Science
A COVID-19 vaccine is now available for young kids. Should they get it?
As any child will let you know, grown-ups prefer to make issues difficult. They usually not often miss an opportunity to argue about stuff.
Working example: the COVID-19 vaccination for kids ages 5 to 11.
The U.S. Meals and Drug Administration has granted emergency use authorization for kid-sized doses of the vaccine made by Pfizer and BioNTech, and the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention adopted up by recommending broad use of the vaccine among the many nation’s 28 million elementary-school-age youngsters.
The motion had been really helpful by two panels of unbiased specialists who advise the FDA and CDC on vaccines. Now pictures are going into little arms.
E-newsletter
Get our free Coronavirus In the present day publication
Join the most recent information, finest tales and what they imply for you, plus solutions to your questions.
It’s possible you’ll sometimes obtain promotional content material from the Los Angeles Instances.
In relation to adults and older children, teams like this have virtually all the time mentioned everybody ought to get vaccinated. However this time was totally different: A number of members of the FDA advisory panel made clear that they don’t assume the vaccination needs to be given to as many younger youngsters as potential, at the least proper now.
The CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices didn’t share these reservations, particularly in mild of information suggesting the vaccine was greater than 90% efficient in stopping COVID-19 in 5- to 11-year-olds.
“Primarily based on our experience and the data that we now have, we’re all very enthusiastic,” mentioned committee member Dr. Beth Bell, a professor of world well being on the College of Washington.
Right here’s a better take a look at the talk over the vaccination of younger youngsters.
Why all of the drama?
You is perhaps questioning why there’s even a query about whether or not to vaccinate children in opposition to COVID-19.
The hazard of the illness appears clear: Not less than 94 youngsters ages 5 to 11 have died of COVID-19 because the pandemic started, and eight,300 have develop into so sick they wanted to be hospitalized.
Even some who had solely gentle signs went on to develop MIS-C, a situation wherein the immune system goes haywire and begins attacking completely wholesome elements of the physique. By early October, 5,217 children had come down with MIS-C, together with 2,034 between 6 and 11. Between 1% and a couple of% of them died.
There’s additionally the chance they may develop “lengthy COVID.” In Nice Britain, about 8% of youngsters who knew they’d a coronavirus an infection suffered signs that lingered for months. They’d fatigue or muscle aches or respiration issues or hassle concentrating in class.
There’s one other huge purpose to contemplate vaccinating younger children: getting again to regular.
Nobody loves sporting a masks all day, or having to spend two weeks in quarantine after being uncovered to an contaminated individual. If most children received vaccinated, lots of pandemic restrictions would most likely get tossed out and youngsters might resume their regular lives.
What’s to not like?
Not everybody sees it this fashion. Some mother and father nonetheless aren’t able to get their children vaccinated, and never all specialists are certain that each child must be. Over your entire pandemic, the possibility {that a} child of any age would die of COVID-19 by no means rose above one in 2 million (and was often approach decrease). That’s 4 occasions lower than the percentages of being struck by lightning in any given 12 months.
Plus, greater than half of younger children with coronavirus infections have virtually no signs in any respect. The children which were least prone to get very sick or die are those between 5 and 11. Infants and youngsters had been extra prone to get sick in the event that they received contaminated, and extra of them died.
Given all that, these skeptics ask, why would you run the danger of getting each younger child jabbed with COVID-19 vaccine — particularly if there are issues of safety that researchers don’t but perceive?
A scary coronary heart drawback
One of many foremost issues the FDA advisors argued about was a uncommon vaccination facet impact that will not even have an effect on children beneath 12 after they get this COVID-19 vaccine. The facet impact is known as myocarditis, and it irritates the center muscle, inflicting some swelling and sometimes chest ache.
Myocarditis after an mRNA vaccination is unquestionably uncommon: For those who vaccinated 1 million 16- or 17-year-old boys and gave them the grownup model of this Pfizer vaccine, about 70 of them would expertise some type of the situation. It appears to go away by itself, however if you happen to get it, you’ll most likely spend a number of days within the hospital. When these sufferers get out, they’ll be suggested to stop sports activities for 3 to 6 months simply to make certain they’re OK.
The issue is that nobody is bound whether or not myocarditis hurts a baby’s coronary heart in any lasting approach. Nor do they know whether or not youthful children who haven’t began puberty might get it within the first place. They’re relying on the kid-sized dose to be too small to set off any such response.
How will we discover out?
This is without doubt one of the issues that comes with judging the security of a brand new vaccine throughout a public well being emergency. To hurry the duty of creating certain this vaccine works safely in younger children, authorities specialists relied on a number of the security knowledge from earlier trials and requested Pfizer to check smaller doses in a couple of thousand children within the 5-to-11 age group.
Even when myocarditis occurred as typically in little children because it does in youngsters, you’d want greater than 14,000 children in your take a look at group to have one case of myocarditis. With a take a look at group of lower than 3,000 children, odds are good you gained’t see any circumstances.
However that doesn’t imply they gained’t occur — and nobody will know till hundreds of thousands of youngsters begin getting vaccinated.
The thought of marching hundreds of thousands of youngsters into such an unsure state of affairs is unnerving to some specialists. However the authorities has a system for preserving tabs on reviews of potential vaccination negative effects. The FDA assured its advisors that if circumstances of myocarditis begin cropping up, they’ll put vaccinations on maintain whereas they work out whether or not there’s a connection and let individuals know what they’ve discovered.
Do children have already got some safety?
Possibly. Youngsters in grade faculty can catch the coronavirus simply. Even when it doesn’t make them sick, their immune techniques be taught to acknowledge it so the subsequent time the virus comes calling, their pure defenses can act shortly to close it down.
A research by researchers on the CDC discovered that at the least 40% of youngsters are on this class. However because the coronavirus is new, nobody is bound how lengthy a baby’s immune system will keep in mind it, or how robust the safety shall be.
With all this in thoughts, does it make sense to hurry out and vaccinate all of them? Some specialists don’t assume so.
Is it over but?
Plenty of adults have been certain the pandemic was nearly over, and, boy, have they been proved mistaken. 4 separate occasions, we’ve seen infections and deaths climb, then fall. And each time to date, they’ve gone again up once more.
However when contemplating whether or not most youthful children want the vaccination, it actually issues whether or not the top is in sight. If the virus simply can’t unfold as quick as a result of so many individuals have immunity, perhaps most children don’t want extra safety — particularly since there could also be dangers to getting all children on this age group vaccinated.
Alternatively, if one other surge is on the horizon, taking that threat is perhaps a extremely good strategy to cease it from occurring.
Does the vaccine do extra to guard younger children or these round them?
Though most younger children with coronavirus infections don’t get sick themselves, they’re good at spreading the virus — and it may be arduous to inform that it’s occurring as a result of they might appear completely high-quality whereas they’re doing it. That’s an actual drawback in the event that they stay with or go to high school with individuals who might get very sick in the event that they’re contaminated.
That features different children who’ve bronchial asthma, diabetes or weight problems, in addition to mother and father or grandparents who’ve had most cancers or continual coronary heart issues. The younger youngsters in these conditions most likely ought to get vaccinated to chop off the chain of transmission earlier than it reaches those that are susceptible.
The children with these higher-risk well being circumstances should get vaccinated too to guard themselves, specialists say.
Why does anybody get vaccinated?
Principally, to guard ourselves. But additionally to guard one another.
The extra individuals who get vaccinated, the extra safety there’s for essentially the most susceptible amongst us. For lots of people, it could be value working a small threat of a vaccination facet impact — even one like myocarditis — to assist defend a classmate or grandparent.
One factor is obvious: Youngsters needs to be protected
Right here’s the very last thing value saying about grown-ups: They love their little children, and — no shock right here — will defend them fiercely in opposition to any hurt. That’s why some adults who’ve been vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19 themselves would possibly want extra data earlier than they’d get their youngsters vaccinated, whereas others take their children straight to the pediatrician for his or her first dose.
It’s difficult.
Science
Cluster of farmworkers diagnosed with rare animal-borne disease in Ventura County
A cluster of workers at Ventura County berry farms have been diagnosed with a rare disease often transmitted through sick animals’ urine, according to a public health advisory distributed to local doctors by county health officials Tuesday.
The bacterial infection, leptospirosis, has resulted in severe symptoms for some workers, including meningitis, an inflammation of the brain lining and spinal cord. Symptoms for mild cases included headaches and fevers.
The disease, which can be fatal, rarely spreads from human to human, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Ventura County Public Health has not given an official case count but said it had not identified any cases outside of the agriculture sector. The county’s agriculture commissioner was aware of 18 cases, the Ventura County Star reported.
The health department said it was first contacted by a local physician in October, who reported an unusual trend in symptoms among hospital patients.
After launching an investigation, the department identified leptospirosis as a probable cause of the illness and found most patients worked on caneberry farms that utilize hoop houses — greenhouse structures to shelter the crops.
As the investigation to identify any additional cases and the exact sources of exposure continues, Ventura County Public Health has asked healthcare providers to consider a leptospirosis diagnosis for sick agricultural workers, particularly berry harvesters.
Rodents are a common source and transmitter of disease, though other mammals — including livestock, cats and dogs — can transmit it as well.
The disease is spread through bodily fluids, such as urine, and is often contracted through cuts and abrasions that contact contaminated water and soil, where the bacteria can survive for months.
Humans can also contract the illness through contaminated food; however, the county health agency has found no known health risks to the general public, including through the contact or consumption of caneberries such as raspberries and blackberries.
Symptom onset typically occurs between two and 30 days after exposure, and symptoms can last for months if untreated, according to the CDC.
The illness often begins with mild symptoms, with fevers, chills, vomiting and headaches. Some cases can then enter a second, more severe phase that can result in kidney or liver failure.
Ventura County Public Health recommends agriculture and berry harvesters regularly rinse any cuts with soap and water and cover them with bandages. They also recommend wearing waterproof clothing and protection while working outdoors, including gloves and long-sleeve shirts and pants.
While there is no evidence of spread to the larger community, according to the department, residents should wash hands frequently and work to control rodents around their property if possible.
Pet owners can consult a veterinarian about leptospirosis vaccinations and should keep pets away from ponds, lakes and other natural bodies of water.
Science
Political stress: Can you stay engaged without sacrificing your mental health?
It’s been two weeks since Donald Trump won the presidential election, but Stacey Lamirand’s brain hasn’t stopped churning.
“I still think about the election all the time,” said the 60-year-old Bay Area resident, who wanted a Kamala Harris victory so badly that she flew to Pennsylvania and knocked on voters’ doors in the final days of the campaign. “I honestly don’t know what to do about that.”
Neither do the psychologists and political scientists who have been tracking the country’s slide toward toxic levels of partisanship.
Fully 69% of U.S. adults found the presidential election a significant source of stress in their lives, the American Psychological Assn. said in its latest Stress in America report.
The distress was present across the political spectrum, with 80% of Republicans, 79% of Democrats and 73% of independents surveyed saying they were stressed about the country’s future.
That’s unhealthy for the body politic — and for voters themselves. Stress can cause muscle tension, headaches, sleep problems and loss of appetite. Chronic stress can inflict more serious damage to the immune system and make people more vulnerable to heart attacks, strokes, diabetes, infertility, clinical anxiety, depression and other ailments.
In most circumstances, the sound medical advice is to disengage from the source of stress, therapists said. But when stress is coming from politics, that prescription pits the health of the individual against the health of the nation.
“I’m worried about people totally withdrawing from politics because it’s unpleasant,” said Aaron Weinschenk, a political scientist at the University of Wisconsin–Green Bay who studies political behavior and elections. “We don’t want them to do that. But we also don’t want them to feel sick.”
Modern life is full of stressors of all kinds: paying bills, pleasing difficult bosses, getting along with frenemies, caring for children or aging parents (or both).
The stress that stems from politics isn’t fundamentally different from other kinds of stress. What’s unique about it is the way it encompasses and enhances other sources of stress, said Brett Ford, a social psychologist at the University of Toronto who studies the link between emotions and political engagement.
For instance, she said, elections have the potential to make everyday stressors like money and health concerns more difficult to manage as candidates debate policies that could raise the price of gas or cut off access to certain kinds of medical care.
Layered on top of that is the fact that political disagreements have morphed into moral conflicts that are perceived as pitting good against evil.
“When someone comes into power who is not on the same page as you morally, that can hit very deeply,” Ford said.
Partisanship and polarization have raised the stakes as well. Voters who feel a strong connection to a political party become more invested in its success. That can make a loss at the ballot box feel like a personal defeat, she said.
There’s also the fact that we have limited control over the outcome of an election. A patient with heart disease can improve their prognosis by taking medicine, changing their diet, getting more exercise or quitting smoking. But a person with political stress is largely at the mercy of others.
“Politics is many forms of stress all rolled into one,” Ford said.
Weinschenk observed this firsthand the day after the election.
“I could feel it when I went into my classroom,” said the professor, whose research has found that people with political anxiety aren’t necessarily anxious in general. “I have a student who’s transgender and a couple of students who are gay. Their emotional state was so closed down.”
That’s almost to be expected in a place like Wisconsin, whose swing-state status caused residents to be bombarded with political messages. The more campaign ads a person is exposed to, the greater the risk of being diagnosed with anxiety, depression or another psychological ailment, according to a 2022 study in the journal PLOS One.
Political messages seem designed to keep voters “emotionally on edge,” said Vaile Wright, a licensed psychologist in Villa Park, Ill., and a member of the APA’s Stress in America team.
“It encourages emotion to drive our decision-making behavior, as opposed to logic,” Wright said. “When we’re really emotionally stimulated, it makes it so much more challenging to have civil conversation. For politicians, I think that’s powerful, because emotions can be very easily manipulated.”
Making voters feel anxious is a tried-and-true way to grab their attention, said Christopher Ojeda, a political scientist at UC Merced who studies mental health and politics.
“Feelings of anxiety can be mobilizing, definitely,” he said. “That’s why politicians make fear appeals — they want people to get engaged.”
On the other hand, “feelings of depression are demobilizing and take you out of the political system,” said Ojeda, author of “The Sad Citizen: How Politics is Depressing and Why it Matters.”
“What [these feelings] can tell you is, ‘Things aren’t going the way I want them to. Maybe I need to step back,’” he said.
Genessa Krasnow has been seeing a lot of that since the election.
The Seattle entrepreneur, who also campaigned for Harris, said it grates on her to see people laughing in restaurants “as if nothing had happened.” At a recent book club meeting, her fellow group members were willing to let her vent about politics for five minutes, but they weren’t interested in discussing ways they could counteract the incoming president.
“They’re in a state of disengagement,” said Krasnow, who is 56. She, meanwhile, is looking for new ways to reach young voters.
“I am exhausted. I am so sad,” she said. “But I don’t believe that disengaging is the answer.”
That’s the fundamental trade-off, Ojeda said, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution.
“Everyone has to make a decision about how much engagement they can tolerate without undermining their psychological well-being,” he said.
Lamirand took steps to protect her mental health by cutting social media ties with people whose values aren’t aligned with hers. But she will remain politically active and expects to volunteer for phone-banking duty soon.
“Doing something is the only thing that allows me to feel better,” Lamirand said. “It allows me to feel some level of control.”
Ideally, Ford said, people would not have to choose between being politically active and preserving their mental health. She is investigating ways to help people feel hopeful, inspired and compassionate about political challenges, since these emotions can motivate action without triggering stress and anxiety.
“We want to counteract this pattern where the more involved you are, the worse you are,” Ford said.
The benefits would be felt across the political spectrum. In the APA survey, similar shares of Democrats, Republicans and independents agreed with statements like, “It causes me stress that politicians aren’t talking about the things that are most important to me,” and, “The political climate has caused strain between my family members and me.”
“Both sides are very invested in this country, and that is a good thing,” Wright said. “Antipathy and hopelessness really doesn’t serve us in the long run.”
Science
Video: SpaceX Unable to Recover Booster Stage During Sixth Test Flight
President-elect Donald Trump joined Elon Musk in Texas and watched the launch from a nearby location on Tuesday. While the Starship’s giant booster stage was unable to repeat a “chopsticks” landing, the vehicle’s upper stage successfully splashed down in the Indian Ocean.
-
Business1 week ago
Column: OpenAI just scored a huge victory in a copyright case … or did it?
-
Health1 week ago
Bird flu leaves teen in critical condition after country's first reported case
-
Business6 days ago
Column: Molly White's message for journalists going freelance — be ready for the pitfalls
-
Science4 days ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics5 days ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology5 days ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle6 days ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World5 days ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government