara VanderVeer 54-53 Arizona San Antonio, Texas
2019 Baylor (37-1) Kim Mulkey 82-81 Notre Dame Tampa, Fla.
2018 Notre Dame (34-3) Muffet McGraw 61-58 Mississippi State Columbus, Ohio
2017 South Carolina (33-4) Dawn Staley 67-55 Mississippi State Dallas, Texas
2016 Connecticut (38-0) Geno Auriemma 82-51 Syracuse Indianapolis, Ind.
2015 Connecticut (38-1) Geno Auriemma 63-53 Notre Dame Tampa, Fla.
2014 Connecticut (40-0) Geno Auriemma 79-58 Notre Dame Nashville, Tenn.
2013 Connecticut (35-4) Geno Auriemma 93-60 Louisville New Orleans, La.
2012 Baylor (40-0) Kim Mulkey 80-61 Notre Dame Denver, Colo.
2011 Texas A&M (33-5) Gary Blair 76-70 Notre Dame Indianapolis, Ind.
2010 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 53-47 Stanford San Antonio, Texas
2009 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 76-54 Louisville St. Louis, Mo.
2008 Tennessee (36-2) Pat Summitt 64-48 Stanford Tampa, Fla.
2007 Tennessee (34-3) Pat Summitt 59-46 Rutgers Cleveland, Ohio
2006 Maryland (34-4) Brenda Frese 78-75 (OT) Duke Boston, Mass.
2005 Baylor (33-3) Kim Mulkey 84-62 Michigan State Indianapolis, Ind.
2004 Connecticut (31-4) Geno Auriemma 70-61 Tennessee New Orleans, La.
2003 Connecticut (37-1) Geno Auriemma 73-68 Tennessee Atlanta, Ga.
2002 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 82-70 Oklahoma San Antonio, Texas
2001 Notre Dame (34-2) Muffet McGraw 68-66 Purdue St. Louis, Mo.
2000 Connecticut (36-1) Geno Auriemma 71-52 Tennessee Philadelphia, Pa.
1999 Purdue (34-1) Carolyn Peck 62-45 Duke San Jose, Calif.
1998 Tennessee (39-0) Pat Summitt 93-75 Louisiana Tech Kansas City, Mo.
1997 Tennessee (29-10) Pat Summitt 68-59 Old Dominion Cincinnati, Ohio
1996 Tennessee (32-4) Pat Summitt 83-65 Georgia Charlotte, N.C.
1995 Connecticut (35-0) Geno Auriemma 70-64 Tennessee Minneapolis, Minn.
1994 North Carolina (33-2) Sylvia Hatchell 60-59 Louisiana Tech Richmond, Va.
1993 Texas Tech (31-3) Marsha Sharp 84-82 Ohio State Atlanta, Ga.
1992 Stanford (30-3) Tara VanDerveer 78-62 Western Kentucky Los Angeles, Calif.
1991 Tennessee (30-5) Pat Summitt 70-67 (OT) Virginia New Orleans, La.
1990 Stanford (32-1) Tara VanDerveer 88-81 Auburn Knoxville, Tenn.
1989 Tennessee (35-2) Pat Summitt 76-60 Auburn Tacoma, Wash.
1988 Louisiana Tech (32-2) Leon Barmore 56-54 Auburn Tacoma, Wash.
1987 Tennessee (28-6) Pat Summitt 67-44 Louisiana Tech Austin, Texas
1986 Texas (34-0) Jody Conradt 97-81 Southern California Lexington, Ky.
1985 Old Dominion (31-3) Marianne Stanley 70-65 Georgia Austin, Texas
1984 Southern California (29-4) Linda Sharp 72-61 Tennessee Los Angeles, Calif.
1983 Southern California (31-2) Linda Sharp 69-67 Louisiana Tech Norfolk, Va.
1982 Louisiana Tech (35-1) Sonja Hogg 76-62 Cheyney Norfolk, Va.

2025 NCAA women’s basketball bracket: Schedule, scores for March Madness

Here is the official and printable NCAA bracket for the 2025 March Madness DI women’s basketball tournament. You can also find the schedule, scores and TV channels information here.

READ MORE

NCAA DI Women’s Basketball Committee names officials for 2025 Women’s Final Four

The NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Committee has approved the 11 game officials recommended by Penny Davis, the national coordinator of women’s basketball officiating, to work Friday’s two national semifinal games and Sunday’s national championship game.

Advertisement

READ MORE

NCAA women’s basketball tournament: How often No. 1 seeds make the Final Four

The Final Four is on the minds of every team come the month of March. Here’s how often No. 1 seeds make the women’s Final Four.

READ MORE

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Austin, TX

Austin excels as one of America’s top 3 cities to start a career

Published

on

Austin excels as one of America’s top 3 cities to start a career


After ranking as the third-best large U.S. city for starting a business last year, Austin took a surprising tumble into the 24th spot nationally for 2026.

WalletHub’s annual report, “Best Large Cities to Start a Business (2026)” compared 100 U.S. cities based on 19 relevant metrics across three key dimensions: business environment, access to resources, and costs. Factors that were analyzed include five-year business survival rates, job growth comparisons from 2020 and 2024, population growth of working-age individuals aged 16-64, office space affordability, and more.

Florida cities locked other states out of the top five best places in America for starting a new business: Tampa, Orlando, Jacksonville, Hialeah, and St. Petersburg.

Austin’s business environment ranked 11th best in the country, and the city ranked ninth in the “access to resources” category. The city also tied with Boise, Idaho, and Fresno, California, for the highest average growth in the number of small businesses nationally.

Advertisement

Austin lagged behind in the “business costs” ranking, coming in at No. 80 overall. This category examined metrics such as the city’s working-age population growth, the share of college-educated individuals, financing accessibility, the prevalence of investors, venture investment amounts per capita, and more.

Earlier this year, WalletHub declared Texas the third-best state for starting a business in 2026, and several Houston-area cities have seen robust growth after being recognized among the best career hotspots in the U.S. WalletHub also ranked Austin on its top-10 list of the best U.S. cities to find a job. Entrepreneurial praise has also been extended to 15 Austin-based innovators that made Inc Magazine’s 2026 Female Founders 500 list.

Texas cities with strong environments for new businesses
Multiple cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex can claim bragging rights as the best Texas locales for starting a new business. Dallas ranked highest overall — appearing 11th nationally — and Irving landed a few spots behind in the 16th spot. Arlington (No. 23), Fort Worth (No. 30), Plano, (No. 35), and Garland (No. 65) followed behind.

Only six other Texas cities earned spots in the report: Houston (No. 26), Lubbock (No. 36), Corpus Christi (No. 39), San Antonio (No. 64), El Paso (No. 67), and Laredo (No. 76). Corpus Christi and Laredo also topped WalletHub’s list of the U.S. cities with the most accessible financing.

“From the Gold Rush and the Industrial Revolution to the Internet Age, periods of innovation have shaped our economy and driven major societal progress,” the report’s author wrote. “However, the past few years have been particularly challenging for business owners in the U.S., due to factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the Great Resignation and high inflation.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

‘I want to be louder’: Austin Drag King Bobby Pudrido refuses to be deterred by Texas ban

Published

on

‘I want to be louder’: Austin Drag King Bobby Pudrido refuses to be deterred by Texas ban


Jay Thomas grew up like any kid, laughing at silly things and making up funny names.

So in the ’90s, when Tejano superstar Bobby Pulido’s songs played on the radio, young Jay and his peers couldn’t help but rhyme his last name with the Spanish word pudrido (which means rotten in English).

“We grew up calling him that just because it was funny,” he told Austin Signal host Jerry Quijano.

When he was thinking of a name for his drag persona, Thomas created a list.

Advertisement

“I was thinking of some queer icons and some not queer icons,” he said. “This one just resonated because he is a Tejano star. And in the ’90s he was this really big heartthrob that everybody wanted to be or be with.”

And three years ago, Thomas became Drag King Bobby Pudrido.

He thought it would be fun to impersonate a masculine figure from the Latino community and perform for an audience attracted to that type of energy. He also wanted to bring his culture into his drag.

Pudrido’s name has new recognition these days: Tejano singer Pulido decided to retire from music and go into politics. He’s running for Congress in South Texas’ District 15 against incumbent Republican Monica De La Cruz.

Both in an out of drag, Pudrido is also politically vocal. He advocates for trans rights and against the drag ban that went into effect statewide in March. The law prohibits drag performances in public properties or in front of children. Venues that host these performances can be fined up to $10,000.

Advertisement
Bobby Pudrido puts on makeup in his home.

“As a drag artist, one of the things we need to do is get booked so we can pay our bills,” Pudrido said.

Even though it’s unclear whether the ban affects some venues, he said, he thinks certain business owners won’t book drag performers because of the risk of being fined.

But as a working-class artist, he doesn’t have the luxury to dwell on it.

“You have to go to work, because you need to pay your bills,” he said.

The law has taken an emotional toll on him, too.

Advertisement

“The way it chips away at a queer person to hear any type of anti-queer legislation pass is something that is really big for me,“ he said. “We are constantly — just as human beings — trying to maintain our mental health. “

But that doesn’t mean his love for performing has been diminished. In fact, quite the opposite is true.

“It has fueled me,” Pudrido said. “Right now I’m in the angry phase where I want to be louder.”

As a performer and producer, the drag king has put on shows in the Austin area and recently traveled back to his hometown in Laredo for a show.

A person dressed in drag king make up poses for a photo in their makeup room.
Bobby Pudrido has become an advocate for trans rights and against the ban that prohibits drag performances on public property or in front of children.

“It’s hard for drag kings to get booked sometimes, so we are still far away from the perfect ideal world for [them],” he said. “But the fact that I have a platform at all is huge.”

Advertisement

Pudrido’s passion for performing comes from his drag ancestors, “who started the art form as a way of being political and of being against the systems that were oppressing queer people.”

Drag King Bobby Prudido is currently producing his second queer quinceañera, “Con Mucho Amor,” with an anticipated show date in the fall.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Men wrongly accused of grisly yogurt shop murders in Texas reach $35 million settlement with city

Published

on

Men wrongly accused of grisly yogurt shop murders in Texas reach  million settlement with city


The city of Austin will pay $35 million to three men and the family of a fourth who were wrongly accused of the 1991 rape and murder of four teenage girls at a yogurt shop, a case that initially sent one of the men to death row and another to life in prison, under a tentative settlement reached Tuesday.

Robert Springsteen, Michael Scott, Forrest Welborn and Maurice Pierce had all insisted they were innocent of one of the city’s most notorious crimes. They were finally declared innocent by a judge in February after investigators determined the crime was committed by a suspect who died in 1999.

The settlement must still be approved by the city council at a later date. Details of the payments to the men and their families were not released.

“This settlement closes the final chapter of a devastating story in Austin’s history,” Austin City Manager T.C. Broadnax said in a statement. “We are pleased to have reached an agreement with those who were wrongly accused and wrongly convicted in this case and hope that this settlement brings a sense of closure to everyone affected by this horrific event.”

Advertisement

Scott and his attorney Tony Diaz said in a joint statement they are hopeful the settlement will help improve investigation practices and safeguards against wrongful convictions.

“Discussions and negotiations are ongoing regarding police reforms that would help ensure that nothing like what occurred in this case ever happens again,” they said.

Amy Ayers, 13; Eliza Thomas, 17; and sisters Jennifer and Sarah Harbison, ages 17 and 15, were bound, gagged and shot in the head at the “I Can’t Believe It’s Yogurt” store where two of them worked. The building was set on fire.

Investigators chased thousands of leads and several false confessions before the four men, who were teenagers when the girls were killed, were arrested in late 1999.

Springsteen and Scott were convicted based largely on confessions they insisted were coerced by police. Both convictions were overturned in the mid-2000s.

Advertisement

Welborn was charged but never tried after two grand juries refused to indict him. Pierce spent three years in jail before the charges were dismissed. He died in 2010 in a confrontation with police after a traffic stop.

Prosecutors wanted to try Springsteen and Scott again, but a judge ordered the charges dismissed in 2009 when new DNA tests that were unavailable in 1991 and the previous trials revealed another male suspect.

Investigators determined in 2025 that new DNA science and reviews of old ballistics evidence pointed to Robert Eugene Brashers as the sole killer.

Since 2018, authorities had used advanced DNA evidence to link Brashers to the strangulation death of a South Carolina woman in 1990, the 1997 rape of a 14-year-old girl in Tennessee and the shooting of a mother and daughter in Missouri in 1998.

The link to the Austin case came when a DNA sample taken from under Ayers’ fingernail came back as a match to Brashers from the 1990 killing.

Advertisement

Brashers died in 1999 when he shot himself during an hourslong standoff with police at a motel in Kennett, Missouri.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending