Science
Upheaval in Washington Hinders Campaign Against Bird Flu
The campaign to curb bird flu on the nation’s farms has been slowed by the chaotic transition to a new administration that is determined to cut costs, reduce the federal work force and limit communications, according to interviews with more than a dozen scientists and federal officials.
On poultry farms, more than 168 million birds have been killed in an effort to curtail outbreaks. Since the virus first appeared on American dairy cattle about a year ago, it has spread to 17 states and infected more than 1,000 herds.
In its first months, the Trump administration has fired teams of scientists crucial to detecting the spread of the virus, canceled important meetings, and limited access to data even for federal scientists.
The Department of Health and Human Services has not held a public news briefing on bird flu since January, and did not respond to requests for comment.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the health secretary, has suggested allowing the virus to spread uncontrolled through poultry flocks to identify birds that might be immune, an idea that scientists called reckless and dangerous. His comments prompted Democratic lawmakers to open an investigation into the federal response.
The Trump administration has also eliminated funding for programs at the Food and Agriculture Organization, an agency at the United Nations, that monitor and contain bird flu in 49 countries.
“It’s just like watching this almost textbook story of how a virus spreads through animals, mixes in different types of animals and then is able to jump to humans,” said Linsey Marr, an expert in airborne viruses at Virginia Tech.
“We are getting strong warning signs from animals and people, and we are just watching and not doing a lot about it,” she added.
Bird flu has infected dozens of mammal species, including 150 domestic cats in 26 states and at least 70 people, leading to four hospitalizations and one death. After a lull this winter, the spring migratory season has renewed the pace of infections.
Over the past 30 days, the Department of Agriculture, which regulates the livestock industry, has confirmed new infections in 47 herds in three states.
The virus, called H5N1, does not yet seem to be able to spread from person to person. But with one recent mutation, it seems to have moved closer to becoming a human contagion, a worrisome development.
This week, an international group of virologists concluded that turning back bird flu would require continuous monitoring of milk from dairy farms, wastewater and people working with infected animals — a tall order when federal and state officials do not have the legal authority to compel farms to test animals or people.
Officials are testing bulk milk, which has helped to identify infected herds. But the Agriculture Department’s plan to combat bird flu is now focused on lowering egg prices and makes little mention of dairy cattle.
Brooke Rollins, the agriculture secretary, has proposed improving farm biosecurity, helping producers in 10 states prevent the virus’s spread on their premises.
“Our initial expansion of these ongoing efforts will focus on egg-laying facilities — as part of U.S.D.A.’s concerted effort to address egg prices — but we expect to include other poultry producers and dairy producers as well, as the programs are expanded and implemented,” the department said in a statement to The New York Times.
In an early wave of federal layoffs, some Agriculture Department veterinarians specializing in bird flu were fired and then hired back. Even now, many are working with government credit cards that have a $1 limit, making it difficult for them to travel or buy necessary supplies without lobbying to get extended credit — a “massive task” entailing multiple approvals and long delays, according to one official.
The Agriculture Department disagreed with that assessment. “Government-issued credit card limits automatically increase once staff are on an approved trip,” a department spokesman said in an email.
On April 1, the Trump administration fired veterinarians and other scientists at the Food and Drug Administration who were investigating raw pet food contaminated with H5N1 that was sickening cats, and who were helping to vet proposals to develop vaccines and treatments for infected animals.
And the C.D.C. has begun to withhold genetic analyses of viral samples gathered from people, according to one official who asked to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. Even some internal teams are no longer allowed to review them.
On average, federal agencies are releasing the data 242 days after collection, according to one recent analysis. Ideally the task should not take more than a couple of weeks, scientists said. The delay makes it more difficult for scientists to track the spread of the virus and accurately assess its threat to people.
Important reports in agency publications, including the prestigious Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report, have been delayed or stymied altogether, said one former official who spoke on the condition of anonymity for fear of retaliation.
In February, instead of a scheduled report on bird flu infections in household cats, agency scientists were ordered to produce and publish a paper on the effect of the Los Angeles wildfires on air quality.
The bird flu study did appear weeks later, but agency staff members said they were appalled that it had been delayed on orders from above.
The Biden administration held regular interagency calls about bird flu that included dozens of outside experts and state health officials, apprising them of the latest findings. Those calls have ended, as has much of the C.D.C.’s guidance on surveillance.
All communications from the C.D.C. now have to be cleared by federal health officials in Washington. The agency has not held a press briefing on bird flu since January.
“There’s not as much activity as there has been or should be, and what activity there is suffers from lack of coordination,” said Dr. Adam Lauring, a virologist and infectious disease physician at the University of Michigan.
The nation maintains a stockpile containing millions of doses of human vaccine against bird flu. But amid the paring down at the health department, the agency that oversaw the stockpile and specialized in rapid emergency distribution was moved into the C.D.C.
The reshuffle “adds layers of bureaucracy instead of removing it,” said Dawn O’Connell, who led the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, the agency that had maintained the stockpile under the Biden administration.
In interviews, several employees at the C.D.C. and the Agriculture Department said morale was low and falling with every round of layoffs. At a town hall meeting on April 16, about a quarter of the veterinarians in attendance said they would sign on to the deferred resignation program that would offer them full pay and benefits till Sept. 30.
Last year, cows infected with H5N1 were tough to miss. They had fevers and produced viscous, yellow milk. Some cows had spontaneous abortions.
But cattle can be reinfected, it turns out, and the second round of symptoms can be subtler, making it harder to identify infected cows and protect the people who work with them. (A rapid test to detect the virus in cows or people is still not available.)
Reinfections suggest that the virus may become permanently entrenched in dairy cattle. At the same time, the virus continues to circulate in wild birds, evolving at about twice the rate in birds as in cattle.
A new version thought to cause more serious disease, called D1.1, appeared in September and quickly became the dominant variant. The government’s response has been no match for this speed.
In Nevada, milk samples collected on Jan. 6 and 7 tested positive for bird flu on Jan. 10. Ideally, the 12 farms that contributed to those samples would have been quarantined while the results were confirmed.
Instead, more samples were taken on Jan. 17, and the results were confirmed an additional week later.
The Agriculture Department said in a statement that the delay in testing results did not affect its response to the outbreak. “It is important to note that response activities are not dependent upon the sequence and are occurring in the interim,” the department said.
Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona, said he wasn’t so sure. “This does appear to be a case of closing the barn door after the cow is gone,” he said.
It might still be possible to extinguish the virus on American farms if the Agriculture Department were to step up containment efforts, he said.
For example, a rapid test that could quickly detect H5N1 in bulk milk would give officials more time to snuff out an outbreak, compared with a test that delivers results weeks later.
“I do think it’s still a goal that we should be driving for, until and unless it’s clear that it’s futile,” Dr. Worobey said of banishing the virus.
At the moment, keeping the virus off farms is not easy.
When an infected duck, for example, flies over a farm and defecates — not unlikely when millions of birds are infected — there are dozens of ways an outbreak may begin. A farmer may track the detritus into a poultry barn. An infected rodent may sneak in through a tiny gap.
Chickens are packed together, and they have weak immune systems. One bird sneezing out virus can quickly lead to hundreds or thousands of sick birds.
Over the past two years, the Agriculture Department has worked with egg producers in four states — Iowa, Minnesota, South Dakota and North Dakota — on biocontainment efforts to prevent the virus from spreading on farms.
Federal officials helped identify and remove nearby wildlife, including rats, and entry points for the virus that the farmers may easily miss. Only two of the 108 premises that participated in the pilot project had virus infections afterward.
The project is now set to expand this year to 10 states — including California, Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania — and to all 50 states by 2027. Agriculture Department experts are expected to conduct free audits to help farmers identify even the smallest gaps in their defenses against bird flu.
The proposal has garnered praise from scientists, but some experts, including Agriculture Department veterinarians, were unsure how the programs might be carried out.
The staff at the department has worked intensely to turn back bird flu since early 2022. There are already not enough employees to help farms contain outbreaks, identify the flaws in their facilities and inspect the premises to ensure they are ready to reopen.
“We’re three years running without a break, so we’re starting to wear people out,” said a veterinarian who, without permission to speak to the news media, asked to remain anonymous.
Given how birds are currently raised on farms, even the most stringent measures may not be enough to keep the virus out, said Andrew deCoriolis, the executive director of the advocacy group Farm Forward.
“Until that industry changes radically, that outbreak is destined to continue,” he said.
Science
Warning of cuts to medical services, L.A. health officials ask state for emergency funds
The Los Angeles County Department of Health Services has joined a chorus of California hospitals and health systems lobbying the state for a $500-million emergency payment to public hospitals bracing for massive financial losses.
The California Assn. of Public Hospitals and Health Systems is requesting a one-time general fund payment in the 2026-27 budget to help cover inpatient care for fee-for-service Medi-Cal patients at the state’s 17 public hospitals.
While the exact percentage of the $500 million allocated to each hospital will depend on inpatient claims, the county expects that roughly 25%, or $125 million, will end up at Los Angeles County hospitals, said Dr. Christina Ghaly, director of LA Health Services.
“That’s the money that is really necessary to serve as a stopgap and continue that lifeline that the public hospitals desperately need, particularly with the state’s proposed shift of undocumented individuals from managed care into fee-for-service,” Ghaly said.
Ghaly praised county voters for passing Measure ER, which will provide an estimated $220 million annually for the next five years to the county health system through a new half-cent sales tax, Ghaly said.
But it’s not enough to stanch what the county estimates will be a $700-million annual loss by the 2028-29 fiscal year.
LA Health Services is the largest public health system in the state and second-largest in the nation. It serves as a safety net for the county’s 10 million residents, providing healthcare regardless of an individual’s ability to pay.
More than 80% of the system’s patients rely on Medi-Cal, Los Angeles General Medical Center Chief Executive Jorge Orozco told a state Senate committee in March.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which President Trump signed into law last summer, alters Medicaid eligibility requirements and includes about $1 trillion in federal Medicaid reductions over 10 years, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office. As a result, California is expected to lose tens of billions in total funding for Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid program.
About 660,000 people in Los Angeles County are expected to lose Medi-Cal coverage, “but they will not stop needing healthcare,” Orozco said in March. “They will still come to our emergency rooms for everything from routine illness to life threatening conditions. And safety net hospital systems like ours will be forced to absorb those costs.”
County health officials have enacted hiring freezes, consolidated services, reduced overtime and taken other cost-cutting measures in anticipation of the losses, resulting in about $230 million in savings.
“But we need to be clear: we cannot cut our way out of a funding loss of this magnitude,” the department said in a statement released this week. “Without help from the State, we will be forced to consider options no one wants, reduced patient services, staff layoffs, and potential facility closures.”
The county has not yet identified specific services for closure, Ghaly said.
“Our focus is entirely on preventing the harm that would come before we have to make those tough choices,” she added.
A memo on the department’s fiscal outlook prepared for the Board of Supervisors sounded the alarm in April.
“For the patients we serve, losing Medi-Cal doesn’t mean they stop getting sick — it means losing access to care. Health Services will still be here, but with over 600,000 more uninsured patients in LA County alone, the strain will be felt across our health system and across every emergency room in Los Angeles County,” the memo read.
“Without substantial new revenue sources, Health Services will have no alternative but to consider planning for service curtailments — including possible facility closures and staff layoffs — beginning in early 2027.”
Science
Video: Southern Lights Seen From International Space Station
new video loaded: Southern Lights Seen From International Space Station
By Cynthia Silva
June 10, 2026
Science
UC Davis favored less qualified Black, Latino med school applicants, Justice Department claims
The U.S. Justice Department has accused the UC Davis School of Medicine of choosing race “over merit, skill, and competence” in its admissions process, favoring Black and Latino students even when they weren’t as qualified as white and Asian applicants.
The department said its findings, announced Wednesday afternoon, were based on a six-month investigation by its Civil Rights Division. The Justice Department said it found that the Northern California university violated the Supreme Court’s 2023 ruling against race-based determinations in admissions. The findings have been contested by the school.
“Davis Med’s actions reflect both unabashed contempt for the rule of law and plain disregard for the potential public health consequences of putting race over merit, skill, and competence,” Assistant Atty. Gen. Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division said in a statement.
“The Department will not allow schools to violate federal law without consequence.”
A spokesperson said the university was “disappointed” with the report and its findings.
“UC Davis School of Medicine strongly disagrees with any characterization of its admissions practices as discriminatory or inconsistent with applicable law,” a school statement read. “The report’s findings do not accurately reflect the school’s rigorous, individualized, and merit-based admissions process and our firm commitment to complying with applicable federal and state antidiscrimination laws.”
The department outlined its case in a 12-page letter to an attorney representing UC Davis, claiming the university violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, as interpreted by the Supreme Court’s 2023 Students for Fair Admissions vs. Harvard.
Title VI prohibits institutions receiving federal funding from discriminating based on race, while the 2023 decision banned affirmative action in higher-education admissions.
The Justice Department said its investigation found the medical school “adopted admissions practices with the express purpose of circumventing” the 2023 ruling.
That method was the “Davis Scale,” the department said. The letter called the scale a “continuous measure of socioeconomic disadvantage” that includes parental income and education, growing up in a medically underserved area and other socioeconomic variables.
The Justice Department included UC Davis literature that said the scale had allowed the school to triple the enrollment of Black and Latino students.
In 2024, Davis’ medical school became the third most racially diverse medical school in the country, the Justice Department claimed.
Conversely, the department said its review of medical school admissions data from 2023 to 2025 found that 93% of white and certain Asian applicants had MCAT scores at or above those of the average Black student.
It also showed that Black and Hispanic applicants were admitted at rates up to six times higher than whites and Asians, despite consistently having, on average, lower academic qualifications, according to the department.
The Justice Department said it is attempting to enter into a voluntary agreement with UC Davis to bring the medical school into compliance. The department would eventually sue the medical school if such a resolution is not found.
UC Davis did not indicate whether it would comply with the Justice Department.
“UC Davis is fully committed to meeting the critical healthcare needs of California, particularly those in underserved and under-resourced areas,” the school said in a statement.
The finding mirrors similar investigations into medical schools at UCLA and UC San Diego.
The Justice Department said last month that UCLA’s David Geffen School of Medicine intentionally used race for the last three years to discriminate against white and Asian applicants during admissions.
-
Mississippi4 minutes agoTennessee football offers 2029 Mississippi wide receiver
-
Missouri11 minutes agoChristie Jean Lee Vauter
-
Montana13 minutes agoJury convicts Honduran woman of transporting undocumented immigrant in Montana
-
Nebraska18 minutes agoBullerman follows a family legacy into Nebraska’s prairies
-
Nevada25 minutes agoDr. Brian Evans Selected as Nevada County’s Health Officer
-
New Hampshire28 minutes agoNew Hampshire governor to decide on housing bills – Valley News
-
New Jersey34 minutes agoSevere Storms, Dangerous Heat Targets NJ Friday
-
New Mexico41 minutes agoFriday morning forecast: Storms could bring flooding to eastern NM this weekend