Connect with us

Science

At-home COVID tests could make holiday reunions with family safer. Here’s how

Published

on

At-home COVID tests could make holiday reunions with family safer. Here’s how

Even with practically 63% of Californians absolutely vaccinated, some public well being officers fear that huge gatherings this vacation season may result in huge outbreaks of COVID-19. However households seeking to reunite have at the least one infection-averting software that they didn’t have final 12 months: fast at-home testing kits.

The kits aren’t foolproof, and most aren’t as dependable because the lab-based various relating to detecting coronavirus infections of their earliest levels. Additionally, the fee could be excessive if you must check a houseful of individuals.

For the report:

2:57 p.m. Nov. 22, 2021An earlier model of this story incorrectly reported that the CDC advisable that unvaccinated vacationers quarantine for seven days after arriving at their vacation spot. The CDC recommends that unvaccinated vacationers quarantine for seven to 10 days after they return from their journey.

Advertisement

If utilized in the best circumstances, nonetheless, an at-home check can warn you in a matter of minutes if Cousin Antoine’s cough or Aunt Maggie’s muscle aches are indicators of a probably grave risk to the remainder of the household. Even higher, the checks could make it straightforward in your invited friends to verify for an lively an infection earlier than they trundle off to your own home.

One different essential caveat: When you haven’t been absolutely vaccinated, the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention cautions towards touring to that vacation get-together. And in case you’re decided to journey sans vaccination, the CDC recommends doing so provided that you get a unfavorable coronavirus check one to 3 days days earlier than departure, and after you come back, quarantining for seven to 10 days.

Right here’s a rundown of how the checks work, how dependable the outcomes are, who makes them, the place to seek out them and the way a lot they price.

What are at-home fast COVID checks?

The important thing phrase right here is “fast,” as in delivering leads to about quarter-hour. In contrast to the self-testing kits that you must ship to a lab for processing, the fast kits allow you to course of your samples at house — in actual fact, most of them allow you to watch the outcomes slowly emerge on a check strip, the best way you would possibly watch a picture type on a Polaroid (however with larger stakes).

The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration has given emergency-use authorization to 2 sorts of fast checks: molecular and antigen. The molecular checks, which boast larger sensitivity however carry the next price, study the genetic materials in your pattern for the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The antigen checks search for the presence of a protein that binds to the coronavirus’ RNA.

Advertisement

Solely two of the three accepted house molecular checks — the Lucira CHECK-IT package and the Cue Well being package — can be found now on-line, and so they’re expensive: Amazon sells Lucira’s for $89 per check, and Cue sells a pack of three of its checks for $225, plus $249 for the bottom unit (it additionally provides a membership-based plan). A 3rd firm, Detect, says its molecular check shall be out there from the corporate’s web site this month for lower than $50 per check, not together with the price of the reusable base unit, which can promote for lower than $40.

A fast seek for antigen checks, then again, discovered six of the 9 accepted checks out there to U.S. customers in shops or on-line, one from two totally different producers:

One different antigen check, by Celltrion, is obtainable in bulk portions from medical provide shops on-line for about $10 per check.

Completely different antigen check kits include totally different options — for instance, some have smartphone apps that may show your check consequence, which might be helpful in case you’re requested to point out proof of a unfavorable check. And the efficiency of the checks could range, though all did properly sufficient to win the FDA’s emergency authorization.

Dr. Ashish Ok. Jha, dean of the Brown College Faculty of Public Well being, stated the BinaxNow check has been probably the most broadly used, so it has extra of a monitor report than the opposite checks. However he stated individuals shouldn’t pay an excessive amount of consideration to model names, on condition that the checks have been in comparatively quick provide. “Any of the checks that yow will discover are approach higher than not having checks,” he stated.

Advertisement

How dependable are the outcomes?

The coronavirus that causes the COVID-19 illness can take a number of days to construct up steam (or “viral load”), which suggests you aren’t more likely to present signs or be infectious to others instantly after you’ve caught it. That’s why public well being officers advise you to not get examined instantly after you’ve been uncovered to individuals who is likely to be infectious.

Molecular checks, nonetheless, use chemical methods to amplify the quantity of genetic materials in a pattern, enabling them to detect the presence of the coronavirus at a really early stage — in some circumstances, even earlier than an individual can go alongside the an infection to others. Then again, they could additionally discover leftover traces of the virus after an individual is now not contagious. And like all check, they’re topic to contamination and different glitches that may trigger misguided outcomes, together with the occasional false optimistic. It’s not frequent, however it’s extra more likely to occur in communities which have few circumstances of the illness.

Antigen checks have confirmed to be pretty much as good as molecular checks at avoiding false optimistic outcomes. And in keeping with the CDC, these checks are additionally simply pretty much as good relating to detecting COVID in somebody who’s displaying signs of the illness, akin to a cough, a fever and a sore throat.

The place the checks fall quick, the CDC warns, is with individuals who have the virus however present no signs, particularly in the event that they’re within the early levels of an infection and will not but have sufficient of a viral load to contaminate others. The company recommends that folks carry out a second antigen check a couple of days after the primary one, which is why the kits are bought as two-packs.

When you haven’t been vaccinated and also you’ve come into shut contact someday within the earlier two weeks with somebody who had COVID, the CDC recommends that you simply get a molecular check simply to make sure you’re not contaminated.

Advertisement

What’s the most effective use of fast checks?

Testing can scale back the danger in quite a lot of vacation situations, however Jha and Dr. Robert Wachter, chair of the division of drugs at UC San Francisco Faculty of Medication, stated it makes probably the most sense in two conditions: if unvaccinated individuals shall be becoming a member of you for the vacations, or if individuals in your group could be at excessive danger of lethal problems in the event that they contracted a breakthrough case of COVID-19. “Aside from that, whereas it may render a gathering a smidgen safer, it doesn’t really feel price it to me to spend a couple of hundred bucks testing 10 or so individuals,” Wachter stated in an e-mail.

One other issue weighing in favor of testing is when there’s a excessive fee of coronavirus infections locally, Jha stated. However which group determines the quantity of danger? That could be arduous to determine when you have friends coming from a number of elements of the nation.

When and the way usually you must take a check is determined by the character of the gathering. “Fast checks are a measure of contagiousness,” Jha stated, “and so that you need to check as shut as you possibly can of getting along with individuals.” If it’s only a Thanksgiving day meal, Jha stated, “The best scenario could be to check on Thursday morning.”

But when it’s a vacation weekend go to, he and Wachter prompt testing greater than as soon as — say, simply earlier than arriving and once more in a day or two — particularly in case you’ll be within the presence of unvaccinated individuals. “Two unfavorable checks, you’re actually good to go,” Jha stated, including that in case you’re round individuals at excessive danger of COVID-19 problems, you can even take a check every day.

“In an unvaccinated inhabitants, one single check might be not adequate,” Jha stated. For proof, he pointed to the ceremony President Trump held final 12 months for brand new Supreme Courtroom Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Attendees needed to have gotten a unfavorable check consequence to achieve admission, however it nonetheless became one thing near a superspreader occasion.

Advertisement

How do you check your self?

The everyday course of begins with taking a sterile swab from the package and tracing the within of every nostril a number of instances. That gathers the pattern. The subsequent step is determined by the kind of check.

With molecular checks, the swab is inserted right into a small container, the place the pattern is combined with a reagent, a substance that begins the method of showing the pattern’s genetic make-up. The container is then positioned in a base unit, the place the magic (technically, the isothermal amplification) occurs. The outcomes seem on the bottom unit or in a smartphone app.

With antigen checks, the swab is positioned in a disposable reader (usually made from paper) the place it meets a check strip. You add a couple of drops of the package’s reagent, then watch to see whether or not the strip exhibits a optimistic, unfavorable or inconclusive consequence.

You should definitely learn and comply with the directions rigorously to gather a correct pattern and keep away from contamination. With the favored BinaxNow check, for instance, you’re imagined to swab every of your nostrils for 15 seconds and rotate the swab thrice after putting it within the reagent.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Science

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

Published

on

Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County

A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.

The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.

The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.

Advertisement

The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.

After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.

As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.

Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.

The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.

Advertisement

Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.

Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.

The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.

Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.

While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.

Advertisement

Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.

Continue Reading

Science

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

Published

on

Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?

It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.

“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”

Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.

Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.

The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.

Advertisement

That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.

In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.

“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”

Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).

The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.

Advertisement

For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.

Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.

“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.

Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.

There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.

Advertisement

“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.

Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.

“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”

That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.

Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.

Advertisement

“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”

Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.

“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”

On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”

“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.

Advertisement

Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.

The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.

“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.

“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”

That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.

Advertisement

“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.

Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.

“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”

Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.

“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.

Advertisement

The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”

“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”

Continue Reading

Science

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

Published

on

Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight

President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.

Continue Reading

Trending