Connect with us

Politics

Ali: Yes, we have anxiety every time Biden opens his mouth. But let's not give Trump a pass

Published

on

Ali: Yes, we have anxiety every time Biden opens his mouth. But let's not give Trump a pass

The nation and the world were hanging on President Biden’s every word, every pause, every throat-clearing and verbal gaffe during the first solo news conference since his devastating debate performance two weeks ago. Frankly, it was exhausting.

The live presser coming off a NATO conference in Washington was more than a do-or-die moment for Biden; it was a source of anxiety for millions of Americans who watched with apprehension (or didn’t watch at all) for fear that the 81-year-old would irrevocably fumble one of the most high-stakes moments in his career — and the future of the country.

But then something funny happened. Biden the seasoned statesman showed up and answered reporters’ questions for nearly an hour. He was alert, articulate and delivered more zingers than goofs. You could almost hear the collective exhale when he finally walked off stage … and then the collective girding for the next tightrope conference, terrifying speaking event or hateful debate.

Holding our breath every time Biden opens his mouth is not ideal heading into one of the most consequential elections in the nation’s history. Each mispronounced word or self-correction feels like a death-defying drop on a bumpy flight. If my nervous system is anything like that of other folks who fear a win by democracy-wrecking Trump, then it’s unlikely we’ll all make it through to November without shingles, an ulcer or sedating meds.

Thursday was a roller-coaster ride, and that was before the news conference began. In announcing a NATO compact to support Ukraine, Biden referred to the Eastern European nation’s leader Volodymyr Zelensky as “Putin.” He quickly returned to the microphone and said, “He’s going to beat President Putin … President Zelensky. I’m so focused on beating Putin.”

Advertisement

The name swap would have gone unnoticed had it been muttered by any other leader, but because it was Biden, the mistake was brought up at the ensuing face-off with reporters.

The news conference was ostensibly to discuss the NATO summit, but Russia and Gaza took a backseat to Biden’s future and the election. Reporters repeatedly asked Biden about his mental acuity, his low polling numbers, the stakes if he stays in the race, the stakes if he drops out, the readiness of his VP, Kamala Harris, should she be the candidate and his legacy should he lose to Trump.

“I’m not in this for my legacy. I’m in this to complete the job that I started,” said a confident Biden.

But let’s cut to the chase: Did he make sense? Did he appear “with it?” Was he tracking?”

Yes, yes and yes.

Advertisement

His big mess-up was saying “Vice President Trump” instead of Harris. He corrected himself in the few other instances where he mixed up or repeated country names. Otherwise, there was nothing to indicate his cognitive abilities were slipping or he was unfit to lead.

On the contrary, he demonstrated again why he is the superior choice next to the Republican candidate when Biden answered reporters’ questions with impressive range and detail about foreign policy, inflation, his dealings with world leaders and other subjects Trump regularly deflects.

Biden also explained his concerns about the future of the world should Trump win the election. “Do you think democracy is under siege based on Project 2025?” Biden rhetorically asked a journalist who posed the question. “Do you think he means what he says when he says he is going to do away with the civil service and eliminate the Department of Education?”

“I mean, we’ve never been here before,” Biden said, adding that his rival “seems to have an affinity to people who are authoritarian.”

And it just so happened that Trump was hosting his own sort of international summit Thursday at his Mar-a-Lago estate … with right-wing neo-fascist Viktor Orbán. His meeting with the Hungarian prime minster certainly would have generated more coverage if the media hadn’t been busy dissecting Biden’s every utterance.

Advertisement

If only the same attention were paid to Trump’s word salad dumps or meaningful comparisons were made by the media between the two men and their relationship with the truth. During the conference, if Biden didn’t have the exact figures for, say, the number of Biden/Harris campaign offices, he didn’t just make something up (“A billion of the most beautiful offices you’ve ever seen!”) He said what he believed to be true then qualified it with, “Don’t hold me to it in case I’m off.”

When asked if he’d take a cognitive test every day to prove he’s mentally fit, he said, “I’m tested every day with the neurological decisions I have to make. … But if a neurologist tells me I think I need another exam, if they think it’s a problem, I promise you, I’ll do it.”

We know what will happen if Biden continues as the front-runner and wins. He runs the country, and if or when he can’t, it’s up to his vice president. What we don’t know is what things look like if Biden loses. Trump is a uniquely dangerous candidate for a multitude of reasons — among them his penchant for vengeance and using the Supreme Court as a personal firewall from prosecution.

It’s important that we discuss Biden’s health, but in that avalanche of assessment and panic, Trump is getting a pass. Parse any of the former president’s recent speeches or rants and you’ll find they’re disjointed and often nonsensical. He’s also a convicted felon who promises to turn democracy into a monarchy.

Yet we can’t stop examining Biden’s every utterance for clues to his incompetence.

Advertisement

“No matter what I do, no one is going to be satisfied,” Biden said. And he’s right.

Politics

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

Published

on

Federal judge blocks Trump from cutting childcare funds to Democratic states over fraud concerns

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge Friday temporarily blocked the Trump administration from stopping subsidies on childcare programs in five states, including Minnesota, amid allegations of fraud.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, a Biden appointee, didn’t rule on the legality of the funding freeze, but said the states had met the legal threshold to maintain the “status quo” on funding for at least two weeks while arguments continue.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns.

The programs include the Child Care and Development Fund, the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program, and the Social Services Block Grant, all of which help needy families.

Advertisement

USDA IMMEDIATELY SUSPENDS ALL FEDERAL FUNDING TO MINNESOTA AMID FRAUD INVESTIGATION 

On Tuesday, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it would withhold funds for programs in five Democratic states over fraud concerns. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

“Families who rely on childcare and family assistance programs deserve confidence that these resources are used lawfully and for their intended purpose,” HHS Deputy Secretary Jim O’Neill said in a statement on Tuesday.

The states, which include California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota and New York, argued in court filings that the federal government didn’t have the legal right to end the funds and that the new policy is creating “operational chaos” in the states.

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian at his nomination hearing in 2022.  (Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Advertisement

In total, the states said they receive more than $10 billion in federal funding for the programs. 

HHS said it had “reason to believe” that the programs were offering funds to people in the country illegally.

‘TIP OF THE ICEBERG’: SENATE REPUBLICANS PRESS GOV WALZ OVER MINNESOTA FRAUD SCANDAL

The table above shows the five states and their social safety net funding for various programs which are being withheld by the Trump administration over allegations of fraud.  (AP Digital Embed)

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.”

Advertisement

New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is leading the lawsuit, called the ruling a “critical victory for families whose lives have been upended by this administration’s cruelty.” (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Fox News Digital has reached out to HHS for comment.

Continue Reading

Politics

Washington National Opera is leaving the Kennedy Center in wake of Trump upset

Published

on

Washington National Opera is leaving the Kennedy Center in wake of Trump upset

In what might be the most decisive critique yet of President Trump’s remake of the Kennedy Center, the Washington National Opera’s board approved a resolution on Friday to leave the venue it has occupied since 1971.

“Today, the Washington National Opera announced its decision to seek an amicable early termination of its affiliation agreement with the Kennedy Center and resume operations as a fully independent nonprofit entity,” the company said in a statement to the Associated Press.

Roma Daravi, Kennedy Center’s vice president of public relations, described the relationship with Washington National Opera as “financially challenging.”

“After careful consideration, we have made the difficult decision to part ways with the WNO due to a financially challenging relationship,” Daravi said in a statement. “We believe this represents the best path forward for both organizations and enables us to make responsible choices that support the financial stability and long-term future of the Trump Kennedy Center.”

Kennedy Center President Ambassador Richard Grenell tweeted that the call was made by the Kennedy Center, writing that its leadership had “approached the Opera leadership last year with this idea and they began to be open to it.”

Advertisement

“Having an exclusive relationship has been extremely expensive and limiting in choice and variety,” Grenell wrote. “We have spent millions of dollars to support the Washington Opera’s exclusivity and yet they were still millions of dollars in the hole – and getting worse.”

WNO’s decision to vacate the Kennedy Center’s 2,364-seat Opera House comes amid a wave of artist cancellations that came after the venue’s board voted to rename the center the Donald J. Trump and the John F. Kennedy Memorial Center for the Performing Arts. New signage featuring Trump’s name went up on the building’s exterior just days after the vote while debate raged over whether an official name change could be made without congressional approval.

That same day, Rep. Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio) — an ex officio member of the board — wrote on social media that the vote was not unanimous and that she and others who might have voiced their dissent were muted on the call.

Grenell countered that ex officio members don’t get a vote.

Cancellations soon began to mount — as did Kennedy Center‘s rebukes against the artists who chose not to appear. Jazz drummer Chuck Redd pulled out of his annual Christmas Eve concert; jazz supergroup the Cookers nixed New Year’s Eve shows; New York-based Doug Varone and Dancers dropped out of April performances; and Grammy Award-winning banjo player Béla Fleck wrote on social media that he would no longer play at the venue in February.

Advertisement

WNO’s departure, however, represents a new level of artist defection. The company’s name is synonymous with the Kennedy Center and it has served as an artistic center of gravity for the complex since the building first opened.

Continue Reading

Politics

AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated in the street’

Published

on

AOC accuses Vance of believing ‘American people should be assassinated in the street’

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is leveling a stunning accusation at Vice President JD Vance amid the national furor over this week’s fatal shooting in Minnesota involving an ICE agent.

“I understand that Vice President Vance believes that shooting a young mother of three in the face three times is an acceptable America that he wants to live in, and I do not,” the four-term federal lawmaker from New York and progressive champion argued as she answered questions on Friday on Capitol Hill from Fox News and other news organizations.

Ocasio-Cortez spoke in the wake of Wednesday’s shooting death of 37-year-old Renee Nicole Good after she confronted ICE agents from inside her car in Minneapolis.

RENEE NICOLE GOOD PART OF ‘ICE WATCH’ GROUP, DHS SOURCES SAY

Advertisement

Members of law enforcement work the scene following a suspected shooting by an ICE agent during federal operations on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. (Stephen Maturen/Getty Images)

Video of the incident instantly went viral, and while Democrats have heavily criticized the shooting, the Trump administration is vocally defending the actions of the ICE agent.

HEAD HERE FOR LIVE FOX NEWS UPDATES ON THE ICE SHOOTING IN MINNESOTA

Vance, at a White House briefing on Thursday, charged that “this was an attack on federal law enforcement. This was an attack on law and order.”

“That woman was there to interfere with a legitimate law enforcement operation,” the vice president added. “The president stands with ICE, I stand with ICE, we stand with all of our law enforcement officers.”

Advertisement

And Vance claimed Good was “brainwashed” and suggested she was connected to a “broader, left-wing network.”

Federal sources told Fox News on Friday that Good, who was a mother of three, worked as a Minneapolis-based immigration activist serving as a member of “ICE Watch.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Ocasio-Cortez, in responding to Vance’s comments, said, “That is a fundamental difference between Vice President Vance and I. I do not believe that the American people should be assassinated in the street.”

But a spokesperson for the vice president, responding to Ocasio-Cortez’s accusation, told Fox News Digital, “On National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day, AOC made it clear she thinks that radical leftists should be able to mow down ICE officials in broad daylight. She should be ashamed of herself. The Vice President stands with ICE and the brave men and women of law enforcement, and so do the American people.”

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending