Connect with us

Politics

Newsom scales back some special pandemic rules, but not California’s state of emergency

Published

on

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday rescinded a slate of COVID-19-related govt orders in response to indicators of a subsiding pandemic, however didn’t finish California’s almost two-year-long state of emergency regardless of criticism from Republican lawmakers that he not wants its immense govt powers.

The governor’s workplace summarized 19 provisions in govt orders that can be instantly terminated, which included necessities that every one state-owned properties be made obtainable for emergency use and state companies to determine amenities for housing and medical therapy.

One other 18 provisions will expire on the finish of March, together with people who defend COVID-19 reduction funds from garnishment and permit for digital company and public conferences, in accordance with Newsom’s workplace. Further govt orders that restrict legal responsibility for knowledge breaches on telemedicine platforms and permit video assessments for these with COVID-19 signs who obtain in-home supportive care can be rescinded on June 30.

Advertisement

Newsom administration officers mentioned California’s COVID-19 state of emergency wants to remain in place, nonetheless, as a result of it’s essential to proceed the state’s COVID response. Utilizing that broad authority, the Democratic governor waived statutes and legal guidelines to permit testing and vaccination packages and to make sure that California had sufficient capability in hospitals to deal with one other surge in instances.

“Many people know households, communities, people who benefited, perhaps had their life saved, as a result of these provisions have been in place up till this level,” mentioned Mark Ghaly, secretary of the California Well being and Human Providers Company. “It isn’t by chance or mistake that California has one of many lowest dying charges of a giant state.”

Since he declared a state of emergency on March 4, 2020, Newsom has issued 70 govt orders involving the COVID-19 pandemic that addressed a spread of points, together with worth gouging, halting evictions and suspending the deadline for submitting tax returns in 2020. The overwhelming majority of these have both been rescinded or have expired.

Beneath the 1970 California Emergency Providers Act, the governor has broad authority to reply throughout a state of emergency resembling a pandemic. The governor can “make, amend, and rescind” state rules and droop state statutes and has the ability to redirect state funds to assist in an emergency — even funds appropriated by the California Legislature for a wholly totally different objective. The governor additionally has the authority to commandeer non-public property, together with hospitals, medical labs, lodges and motels.

The California Supreme Courtroom in 2021 upheld an appeals courtroom ruling that affirmed Newsom’s emergency powers. Two state Republican lawmakers had challenged Newsom’s energy, arguing he had no proper to problem an govt order requiring ballots to be mailed to the state’s 22 million registered voters earlier than the Nov. 3, 2020, election.

Advertisement

The excessive courtroom dominated the regulation was constitutional as a result of it required the governor to terminate a declared state of emergency as quickly as attainable and in addition permits the Legislature to finish it by passing a joint decision.

For greater than a yr, GOP lawmakers have been pushing for the Democratic-controlled Legislature to take motion. Nevertheless, it wasn’t till final week that Senate President Professional Tem Toni Atkins (D-San Diego) agreed to carry a listening to on the proposal, now scheduled for March 15.

“I believe it’s outrageous that he would acknowledge that these govt orders can expire however that his claimed prerogative to rule the state by decree will stay in impact. The Emergency Providers Act may be very clear that the governor should terminate the emergency on the earliest attainable date that circumstances warrant,” mentioned Assemblyman Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), who sponsored a invoice in his chamber to finish the emergency.

Ann Patterson, the governor’s authorized affairs secretary, mentioned rescinding the state of emergency would “cripple” California’s response to the pandemic.

Patterson additionally mentioned that every one state masks and vaccine mandates, together with these for schoolchildren and healthcare employees, had been enacted below the state well being and security code. Even when the state of emergency ends, these mandates would stay in place till rescinded by the state’s high public well being officer.

Advertisement

Beneath Newsom’s govt powers that can stay in place, the state will proceed to largely waive licensing necessities for healthcare amenities, employees and testing labs — actions designed to spice up the state’s vaccination and testing capability and increase the scope of apply for pharmacists, technicians and EMS employees. Pharmacies are allowed to offer testing and vaccinations and cellular vaccination clinics are permitted.

Patterson famous that declared states of emergency stay in impact for disasters that struck years in the past, together with the lethal Camp fireplace in 2018 that decimated the Northern California city of Paradise. A 2015 emergency declared by then-Gov. Jerry Brown over tree morbidity in California’s forests additionally stays in impact, she mentioned. These emergencies give the administration extra flexibility to restore injury, scale back threats and permit communities to rebuild, she mentioned.

“The emergency isn’t over when the bottom stops shaking. It’s not over when the fireplace is put out. It’s not even over after we’ve offered instant medical consideration or safe broken bridges after an earthquake,” Patterson mentioned. “The results of a catastrophe can proceed for years.”

Patterson mentioned Newsom has confirmed to be very considered when exercising his emergency powers through the pandemic. With the actions introduced Friday, the governor’s workplace mentioned solely 30 of 561 govt order provisions associated to the pandemic will stay in place by this summer season.

Nevertheless, till the state of emergency ends, Newsom will retain his expanded emergency powers — together with the authority to vary legal guidelines, reappropriate funds with out legislative approval and enter into no-bid contracts.

Advertisement

Within the first months of the pandemic, Newsom got here below fireplace for a secretive $1-billion masks deal his administration signed in 2020 with BYD, a Chinese language electrical automobile producer that had been ramping up its political presence in California in recent times. The contract was saved below seal for weeks, prompting bipartisan issues from lawmakers.

Final yr, Newsom introduced in Blue Defend of California to supervise the state’s distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, prompting objections from county officers and questions on preferential therapy of a longtime donor to the governor.

Critics have argued that lots of the no-bid contracts awarded below Newsom’s emergency powers have gone to corporations which have donated thousands and thousands to the governor or on his behalf by behested funds, which they are saying creates the looks of a pay-to-play system.

Senate Republican chief Scott Wilk (R-Santa Clarita) launched a invoice this week that might prohibit a state company from awarding no-bid contracts to corporations which have made a charitable donation on behalf of the governor within the yr main as much as the reward.

“I’m deeply involved concerning the growing use of huge no-bid contracts,” Wilk mentioned in a press release.

Advertisement

Occasions employees author Melody Gutierrez contributed to this report.

Politics

Youngkin vetoes slew of Virginia bills, including contraception access measure

Published

on

Youngkin vetoes slew of Virginia bills, including contraception access measure

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed several bills late Friday from the final batch of the year’s regular legislative session, including legislation that focuses on protecting access to contraceptives, as well as a measure that would have allowed small businesses to host skill games, which are similar to slot machines.

The vetoes came after Youngkin, a Republican, first proposed amendments that the legislature rejected. In a nighttime statement, he said he was willing to keep working with the Democratic-controlled General Assembly on the issues but was vetoing measures that were “not ready to become law.”

In total, Youngkin signed seven bills into law and vetoed 48, including the Right to Contraception Act, which was approved by the Democrat-controlled Virginia Senate and House of Delegates. 

“I support access to contraception. However, we cannot trample on the religious freedoms of Virginians,” Younkin said in a statement, adding that access to contraception is already protected under the Constitution. 

PROTECTION OF CONTRACEPTION ACCESS ADVANCES IN VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

Advertisement

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed several bills late Friday from the final batch of the year’s regular legislative session, including legislation that focuses on protecting access to contraceptives, as well as a measure that would have allowed small businesses to host skill games, which are similar to slot machines. (AP Photo/Steve HelbeR)

The bill defined contraception, prevented any restrictions and established enforcement by civil penalty, according to WRC-TV. Instead of signing the bill. Youngkin already sent back a substitute measure that was not a new law but a policy statement that Virginians have a right to access contraception under current Supreme Court precedents. But his motion expired, and the original bill was sent back to the governor, which he then vetoed.

“Quality health care for women is essential and contraception remains a crucial component of reducing abortions and fostering a culture of life, making Virginia the best place to raise a family.  As the issue continues to be deliberated by the Legislature, and recognizing the diverse religious, ethical, and moral beliefs of Virginians, any contraception-related changes must be coupled with robust conscience clause protections for providers and also must uphold the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning their children’s upbringing and care.”

woman taking birth control pill

Close-up of a woman’s hand holding birth control pills. (iStock)

He said that the measure created an “overly broad cause of action against political subdivisions and parents, as well as medical professionals acting in their expert judgment and within their scope of practice.”

VIRGINIA DEMS ADVANCE BILL THROUGH SENATE TO PROVIDE TAXPAYER-BACKED HEALTH INSURANCE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS

Advertisement

Younkin also said the bill fails to include adequate conscience clause protections for providers and also undermines the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning their children’s upbringing and care.

Democrats criticized the veto, with state party chair Susan Swecker saying in a statement, “Youngkin just proved to Virginians that once again, he does not care about their health or rights.”

Youngkin-Budget

In total, Youngkin signed seven bills into law and vetoed 48.

Youngkin’s veto of the skill games measure, one of the year’s most contentious issues, was widely expected. The governor sought to overhaul the bill that was sent to him, but the Legislature overwhelmingly rejected his changes. Youngkin wanted a higher tax rate and far stricter limits on where the machines could be located, carving out a 35-mile radius around any casino, racetrack or gambling “satellite facility” where they would have been banned.

The governor also vetoed a measure that would have eliminated both a recordation and a property tax exemption for the United Daughters of the Confederacy, the Richmond-based women’s group that helped erect many of the country’s Confederate monuments. Proponents have argued that the group’s priorities were out of line with 21st century values.

Advertisement

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Continue Reading

Politics

Gavin Newsom, during his speech at the Vatican on climate change, accuses Trump of 'open corruption'

Published

on

Gavin Newsom, during his speech at the Vatican on climate change, accuses Trump of 'open corruption'

Gov. Gavin Newsom accused former President Trump of “open corruption” in a speech Thursday at a climate summit of Catholic officials and international leaders, elevating his criticism of the Republican leader in the hallowed halls of the Vatican.

The California governor referenced news stories alleging that Trump recently solicited campaign donations from oil executives and at the same event vowed to walk back climate protections if elected in the 2024 presidential contest.

“He openly asked them for $1 billion to roll back the environmental progress of the Biden administration, environmental progress that we’ve made over the course of the last half century,” Newsom said. “Open corruption. A billion dollars to pollute our states, to pollute our country, and to pollute this planet and roll back progress.”

The governor spoke at a three-day “From Climate Crisis to Climate Resilience” summit organized by the Pontifical Academy of Sciences.

Advertisement

Newsom said he decided to call out Trump by name at the international gathering of governors, mayors and policy experts because he felt stories about Trump’s meeting with oil executives didn’t get enough attention.

“It’s an expression of my sincerity about how serious I take this moment and how consequential it is,” the governor said about the possible negative effects on climate change if Trump returns to the White House.

His comments were also strategic. Climate change isn’t necessarily driving American Catholics to the polls, but drawing attention to an accusation of pay-to-play political corruption might resonate more with Pope Francis’ supporters in the U.S. More than 50 million Americans identify as Catholic.

Newsom’s appearance is likely to elevate his position as a climate leader on a world stage.

Gov. Gavin Newsom attends the “From Climate Crisis to Climate Resilience” summit.

Advertisement

(Gregorio Borgia / Associated Press)

With temperatures and carbon emissions rising worldwide, the aim of the conference is for local and state governments to share best practices about fighting climate change and adapting to hotter temperatures, rising seas and a more volatile environment.

Parts of Newsom’s talk matched the tenor of a critique of the oil industry he delivered last fall at the United Nations Climate Ambition Summit in New York.

“It’s because of the burning of gas, the burning of coal, the burning of oil,” Newsom said at the Vatican. “We have the tools. We have the technology. We have the capacity to address the issue at a global scale and they’ve been fighting every single advancement and we have got to call that out.”

Advertisement

Bob Salladay, Newsom’s top communications advisor, said his candid assessment earlier in New York of the industry, which he said was playing everyone for fools, caught the attention of the Vatican and is one of the reasons he was invited to speak at the climate summit.

The setting of his speech, in a carpeted auditorium at the Vatican that typically houses gatherings of bishops, drew a stark contrast to the marbled floors and renaissance murals that lined the walls and ceilings of Clementine Hall, where Newsom spoke with Pope Francis on Thursday morning.

In an address to government leaders and climate scientists in Clementine Hall, Pope Francis cast the destruction of the environment as an offense against God.

“This is the question: Are we working for a culture of life or for a culture of death?” Pope Francis said.

Newsom and his wife, First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom, sat in the second row of the audience in an Apostolic Palace near St. Peter’s Basilica.

Advertisement

A pope’s body is placed in the hall for private visitation upon his death. It’s also the same room that former President Obama visited in 2009.

 New York's Gov. Kathy Hochul greets Pope Francis.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul greets Pope Francis on Thursday in Vatican City.

(Riccardo De Luca / Associated Press)

Pope Francis called the refusal to protect the most vulnerable who are exposed to climate change caused by human activity a “grave violation of human rights.”

He said around 1 billion people in wealthier nations “produce more than half the heat trapping pollutants” of the world. Poorer people, he said, contribute less than 10% and suffer 75% of the resulting damage.

Advertisement

Pope Francis also took a shot at fossil fuel companies.

“An orderly progress is being held back by the greedy pursuit of short-term gains by polluting industries and by the spread of disinformation, which generates confusion and obstructs collective efforts for a change in course,” Francis said.

The governor called the pope’s address “remarkable.”

“I knew what I was going to say already, but he said it before I said it,” Newsom said.

After Francis’ speech, Newsom and Siebel Newsom walked along an aisle of ornate stone tiles to the front of the room, where the governor briefly spoke with the leader of the Catholic Church. The governor said the pope commended his administration’s work on the death penalty.

Advertisement

The governor said he was struck by the pope’s support for what Newsom described as a difficult decision to issue a moratorium on the death penalty and close California’s execution chambers in 2019.

At the time, more than 700 people were on death row. Newsom met with families of some of the victims who had been killed by the inmates.

“It was nice that he brought up the issue and thanked California for the direction we’re going,” Newsom said.

Newsom’s action ran counter to the expressed will of California voters, who over the previous six years had rejected two statewide ballot measures to repeal the death penalty.

A procession of attendees also greeted the pope, who took time to shake hands with every person in the room.

Advertisement

The pope signed a planetary compact after his speech, which Newsom and other government leaders also signed Thursday.

Wade Crowfoot, California’s Natural Resources secretary, described the compact as an unprecedented agreement among international governors, mayors, Indigenous leaders and scientists to work together to confront climate change with a focus on resiliency and equity.

Crowfoot and Lauren Sanchez, Newsom’s top climate advisor, also participated in hours of meetings at the conference on Wednesday.

Newsom is hosting a state climate summit in Southern California this fall as a continuation of the work at the Vatican conference. The state will be inviting local leaders and experts from California.

“We’re taking the torch of subnational leadership back to California, where it belongs, to convene scientists, local governments and leaders to tackle the climate threat that is the existential crisis of our time,” Sanchez said.

Advertisement

Some environmentalists in California said Newsom’s rhetoric on the global stage is not entirely matched by his actions at home. Though Newsom has championed many environmental measures and has waged a battle with oil companies as governor, he proposed cutting $3.6 billion for climate-related programs to help address the state budget deficit.

Susan Stephenson, executive director of a religious environmental advocacy organization called Interfaith Power and Light, took issue with a recent decision by Newsom’s appointees on the California Public Utilities Commission that she said would slow the use of rooftop solar power.

“He’s saying a lot of the right things,” Stephenson said. “And it is not matched by the urgency of action that we need as climate change is worsening.”

Newsom has also received criticism from some Republicans for traveling abroad instead of staying home to focus exclusively on California’s problems.

That was not the sentiment of a Democratic couple from Riverside who saw Newsom and his wife on a tour of the Roman Forum after the speech. They said they were surprised to see the governor in Rome.

Advertisement

Walter and Susan Davis said they believe in climate change and support the governor coming to deliver the speech, which they called “a real reason.”

“That’s what I’m talking about,” Walter Davis said.

Times Sacramento Bureau Chief Laurel Rosenhall contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump predicts 'jacked up' Biden at upcoming debates, blasts Bidenomics in battleground speech

Published

on

Trump predicts 'jacked up' Biden at upcoming debates, blasts Bidenomics in battleground speech

It’s been more than 50 years since a Republican won Minnesota in a presidential election, but former President Trump says he’s got “a really good shot” of breaking the losing streak this November in his 2024 rematch with President Biden.

The former president is in the historically reliable blue state Friday evening to headline the Minnesota GOP’s annual Lincoln Reagan fundraising dinner. He began his speech with the usual jabs at Biden’s cognitive ability, but also referenced the recently agreed to debates between the two.

“He’s going to be so jacked up for those, you watch,” Trump joked, later saying he was going to “demand a drug test” for Biden before the debate.

BIDEN CAMPAIGN HIGH ON DOJ’S MARIJUANA SHIFT, ‘SMOKES’ TRUMP FOR INACTION DURING HIS TERM

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump attends the annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner hosted by the Minnesota Republican party on May 17, 2024 in St. Paul, Minnesota.  (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Advertisement

He went on to promise a rollback of Biden’s environmental mandates relating to automakers, railed against the sour economic statistics under Biden, and vowed to fix the ongoing border crisis.

Trump also blasted Biden’s habit of repeating false stories concerning his life experiences. “He’s so full of s–t,” Trump said as the crowd laughed.

Trump lost Minnesota by just 1½ points in his 2016 presidential election victory over Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. Four years ago, he lost the state to President Biden by more than seven points in his unsuccessful re-election campaign.

Ahead of the 2020 election, Trump promised a victory in Minnesota, saying that if he lost, “I’m never coming back.”

FIRST ON FOX: TOP JEWISH GOP GROUP STEPS UP FUNDRAISING FOR TRUMP AMID ANTI-ISRAEL COLLEGE CAMPUS PROTESTS 

Advertisement
Trump Minnesota

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump speaks at the annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner hosted by the Minnesota Republican party on May 17, 2024 in St. Paul, Minnesota.  (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

Fast-forward four years and Trump is back and once again predicting a victory.

“We think we have a really good shot at Minnesota,” Trump emphasized in an interview Wednesday with KSTP, a local TV station in the Twin Cities of Minneapolis and Saint Paul. “We have great friendships up there.”

Trump added that he’s “worked hard on Minnesota” and that “Tom Emmer is very much involved,” pointing to the House majority whip.

Emmer, who is joining Trump at the state GOP gala, is chairing the Trump campaign in Minnesota even though the former president and his allies helped sink Emmer’s bid last autumn to become House speaker.

As the Trump and Biden campaigns prepare for battle in seven crucial swing states that decided the 2020 election (Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, which were narrowly won by Biden, and North Carolina, which Trump carried by a razor-thin margin) and will likely once again in the 2024 rematch, both campaigns see opportunities to expand the map.

Advertisement

WARNING SIGNS FOR TRUMP, BIDEN, AS THEY CAREEN TOWARD DEBATES 

Two weekends ago at a closed-door Republican National Committee retreat for top-dollar donors  at a resort in Palm Beach, Florida, senior Trump campaign advisers Susie Wiles and Chris LaCivita and veteran pollster Tony Fabrizio spotlighted internal surveys that suggested both “Minnesota and Virginia are clearly in play.”

“In both states, Trump finds himself in positions to flip key electoral votes in his favor,” the survey, which was shared with Fox News, emphasizes. 

Trump Minnesota

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump attends the annual Lincoln Reagan Dinner hosted by the Minnesota Republican party on May 17, 2024 in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)

And both states have sizable populations of rural white voters without college degrees who disproportionately support the former president.

Biden’s campaign disagrees that either Minnesota or Virginia are up for grabs.

Advertisement

While noting they are “not taking any state or any vote for granted,” Biden campaign battleground states director Dan Kanninen told reporters last week “we don’t see polls that are six or seven months out from a general election, head-to-head numbers certainly, as any more predictive than a weather report is six or seven months out.”

Kanninen highlighted that the campaign has teams on the ground in both states engaging voters.

“We feel strongly the Biden-Harris coalition in both Minnesota and Virginia, which has been strong in the midterms and off-year elections, will continue to be strong for us in the fall of 2024,” he added.

And Biden campaign spokesperson Lauren Hitt, pointing to the president’s current fundraising dominance and ground-game advantage in the key battlegrounds, argued “Trump’s team has so little campaign or infrastructure to speak of they’re resorting to leaking memos that say ‘the polls we paid for show us winning.’” 

But Democratic Rep. Dean Phillips of Minnesota, who launched a long-shot and unsuccessful primary challenge against the president, insists “Minnesota’s in play.”

Advertisement

Phillips, in an interview this week on Fox News’ “Special Edition,” argued Minnesota’s “like a lot of states that I think a lot of my fellow Democrats don’t want to confess is the reality. … I’m telling my Democratic colleagues who are supporting President Biden, myself included, that there’s a lot of work to do.”

While Trump’s campaign looks for opportunities to expand the map in Minnesota and Virginia, Biden’s campaign appears to be eyeing swing state North Carolina and Florida. 

Trump carried the Sunshine State by less than four points in 2020, but two years ago, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis and GOP Sen. Marco Rubio each won re-election by nearly 20 points.

LaCivita argued the Biden campaign was playing “a faux game” in both states but insisted Trump has a “real opportunity in expanding the map in Virginia and Minnesota.”

Advertisement

Trump’s stop in Minnesota comes a week after he held a large rally in Wildwood, New Jersey, a red bastion in an overwhelming blue state where no Republican has carried the state in a presidential election in over three decades. Trump lost the state to Biden by 16 points four years ago.

“We’re going to win New Jersey,” Trump vowed at the rally.

Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending