Connect with us

Arkansas

Nearly a dozen witnesses appear in 9-hour Arkansas Medical Board hearing into gastroenterologist • Arkansas Advocate

Published

on

Nearly a dozen witnesses appear in 9-hour Arkansas Medical Board hearing into gastroenterologist • Arkansas Advocate


The Arkansas State Medical Board on Thursday heard nine hours of testimony regarding a Little Rock physician who has been accused of sexual abuse and improper opioid prescriptions.

The hearing of Dr. Alonzo Williams, a gastroenterologist and medical director of the Arkansas Diagnostic Center, will continue Friday with additional witnesses. The medical board is also expected to make a decision in the case, whether it be disciplinary or otherwise.

Little Rock gastroenterologist has 30-year history of complaints against him, records show

Williams has been accused of a range of wrongdoing over the past 30 years, including questionable medical care and sexual misconduct. According to an Advocate analysis of documents obtained through the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act, the medical board has received about two dozen complaints about Williams since 1993.

Advertisement

None of the previous complaints have resulted in disciplinary action.

Williams appeared before the board Thursday with his attorney Kevin O’Dwyer, who formerly served as the medical board’s legal counsel. The attorney general’s office represented the board.

The first day of the hearing included testimony from 10 witnesses who ranged from a drug control investigator, an experienced gastroenterologist, former and current employees of Williams’ and patients who have received care from the Little Rock physician.

Witnesses called by the state largely discussed Williams’ practice habits, which they said included prescriptions for controlled substances, such as oxycodone, hydrocodone and Xanax, despite reportedly knowing risks to patients and having at least one patient who tested positive for cocaine.

The state also argued Williams conducted some procedures at a concerning frequency, including biopsies and an esophagus examination called an esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or EGD, which can also include a dilation that stretches a patient’s narrow esophagus to help with swallowing.

Advertisement

Among a sample of six of Williams’ patients, records showed he sometimes performed EGDs every month of the year. In one case, Williams performed three sedated procedures in the same month, Michael Lewis with the attorney general’s office said.

Members of the Arkansas State Medical Board listen to testimony during a hearing in Little Rock on Aug. 8, 2024. Left to right: Dr. Michael J. Birrer, Dr. Brad A. Thomas and Dr. Rodney Griffin. (Photo by Mary Hennigan/Arkansas Advocate)

Eduardo deMondesert, the state’s expert witness in gastroenterology, said the records he reviewed showed vague indications that Williams’ patients needed the procedures he consistently conducted.

With nearly 30 years of experience in the field, deMondesert also said if an EGD and dilation didn’t prove to relieve a patient’s symptoms the first time, it shouldn’t be done again. He said repeatedly falling below a standard of care as set forth by disciplinary guidelines, and thus putting patients at risk of harm, is gross negligence.

The witnesses who were patients of Williams’ spoke very highly of the care they have received. Williams’ attorney also argued the patient records the medical board reviewed accounted for a small percentage of the physician’s total patient population and represented “extreme outliers.”

One witness stated that she has needed a dilation completed every three weeks for the last three years or she will struggle to swallow, breathe, talk and work with the pain she experiences. The woman said the chronic issue has prompted her to often seek care at emergency rooms, but the staff always refers her back to Williams.

Advertisement

Kim Graves, another patient of Williams’ who testified, said she has been receiving care from the physician for about 15 years. She receives a dilation about once a year and also visits Williams for her colonoscopies. 

The patients expressed a high degree of trust in Williams’ medical opinion.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement

Sexual abuse allegations

Though she was absent Thursday, attorneys and witnesses made several references to a former employee of Williams’ who accused him of sexual abuse.

Bradley Diner, a state-called witness who works with the Arkansas Medical Foundation, testified that he recently met with Williams to address the possibility of a sexual compulsive disorder. In the 1980s and again in the 1990s, Williams had previous allegations brought against him.

Diner said he could not come to a conclusion whether Williams had a sex-related problem, and he recommended that a further evaluation be completed. Diner said Williams rejected such an evaluation.

Advertisement

Diner said he was also unable to ascertain whether the sexual abuse complaint brought by Williams’ former employee, Rachael Hudspeth, was true or false.

Suzette Siegler, a nurse manager who works with Dr. Alonzo Williams, testifies before the Arkansas Medical Board on Aug. 8, 2024. (Photo by Mary Hennigan/Arkansas Advocate)

A number of witnesses for Williams testified about Hudspeth’s behavior and referred to her as someone who was “hypersexual.” As her former coworkers, the witnesses said Hudspeth often talked about her relationships and personal life in professional settings. Hudspeth also allegedly touched at least one of her coworkers inappropriately at work and touched her breasts to at least one patient.

The witnesses said they did not file any complaints about Hudspeth with the clinic’s human resources office, stating that she was a friend and they all wanted to help her get her life on the right track. 

Hudspeth’s exit from the workplace was described as “storming out.” Suzette Siegler, a witness on Thursday and Williams’ nurse manager, found evidence after Hudspeth left that she had altered medical charts that were in Williams’ name. Siegler said she checked due to suspicions about Hudspeth’s behavior. 

Questioning by Jordan Broyles from the attorney general’s office revealed that Siegler, who signed an affidavit affirming she had collected all available records requested by board investigators, had not provided some from the clinic’s surgery center.

The hearing will begin again at 8 a.m. Friday.

Advertisement

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Advertisement



Source link

Arkansas

Brother of North Little Rock mayor winner of record $1.8 billion Powerball Jackpot

Published

on

Brother of North Little Rock mayor winner of record .8 billion Powerball Jackpot


NORTH LITTLE ROCK, Ark. —The identity of the winner of Arkansas’ record-setting $1.8 billion Powerball jackpot has now been confirmed through Arkansas Scholarship Lottery documents, revealing that the prize was claimed by Tracy Hartwick, the brother of North Little Rock Mayor Terry Hartwick.

Lottery records show Tracy Hartwick claimed the jackpot in January after purchasing the winning ticket in Cabot. After electing the lump-sum cash option and paying taxes, Hartwick received $565,873,785.82, according to the documents.

The records also show Hartwick signed paperwork to remain anonymous for six months after claiming the prize. Under Arkansas law, that is the maximum amount of time a lottery winner who is related to an elected official can remain anonymous before their identity becomes public.

According to the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery documents, Tracy Hartwick received 94 percent of the after-tax winnings. His brother, Timothy Allen Hartwick, received 3 percent, while another 3 percent was distributed to a third claimant whose name was redacted in the released records.

Advertisement

The Powerball jackpot, announced by the Arkansas Scholarship Lottery after the winning drawing in late December 2025, remains the largest lottery prize ever won in Arkansas.  The winning ticket was sold at a Murphy USA gas station in Cabot on 208 S. Rockwood Drive.

The revelation of the winner’s identity surprised many across Central Arkansas.

“That’s crazy news but you hear something crazy every day,” said Benjamin Britton.

Others said they understood why Hartwick chose to remain anonymous for as long as the law allowed.

“I think waiting over time and then thinking about it and then coming to claim it would be good,” said Ricky Rhodes.

Advertisement

The documents show Hartwick waited the full six-month anonymity period before his identity became public.

We reached out to the City of North Little Rock seeking comment from Mayor Terry Hartwick regarding the records. A city spokesperson said the mayor would not be providing interviews or commenting on the matter.

The newly released lottery documents provide the first official confirmation that the record-breaking Powerball prize claimed in Arkansas belongs to the mayor’s brother, ending months of speculation about the identity of the state’s biggest lottery winner.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

AGFC proposes WMA regulation | Arkansas Democrat Gazette

Published

on

AGFC proposes WMA regulation | Arkansas Democrat Gazette


To manage hunting traffic at St. Francis Sunken Lands Wildlife Management Area, the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission proposed a permit-only system for the lower portion of the WMA at its monthly committee meetings Wednesday at Little Rock.

The debate over the proposed regulation lasted about an hour. It passed 6-1, with Phillip Tappan of Little Rock dissenting. It’s the first split vote within the commission in years. Tappan did not oppose the idea as a whole or the reasoning behind it. He argued for a slightly different format.

Having passed out of committee, the proposal will be subject to a 30-day comment period, after which the commission will vote to approve or reject the proposal in August.

Advertisement

Randy Zellers, assistant chief of communications for the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, said the proposal would establish permit-only waterfowl hunting on about 1,000-acres of tupelo and cypress forest along the St. Francis River. The 4.6-mile section is on the southernmost part of the WMA, which is more than 30 miles long. If the commission approves the regulation as currently worded, the permits will be awarded weekly through a random, online drawing. The format is similar to the one used at Steve N. Wilson Raft Creek WMA.

Doug Schoenrock, the Game and Fish Commission’s director, said the proposed regulation will create 20-25 public “markers” or hunting spots. A successful applicant may bring as many as three companions, with a maximum of four in a hunting party. A permit will be good for one day only. Schoenrock said this will eliminate one group of hunters monopolizing a hunting spot for multiple days.

There will also be a 150-yard buffer between the markers to avoid conflicts. Private landowners will not be required to have a permit to hunt on private land adjoining the WMA.

The most vigorous debate centered on whether hunting should be allowed for seven days or four days. Tappan advocated reserving four days per week for hunting and suspending hunting for three days to allow ducks to rest. The other six commissioners demurred, saying they did not want to reduce hunting opportunity. Tappan felt strongly enough about creating a rest period for ducks that he voted against the proposal.

Zellers said commissioners want to know if hunters prefer having rest days each week — Monday, Wednesday and Friday, which he said is consistent with other waterfowl hunting areas where hunting is allocated by permits only.

Advertisement

“Permits will be for marked locations within the unit.” Zellers said. “Permit winners will be able to bring three hunting companions on their designated hunt day. Permit winners and their guests must remain on public land within 150 yards of their designated location. The exact number of locations has not been finalized, but will be based on safety and consideration to distance from area boundaries and private land. Traditionally popular locations within the unit will be prioritized for inclusion in the draw.”

Hunters will be able to apply for a single day of the weekend, from Thursday through Sunday two weeks before the week they are applying for.

Knowing the agency’s tumultuous history with hunters in this area, commissioners were extremely cautious about the precise wording of this regulation. In 2012, the commission enraged local hunters in this area when it outlawed private duck blinds in the St. Francis Sunken Lands WMA. Private duck blinds had been long established when the commission, then under the leadership of the late director Loren Hitchcock, banned private property on the state-owned WMA. The action prompted multiple hearings within the Arkansas legislature.

The southernmost portion of the WMA is very popular for its excellent duck hunting. Overcrowding is a chronic issue, Schoenrock said. Separating hunters and allocating opportunity through a randomly-drawn permit system will alleviate overcrowding and provide a more enjoyable hunting experience.

“We’re making it safer and providing more opportunity for people to use it,” Schoenrock said. “The place has been like a Walmart parking lot. We’re talking about 4.6 miles of river on a 30-plus mile WMA. The rest of the WMA will be open seven days a week with no draw on a navigable waterway.”

Advertisement

Brad Carner, the AGFC’s deputy director, said the drawings will be held weekly, and the first application period will open two weeks before duck season. The drawings will be conducted on Monday mornings, and applicants will be notified by email about the status of their applications.

Despite concerns expressed by some non-hunters and non-anglers, the commission did not discuss its new regulation that requires non-hunters and non-anglers to purchase a $10.50 permit to use wildlife management areas. Zellers said purchases of the new permit will not increase the commission’s apportionment of federal aid dollars.

“If non-hunters and non-anglers want to contribute to the mission, they would help us more if they buy a fishing license for the same price,” Zellers said.

Fishing licenses and hunting licenses contribute to the formula upon which the federal government apportions federal aid dollars for fish and wildlife conservation.

Also, the commission did not discuss a new regulation that eliminated Special Use Area designations from portions of Camp Robinson WMA and Perry Mikles Blue Mountain WMA. These areas were previously reserved for bird dog field trials. Even when field trials were not being held, the public was not allowed to hunt on the SUAs, which totaled about 9,000 acres.

Advertisement

Zellers said the former SUAs are now subject to the standard wildlife habitat management practices, the most important of which is prescribed burning. Zellers said prescribed burning must be conducted in a narrow time window, and bird dog field trials often conflict with the agency’s prescribed burning schedule.

Zellers said that field trials may still be held at Camp Robinson and Blue Mountain WMAs, but that the commission will no longer manage the areas around field trial activities.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Arkansas

Rock City Margarita & Arkansas Beer Festivals: An Interview with Organizer Reed Llewellyn

Published

on

Rock City Margarita & Arkansas Beer Festivals: An Interview with Organizer Reed Llewellyn


Join us for an exclusive interview with Reed Llewellyn, organizer of the Rock City Margarita Festival and the Great Arkansas Beer Festival. Discover what to expect at this year’s event, including a ‘midway’ experience, over 100 breweries, 25+ restaurants, and unique margarita creations. Learn how to get your tickets before they sell out and hear about the long-standing partnership with Ronald McDonald House. The event is held indoors at the State House Convention Center.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending