Connect with us

Politics

Homeless people in the Governor’s Manson? From “STOOPID” to “Hell, yes,” readers responded

Published

on

Homeless people in the Governor’s Manson? From “STOOPID” to “Hell, yes,” readers responded

A number of weeks in the past, I wrote a column suggesting that homeless households transfer into the empty governor’s mansion in Sacramento.

I puzzled what others would consider the concept, so I hooked up a survey to the story, and oh, readers, you weren’t shy in your opinions. Loads of you thought it was a horrible concept, nevertheless it was those who didn’t who shocked me probably the most.

Two responses stood out.

The grandson of former California Gov. Goodwin “Goodie” Knight, Jonathan Weedman, was unequivocally in favor of repurposing a home that has “particular that means” for his household.

Advertisement

“Hell, sure,” stated Weedman. “Flip the mansion right into a facility that may assist.”

Weedman’s mother and father, Carolyn Knight and Charles Weedman, had been married within the mansion in the summertime of 1955, slicing by way of a six-tiered cake and strolling down a white runner laid throughout the mansion’s ornate carpets. They divorced about 12 years later.

Carolyn was stunning, loving, caring and progressive. However she was additionally a “very fragile soul” who suffered from untreated psychological sickness, Weedman stated. She died by suicide when Weedman was 10 years outdated and he or she was 36, just a few years after the divorce, the defining occasion of his life and one which set him on a path of working for nonprofits in a bid to assist others.

Goodie Knight, who was governor from late 1953 to 1959, found his daughter’s physique in her storage a day after she died, and Weedman stated his grandfather by no means recovered. Two months later, Knight died of a stroke.

Carolyn Knight kisses her father, former California Gov. Goodwin Knight, at her 1955 wedding ceremony on the governor’s mansion in Sacramento.

Advertisement

(Jonathan Weedman)

Weedman stated for a very long time, his household didn’t discuss his mother’s loss of life brazenly, they however in the end determined talking out might assist others with psychological sickness and serves for example that mind illness occurs to folks from all backgrounds.

“If it provides anybody pause, a second of reflection — that somebody of their world could also be struggling — it’s completely value it,” he stated.

Weedman sees the locations the place psychological sickness intersects with homelessness and believes our responses to the twin crises must be artistic. He is aware of his mother would agree.

Advertisement

“If it’s empty, and unused, and uninhabited, what higher option to honor my grandfather, grandmother and oldsters’ reminiscences than to take this stunning outdated residence and switch it into a spot that may assist probably the most susceptible in our society?” he wrote.

In fact, there have been many individuals who introduced a unique outlook.

“You need to be out of your rattling thoughts to suppose housing homeless within the governor’s mansion is a good suggestion!” wrote Jackson Brown of Sign Hill (not the singer, who spells his final title with an “e”). “This isn’t the Soviet Union the place folks piled into communal housing. RIP widespread sense.”

Michael Peterson of Palm Springs recommended that concepts like mine are what earns California its repute for craziness.

“Nothing says ‘your state has failed’ higher than letting the governor’s mansion descend into homeless squalor,” Peterson stated, including, “I’m not a NIMBY.”

Advertisement

Patty Nash of Riverside puzzled about my mind after studying the column.

“For those who can’t determine the considerations it’s since you are STOOOPID,” she wrote. “Most of those persons are there due to their long run decisions.”

Many voiced considerations like Nash’s concerning the suitability of at present homeless folks dwelling in a grand home — believing that almost all of these on the streets mentally in poor health or hooked on medicine or alcohol, and might’t be trusted to correctly look after such a house.

“Druggie bums would destroy it,” predicted Robert Value of Atascadero.

In truth, about 40,000 out of California’s 160,000 unsheltered persons are mentally in poor health, with about 10% of these having extreme psychological sickness. However these with extreme psychological sickness, or the addictions that always accompany it, are sometimes probably the most seen and troubling. Some who wrote in have lived expertise in the case of coping with that 10%, and raised relatable considerations.

Advertisement

Sara from Lakewood (who requested that her final title not be used) stated that she lived subsequent door to an deserted constructing that homeless folks took over. “They left big piles of trash within the yard and triggered a rat infestation,” she stated. “They acquired into horrific and violent fights in the course of the night time.” All of it got here crashing down, actually, when the constructing caught on fireplace, threatening close by constructions.

Sara stated she believes we want extra shelters, however she doesn’t need that type of exercise close to her children, and truthfully, who does?

“The L.A. Occasions assaults folks for not wanting shelters of their neighborhoods, however refuses to acknowledge the the explanation why,” she wrote.

Truthful sufficient. Acknowledged.

Nobody deserves to reside in unsafe situations, and I completely agree that these in homeless housing have to be good neighbors — and that these working housing services want to verify their tenants perceive what that appears like.

Advertisement

However regardless of issues with the concept, actual and imagined, nearly all of the 200-plus individuals who responded didn’t oppose the notion. A number of even went all in with me, seeing it as an emblematic remark concerning the discrimination and stigma homeless folks face, a pushback on the sense that “the homeless” are a monolithic bloc too far gone to reside amongst civilized society. (A couple of respondent advocated for transport homeless folks to empty areas, from the Southwest desert to Lancaster.)

“It’s a cool symbolic gesture which might assist a few households. Why not?” stated Kevin Jensen of Bakersfield.

“It might make a strong assertion about our state’s dedication to addressing this disaster, in addition to being sensible,” stated Larelle Hendon of Santa Ana. “The basis explanation for NIMBYism is that we don’t see homeless folks as ‘one in all us.’ We don’t see that we’re all linked; that struggling by anybody is an issue for us all.”

Others linked with the concept of extra small-scale housing for homeless folks, bringing them into communities in single-family homes or different restricted settings that may give each the dignity of a house whereas calming neighborhood fears that always accompany bigger services.

“[T]he downside is the considered an enormous, industrialized shelter,” stated Andrea Bersaglieri from La Miranda. “Nobody needs that of their neighborhood! If there have been one home on every block or in every neighborhood it will be a sport changer. We actually would all be on this collectively.”

Advertisement

Jason Gonzalez, who lives within the Hollywood Hills, agreed with Bersaglieri.

“Everybody homeless has a unique scenario,” he wrote. “The possibility to fill a particular place with a particular household or particular person shouldn’t be wasted because of a pompous perspective concerning the [mansion].”

The exterior of the governor's mansion

The Outdated Governor’s Mansion State Historic Park is seen in Sacramento.

(Wealthy Pedroncelli/AP)

That brings me to the second response that struck me, and actually made my level higher than I ever might.

Advertisement

It got here from a 17-year-old named Joanna, who lives in Downey. She wrote that she grew up dwelling in “different folks’s properties as a result of my mom didn’t make a secure earnings for a cushty dwelling.” She thinks permitting households like hers — individuals who simply want a little bit assist, and a little bit safety — to reside within the governor’s mansion is a “nice” concept.

“My youthful self could be very pleased if my household was supplied to reside within the governor’s mansion as a result of my mom wouldn’t have to fret about discovering a short lived residence only for her children to really feel secure,” Joanna wrote.

I hope Joanna’s phrases kick you within the intestine. They hit me that means. She grew up so insecure about her housing, with all of the harm and hardship that brings, and but she thinks of the way it makes her mother really feel as an alternative of specializing in her personal expertise.

I’ve been overlaying homelessness for lots of years, and I’ve met as many individuals like Joanna as I’ve folks with extreme psychological sickness. For each particular person you see incoherent on the street, know that there’s a mother and her children parked someplace in a beat-up automobile, hoping nobody sees them, fearing they are going to be break up up if they’re discovered, determined to make it to the subsequent paycheck to hire a rundown room for just a few nights.

Or a dad, too ashamed to hunt assist as a result of he can’t determine make sufficient cash on his personal. Or a teenager, aged out of foster care with nowhere to go and nobody to assist, perhaps working from a home the place they weren’t accepted, or confronted hurt.

Advertisement

The one fixed I’ve realized is that there are 1,000,000 the explanation why persons are homeless, and none of them are easy. However most of them, someplace alongside the road, are about an individual who wanted assist, wanted somebody to see how their lives had been falling aside. Like Joanna’s mother and Carolyn Knight.

“All people deserves a house, however not everyone seems to be lucky sufficient to reside underneath a roof,” Joanna wrote, once more with the empathy. “I strongly consider that the governor’s mansion is of extra use to homeless folks than to the governor himself.”

Me too, Joanna. Could your future be secure, with a roof at all times over your head.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

Published

on

What is Evacuation Day? The forgotten holiday that predates Thanksgiving

When President Abraham Lincoln first proclaimed Thanksgiving a national holiday, little did he know he was spelling the beginning of the end to the prominence of the original patriotic celebration held during the last week of November: Evacuation Day.

In November 1863, Lincoln issued an order thanking God for harvest blessings, and by the 1940s, Congress had declared the 11th month of the calendar year’s fourth Thursday to be Thanksgiving Day.

That commemoration, though, combined with the gradual move toward détente with what is now the U.S.’ strongest ally – Great Britain – displaced the day Americans celebrated the last of the Redcoats fleeing their land.

Following the Declaration of Independence in Philadelphia in 1776, New York City, just 99 miles to the northeast, remained a British stronghold until the end of the Revolutionary War.

Captured Continentals were held aboard prison ships in New York Harbor and British political activity in the West was anchored in the Big Apple, according to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Advertisement

GEORGE WASHINGTON’S SACRED TRADITION

Gen. George Washington parades through Lower Manhattan on Evacuation Day on Nov. 25, 1783 (Library of Congress lithograph via Getty)

However, that all came crashing down on the crown after the Treaty of Paris was signed, and new “Americans” eagerly saw the British out of their hard-won home on Nov. 25, 1783.

In their haste to flee the U.S., the British took time to grease flagpoles that still flew the Union Jack. One prominent post was at Bennett Park – on present-day West 183 Street near the northern tip of Manhattan.

Undeterred, Sgt. John van Arsdale, a Revolution veteran, cobbled together cleats that allowed him to climb the slick pole and tear down the then-enemy flag. Van Arsdale replaced it with the Stars and Stripes – and without today’s skyscrapers in the way, the change of colors at the island’s highest point could be seen farther downtown.

Advertisement

In the harbor, a final blast from a British warship aimed for Staten Island, but missed a crowd that had assembled to watch the 6,000-man military begin its journey back across the Atlantic to King George III.

SYLVESTER STALLONE CALLS TRUMP ‘THE SECOND GEORGE WASHINGTON’

John_van_arsdale_evacuation_day_nyc

John Van Arsdale replaces the Union Jack with the American flag as the British evacuate New York on Nov. 25, 1783. (Getty)

Later that day, future President George Washington and New York Gov. George Clinton – who had negotiated “evacuation” with England’s Canadian Gov. Sir Guy Carleton – led a military march down Broadway through throngs of revelers to what would today be the Wall Street financial district at the other end of Manhattan.

Clinton hosted Washington for dinner and a “Farewell Toast” at nearby Fraunces’ Tavern, which houses a museum dedicated to the original U.S. holiday. Samuel Fraunces, who owned the watering hole, provided food and reportedly intelligence to the Continental Army.

Washington convened at Fraunces’ just over a week later to announce his leave from the Army, surrounded by Clinton and other top Revolutionary figures like German-born Gen. Friedrich von Steuben – whom New York’s Oktoberfest-styled parade officially honors.

Advertisement

“With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy, as your former ones have been glorious and honorable,” Washington said.

Before Lincoln – and later Congress – normalized Thanksgiving as the mass family affair it has become, Evacuation Day was more prominent than both its successor and Independence Day, according to several sources, including Untapped New York.

Nov. 25 was a school holiday in the 19th century and people re-created van Arsdale’s climb up the Bennett Park flagpole. Formal dinners were held at the Plaza Hotel and other upscale institutions for many years, according to the outlet.

An official parade reminiscent of today’s Macy’s Thanksgiving Parade was held every year in New York until the 1910s.

Advertisement
Fraunces_Tavern_NY

Fraunces’ Tavern, at Pearl and Broad Streets in New York City. (Getty)

As diplomatic relations with the United Kingdom warmed heading into the 20th century and the U.S. alliance with London during the World Wars proved crucial, celebrating Evacuation Day became less and less prominent.

Into the 2010s, however, commemorative flag-raisings have been sporadically held at Bowling Green, the southern endpoint of Broadway. On the original Evacuation Day, Washington’s dinner at Fraunces Tavern was preceded by the new U.S. Army marching down the iconic avenue to formally take back New York.

Thirteen toasts – marking the number of United States – were raised at Fraunces, each one spelling out the new government’s hope for the new nation or giving thanks to those who helped it come to be. 

An aide to Washington wrote them down for posterity, and the Sons of the American Revolution recite them at an annual dinner, according to the tavern’s museum site.

“To the United States of America,” the first toast went. The second honored King Louis XVI, whose French Army was crucial in America’s victory.

Advertisement

“To the vindicators of the rights of mankind in every quarter of the globe,” read another. “May a close union of the states guard the temple they have erected to liberty.”

The 13th offered a warning to any other country that might ever seek to invade the new U.S.:

“May the remembrance of this day be a lesson to princes.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Published

on

Why Donald Trump still could not conquer Orange County

Donald Trump posted notable gains in Orange County during the November election, but it was not enough to win the increasingly purple county that has become a suburban battleground between Republicans and Democrats — and a reflection of the demographic political realignment unfolding across the nation.

Kamala Harris won Orange County, but by a much tighter margin than either Hillary Clinton in 2016 or Joe Biden in 2020. When it comes to presidential politics, Orange County has backed Democrats since 2016, with increasingly blue areas such as Santa Ana, Anaheim and Irvine besting more red areas such as Huntington Beach and south Orange County.

But experts say the 2024 results offer some warning signs for Democrats.

“What the early numbers indicate is that Donald Trump made inroads with minority voters including probably substantial gains with Latino and Asian voters,” said Jeff Corless, a former strategist for Orange County Dist. Atty. Todd Spitzer. “What we’re hearing is that he made those same kinds of gains in other communities similar to Orange County across the country. He also made gains with traditional suburban voters, which he struggled with in 2020.”

Paul Mitchell, a Democratic data specialist, said Trump probably did better in the county because of lower Democratic turnout this year compared with 2020, as well as voters being familiar — and potentially comfortable — with Trump because of their experience during his prior tenure.

Advertisement

“It may also be Trump has been normalized, in an odd way,” Mitchell said. “He’s been in our political eyesight for the last decade now. Maybe voters like the economy better under Trump.”

In 2016, Clinton received roughly 100,000 more votes in Orange County than Trump, making her the first Democrat county voters selected for the presidency in 80 years. In 2020, Biden fared even better, besting Trump by more than 137,500 votes. Now, Harris has edged out Trump, but the margin of victory is on trend to be much tighter than seen in past elections.

Votes in Orange County are still being counted and final numbers aren’t required to be certified by the county until Dec. 5 and by the state until Dec. 13. But it’s clear, experts say, that Trump harnessed the disillusionment felt by voters who are unhappy with the direction of the country and the economic pains that have beset many living in the suburbs.

“People in the press and people like me still so often take Trump literally, whereas voters lived through this once and the apocalypse didn’t happen and they liked the economy better,” said Rob Stutzman, a veteran GOP strategist and Trump critic who previously advised former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.

He noted that Trump’s improved performance in Orange County was not an outlier.

“He did better — look at how he did in New York, on the Eastern Seaboard, in Massachusetts,” Stutzman said. “There are red dots that never existed the last few decades.”

Advertisement

Still, there were some bright spots for Democrats, notably being able to hold on to a congressional seat that became open because Rep. Katie Porter of Irvine pursued an unsuccessful Senate bid, and flipping the 45th Congressional District. In that race, first-time candidate Derek Tran defeated Republican Rep. Michelle Steel of Seal Beach in a hotly contested race that became one of the most expensive in the country.

A UC Irvine poll released last year conveyed discord among Orange County voters, particularly Republicans and those who choose not to identify with a political party, who said despite their optimism about Orange County and somewhat about California, they did not have a good feeling about the future of America.

“The [election] results are much more a statement about people’s dissatisfaction with the current national administration than some grand statement about Trump or Republicans,” said Jon Gould, dean of the university’s School of Social Ecology.

“This is not a sign that Orange County is suddenly a red county,” Gould said. “This is exactly what it means to be a purple county.”

Michele Monda, a Republican who lives in the deep-blue city of Laguna Beach, voted for Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024 with her son and grandchildren in mind. The high housing costs and general lack of affordability have made it a challenge for middle-class couples, like her son and daughter-in-law, to build a life in many parts of California, including Orange County.

Advertisement

“Who is looking out for them?” Monda said. “They’re barely getting by, and quite honestly, the Democrats don’t seem to care. While I know Trump is a billionaire, I think he understands the needs of a middle-class person.”

Economics and Trump’s stance on immigration were the two main drivers that motivated her to vote for him. While she’s not always a fan of Trump’s behavior, she loves his policies. It’s not surprising, she said, that others in Orange County were swayed to his side as well.

“I think people have had enough of the Democrat party line, enough of the economy, enough of the whole platform. The things they espouse they just don’t work,” Monda said. “I think people in California are waking up.”

Trump’s improvement in the county has generated excitement among California Republicans who for years have tried to strengthen its hold on Orange County as Democratic voter registration grew and elections became more competitive.

For decades, Orange County was a conservative stronghold — the birthplace of former President Nixon, the cradle of Ronald Reagan’s ascent to the governor’s mansion and then the White House, and, for decades, a virtual synonym for the Republican Party of California.

Advertisement

The county’s shift over the last decade from deeply red to a more politically and demographically diverse region has fascinated the public for years.

“Orange County is a battleground,” said Jon Fleischman, a Republican campaign strategist and former executive director of the California GOP.

Trump’s popularity boost among Latinos and Asian Americans seen nationally could very well also be at play in swing counties such as Orange County. Republicans in the county for years have sought to attract Latinos and Asian Americans to their party with mixed success, and Trump’s performance could signal gains among these voter blocs, as well as Black Americans. He also won back some suburban women who turned against the Republican Party during his 2016 campaign and in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn federal protection for abortion access in 2022.

Democrats leaned heavily into messaging about the loss of reproductive rights during this year’s campaign, in television ads and during their convention when they nominated Harris. However, Stutzman contended that the argument failed to resonate with suburban women in affluent areas such as Orange County as much as Democrats expected it to.

“Most women in America still have access — an overwhelming majority have access to abortion,” he said. “I just don’t know if there’s a connection, any real existential threat that their rights are being further eroded than they have been.”

Though Harris won the majority of votes across deep-blue California, Trump was on track to win Butte, Stanislaus, Fresno, Inyo, San Bernardino and Riverside counties, all areas that Biden carried in 2020. Trump also gained ground in Silicon Valley and Los Angeles County compared with 2016 and 2020.

“In order for Trump to win Orange County, he had to make inroads with minority voters, and he did that through issues that mattered to them and the struggles they’re facing,” Corless said.

Democrats’ ability to register voters in Orange County has also slowed.

Between October 2022 and October 2024, the Democratic Party in Orange County grew by just over 3,100 voters. At the same time, the Republican Party’s numbers swelled by 31,000 people, according to data from the California secretary of state.

Advertisement

In the years that the GOP voter registration waned, the number of nonparty-preference voters grew. Many longtime Republicans in Orange County, irritated by Trump’s outlandish speaking style and policy positions, branded themselves as “Never Trumpers.” But Republicans in Orange County have made a concerted effort this cycle to reregister former GOP voters and push early voting and mail ballots, a recognition of how much Trump’s opposition to such efforts harmed the party in 2020.

“When Trump was first elected, he was not everybody’s favorite flavor of ice cream, and I think you saw a lot of Republicans who decided to become independent,” Fleischman said. “I think as people have decided that they’re OK with Trump, they’ve been coming back to the party.”

The Republican Party of Orange County went as far as hosting a ballot collection day on Oct. 11 in which Republican Party offices served as designated ballot-drop locations. The move, it said at the time, makes voting more accessible while “maintaining the highest level election integrity.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

Published

on

Appeals court rules Texas has right to build razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration: 'Huge win'

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that Texas has the right to build a razor wire border wall to deter illegal immigration into the Lone Star State. 

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced the ruling on X, saying President Biden was “wrong to cut our razor wire.” 

“We continue adding more razor wire border barrier,” the Republican leader wrote. 

Wednesday’s 2-1 decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals clears the way for Texas to pursue a lawsuit accusing the Biden administration of trespassing without having to remove the fencing.

TRUMP SAYS MEXICO WILL STOP FLOW OF MIGRANTS AFTER SPEAKING WITH MEXICAN PRESIDENT FOLLOWING TARIFF THREATS

Advertisement

It also reversed a federal judge’s November 2023 refusal to grant a preliminary injunction to Texas as the state resisted federal efforts to remove fencing along the Rio Grande in the vicinity of Eagle Pass, Texas.

U.S. Border Patrol agents cut an opening through razor wire after immigrant families crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

Circuit Judge Kyle Duncan, a Trump appointee during the president-elect’s first term, wrote for Wednesday’s majority that Texas was trying only to safeguard its own property, not “regulate” U.S. Border Patrol, and was likely to succeed in its trespass claims.

LIBERAL NANTUCKET REELS FROM MIGRANT CRIME WAVE AS BIDEN SPENDS THANKSGIVING IN RICH FRIEND’S MANSION

Duncan said the federal government waived its sovereign immunity and rejected its concerns that a ruling by Texas would impede the enforcement of immigration law and undermine the government’s relationship with Mexico.

Advertisement
TEXAS BORDER RAZOR WIRE

A Venezuelan immigrant asks Texas National Guard troops to let his family pass through razor wire after they crossed the Rio Grande from Mexico in Eagle Pass, Texas, Sept. 27, 2023. (John Moore/Getty Images)

He said the public interest “supports clear protections for property rights from government intrusion and control” and ensuring that federal immigration law enforcement does not “unnecessarily intrude into the rights of countless property owners.”

Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton called the ruling a “huge win for Texas.” 

“The Biden Administration has been enjoined from damaging, destroying, or otherwise interfering with Texas’s border fencing,” Paxton wrote in a post on X. “We sued immediately when the federal government was observed destroying fences to let illegal aliens enter, and we’ve fought every step of the way for Texas sovereignty and security.”

Texas border

Migrants attempt to cross the southern border in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, in February. (David Peinado/Anadolu via Getty Images)

The White House has been locked in legal battles with Texas and other states that have tried to deter illegal immigration. 

In May, the full 5th Circuit heard arguments in a separate case between Texas and the White House over whether the state can keep a 1,000-foot floating barrier on the Rio Grande.

Advertisement

The appeals court is also reviewing a judge’s order blocking a Texas law that would allow state officials to arrest, prosecute and order the removal of people in the country illegally.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending