Connect with us

Alabama

Lawmaker stalls dozens of contracts in Alabama liquor board dispute: ‘Classic bureaucrat double speak’

Published

on

Lawmaker stalls dozens of contracts in Alabama liquor board dispute: ‘Classic bureaucrat double speak’


An Alabama lawmaker on Thursday temporarily put on hold dozens of state agency contracts because of what he said were delays by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to implement a law passed in 2023.

Sen. Chris Elliott, a Republican from Baldwin County, said the bill, which he sponsored, was intended to allow employees at businesses that serve liquor to complete the ABC Board’s Responsible Vendor Program online.

Elliott said the ABC Board has not adopted the rules to allow the online training.

A spokesman for the ABC Board said online training is already taking place.

Advertisement

But Elliott disputed that and said the ABC Board’s rules contradict the 2023 law.

“It’s very frustrating for the Legislature, an entire branch of government, to be ignored by the bureaucracy,” Elliott said.

“We’ve passed this piece of legislation. We have communicated with the ABC Board about what the legislative intent was, communicated by phone call or in person, in writing what the intent was.

“And some 18 months later, we still have no rules promulgated by the bureaucracy that is charged with doing it,” Elliott said.

Elliott released a copy of a letter he wrote to the ABC Board in September. The letter said the 2023 law was intended to remove barriers for businesses to participate in the Responsible Vendor Program.

Advertisement

Elliott‘s comments came at Thursday’s meeting of the Legislature’s contract review committee. The committee, which meets monthly, reviews state agency contracts and asks representatives of the agencies questions.

Any member of the committee can delay contracts for up to 45 days. But the committee cannot permanently block or kill a contract.

The ABC Board did not have any contracts on the committee’s agenda on Thursday. Elliott said he put a hold on all the other agencies’ contracts to put pressure on the ABC Board to implement the law.

Dean Argo, manager of government relations and communications for the ABC Board, issued a statement in response to Elliott’s comments.

Argo said online training for the Responsible Vendor Program is allowed and has been taking place for some time.

Advertisement

“The 2023 law by Sen. Chris Elliott did not require the ABC Board to promulgate rules or change any existing rules,” Argo said.

“A private association approached the ABC Board three months ago and requested that several rules regarding the online training presentation be clarified to benefit its members.

“The ABC Board agreed to do (so) because the clarifications did not impact whether or not online training was offered. However, there was disagreement over how incorrect answers offered online were processed.”

Argo said the ABC Board plans to consider the rule change at its meeting next week.

“During its regularly scheduled meeting on October 17, 2024, the Board asked staff for some additional research on what other states are doing regarding online RVP Training,” Argo said. “The proposed rule modification is on next week’s (November 14, 2024) agenda.”

Advertisement

Elliott said Argo’s statement was misleading.

“The statement from the ABC Board is the type of classic bureaucrat double speak that frustrates small business owners and their representatives alike,” Elliott said in an email.

Elliott cited an ABC rule that says: “The format of the course of instruction shall include face-to-face training and question and answer opportunities.”

“This is obviously not conducive to online training,” Elliott said. “To say otherwise is just wrong.”

Sen. Billy Beasley, D-Clayton, a member of the Contract Review Committee, opposed Elliott’s decision to hold up all the contracts.

Advertisement

“I think it’s unfair to the agencies that come here and present their case and have a blanket objection to any of the contracts being approved,” Beasley said.

“I’d like to move that we rescind the senator from Baldwin County’s request. If he wants to object and hold ABC, that’s his prerogative. But I don’t think we need to hold everybody else.”

Rep. Chris Pringle, R-Mobile, said he understood Beasley’s point. But Pringle said the committee has always operated under the rules that one lawmaker could hold contracts without consent from other members.

“One member does have a right to hold every contract,” Pringle said. “And that’s just kind of the way this committee works.”

Elliott said his purpose is to put pressure on the ABC Board to implement the 2023 law. He said he would lift his hold on contracts when the board adopts the rules for the law.

Advertisement

“I’m hoping that this fairly dramatic step here will get their attention,” Elliott said. “And I’m hoping to provide a little bit more incentive to them and pressure all the people in this room to deal with this issue as they should.

“This has been something that’s been going on for months and months. We pass laws and the governor signs them, and we expect them to be enacted by the executive branch.”

The Alabama Responsible Vendor Program is a voluntary program for licensees that sell and serve alcohol. To be certified, businesses must train all employees who sell and serve alcoholic beverages on topics such as Alabama liquor laws, legal age determination, civil and criminal penalties, and risk reducing techniques.

“Obviously, I represent an area that‘s very heavy in the restaurant and hospitality world, they want to have more people responsibly trained to be servers,” said Elliott, whose district includes Baldwin County’s Gulf Coast beaches. “That’s a good thing for them. It’s a good thing for their insurance.

“And so why the ABC board is not moving forward on this, I don’t know. I’m thinking they’re going to get the message after today.”

Advertisement

The contract review agenda included 60 contracts with a total cost of about $80 million.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Alabama

AAA Alabama advises on what to expect with seasonal gas prices

Published

on

AAA Alabama advises on what to expect with seasonal gas prices


MONTGOMERY, Ala. (WSFA) – Right now, gas prices are up by 3 cents since last month, but 20 cents less than what they were this time last year.

As for the rest of the year, Clay Ingram with AAA Alabama says it will continue to go down.

“When we get to the fall, that’s when we typically see our gas prices in a declining, downward trend because our demand is declining,” said Ingram.

Despite people traveling for the holidays, Ingram says less people travel when it gets colder outside, hence why prices are at their lowest in January and February.

Advertisement

If you see a price uptick during the holiday, find another gas station.

“Some stations try to bump their prices up a little higher than they need to to kind if make some extra money. We need to be sure we’re price-shopping during those times and not rewarding those stations for trying to take advantage of us,” said Ingram.

Ingram says prices can go up during the hurricane season if a refinery or pipeline is damaged in a storm. None were in the path of impact this season.

Sign up for the WSFA Newsletter and get the latest local news and breaking alerts in your email!

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Alabama

LSU to reportedly have a live tiger on the sideline for game vs. Alabama on Saturday

Published

on

LSU to reportedly have a live tiger on the sideline for game vs. Alabama on Saturday


LSU ended the practice of having a live tiger at games following the death of Mike VI, the last mascot to grace the sideline, in 2016. (Photo by Doug Benc/Getty Images)

This weekend, No. 14 LSU will take on No. 11 Alabama in a massive SEC matchup. LSU will reportedly have an unexpected presence on the sideline Saturday: a live tiger.

Per multiple media reports, the Tigers will have a live mascot for the first time in nearly a decade, with state Sen. Bill Wheat confirming the news to the Louisiana Illuminator. The school has not had a tiger in the stadium since 2015, following the death of mascot Mike VI from cancer in 2016.

The return of the tiger is seemingly in response to Gov. Jeff Landry, who said earlier this fall that he wanted to bring a live mascot back to LSU. Surgeon general Ralph Abraham, who is a veterinarian, has also been instrumental in the operation. Per the Illuminator, Landry set up an unofficial committee to lobby LSU on the issue, involving Wheat, who is also a veterinarian.

Advertisement

Wheat told the Illuminator that the live mascot will not be Mike VII, the 8-year-old tiger who became the school’s mascot in 2017. Mike VII lives in an enclosure across from the stadium, and has never attended an LSU football game.

Abraham had reportedly suggested bringing in a second tiger to address concerns about bringing Mike VII to a game. The origin of the second tiger and whether it will be taken care of by the school is currently unclear.

Mike VI, the previous mascot, was the final tiger to grace the sideline at Tigers games. As with previous Mikes, Mike VI was placed in a trailer cage and brought to the stadium, and was occasionally provoked to roar.

Mike VII, the current mascot, was donated from a sanctuary in Florida as a cub in 2017, according to a website run by the school, at which point the school decided to stop the gameday tradition. Per the school, LSU has not bought a tiger since Mike III, and has only adopted cubs from rescue facilities.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alabama

Alabama's presidential results shift right — but not because of new GOP voters • Alabama Reflector

Published

on

Alabama's presidential results shift right — but not because of new GOP voters • Alabama Reflector


Alabama shifted about 3% toward President-Elect Donald Trump in Tuesday’s election. But if unofficial returns are correct, that may have less to do with new Republican votes than a shrinking pool of Democratic ones.

Trump got about 1.4 million votes (65%) in Alabama on Tuesday, according to numbers from the Alabama Secretary of State’s office, while Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, got about 766,680 (34%).  About 58.5% of registered voters in Alabama participated in the election, the lowest number since 1988.

But Trump’s support was relatively unchanged from his numbers in 2020. According to the Secretary of State’s figures, Trump only added 11,540 votes to his total. Harris’ total fell by almost 82,000 votes — a drop of about 9.6% — over President Joe Biden’s numbers in 2020. 

Experts say this shift points to declining Democratic engagement rather than a surge in Republican support.

Advertisement

Randy Kelley, chair of the Alabama Democratic Party, and several political science professors cited a lack of competitive races and stricter voting access rules as factors behind the lower Democratic turnout. John Wahl, chair of the Alabama Republican Party, pointed to sustained Republican outreach and demographic shifts as the GOP focuses on working-class and minority voters.

“They had many less Democrats on the ballot this time. They had few options to choose from,” Kelley said in a phone interview Wednesday.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES.

Advertisement

Democratic turnout decreased across the state in both rural and urban areas with significant losses in traditionally Democratic strongholds. In Jefferson County, for example, Democratic votes dropped by 20,000, while Republican votes fell by 8,000. In rural counties, the decrease was even more notable; in Franklin County, Democratic turnout dropped by 25%, compared to smaller decreases among Republicans. Similar drops were seen in the Black Belt, where Lowndes County showed a 22% decrease in Democratic votes from 2020.

Kelley said the limited options available to voters, especially in Black candidates, discouraged turnout. Kelley noted that fewer Black candidates ran in 2024 and said that the party must improve its recruitment efforts​.

Advertisement

“Candidates bring out their constituents, and without representation, it’s hard to get people excited about voting,” Kelley said.

Spencer Goidel, a political science professor at Auburn University, said that Alabama’s election landscape in 2024 lacked competitive races to encourage Democratic voters. Unlike in 2020, when then-incumbent Democratic U.S. Sen. Doug Jones’s campaign drew some left-leaning voters, the current election cycle offered limited engagement.

“If you’re a Democratic voter in Alabama, people can tell you it’s important to go out and vote, practice your civic duty, but at the end of the day, there’s not much of a reason to vote, and I think that that just filters down. It discourages people,” Goidel said​.

In Alabama’s seven congressional districts, only District 2 had a Democratic candidate — Shomari Figures — in races considered somewhat competitive. Figures defeated Republican nominee Caroleene Dobson in the district on Tuesday. 

Wahl said he believes a Republican focus on economic and educational issues may have contributed to Democrats’ smaller margins in these areas.

Advertisement

“We love to have these new minority voters coming to the Republican Party, kind of seeking refuge from how far left the Democrat Party has gone, and we’re excited about that,” Wahl said​.

Enrijeta Shino, a political science professor at the University of Alabama, sees Alabama’s results as part of a national trend where Democratic turnout has dropped while Republican enthusiasm remained steady. Shino said the votes in Alabama mirrored a broader pattern nationwide.

“That shows that Republicans were more energized, probably did better in get-out-to-vote mobilization for their base, and the messaging that they were getting from Trump resonated with them better than the messages Democrats were getting from Harris with her base,” Shino said.”

Alabama’s restrictive absentee voting rules in 2024 also may have affected turnout. The state had effective no-excuse absentee voting in 2020 in response to the pandemic, but state officials ended that program after that election. The change especially affected low-income and hourly-wage workers who may face greater challenges voting in person.

“When you only have Election Day voting, the cost of voting for people is higher, and when the cost of voting for people is higher, you’re going to see people who can’t get off work or have to take care of their children, can’t afford child care, people like that are going to be less likely turn out to vote,” Goidel said.

Advertisement

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending