Connect with us

Austin, TX

2025 March Madness: Women's NCAA tournament schedule, dates, times

Published

on

2025 March Madness: Women's NCAA tournament schedule, dates, times


The 2025 NCAA DI women’s basketball tournament bracket is here.

You can find the 2025 women’s tournament bracket and schedule below. You can also see the interactive version here and the printable tournament bracket here.

Updated women's basketball national championship bracket

Here’s the complete schedule:

  • Selection Sunday: 8 p.m. ET Sunday, March 16 on ESPN
  • First Four: March 19-20
  • First round: March 21-22
  • Second round: March 23-24
  • Sweet 16: March 28-29
  • Elite Eight: March 30-31
  • Final Four: Friday, April 4 at 7 p.m. with the second semifinal starting 30 minutes after the first game ends. Both will be at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida
  • NCAA championship game: Sunday, April 6 at 3 p.m. ET on ABC, hosted at Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida

2025 NCAA women’s tournament schedule, scores, highlights

All times ET

Friday, April 4 (Final Four in Tampa, Fla.)

Sunday, April 6 (National championship game in Tampa, Fla.)

Advertisement

Wednesday, March 19 (First Four)

Thursday, March 20 (First Four)

Friday, March 21 (First Round/Round of 64)

  • (6) Michigan 80, (11) Iowa State 74
  • (4) Kentucky 79, (13) Liberty 78
  • (9) Indiana 76, (8) Utah 68
  • (3) Notre Dame 106, (14) Stephen F. Austin 54
  • (5) Kansas State 85, (12) Fairfield 41
  • (4) Baylor 73, (13) Grand Canyon 60
  • (2) TCU 73, (15) FDU 51
  • (1) South Carolina 108, (16) Tennessee Tech 48
  • (10) Oregon 77, (7) Vanderbilt 73 (OT) 
  • (4) Ohio State 71, (13) Montana State 51
  • (5) Ole Miss 83, (12) Ball State 65
  • (7) Louisville 63, (10) Nebraska 58
  • (8) Richmond 74, (9) Georgia Tech 49
  • (5) Tennessee 101, (12) South Florida 66
  • (2) Duke 86, (15) Lehigh 25
  • (1) UCLA 84, (16) Southern U. 46 

Saturday, March 22 (First Round/Round of 64)

  • (6) Iowa 92, (11) Murray State 57
  • (2) UConn 103, (15) Arkansas State 34
  • (5) Alabama 81, (12) Green Bay 67
  • (2) NC State 75, (15) Vermont 55
  • (6) West Virginia 78, (11) Columbia 59
  • (3) Oklahoma 81, (14) FGCU 58
  • (1) Southern California 71, (16) UNC Greensboro 25
  • (10) South Dakota State 74, (7) Oklahoma State 68
  • (4) Maryland 82, (13) Norfolk State 69
  • (3) North Carolina 70, (14) Oregon State 49
  • (7) Michigan State 64, (10) Harvard 50
  • (9) Mississippi State 59, (8) California 46
  • (8) Illinois 66, (9) Creighton 57
  • (6) Florida State 94, (11) George Mason 59
  • (1) Texas 105, (16) William & Mary 61
  • (3) LSU 103, (14) San Diego State 48

Sunday, March 23 (Second Round/Round of 32)

Monday, March 24 (Second Round/Round of 32)

Friday, March 28 (Sweet 16)

Advertisement

Saturday, March 29 (Sweet 16)

Sunday, March 30 (Elite Eight)

Monday, March 31 (Elite Eight)

These are the sites for the women’s tournament in 2025:

2025 Regional ROUND SITES      
Round City Venue Dates
Sweet 16/Elite Eight Birmingham, Alabama Legacy Arena March 28-31
Sweet 16/Elite Eight Spokane, Washington Spokane Arena March 28-31

Here are the future sites and dates for the Final Four:

Advertisement
Year city venue dates host
2025 Tampa, FL Amalie Arena April 4 & 6 University of South Florida, Tampa Bay Sports Commission
2026 Phoenix Footprint Center April 3 & 5 Arizona State University
2027 Columbus, OH Nationwide Arena April 2 & 4 The Ohio State University, Greater Columbus Sports Commission
2028 Indianapolis Gainbridge Fieldhouse March 31 & April 2 Horizon League, IUPUI, Indiana Sports Corp
2029 San Antonio Alamodome March 30 & April 1 University of Incarnate Word, UTSA, San Antonio Sports
2030 Portland, OR Moda Center April 5 & 7 University of Portland, Sport Oregon
2031 Dallas American Airlines Center April 4 & 6 Big 12 Conference, Dallas Sports Commission

Here is the complete list of teams who have won the DI national championship:

NCAA DI women’s basketball: Champions, history

YEAR CHAMPION (RECORD) COACH SCORE RUNNER-UP SITE
2024 South Carolina (38-0) Dawn Staley 87-75 Iowa Cleveland, Ohio
2023 LSU (34-2) Kim Mulkey 102-85 Iowa Dallas, Texas
2022 South Carolina (36-2) Dawn Staley 64-49 Connecticut Minneapolis, Minn.
2021 Stanford (31-2) Tara VanderVeer 54-53 Arizona San Antonio, Texas
2019 Baylor (37-1) Kim Mulkey 82-81 Notre Dame Tampa, Fla.
2018 Notre Dame (34-3) Muffet McGraw 61-58 Mississippi State Columbus, Ohio
2017 South Carolina (33-4) Dawn Staley 67-55 Mississippi State Dallas, Texas
2016 Connecticut (38-0) Geno Auriemma 82-51 Syracuse Indianapolis, Ind.
2015 Connecticut (38-1) Geno Auriemma 63-53 Notre Dame Tampa, Fla.
2014 Connecticut (40-0) Geno Auriemma 79-58 Notre Dame Nashville, Tenn.
2013 Connecticut (35-4) Geno Auriemma 93-60 Louisville New Orleans, La.
2012 Baylor (40-0) Kim Mulkey 80-61 Notre Dame Denver, Colo.
2011 Texas A&M (33-5) Gary Blair 76-70 Notre Dame Indianapolis, Ind.
2010 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 53-47 Stanford San Antonio, Texas
2009 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 76-54 Louisville St. Louis, Mo.
2008 Tennessee (36-2) Pat Summitt 64-48 Stanford Tampa, Fla.
2007 Tennessee (34-3) Pat Summitt 59-46 Rutgers Cleveland, Ohio
2006 Maryland (34-4) Brenda Frese 78-75 (OT) Duke Boston, Mass.
2005 Baylor (33-3) Kim Mulkey 84-62 Michigan State Indianapolis, Ind.
2004 Connecticut (31-4) Geno Auriemma 70-61 Tennessee New Orleans, La.
2003 Connecticut (37-1) Geno Auriemma 73-68 Tennessee Atlanta, Ga.
2002 Connecticut (39-0) Geno Auriemma 82-70 Oklahoma San Antonio, Texas
2001 Notre Dame (34-2) Muffet McGraw 68-66 Purdue St. Louis, Mo.
2000 Connecticut (36-1) Geno Auriemma 71-52 Tennessee Philadelphia, Pa.
1999 Purdue (34-1) Carolyn Peck 62-45 Duke San Jose, Calif.
1998 Tennessee (39-0) Pat Summitt 93-75 Louisiana Tech Kansas City, Mo.
1997 Tennessee (29-10) Pat Summitt 68-59 Old Dominion Cincinnati, Ohio
1996 Tennessee (32-4) Pat Summitt 83-65 Georgia Charlotte, N.C.
1995 Connecticut (35-0) Geno Auriemma 70-64 Tennessee Minneapolis, Minn.
1994 North Carolina (33-2) Sylvia Hatchell 60-59 Louisiana Tech Richmond, Va.
1993 Texas Tech (31-3) Marsha Sharp 84-82 Ohio State Atlanta, Ga.
1992 Stanford (30-3) Tara VanDerveer 78-62 Western Kentucky Los Angeles, Calif.
1991 Tennessee (30-5) Pat Summitt 70-67 (OT) Virginia New Orleans, La.
1990 Stanford (32-1) Tara VanDerveer 88-81 Auburn Knoxville, Tenn.
1989 Tennessee (35-2) Pat Summitt 76-60 Auburn Tacoma, Wash.
1988 Louisiana Tech (32-2) Leon Barmore 56-54 Auburn Tacoma, Wash.
1987 Tennessee (28-6) Pat Summitt 67-44 Louisiana Tech Austin, Texas
1986 Texas (34-0) Jody Conradt 97-81 Southern California Lexington, Ky.
1985 Old Dominion (31-3) Marianne Stanley 70-65 Georgia Austin, Texas
1984 Southern California (29-4) Linda Sharp 72-61 Tennessee Los Angeles, Calif.
1983 Southern California (31-2) Linda Sharp 69-67 Louisiana Tech Norfolk, Va.
1982 Louisiana Tech (35-1) Sonja Hogg 76-62 Cheyney Norfolk, Va.

2025 NCAA women’s basketball bracket: Schedule, scores for March Madness

Here is the official and printable NCAA bracket for the 2025 March Madness DI women’s basketball tournament. You can also find the schedule, scores and TV channels information here.

READ MORE

NCAA DI Women’s Basketball Committee names officials for 2025 Women’s Final Four

The NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Committee has approved the 11 game officials recommended by Penny Davis, the national coordinator of women’s basketball officiating, to work Friday’s two national semifinal games and Sunday’s national championship game.

Advertisement

READ MORE

NCAA women’s basketball tournament: How often No. 1 seeds make the Final Four

The Final Four is on the minds of every team come the month of March. Here’s how often No. 1 seeds make the women’s Final Four.

READ MORE

Advertisement





Source link

Advertisement

Austin, TX

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo

Published

on

New Texas law tightens rules for autonomous vehicle companies, including Waymo


Self-driving cars have become a common sight on Austin streets, but a new Texas law is adding tougher requirements for the companies behind the wheelless vehicles.

Senate Bill 2807 imposes stricter rules on autonomous vehicle companies operating in the state, including state authorization, emergency response plans for law enforcement, and a public portal where residents can verify operators and file safety complaints.

The changes come as Austin continues to track incidents involving autonomous vehicles. The city’s autonomous vehicle dashboard shows 75 incidents in 2026, including a collision, eight near misses, and seven incidents of ignoring police direction.

Attorney Drew Gibbs, a partner at Slingshot Law, said one crash involved a Waymo vehicle.

Advertisement

“There was a T-bone collision. A pretty serious T-bone collision where a Waymo just crashed into the side of my client’s vehicle,” Gibbs said.

ALSO| Waymo files voluntary software recall over flooded-lane risks on high-speed roads

KEYE

Advertisement

One of the incidents of ignoring police direction happened during the mass shooting on West Sixth Street back in March, when three people died, and 15 others were injured.

Austin Police Association President Michael Bullock said autonomous vehicles can struggle in unusual situations.

“It didn’t impede on anything in the moment, but it’s not necessarily uncommon where these vehicles don’t quite know how to deal with these one-off scenarios,” Bullock said.

The new law requires autonomous vehicle companies to be authorized by the state, to provide an emergency response plan for law enforcement, and to participate in a public-facing portal that allows the public to verify operators and submit safety complaints.

Kara Kockelman, a professor of transportation and engineering at the University of Texas at Austin, welcomed the added oversight.

Advertisement

“I’m glad that the state is taking this a bit more seriously now,” she said. “It’s important not to just let others slip in without kind of meeting those basic minimums.”

Bullock said the emergency planning requirement may not make a major difference in fast-moving situations. Asked how impactful it is to have a fully laid out emergency response plan, Bullock said, “These plans are great, but it takes time to work through all of those versus the immediacy of having someone behind the wheel.”

The four autonomous vehicle companies operating in Austin — Waymo, Zoox, AV-Ride, and Tesla — are all state-authorized.

The Texas DMV said an autonomous vehicle company can lose its authorization to operate in Texas if the agency deems the vehicles are operating in a way that endangers public safety.

Waymo was contacted for comment, but had not responded.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State

Published

on

Jane Nelson, Texas’ top election official, stepping down as Secretary of State


Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson said Tuesday she will leave the post next month.

What we know:

Advertisement

In a statement, Nelson said her resignation will be effective July 17 but did not provide a reason for the departure.

“It has been an honor to serve the people of Texas in this role,” Nelson said. “My time as Secretary came at an important moment for Texas, and I am proud of what we have been able to accomplish as an agency in under four years.”

Nelson has served in the role since 2023.

Advertisement

Among other things, the Secretary of State oversees elections and business filings in the state and serves as the chief diplomat of Texas.

View of Texas State Senator Jane Nelson, during the 80th Texas Legislature, on the floor of the Senate at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas, January 22, 2007. (John Anderson/The Austin Chronicle / Getty Images)

Advertisement

What they’re saying:

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott described Nelson as extraordinary.

“I am deeply grateful for her long and loyal service and outstanding leadership. She has represented our state with grace and honor across the globe, and Texas is better because of it,” Abbott said. “Cecilia and I wish her all the best in the next chapter of her distinguished career.”

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

According to the Secretary of State’s office, Nelson has presided over seven statewide elections during her tenure with a cumulative 27 million ballots cast and broke a record with more than 3 million active business filers.

Advertisement

Nelson also served three decades in the Texas Senate, where she remains the longest-serving Republican in state history.

The Source: Information in this story came from the Texas Secretary of State’s office.

TexasElectionPoliticsTexas Politics2026 ElectionsAustinGreg Abbott
Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Austin, TX

Austin OKs $2.35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election

Published

on

Austin OKs .35 billion of revenue bonds, eyes GO bond election


Austin Mayor Kirk Watson wants the city council to hold off on a bond measure this year to set up a better proposal in 2028.

Michael Dorman

Austin, Texas, is revving up to sell $2.35 billion of debt for a convention center and a wastewater treatment plant, while a legal battle continues over bonds to help finance a light rail system. 

Processing Content

Advertisement

The bond boom comes as the city council voted on Thursday to pursue the development of a $390 million baseline general obligation bond package for the November ballot despite a call by Mayor Kirk Watson to wait until 2028.

“I believe we can and we should bring forward significant investments in the future,” he said. “In fact, if we restore compliance with our financial policies and we maintain the discipline we actually will have greater future capacity to do more for this community in 2028.”

A bond election would follow the rejection of a maintenance and operations property tax hike by 63% of city voters in November. In the wake of the defeat, Austin officials took steps to better manage its finances, including pursuing a citywide performance and efficiency audit of city operations.

The city, which last held a successful GO bond election in 2022 for $350 million of debt for affordable housing, had $1.03 billion of unissued voter-approved GO bond authorization as of the Sept. 30 end of fiscal 2025. Last year, Austin sold $796 million of GO bonds and certificates of obligation in a deal rated triple-A with stable outlooks by S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings.

On Thursday, the city council signed off on a $34.5 million wrongful prosecution and conviction settlement with four individuals to be financed through the sale of non-voter-approved GO bonds. 

Advertisement

The council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds on May 21 for a $1.6 billion project to replace the city’s now-demolished convention center with a facility that will increase rentable event space to 620,000 square feet from 365,000 square feet.

Construction site for Austin convention center project
Construction site for Austin’s convention center project, shown in March. The city council approved up to $1.35 billion of special tax revenue bonds for a bigger convention center.

Rich Saskal

The bonds are backed with revenue from certain city hotel occupancy taxes and incremental state tax revenue generated within a project finance zone the city established in 2024. Amounts and timings for issuing the debt are being determined, according to the city, which filed a petition with a Travis County District Court for an expedited validation of the bonds. 

An ordinance approved in October to issue up to an initial $650 million of bonds for the project was rescinded by the council.

The city also plans to refund hotel occupancy tax-backed debt issued for the prior convention center in order to pledge a 4.5% hotel tax for the upcoming bonds. 

Advertisement

“The refunding bonds are a separate, but related item to the expansion bonds and will only be secured by 2% venue HOT,” city documents said. “The 2% venue HOT will not be pledged to the expansion bonds and will cease to be collected upon final maturity or early payoff of (the refunding bonds).” 

A petition drive that would have delayed the project fell 494 signatures short of a requirement for 20,000 valid signatures of registered voters, Austin City Clerk Erika Brady determined in November.

Petition backers are appealing a district court’s refusal to force validation in state appellate court after the Texas Supreme Court dismissed their petition for a writ of mandamus, according to attorneys.

The petition drive by Austin United PAC and others sought a ballot measure to stop the demolition and reconstruction of the convention center for seven years — or until the project was approved by voters — and prioritize city funding for local live music, arts, cultural, and outdoor tourism. 

The Austin City Council also approved as much as $1 billion of water and wastewater system revenue bonds last month for the Walnut Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant expansion and enhancement project. The bonds will be used to obtain a direct low-interest loan from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act program. 

Advertisement

Other financing sources for the $1.5 billion project are $59 million from the Texas Water Development Board Clean Water State Revolving Fund program and funding from Austin Water.

A groundbreaking for the project, which is aimed at improving treatment processes and protecting the Colorado River, was held in April.

The plant, which serves more than 50% of Austin and operates at a treatment capacity of 75 million gallons per day, will have its capacity increased to 100 MGD, helping meet future demand and requirements set by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for Austin’s projected growth of 1.5 million by 2040, according to a city statement.

A legal logjam over a light rail system eased May 22 when the Texas Supreme Court finally ruled on a procedural issue related to an initial $150 million of bonds for the project. The high court ordered a Travis County Court judge to decide whether the bonds’ issuer, the Austin Transit Partnership, a nonprofit corporation created by the city and Capital Metro Transportation Authority, has standing to seek court validation for the debt.

City taxpayers who filed a lawsuit in 2023, along with the Texas Attorney General’s Office have been challenging the legality of the bonds, which would be paid off with a portion of Austin’s operation and maintenance property taxes voters approved in November 2020 for what was then billed as a 27-mile, 31-station light-rail project estimated to cost $7.1 billion.

Advertisement

Escalating costs led ATP to downsize Project Connect to an initial less than 10-mile, 15-station system with a similar price tag. The completion of a federal environmental review in January allowed the project to continue a process to seek billions of dollars in federal grants and loans.

ATP said Project Connect is moving forward with construction scheduled to begin next year.  

“We are confident in our case and look forward to our day in court,” ATP said in a statement. “The pending litigation has not slowed our progress advancing Austin light rail, which has hit major milestones in the federal funding process, design, and pre-construction work this year.” 

Bill Aleshire, an attorney who filed the taxpayers’ lawsuit, cautioned that several issues remain before the court, including the legality of the downsized project and the ability to pay off bonds with property tax revenue that is supposed to be used for operations. 

“Their federal funding is uncertain, their ability to issue bonds is uncertain, and they just stubbornly will not listen to us and say it’s time to pause Project Connect and rethink it, that maybe rail isn’t the best way to go at this time and maybe we can’t afford it at this time,” he said.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending