Politics
Tesla raises concerns over retaliatory tariffs in unsigned letter
Elon Musk’s electric vehicle company Tesla has joined several other American businesses in raising concerns over retaliatory tariffs that could result from a trade war fueled by President Trump.
In an unsigned letter on Tesla letterhead addressed to the U.S. Trade Representative, Tesla warned that Trump’s actions to “address unfair trade practices” could “inadvertently harm U.S. companies.”
Trump imposed a 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico in an effort to alleviate the “threat posed by illegal aliens and drugs,” according to a White House fact sheet. The tariffs have triggered a trade war that threatens to raise the cost of a number of consumer goods.
Earlier this month, a trade group representing nearly all major automakers except Tesla said the tariffs on Canada and Mexico could lead to drastic price hikes and supply chain disruptions, Reuters reported.
Tesla’s letter, posted on the U.S. Trade Representative website, said that past U.S. tariff actions have led to increased costs for domestic manufacturing and increased tariffs on EVs exported into foreign countries.
“U.S. exporters are inherently exposed to disproportionate impacts when other countries respond to U.S. trade actions,” the letter from Tesla said. “Tesla encourages USTR to consider the downstream impacts of certain proposed actions.”
A representative of Austin, Texas-based Tesla could not be immediately reached for comment.
Tesla’s message to the U.S. Trade Representative is notable because the company’s chief executive, Musk, is a close Trump ally and leads efforts by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency to downsize the federal government. In a show of support for Musk and Tesla this week, Trump purchased a new red Model S on the White House lawn.
Tesla’s stock, which has plummeted 34% since January, received a boost after Trump’s vehicle purchase and was up nearly 4% at the end of the day Friday, closing at $249.98.
The letter comes as some Tesla owners are protesting Musk’s political actions by selling their vehicles or adding anti-Musk bumper stickers to their rides.
Some politicians and celebrities, including Sen. Mark Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona, have publicly shared plans to get rid of their Tesla vehicles.
Tesla facilities in the United States support more than 70,000 employees and are responsible for billions of dollars of economic activity each year, the letter said. The company has multiple manufacturing sites in California, including an assembly plant in Fremont and a “megafactory” in Lathrop.
Tesla’s letter also warned of supply chain issues that could result from existing and proposed trade policies.
“Even with aggressive localization of the supply chain, certain parts and components are difficult or impossible to source within the United States,” the letter said. “Trade actions should not [and need not] conflict with objectives to further increase and support domestic manufacturing.”
The trade group Autos Drive America, which represents foreign automakers, including Toyota and BMW, warned the U.S. Trade Representative in separate comments that imposing broad-based tariffs would disrupt production at U.S. plants and lead to higher prices for consumers.

Politics
How New York’s Mayor, Eric Adams, Wooed Donald Trump

Donald J. Trump’s electoral victory alarmed most New York Democrats — but not Eric Adams. For Mr. Adams, the mayor of New York City who had been criminally indicted and faced political isolation, it was a golden opportunity.
In the weeks before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Adams cozied up to Mr. Trump, his political allies and his family.
The mayor called the president-elect on multiple occasions, congratulating him on his election victory and discussing city affairs. He met at a luxury Manhattan hotel with Stephen K. Bannon, Mr. Trump’s ally and former top aide. And he contacted the president’s second son, Eric Trump, who runs the Trump family business.
The previously unreported extent of the charm campaign was recounted in interviews with more than a dozen people knowledgeable about the effort, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the nature of the communications.
The effort culminated in Mr. Adams receiving an in-person meeting with Mr. Trump in Florida just days before the inauguration.
While Mr. Adams did not explicitly raise his corruption case at the Florida meeting, the people said, Mr. Trump appeared sympathetic to the mayor’s legal plight. The president-elect, on the verge of attaining the power to make the mayor’s case disappear, lamented that the Justice Department under President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was “weaponized.”
Mr. Adams has said that he was there on city business, and that his outreach to Mr. Trump was normal political bridge-building, irrelevant to his criminal case. A City Hall spokeswoman noted he was not the only Democrat who has sought to find some common ground with Mr. Trump.
“Mayor Adams wants to work with the new president, and not war with him, to better the lives of New Yorkers,” Liz Garcia, the city hall spokeswoman, said in a statement. “There is no difference between how the mayor has approached his relationship with President Trump and how he approached his relationship with former President Biden. Any claim that he has anything but a professional relationship with President Trump is based in falsehood.”
Yet their in-person meeting sealed a connection between the two men and was a prelude to the mayor’s lawyers formally asking the Trump administration to abandon the case.
Less than a month after their meeting, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department ordered federal prosecutors in Manhattan to seek a dismissal of the indictment, arguing that it hindered Mr. Adams’s cooperation with the administration’s immigration crackdown. The department also claimed the corruption case would interfere in this year’s mayoral election. It left open the possibility of reviving the charges after November.
That striking move to drop the case — which prompted several Justice Department resignations last month and a political crisis in New York — reflected a changed reality for the American justice system as the president has begun to demolish the wall between prosecution and politics.
The mayor’s case offers a blueprint for fighting criminal charges in this new, transactional era: flatter Mr. Trump, forge a personal connection and, when possible, support his agenda.
Both sides stood to gain: Mr. Adams might well have secured his freedom, while Mr. Trump gained a friend in City Hall, someone to support elements of his immigration crackdown — and, potentially, his family business.
That business, the Trump Organization, played a role in the mayor’s in-person meeting with Mr. Trump.
For one thing, the meeting was held at a Trump Organization property, a golf club in West Palm Beach, Fla. And it came about after Frank Carone, the mayor’s trusted outside adviser and former chief of staff, contacted Eric Trump, two people with knowledge of the matter said. The two men became acquainted when Mr. Carone was in City Hall in New York and the Trump Organization was operating a golf course on city land.
The Florida meeting also came as the Trump Organization was bidding on a New York City contract to operate a Central Park skating rink, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
There is no indication that the mayor’s office has advocated for the Trump Organization. But the situation is awkward nonetheless as the city’s Department of Parks and Recreation must evaluate a business owned by a family to which Mr. Adams is seemingly indebted.
Mr. Adams, his spokeswoman said, has not discussed the bid with the parks agency, which she said will follow its standard procedure.
She also disputed that Mr. Adams, who has offered mild pushback on some of the most polarizing Trump administration actions, was indebted to the president. The mayor, who has maintained his innocence, has said he never discussed his case with Mr. Trump, and has repeatedly denied that he promised anything in exchange for dropping it.
Mr. Trump, who has played down the significance of the charges, has nonetheless denied having had anything to do with his Justice Department’s abandonment of the case.
For the president, any political gain from the case disappearing might be fleeting. The appearance of a backroom deal playing out in public has damaged the mayor’s re-election prospects, potentially limiting his usefulness to the president.
Moreover, the federal judge overseeing the case might not approve the Justice Department’s plan to revisit the charges after the mayoral race.
Paul D. Clement, a prominent lawyer who the judge tasked with offering an independent recommendation on the case, warned that the arrangement could give the impression that the Trump administration was threatening the mayor with the specter of a revived case.
It could create the appearance, Mr. Clement wrote, “that the actions of a public official are being driven by concerns about staying in the good graces of the federal executive, rather than the best interests of his constituents.”
The judge has already delayed Mr. Adams’s trial, once set for April. Mr. Clement recommended that the judge dismiss the case entirely.
Building a Connection
In late October, a month after he was indicted, the mayor held a briefing for reporters ahead of Mr. Trump’s election rally at Madison Square Garden. He was asked whether he agreed with other Democrats who had called the former president a fascist.
Mr. Adams, who a few years earlier had characterized Mr. Trump as a “complete embarrassment to our nation,” leaned forward, his hands clasped in front of him. “My answer is no,” he said, adding, “I think we could all dial down the temperature.”
Mr. Trump soon won the election, and returned to New York, and the Garden, for a victory lap. This time, the event was an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, where Mr. Adams approached the president-elect at his ringside seat, striking up a brief, friendly conversation.
Those episodes were early signs of compatibility between the two men. In subsequent months, they bonded over their views on immigration. Unlike other big city Democratic mayors, Mr. Adams has pledged to work with the president to target immigrants who have committed crimes, though local sanctuary laws have thus far prevented him from cooperating fully.
They also shared a sense of grievance against the justice system.
Last year, Mr. Trump became the first former and future president to be convicted of a crime and Mr. Adams became the first New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted.
Mr. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records related to a sex scandal. Federal prosecutors in Manhattan accused Mr. Adams of soliciting illegal foreign campaign donations and accepting thousands of dollars’ worth of travel benefits in exchange for helping Turkish officials open a new consulate building.
After Mr. Trump’s electoral victory, Mr. Adams began calling him, according to people with knowledge of the conversations. In an initial call, he congratulated Mr. Trump on his election victory and on subsequent calls discussed city business, though the people declined to elaborate on the business that was discussed. Mr. Adams did not raise his case on the calls, the people said.
In December, as their connection strengthened, Mr. Trump told reporters he would consider pardoning Mr. Adams, contending that the mayor had been treated “pretty unfairly” by federal prosecutors.
Asked about the president-elect’s comments at the time, Mr. Adams deferred to his legal team, saying, “I have an attorney that is going to look at every avenue to ensure I get justice.”
Soon after, Mr. Adams’s defense team learned of a troubling development. According to court filings, a “credible source” on Dec. 22 told Mr. Adams’s lawyer Alex Spiro that a grand jury was hearing testimony related to a potential new charge.
Around this time, Mr. Adams appears to have stepped up his outreach to Mr. Trump’s circle of supporters. That included turning to Mr. Bannon — a hard-right provocateur who was hardly a natural touch point for a Democratic mayor. But Mr. Bannon, too, had once faced charges brought by the Manhattan federal prosecutors’ office, and he had been represented by Mr. Spiro.
Weeks before the inauguration, after Mr. Spiro helped to connect them, the mayor met with Mr. Bannon at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue, according to people with knowledge of the encounter. Mr. Adams did not mention his case, one of the people said, but they discussed a potential mayoral primary against former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.
“The mayor did not do anything differently than mayors do during administration changes,” Mr. Spiro said in an emailed statement.
Mr. Adams had other meetings with people in Mr. Trump’s orbit.
A person with knowledge of the matter said that Mr. Carone, the mayor’s political problem-solver, contacted Bruce Blakeman, a Republican and the Nassau County executive. Mr. Adams and Mr. Blakeman then dined together on Long Island in mid-January, after which the mayor said the two men had discussed “the issue of violent gangs in our region.”
In a statement, a spokesman for Mr. Blakeman declined to discuss the specifics of the conversation, saying only that the men “from time to time discuss matters of regional interest.”
As the inauguration approached, the president-elect was not the only Trump family member to receive a call from the mayor. Mr. Adams also contacted Eric Trump, people with knowledge of the previously unreported call said.
It is unclear what they discussed beyond pleasantries, though the people said that Mr. Adams’s case did not come up.
The friendly call reflected a contrast with the Trump Organization’s relationship with the previous mayor, Bill de Blasio. He had sought to oust the company from its Ferry Point golf course — operated on city land in the Bronx — in the aftermath of Trump supporters’ storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
But in 2022, with Mr. Adams as mayor and Mr. Carone as his chief of staff, the city made two decisions about Ferry Point that were favorable for the Trumps.
It did not appeal a court ruling that allowed the Trump Organization to keep Ferry Point, and it approved the Trumps to host a Saudi Arabia-backed women’s golf tournament there.
Eric Trump later called Mr. Carone to express his appreciation, according to people with knowledge of the previously unreported call. Though Mr. Carone left the Adams administration by early 2023, he and Eric Trump periodically stayed in touch.
Less than a week before the presidential inauguration, Mr. Carone called Eric Trump to arrange the meeting between the mayor and the president-elect.
The younger Trump explained that he was not a formal member of his father’s political operation, but nonetheless offered to connect Mr. Carone with a scheduler for the president-elect.
By the end of that week, Mr. Adams was on his way to Florida.
A Crucial Lunch
The Trump International Golf Club West Palm Beach, the first golf course Mr. Trump acquired, is a sprawling property nestled between an airport and the ocean.
Mr. Adams and Mr. Carone arrived in time for lunch, on a cool day after Mr. Trump had finished a round of golf. Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real estate developer now serving as special envoy to the Middle East, was there, as was Eric Trump. The mayor did not bring any other city officials.
The group huddled in a roped-off corner of the dining room. They discussed the recently signed cease-fire agreement between Israel and Hamas — Mr. Witkoff had played a role in the negotiations — and areas where the Trump and Adams administrations might work together.
“To be clear, we did not discuss my legal case,” Mr. Adams said in a statement afterward. He said he had discussed the city’s priorities, adding, “I strongly believe there is much our city and the federal government can partner on to make New York City safer, stronger and more affordable.”
Three days later, Mr. Adams said he had received a last-minute invitation to the presidential inauguration from Mr. Witkoff, which he accepted “on behalf of New York City.”
Mr. Adams’s lawyers seized the momentum.
Soon after the inauguration, they sent a letter to the top White House lawyer to request that Mr. Trump pardon the mayor. And while the White House did not respond, the acting deputy attorney general, Emil Bove III, one of Mr. Trump’s former criminal defense lawyers, soon reached out to discuss potentially dropping the case.
‘He Was Always Supportive’
Mr. Adams was not the only one who wanted something.
The Trump administration sought the mayor’s support for an immigration crackdown.
And the Trump Organization wants the city’s blessing to regain control of the Wollman ice rink in Central Park, a chance to restore his name to a hometown landmark.
Wollman is a city-owned property that Mr. Trump helped refurbish in 1986 and wove into his public image as a master builder. The Trump Organization operated the rink for years, but the de Blasio administration moved to expel the company after the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. The Trump contract expired, and a new operator took over later that year.
The current contract expires in 2027, so the city parks agency last year solicited bids on a new 20-year deal to operate the rink. The Trump Organization and the existing operator of the rink — a consortium that includes the real estate giant Related Companies — submitted bids that the city is now evaluating, people with knowledge of the matter said.
In a statement, the parks agency said it was “currently reviewing all proposals consistent with its procedures and the terms of the solicitation.”
Even if the Trump Organization loses out on the rink, it owns several properties in the city and must interact with city agencies. As such, Trump Organization executives have privately discussed wanting to maintain friendly ties with Mr. Adams, whose term as mayor will continue through the end of the year even if he loses the Democratic primary in June.
In a radio interview last month, Eric Trump expressed his appreciation for Mr. Adams, comparing him positively with Mr. de Blasio.
“He never tried to throw our company out in New York,” Mr. Trump said of Mr. Adams. “He was always supportive of everything that we did.”
Eric Trump also argued that prosecutors had railroaded Mr. Adams after he criticized the Biden administration’s immigration policies. (In fact, the investigation into Mr. Adams began more than a year before his dispute with Mr. Biden.)
Five days after the radio interview, Mr. Bove ordered the Manhattan federal prosecutors to seek a dismissal of their case against Mr. Adams. The directive led to the resignations of at least eight prosecutors in New York and Washington, including the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, Danielle Sassoon.
Politics
House Democrats to hold 'Day of Action' to push back against GOP-backed spending bill

House Democrats will hold a “Day of Action” across the country on Tuesday to “aggressively” push back against the “diabolical Republican scheme to enact the largest Medicaid cut in our nation’s history” after Congress passed a spending bill to avert a government shutdown.
The Senate voted 54-46 on Friday to pass the stopgap spending bill, with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., as the only Republican to oppose the measure. Nearly all Democrat senators opposed it, but Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., and Independent Sen. Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats, voted to pass the bill.
Earlier in the week, the GOP-controlled House passed the short-term bill, otherwise known as a continuing resolution, which will keep spending levels the same as fiscal year 2024 until Oct. 1.
SHUTDOWN AVERTED AFTER SCHUMER CAVES AND BACKS TRUMP SPENDING BILL
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., speaks during a news conference at the Capitol, in Washington, Thursday, March 6, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
If a spending bill was not passed by the Friday deadline, the government would have entered into a partial shutdown. President Donald Trump backed the bill and urged lawmakers to pass it.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said that the bill “is an attack on veterans, families, seniors and everyday Americans.”
“The ongoing Republican assault on the economy, healthcare, the social safety net and veterans benefits requires all of us working together in the weeks and months to come,” he said in a statement. “Donald Trump’s disingenuous and nakedly superficial effort to divide us will not succeed.”
CHUCK SCHUMER WILL VOTE TO KEEP GOVERNMENT OPEN: ‘FOR DONALD TRUMP, A SHUTDOWN WOULD BE A GIFT’

Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, speaks during a news conference at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2025. (Tierney L. Cross/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Jeffries said House Democrats will hold a “Day of Action” throughout America on Tuesday to “aggressively push back against the diabolical Republican scheme to enact the largest Medicaid cut in our nation’s history,” adding: “We will partner with our colleagues at every level of government to protect the American people.”
Democrats in the House and the Senate, as well as governors, local elected officials, unions, civil rights organizations, democracy reform groups and concerned citizens all have an important role to play, Jeffries said.
“Our party is not a cult, we are a coalition,” he said. “On occasion, we may strongly disagree about a particular course of action. At all times, Democrats throughout the nation remain determined to make life better for everyday Americans and stop the damage being done by Donald Trump, Elon Musk and House Republicans.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., speaks during a news conference. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
The Senate’s vote on Friday to pass the six-month continuing resolution came after a procedural vote earlier in the day in which enough Democrats, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., helped Republicans overcome the filibuster and move forward with the stopgap spending bill.
Jeffries has refused to answer questions about whether he had confidence in Schumer after the senator helped advance the Republican-backed legislation.
Fox News’ Julia Johnson contributed to this report.
Politics
Legal experts pan Trump's Supreme Court appeal on birthright citizenship

WASHINGTON — Trump administration lawyers sent the Supreme Court an emergency appeal this week with a “modest” procedural request, not to uphold new limits on birthright citizenship but rather to narrow the scope of rulings that blocked the limits from taking effect.
It’s a move that surprised and puzzled many legal experts.
They questioned the practicality and the fairness of having a citizenship rule that applied at least temporarily in some parts of the country but not others.
“This is a terrible case to raise this issue,” said University of Virginia law professor Amanda Frost. “Without a nationwide injunction, it would be chaos.”
She said pregnant women might have to cross state borders to ensure their babies were registered as citizens at birth. Judges might have to decide case by case on whether those birth registrations are proper.
Shortly after President Trump issued his executive order proposing to end birthright citizenship, three judges — in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state — declared the change unconstitutional nationwide. They ruled in cases brought on behalf of 22 states, including California, and several groups that represent immigrants.
“If ever a universal injunction makes sense, it’s in a case like this,” George Mason University saw professor Ilya Somin wrote in a blog post. “Nationwide lawbreaking by the federal government requires a nationwide remedy. And that’s especially true if the illegality affects the rights of large numbers of people, many of whom could not easily or quickly bring individual suits to challenge it.”
But Trump administration lawyers argued that district judges should not be allowed to issue rulings that apply nationwide. And they said the court should act now to rein in these judges.
If the justices were to agree, it could deny citizenship in much of the nation to children whose mothers were in the country without legal status.
“Years of experience have shown that the Executive Branch cannot properly perform its functions if any judge anywhere can enjoin every presidential action everywhere,” wrote acting Solicitor Gen. Sarah M. Harris. “The sooner universal injunctions are eliminated root and branch, the better.”
The justices, however, signaled they are not ready to move quickly. They set April 4 as a deadline for responses from the lawyers who won the rulings blocking Trump’s order on birthright citizenship.
In recent years, several justices have questioned the power of a single judge to hand down a ruling that applies nationwide.
Sometimes judges seek to “govern the whole nation from their courtrooms,” Justice Neil M. Gorsuch said last year.
Democrats complained when judges in Texas and Louisiana issued nationwide rulings to block Biden administration regulations.
Two years ago, a conservative judge in Amarillo, Texas, ordered a nationwide ban on abortion pills. The Supreme Court blocked his order and then overturned it entirely on the grounds that the antiabortion plaintiffs did not have standing to sue.
During Trump’s first term, Republicans complained when judges in San Francisco and New York blocked his regulations including the travel ban that halted visitors from several Muslim-majority counties.
Harris said the problem has grown worse.
“Universal injunctions have reached epidemic proportions since the start of the current Administration,” she wrote. “District courts have issued more universal injunctions and [temporary restraining orders] during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration.”
Much of the difference may be due to the unusual number of far-reaching executive orders issued in Trump’s first weeks in office.
This week’s appeals do not ask the court to weigh in on the underlying dispute over the meaning of the 14th Amendment adopted after the Civil War. It says, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside.”
That rule of citizenship based on birth has been well-established and not seriously questioned in the courts.
But Trump and his supporters assert that some authors of the 14th Amendment did not think it extended to children born of women who are in the country temporarily.
Trump’s executive order, if it becomes law, would make two changes. It would deny citizenship to a child if the “person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States” and the father was not a U.S. citizen or a lawful permanent resident or if the mother was in the country legally but temporarily, such as on a student or tourist visa.
The administration’s appeal could allow those changes to take effect in a large part of the country.
But if the justices are not ready to uphold those changes, Harris proposed a fallback option.
The justices, she wrote, “at a minimum” should make clear the administration may develop and issue “guidance explaining how they would implement the Citizenship Order in the event that it takes effect.”
-
Politics1 week ago
EXCLUSIVE: Elon Musk PAC thanks Trump for 'saving the American Dream' in new million-dollar ad
-
News7 days ago
Gene Hackman Lost His Wife and Caregiver, and Spent 7 Days Alone
-
Politics7 days ago
Republicans demand Trump cut American legal association out of nominee process
-
Politics1 week ago
Agriculture secretary cancels $600K grant for study on menstrual cycles in transgender men
-
News7 days ago
States sue Trump administration over mass firings of federal employees
-
Movie Reviews1 week ago
‘Black Bag’ Review: Cate Blanchett and Michael Fassbender Cozy Up in Steven Soderbergh’s Snazzy Spy Thriller
-
News1 week ago
Who Paid for Trump’s Transition to Power? The Donors Are Still Unknown.
-
News1 week ago
Trump Seeks to Bar Student Loan Relief to Workers Aiding Migrants and Trans Kids