Connect with us

Politics

CNN bans pro-Trump commentator after offensive 'beeper' remark

Published

on

CNN bans pro-Trump commentator after offensive 'beeper' remark

CNN banned a right-wing commentator who aimed an offensive comment at another guest that referenced an attack on Hezbollah on Monday’s edition of “NewsNight with Abby Phillip.”

Ryan Girdusky, a political strategist and supporter of former President Trump, made the remark in a heated exchange with panelist Mehdi Hasan about the Republican presidential candidate’s Sunday rally at Madison Square Garden in New York. Vulgar and racist comments made by a number of speakers at the event have drawn significant backlash.

After Hasan weighed in, Girdusky said, “I hope your beeper doesn’t go off” — a reference to the use of mobile communications devices to kill members of Hezbollah in Lebanon on Sept. 17. Israeli intelligence reportedly triggered the mobile device explosives that wounded as many as 3,000 Hezbollah members and others. At least a dozen people were killed in that attack

Hasan, a Muslim, is an outspoken supporter of the Palestinian cause on TV programs and his own news site, Zeteo. He was visibly stunned by the remark.

“Did your guest just say I should be killed on live TV?” Hasan said to Phillip.

Advertisement

After a commercial break, Phillip apologized to Hasan and the viewing audience. She also announced Girdusky would not be returning.

“When we get this discussion started you’ll see Ryan is not at the table,” Phillip said. “There is a line that was crossed there and it is not acceptable to me. It’s not acceptable to this network.”

“Did your guest just say I should be killed on live TV?” asked Mehdi Hasan after the remark.

(NBC News)

Advertisement

In recent months, CNN has turned “NewsNight” into a conflict-driven talk show — reminiscent of the network’s long-running “Crossfire” program that ended in 2005 — with pundits presenting opposing viewpoints. Discussions on the program often become angry, with guests talking over each other while Phillip tries to maintain control.

In a statement, CNN said there is “zero room for racism or bigotry at CNN or on our air” and that Girdursky will not be invited back on the network.

“We aim to foster thoughtful conversations and debate including between people who profoundly disagree with each other in order to explore important issues and promote mutual understanding,” CNN said.

Girdusky tried to apologize on the air. Later on social media site X, he was defiant. “Apparently you can’t go on CNN if you make a joke,” he wrote. “I’m glad America gets to see what CNN stands for.”

Advertisement

Politics

Video: ‘We Don’t Want a Shutdown,’ Says Trump as D.H.S. Talks Continue

Published

on

Video: ‘We Don’t Want a Shutdown,’ Says Trump as D.H.S. Talks Continue

new video loaded: ‘We Don’t Want a Shutdown,’ Says Trump as D.H.S. Talks Continue

transcript

transcript

‘We Don’t Want a Shutdown,’ Says Trump as D.H.S. Talks Continue

Senate Democrats and a handful of Republicans voted to block a government spending package on Thursday. President Trump and Senate Democrats continued to negotiate to rein in federal agents enacting his immigration crackdown and avert a government shutdown.

“On this vote, the ‘yeas’ are 45, the ‘nays’ are 55. Three-fifths of the Senate duly chosen and sworn, not having voted in the affirmative. The motion is not agreed to.” “We’re ready to fund 96 percent of the federal government today. But the D.H.S. bill still needs a lot of work Senate Democrats are united on three main goals that will reign in ICE and end the violence. First, end the roving patrols. Second, enforce accountability. Third, masks off, body cameras on, each officer must have visible — visible — ID. The American people are demanding that something gets done. And of course, to pass legislation and enshrine this into law, we need our Republican colleagues to come along with us.” “Hopefully we won’t have a shutdown, and we’re working on that right now. I think we’re getting close. The Democrats I don’t believe, want to see it either. So we’ll work in a very bipartisan way, I believe, not to have a shutdown. We don’t want a shutdown.”

Advertisement
Senate Democrats and a handful of Republicans voted to block a government spending package on Thursday. President Trump and Senate Democrats continued to negotiate to rein in federal agents enacting his immigration crackdown and avert a government shutdown.

By Meg Felling

January 29, 2026

Continue Reading

Politics

Virginia Democrats seek dozens of new tax hikes, including on dog walking and dry cleaning

Published

on

Virginia Democrats seek dozens of new tax hikes, including on dog walking and dry cleaning

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Virginia Democrats have introduced a host of new tax proposals that would tax a range of services, including dog walking and gym memberships despite running on a campaign to increase affordability. 

More than 50 proposals and new rules were introduced for the new legislative session, including additional local sales tax in all Virginia counties and cities, 7News reported.

The new proposed policies include:

  • dog walking and grooming tax
  • gun and ammunition tax
  • new income tax brackets
  • storage facility tax
  • dry cleaning tax
  • home repair tax
  • new personal property tax on electric leaf blowers and electric landscaping equipment

ELECTION REFLECTION: ‘DEMOCRATS FLIPPED THE SCRIPT’ ON AFFORDABILITY IN BALLOT BOX SHOWDOWNS

A delivery tax would apply to deliveries made by Amazon, Uber Eats, FedEx and UPS orders in northern Virginia. 

Advertisement

In 2025, Democrats picked up several seats in the House of Delegates, resulting in a large Democratic majority. The party also holds a majority in the state Senate. 

“Virginians should judge Democrats by their actions, not their campaign slogans,” Republican state Senator Tara Durant told Fox News Digital. “And their actions speak for themselves—pushing dozens of new tax proposals that raise costs on hardworking families. Virginians deserve leadership that actually makes life more affordable, not more expensive.

A bag with the logo of the food ordering platform “Uber Eats” hangs on an apartment door.  (Sebastian Kahnert/picture alliance via Getty Images)

Fox News Digital has reached out to House Speaker Don Scott and State Senator Majority Leader Scott Surovell about the potential tax increases, asking how they would make Virginia more affordable, as well as what the additional tax revenue would be spent on. 

Newly sworn-in Gov. Abigail Spanberger ran on a platform of making Virginia more affordable. 

Advertisement

ECONOMIC ANXIETY KEYS DEM SWEEP IN HIGH-STAKES RACES AS LEFT LEVERAGES VOTER FRUSTRATION

Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger speaks during inaugural ceremonies at the Capitol in Richmond, Va., on Saturday, Jan. 17, 2026.  (Steve Helber/AP)

After taking office earlier this month, she said the state will rejoin the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), which will add a fee to monthly electric bills. 

Americans For Tax Reform, a group that advocates for lower taxes, criticized the proposals, saying state Democrats were seeking to do the opposite of neighboring states, which are trying to lower taxes. 

“It’s always a bad time to raise taxes, but it would be particularly foolish for Governor Spanberger and the Democrats who now control Richmond to do so at this time of heightened state tax competition,” said ATR leader Grover Norquist. “Governors and lawmakers in other states aren’t just seeking to reduce income taxes and other levies, they’re pursuing full tax elimination in many state capitals.”

Advertisement

“For individuals, families, and employers who wish to avoid the hostile tax policies pursued by Democrats in Richmond, they have plenty of options close by,” he added. 

The Virginia State Capitol is seen in Richmond. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Fox News Digital has reached out to Spanberger, the Virginia Republican Party, as well as Scott and Surovell.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Immigration raids pick up in L.A. as federal tactics shift. Arrests happen in ‘as fast as 30 seconds’

Published

on

Immigration raids pick up in L.A. as federal tactics shift. Arrests happen in ‘as fast as 30 seconds’

At a recent training session for 300 immigration activists in Los Angeles, the main topic was Minnesota and the changes to federal immigration tactics.

For the last few months, federal law enforcement officers have intensified their efforts to locate and deport immigrants suspected of living in the country illegally. They have used children as bait, gone door-to-door and at times forcibly stormed into people’s homes without judicial warrants.

But it was the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, two U.S. citizens protesting immigration raids in Minnesota, that sparked a growing backlash of the federal government’s aggressive actions and caused activists to reconsider their own approach when monitoring Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

“One quick note about de-escalation,” Joseline Garcia, the community defense director for City Council District 1, told a crowd at St. Paul’s Commons in Echo Park. “What we would do when it came to de-escalation is we’d tell people their rights, try to get their information and try to reason with the ICE agents and pressure them to leave.”

“Things have changed a ton in the past two months, so that’s not something we’re willing to put you all at risk to do,” she added. “There is risk here and we are always encouraging people to stay safe and please constantly be assessing the risks.”

Advertisement

The immigration crackdown began in Los Angeles last summer but has continued in the region even after the national focus shifted to Chicago and now Minneapolis. The last month has seen a new series of arrests and actions that have left local communities on edge.

While the scope of the sweeps and the number of arrests in Los Angeles appear to be down overall compared with last summer, daily immigration operations are being documented across the city, from street corners in Boyle Heights to downtown L.A.’s Fashion District.

Federal agents carry less-lethal projectile weapons in Los Angeles in June.

(Carlin Stiehl / Los Angeles Times)

Advertisement

A spokesperson from the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to The Times’ requests for comment. In a previous statement the department said Border Patrol agents were continuing to operate in the city to “arrest and remove the worst of the worst criminal illegal aliens.”

Earlier this month, renewed fears spread among shoppers in the Fashion District after federal agents conducted an immigration sweep that shut down local commerce to check vendors’ proof of citizenship. Days later a federal agent opened fire at a suspect, who the Department of Homeland Security said rammed agents with his vehicle while attempting to evade arrest, during a targeted operation in South Los Angeles.

Local immigration activists say they have noticed a change in immigration agents’ tactics. The change has forced activists to also adjust their tactics.

“What we’re seeing now are large numbers of officers to grab anywhere from one to five people, not necessarily questioning them, and then moving out as quickly as possible,” said Juan Pablo Orjuela-Parra, a labor justice organizer with the National Day Laborer Organizing Network.

Maribel C., associate director of Órale, a Long Beach-based immigrant advocacy group that was established in 2006, said rapid response volunteers in Long Beach have reported similar tactics by immigration agents.

Advertisement

“In as fast as 30 seconds” a target can be “literally taken off the streets” by federal agents, leaving no time for a rapid response volunteer to relay “know your rights” information or get the detainee’s name, said Maribel, who is not providing her full name to protect her safety.

Immigrant rights advocates say one thing that has not changed is federal officials continue to detain immigrants with no criminal history.

On Jan. 20, exactly one year into the Trump administration’s second term, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security said about 70% of people whom the agency has arrested have been convicted or charged with a crime in the United States.

In the first nine months of the administration’s immigration crackdown, from Jan. 1 to Oct. 15, a Times analysis of nationwide ICE arrests found that percentage to be about the same.

In Los Angeles, the same analyses found that of the more than 10,000 Los Angeles residents who were arrested in immigration operations, about 45% were charged with a criminal conviction and an additional 14% had pending charges.

Between June and October of last year, the number of arrests has fluctuated significantly.

The arrests peaked in June with 2,500 people who were apprehended — including those who have pending criminal charges or were charged with immigration violations — but the following month the number fell to slightly more than 2,000. After further drops, a small spike in arrests occurred in September, with more than 1,000 arrested and then dramatically dropped in October with fewer than 500 arrests.

Advertisement

Officials have not released detailed data since then.

“I think what’s happened in Minnesota is terrifying for everyone in the country because those tactics that are being implemented in Minnesota are going to be the same tactics that are going to be implemented elsewhere,” Maribel said.

After a second fatal shooting of a U.S. citizen by federal officers, the Trump administration is moving to scale back its presence in Minneapolis and in the process bumping Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino out of the state, with border advisor Tom Homan taking his place.

Bovino led and participated in highly visible immigration operations in Los Angeles, Chicago, Charlotte, N.C., and Minneapolis, sparking outrage and mass demonstrations.

At the training event in Echo Park, organizers said the recent events in Minnesota are jarring and forcing them to reconsider the safety of activists who protest or document immigration raids. Those activities will continue, they said, but with a focus on safety.

Advertisement

“Over the past two weeks, we saw that they’re escalating to the point of killing people that are exercising their rights,” Garcia said.

Continue Reading

Trending