Connect with us

Politics

Could polls about battleground Senate races be wrong? Democrat, Republican strategists weigh in

Published

on

Could polls about battleground Senate races be wrong? Democrat, Republican strategists weigh in

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

An eventful summer time of abortion fights, bruising GOP primaries and an increase in President Biden’s approval ranking have turned close to certainty that Republicans retake the Senate right into a uncertain prospect.

Polls in battleground Senate races throughout the U.S. in latest weeks have proven GOP candidates behind their Democratic rivals in public opinion polls, with many citing the Supreme Courtroom’s overturn of Roe v. Wade as a motivating concern for the left, in addition to impartial swing voters.

However polls have been improper earlier than. In 2016, quite a few polls confirmed Hillary Clinton forward of Donald Trump, who succeeded in profitable the election. Polls bought main Senate races improper in 2018 and 2020 as properly – together with Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who gained re-election in 2020 by 8.6% regardless of most polls displaying her underwater. 

To know whether or not 2022 polls may have the identical points, Fox Information Digital requested a number of high strategists, from each the Democratic and Republican events, if the present 2022 polls that point out Democrat Senate candidates are main in states equivalent to Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia and Minnesota might be as improper as opinion polls had been in 2020 and 2016. This is what they stated.

Advertisement

SEVERAL GOP SENATE CANDIDATES REVEAL THEY DO NOT SUPPORT 15-WEEK FEDERAL ABORTION LIMITS

Democratic Senate candidates Rep. Tim Ryan, Sen Raphael Warnock, Pennsylvania Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, Wisconsin Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes
(Daniel Acker/Getty | AP Picture/Brynn Anderson | Michael M. Santiago/Getty | Brandon Bell / Getty_Images)

Emily Ekins vice president, director of polling on the Cato Institute

“It’s fairly potential the polls are off once more as a result of Democrats are performing higher than we’d count on given previous elections in the identical locations they had been off in 2020 and 2016. However extra – pollsters haven’t modified the way in which the ballot as a result of AAPOR (polling group) couldn’t agree what went improper in 2020 and thus didn’t considerably replace their methodologies.”

Emily Ekins

Kellyanne Conway, pollster and former senior counselor to former President Trump

“Some folks by no means be taught. The pollsters who blew it in 2016, 2018, and sure, in 2020, are at it once more, predicting gloom and doom for Republican Senate candidates and pretending a deeply unpopular president and vice chairman are surging’. If previous is prologue, these polls overstate power of the Democrats and undercount right-leaning Independents and Republicans. 

“With a slight change following their embarrassing 2016 polling miss, they missed once more in 2018 and 2020. In 2018, they wrongly predicted the Republicans would lose the Senate and that Democrat Sens, Invoice Nelson (Florida) and Joe Donnelly (Indiana) would win re-election. The alternative occurred.”

Advertisement
Kellyanne Conway

Kellyanne Conway
(Fox Information)

“Much more evident, in 2020, not a single ballot within the Actual Clear Politics common confirmed Sen. Susan Collins of Maine profitable; she triumphed by 8.6%. In North Carolina, not a single public ballot within the closing weeks confirmed Sen. Thom Tillis profitable, but he did. In Iowa, Montana and South Carolina, public polls went backwards and forwards displaying a real toss-up. But the precise outcomes had been hardly a squeaker. Sen. Joni Ernst gained by 6.6%, Sen. Steve Daines by 10% and Sen. Lindsey Graham, dealing with a Democrat opponent who raised $112 million, beat him by 10%.

“Maintain these details and phony figures in thoughts while you see polls in swing states like Arizona, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Georgia and Nevada displaying comfy leads for tax-and-spend-happy candidates that enable inflation to spike and criminals to roam free and but lure our youngsters in failing colleges. 

“Do not fall for it. Voters do not ask, ‘Who can win?’; they ask, ‘Who can lead?’ These candidates should ignore the critics and the phony polls, velcro Democrat candidates to Joe Biden and his failing and flailing, and provides voters a purpose to consider, belief and assist them.”

Stanley Greenberg, former pollster for Invoice Clinton’s presidential marketing campaign  

Stanley Greenberg

Stanley Greenberg
(Fox Information)

“The polls had been improper as a result of they underestimated the proportion of working-class voters. And Trump introduced out tens of hundreds of thousands of recent, first-time voters. But it surely was there within the registration, all 12 months in 2020. I assume all polls, like mine, use the 2020 non-college proportion as given.” 

“If the identical polling error was to repeat itself, it might be evident within the new registration. I feel girls are dominating the brand new registration.”

Advertisement

WASHINGTON AND OREGON VOTERS SAY ABORTION, AFFORDABLE HOUSING AMONG TOP ELECTION PRIORITIES

Matt Bennett, government vice chairman of public affairs at Third Method, and former marketing campaign supervisor for Wesley Clark’s presidential marketing campaign

Matt Bennett

“Sure, the polls might be as improper as they had been in 2016 and 2020. We all know that in these cycles they undercounted Republican voters, maybe as a result of Trump voters don’t belief or like pollsters and/or the media. However in each of these elections, Trump was on the poll and turnout amongst lower-propensity voters was a lot greater than we’re more likely to see in a midterm. These are the voters more than likely to be undercounted. Which means the higher comparability might be to 2018, when Trump wasn’t up, such voters didn’t prove, and the polls had been way more correct.”

“That stated, Democrats should presume that they polls are improper and that they’re doing a lot worse than the polls would point out. Operating as if you happen to’re behind is the one correct course in elections which can be more likely to be very shut.” 

Adam Geller, Republican pollster

Adam Geller

“There isn’t any doubt that the polls might be improper – however It is essential to grasp a number of the explanation why, and to additionally make the excellence between a poorly executed public ballot, and a extra subtle voter ballot that campaigns use for his or her technique and messaging and that the general public not often will get to see.

“Among the polls are accomplished on a budget by people who find themselves extra keen on headlines or scores than in methodology.  So that you get polls which can be skewed, and while you attempt to discover the breakdown of the pattern, it is nearly inconceivable, or it is means off.

Advertisement

“Some polls are weaponized. They’re launched to additional a specific narrative, and discourage some voters from taking part within the election, as a result of they assume the race is a foregone conclusion.

“What does a ballot of seemingly voters even imply? Is it a random pattern of adults who SAY they’re more likely to vote, or is a ballot taken from a listing of people that really vote in midterms and have the vote historical past to point out their participation? These are essential questions as a result of they’ll decide whether or not a ballot is skewed – or simply plain improper. However oftentimes, this info is tough or inconceivable to evaluate.

“Generally a ballot will be proper, however the evaluation is improper. For instance, a ballot that reveals two candidates with 40% every is perhaps reported as a ‘tie rating,’ however the inner cross tabs would possibly present that the undecided voters will break 3:1 to one of many candidates, so the actual consequence might be 55%-45%. However that’s neglected, and the one factor reported is te 40%-40% tie. The ballot confirmed what would occur, however it was neglected or under-analyzed, and perceived as improper.”

Christy Setzer, Democratic strategist and founding father of New Heights Communications

Christy Setzer

Christy Setzer
(Fox Information)

“It is at all times potential that the polls are improper – at this level, we count on them to be. However two components are current this 12 months that play in Democrats’ favor: the dearth of Trump on the poll, and the massive, probably unprecedented swell of voter enthusiasm from youthful girls who’re fired up post-Dobbs determination to vote towards Republicans’ anti-abortion agenda.

Advertisement

ABORTION REMAINS KEY ISSUE FOR SOME VOTERS AHEAD OF MIDTERMS

“You possibly can see a modified citizens coming to the polls for the reason that Dobbs determination, leading to Alaska’s first Democratic consultant in 50 years, in Kansas overwhelmingly rejecting the anti-abortion poll initiative, and in Democrats profitable or being aggressive in locations they frankly should not be. We must always count on some surprises on election evening, provided that.” 

Jonathan Kott, former communications director for Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and companion at Capitol Counsel

Jonathan Kott

“The polls is perhaps improper however any candidate that appears at polls any day earlier than the election is a idiot. Sen. Manchin at all times instructed me you run each race like you might be behind. 

“A extra essential indicator of election outcomes is the standard of the Democratic candidates, the acute views of their opponents and assist from voters on key points. 

Advertisement

“If Democrats run on their historic legislative successes and defending girls’s well being care and Republicans run on Donald Trump’s listing of grievances, it’s going to be an awesome evening for Majority Chief Schumer and the rising Democratic caucus.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Politics

White House grilled on flow of taxpayer dollars to government DEI programs

Published

on

White House grilled on flow of taxpayer dollars to government DEI programs

FIRST ON FOX: A group of House Republicans is demanding the White House provide a full accounting of U.S. taxpayer dollars going toward diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., wrote to President Biden’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Shalanda Young on Friday morning, arguing it is important for the House to have those calculations on hand as lawmakers start crafting federal spending bills to fund the government in the next fiscal year, which begins Oct. 1.

“As Congress begins work on fiscal year 2025 appropriations bills, it is important that we know whether the administration is spending the American people’s hard-earned taxpayer dollars on divisive Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) programs,” Burlison wrote.

UNC CHAPEL HILL BOARD VOTES TO DISMANTLE DEI PROGRAMS, USE FUNDS ON CAMPUS POLICE AFTER ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTS

Rep. Eric Burlison led a letter demanding a full accounting of government spending on DEI from OMB Director Shalanda Young. (Getty Images)

Advertisement

The letter was signed by nine other House Republicans.

Among the details they are seeking are the names and funding allocations for any government DEI programs in fiscal years 2022, 2023 and 2024, as well as what the administration is seeking for those efforts in 2025.

They are also looking for the total number of full- and part-time positions within the federal government that have to do with DEI, and any job listings advertising open roles.

RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR SAYS WITHOUT DEI OFFICES, THERE IS ‘NO ABILITY TO MAKE MEANINGFUL PROGRESS’

President Biden in Oval Office

The Republicans are demanding a full accounting of how President Biden wants to spend federal dollars on DEI. (AP/Evan Vucci)

The letter similarly requested “the names of all potential programs in the planning or development stages that would address diversity, equity, inclusion, the prioritization of non-merit-based hiring or management, and/or similar concepts at each executive branch department and agency, if implemented.”

Advertisement

Burlison accused the Biden administration of trying to “embed DEI” into multiple facets of the federal government.

PENTAGON EQUITY CHIEF PRAISES BOOK CALLING 9/11 FIRST RESPONDERS ‘MENACES’ AS SHE PUSHES FOR ‘REVOLUTION’

“The Biden Administration has made clear that one of its main priorities is to embed DEI ideology into every facet of American society and the federal government. DEI programs are an affront to everything we believe in as Americans,” Burlison told Fox News Digital.

“Instead of uniting us, they divide us and pit American against American. We need to know exactly how much of the American people’s hard-earned taxpayer dollars are being wasted on DEI programs so that we can defund them along with other wasteful and divisive spending.”

Advertisement

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

California bill to scrutinize new electric charge dies in Assembly committee

Published

on

California bill to scrutinize new electric charge dies in Assembly committee

The Assembly Appropriations Committee on Thursday killed a highly watched bill that would have required legislators to study and review a controversial new electric charge recently approved by the Newsom administration.

The committee members didn’t discuss their concerns about the bill known as AB 1999 or why they decided to stop the bill from proceeding.

In a roll call, two Democratic committee members — Timothy Grayson of Concord and Gail Pellerin of Santa Cruz — voted for the bill. The rest of the 15-member committee withheld their votes.

Some legislators said this week that they had received more calls from constituents about the new $24.15 a month electric charge and AB 1999 than any other subject.

Advertisement

The state Public Utilities Commission, which is led by Newsom appointees, approved the charge last week. In return for paying the new fee, consumers will get a lower rate for each kilowatt hour of power they use.

The Newsom administration says the new billing structure is needed to encourage more people to buy electric cars and replace gas appliances in their homes, which would reduce the use of planet-warming fossil fuels.

With California’s electric rates already second highest in the nation, the new fee has angered people across the state.

A coalition of more than 250 consumer and other groups has been protesting against the new monthly charge, saying that millions of Californians who live in apartments or small homes that use little electricity will see their bills increase to subsidize those using far more power.

They point to a study that found that 3.9 million households will pay $65 to $225 more a year under the new billing structure.

Advertisement

People who have solar panels on their homes will also be subject to the monthly charge.

The new fee affects customers of investor-owned power companies, including Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric. It does not apply to customers of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power or other municipal utilities.

The utilities commission says the electric companies will not receive additional revenues under the change. The amount the companies collect from the monthly charge, the commission said, will be equal to what they lose from charging a lower rate for each kilowatt hour.

But critics point out that Newsom’s 2022 bill to begin the process of imposing the new monthly charge eliminated a $10 cap on such fees that had been in place since 2013. That 2022 bill was passed in a matter of days with almost no debate.

In January, Jacqui Irwin, a Thousand Oaks Democrat, introduced AB 1999 to undo much of Newsom’s 2022 bill.

Advertisement

The bill faced a rocky path. Last month, Assembly leaders stopped the legislation before it had even received a hearing.

Irwin then amended the bill in an attempt to revive it. The bill passed its first committee hearing on Wednesday.

The amended bill would have required a study in 2028 of customers’ bills to determine who was paying more or less under the new rate structure. The bill said the monthly fee could be repealed if the legislature found it was not working as the utilities commission intended.

Irwin’s bill would have also kept the utilities from raising the fixed charge by more than inflation.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

AOC, 'baby girl' Marjorie Taylor Greene trade barbs in fiery Garland hearing: 'Are your feelings hurt?'

Published

on

AOC, 'baby girl' Marjorie Taylor Greene trade barbs in fiery Garland hearing: 'Are your feelings hurt?'

Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Marjorie Taylor Greene had a heated exchange Thursday evening during what was supposed to be a contempt hearing for Attorney General Merrick Garland. 

The House Oversight Committee had originally been convened to hold Attorney General Merrick Garland in contempt for refusing to comply with a subpoena to hand over an audio recording of President Biden’s interview with a special counsel. 

The hearing quickly spiraled out of control, with lawmakers bickering with one another. Less than an hour after the hearing was underway, Greene took shots at her Democratic colleague, Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas. 

“Do you know what we’re here for?” Crockett asked Greene, who shot back: “I think your fake eyelashes are messing up what you’re reading.”

MENENDEZ CO-DEFENDANTS REVEAL STRATEGY TO BEAT THE RAP IN HIGH-STAKES CORRUPTIONAL TRIAL

Advertisement

L-R: Reps. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez and Marjorie Taylor Greene.  (Getty Images)

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer pleaded for order amid audible groans in the chamber. 

Ocasio-Cortez weighed in saying: “I do have a point of order, and I would like to move to take down Ms. Green’s words. That is absolutely unacceptable. How dare you attack the physical appearance of another person… move her words down.” 

“Are your feelings hurt?” Greene asked. 

“Oh girl, baby girl!” Ocasio-Cortez shot back. “Don’t even play!” 

Advertisement

Ocasio-Cortez pushed to have Greene’s words “taken down,” which is a procedure to give a speaker the chance to withdraw their words or amend them if they are deemed out of order. 

Comer suspended the hearing while lawmakers weighed striking Greene’s words. Ocasio-Cortez could be heard during discussion: “No way is that being allowed” and “not today.” 

“We’re not going to do a smarmy apology. She has to actually apologize. And that needs to be up to Ms. Crockett as well,” Ocasio-Cortez said. “It needs to be sincere.”  

Greene later agreed to strike her words but refused to apologize and insulted Ocasio-Cortez’s intelligence, prompting the Democratic Congresswoman to move to strike those words as well. 

Later, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who pushed for the court clerk to report the words, asked Greene again if she would apologize, to which she responded: “You will never get an apology out of me.” 

Advertisement

Crockett later reacted to the brouhaha on X.

“So MTG wanted to talk about my appearance in COMMITTEE?!” Crockett wrote on X. “This is what happens when mentally deficient people who can’t read and follow rules or just don’t give a damn… somehow end up in CONGRESS!”

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending