Connect with us

Politics

Ali: Yes, we have anxiety every time Biden opens his mouth. But let's not give Trump a pass

Published

on

Ali: Yes, we have anxiety every time Biden opens his mouth. But let's not give Trump a pass

The nation and the world were hanging on President Biden’s every word, every pause, every throat-clearing and verbal gaffe during the first solo news conference since his devastating debate performance two weeks ago. Frankly, it was exhausting.

The live presser coming off a NATO conference in Washington was more than a do-or-die moment for Biden; it was a source of anxiety for millions of Americans who watched with apprehension (or didn’t watch at all) for fear that the 81-year-old would irrevocably fumble one of the most high-stakes moments in his career — and the future of the country.

But then something funny happened. Biden the seasoned statesman showed up and answered reporters’ questions for nearly an hour. He was alert, articulate and delivered more zingers than goofs. You could almost hear the collective exhale when he finally walked off stage … and then the collective girding for the next tightrope conference, terrifying speaking event or hateful debate.

Holding our breath every time Biden opens his mouth is not ideal heading into one of the most consequential elections in the nation’s history. Each mispronounced word or self-correction feels like a death-defying drop on a bumpy flight. If my nervous system is anything like that of other folks who fear a win by democracy-wrecking Trump, then it’s unlikely we’ll all make it through to November without shingles, an ulcer or sedating meds.

Thursday was a roller-coaster ride, and that was before the news conference began. In announcing a NATO compact to support Ukraine, Biden referred to the Eastern European nation’s leader Volodymyr Zelensky as “Putin.” He quickly returned to the microphone and said, “He’s going to beat President Putin … President Zelensky. I’m so focused on beating Putin.”

Advertisement

The name swap would have gone unnoticed had it been muttered by any other leader, but because it was Biden, the mistake was brought up at the ensuing face-off with reporters.

The news conference was ostensibly to discuss the NATO summit, but Russia and Gaza took a backseat to Biden’s future and the election. Reporters repeatedly asked Biden about his mental acuity, his low polling numbers, the stakes if he stays in the race, the stakes if he drops out, the readiness of his VP, Kamala Harris, should she be the candidate and his legacy should he lose to Trump.

“I’m not in this for my legacy. I’m in this to complete the job that I started,” said a confident Biden.

But let’s cut to the chase: Did he make sense? Did he appear “with it?” Was he tracking?”

Yes, yes and yes.

Advertisement

His big mess-up was saying “Vice President Trump” instead of Harris. He corrected himself in the few other instances where he mixed up or repeated country names. Otherwise, there was nothing to indicate his cognitive abilities were slipping or he was unfit to lead.

On the contrary, he demonstrated again why he is the superior choice next to the Republican candidate when Biden answered reporters’ questions with impressive range and detail about foreign policy, inflation, his dealings with world leaders and other subjects Trump regularly deflects.

Biden also explained his concerns about the future of the world should Trump win the election. “Do you think democracy is under siege based on Project 2025?” Biden rhetorically asked a journalist who posed the question. “Do you think he means what he says when he says he is going to do away with the civil service and eliminate the Department of Education?”

“I mean, we’ve never been here before,” Biden said, adding that his rival “seems to have an affinity to people who are authoritarian.”

And it just so happened that Trump was hosting his own sort of international summit Thursday at his Mar-a-Lago estate … with right-wing neo-fascist Viktor Orbán. His meeting with the Hungarian prime minster certainly would have generated more coverage if the media hadn’t been busy dissecting Biden’s every utterance.

Advertisement

If only the same attention were paid to Trump’s word salad dumps or meaningful comparisons were made by the media between the two men and their relationship with the truth. During the conference, if Biden didn’t have the exact figures for, say, the number of Biden/Harris campaign offices, he didn’t just make something up (“A billion of the most beautiful offices you’ve ever seen!”) He said what he believed to be true then qualified it with, “Don’t hold me to it in case I’m off.”

When asked if he’d take a cognitive test every day to prove he’s mentally fit, he said, “I’m tested every day with the neurological decisions I have to make. … But if a neurologist tells me I think I need another exam, if they think it’s a problem, I promise you, I’ll do it.”

We know what will happen if Biden continues as the front-runner and wins. He runs the country, and if or when he can’t, it’s up to his vice president. What we don’t know is what things look like if Biden loses. Trump is a uniquely dangerous candidate for a multitude of reasons — among them his penchant for vengeance and using the Supreme Court as a personal firewall from prosecution.

It’s important that we discuss Biden’s health, but in that avalanche of assessment and panic, Trump is getting a pass. Parse any of the former president’s recent speeches or rants and you’ll find they’re disjointed and often nonsensical. He’s also a convicted felon who promises to turn democracy into a monarchy.

Yet we can’t stop examining Biden’s every utterance for clues to his incompetence.

Advertisement

“No matter what I do, no one is going to be satisfied,” Biden said. And he’s right.

Politics

Trump sends official notification to Congress on strikes against Iran

Published

on

Trump sends official notification to Congress on strikes against Iran

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump on Monday sent an official notification to Congress about the U.S. strikes against Iran, in which he attempted to justify the military action in the now expanding conflict in the Middle East.

In a letter obtained by FOX News, Trump told Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, that “no U.S. ground forces were used in these strikes” and that the mission “was planned and executed in a manner designed to minimize civilian casualties, deter future attacks, and neutralize Iran’s malign activities.”

This comes after joint U.S.-Israeli strikes against Iran on Saturday as part of Operation Epic Fury, triggering a response from Tehran and a wider conflict in the region. The strikes killed the Islamic Republic’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and other military leaders.

President Donald Trump on Monday sent an official notification to Congress about the U.S. strikes against Iran. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Advertisement

Trump wrote that it is not yet possible to know the full scope of military operations against Iran and that U.S. forces are prepared to take potential further action.

“Although the United States desires a quick and enduring peace, not possible at this time to know the full scope and duration of military operations that may be necessary,” Trump wrote. “As such, United States forces remain postured to take further action, as necessary and appropriate, to address further threats and attacks upon the United States or its allies and partners, and ensure the Government of the Islamic Republic of Iran ceases being a threat to the United States, its allies, and the international community.”

“I directed this military action consistent with my responsibility to protect Americans and United States interests both at home and abroad and in furtherance of United States national security and foreign policy interests,” he added. “I acted pursuant to my constitutional authority as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive to conduct United States foreign relations.”

A general view of Tehran with smoke visible in the distance after explosions were reported in the city, on March 2, 2026, in Tehran, Iran. (Contributor/Getty Images)

Trump said he was “providing this report as part of my efforts to keep the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers Resolution,” as some Republican and Democrat lawmakers attempt to restrain the president’s military action, which they affirm is unconstitutional without congressional approval.

Advertisement

The president also accused Iran of being among the largest state sponsors of terrorism in the world and purported that the “Iranian regime continues to seek the means to possess and employ nuclear weapons,” even after the White House said in June that precision strikes at the time “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities.

US SURGES FORCES TO MIDDLE EAST AS PENTAGON WARNS IRAN FIGHT ‘WILL TAKE SOME TIME’

A person holds an image of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei as Iranian demonstrators protest against the U.S.-Israeli strikes, in Tehran, Iran, Feb. 28, 2026.  (Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“As I previously communicated to the Congress, Iran remains one of the largest, if not the largest, state-sponsors of terrorism in the world,” Trump said in the letter on Monday. “Despite the success of Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER, the Iranian regime continues to seek the means to possess and employ nuclear weapons. Its array of ballistic, cruise, anti-ship, and other missiles pose a direct threat to and are attacking United States forces, commercial vessels, and civilians, as well as those of our allies and partners.”

Advertisement

“Despite my Administration’s repeated efforts to achieve a diplomatic solution to Iran’s malign behavior, the threat to the United States and its allies and partners became untenable,” he continued.

Fox News’ Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

Related Article

Trump admin warned lawmakers Israel was 'determined to act with or without us' before massive Iran strikes
Continue Reading

Politics

Rep. Kevin Kiley opts against challenging fellow Republican Tom McClintock

Published

on

Rep. Kevin Kiley opts against challenging fellow Republican Tom McClintock

Northern California Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Rocklin), whose congressional district was carved up in the redistricting ballot measures approved by voters last year, announced Monday that he would not challenge fellow Republican Rep. Tom McClintock of Elk Grove. Instead, he plans to run in the Democratic-leaning district where he resides.

“It’s true that I was fully prepared to run in [McClintock’s district], having tested the waters and with polls showing a favorable outlook in a ‘safe’ district. But doing what’s easy and what’s right are often not the same,” Kiley posted on the social media site X. “And at the end of the day, as much as I love the communities in [that] District that I represent now – and as excited as I was about the new ones – seeking office in a district that doesn’t include my hometown didn’t feel right.”

Kiley, 41, currently represents a congressional district that spans Lake Tahoe to Sacramento. He did not respond to requests for comment.

But after California voters in November passed Proposition 50 — a ballot measure to redraw the state’s congressional districts in an effort to counter Trump’s moves to increase the numbers of Republicans in Congress — Kiley’s district was sliced up into other districts.

As the filing deadline approaches, Kiley pondered his path forward in a decision that was compared by political insiders to the reality television show “The Bachelor.” Who would receive the final rose? McClintock’s new sprawling congressional district includes swaths of gold country, the Central Valley and Death Valley. The district Kiley opted to run in includes the city of Sacramento and the suburbs of Roseville and Rocklin in Placer County.

Advertisement

Kiley was facing headwinds because of the Republican institutional support that lined up behind McClintock, 69, who has been in Congress since 2009 and served in the state Legislature for 26 years previously. President Trump, the California Republican Party and the Club for Growth’s political action committee are among the people and groups who have endorsed McClintock.

Conservative strategist Jon Fleischman, a former executive director of the state GOP, said he was thrilled by Kiley’s decision, which avoids a divisive intraparty battle.

“If you open up the dictionary and look for the word conservative, it’s a photo of Tom McClintock. He is the ideological leader of conservatives, not only in California but in Congress for many, many years,” Fleischman said, adding that the endorsements for McClintock purposefully came because Kiley was considering challenging him.

Kiley, who grew up near Sacramento, attended Harvard University and Yale Law School. A former Teach for America member, he served in the state Assembly for six years before being elected to Congress in 2022 with Trump’s backing. But he has bucked the president, notably on tariffs. He also unsuccessfully ran to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom during the 2021 recall, and has been a constant critic of the governor.

Kiley is now running in a Sacramento-area district represented by Rep. Ami Bera (D-Elk Grove). Democrats in the newly drawn district had a nearly 9-point voter registration edge in 2024. Bera is now running in the new version of Kiley’s district.

Advertisement

In Kiley’s new race, his top rival is Dr. Richard Pan of Sacramento, a former state senator and staunch supporter of vaccinations.

“Kevin Kiley can try to rebrand himself, but voters know his extreme record,” Pan said in a statement. “He has stood with Donald Trump 98% of the time and was named a ‘MAGA Champion.’ The people of this district deserve better than political opportunism disguised as moderation. This race is about who will actually fight for healthcare, public health, and working families. I’ve done that my entire career. Kevin Kiley has not.”

Continue Reading

Politics

Video: Defense Officials Give No Timeline for War in Iran as U.S. Boosts Forces

Published

on

Video: Defense Officials Give No Timeline for War in Iran as U.S. Boosts Forces

new video loaded: Defense Officials Give No Timeline for War in Iran as U.S. Boosts Forces

transcript

transcript

Defense Officials Give No Timeline for War in Iran as U.S. Boosts Forces

At a Pentagon news conference, top defense officials said that the U.S. military was sending more forces to the Middle East and expects to “take additional losses.” Earlier, President Trump said that the U.S. could continue striking Iran for the next four to five weeks.

“We didn’t start this war, but under President Trump, we are finishing it. This operation is a clear, devastating, decisive mission. Destroy the missile threat. Destroy the navy. No nukes. President Trump has all the latitude in the world to talk about how long it may or may not take. Four weeks. Two weeks, six weeks. It could move up. It could move back. We’re going to execute at his command the objectives we’ve set out to achieve.” “We expect to take additional losses. And as always, we will work to minimize U.S. losses. But as the secretary said, this is major combat operations.” Reporter: “Are there currently any American boots on the ground in Iran?” “No, but we’re not going to go into the exercise of what we will or will not do. I think — it’s one of those fallacies for a long time that this department or presidents or others should tell the American people. This — and our enemies by the way — here’s exactly what we’ll do. Why in the world would we tell you, you, the enemy, anybody, what we will or will not do in pursuit of an objective?”

Advertisement
At a Pentagon news conference, top defense officials said that the U.S. military was sending more forces to the Middle East and expects to “take additional losses.” Earlier, President Trump said that the U.S. could continue striking Iran for the next four to five weeks.

By Christina Kelso

March 2, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending