Connect with us

Vermont

Vermont Road Conditions: What to expect as during the morning commute, per New England 511

Published

on

Vermont Road Conditions: What to expect as during the morning commute, per New England 511


Bernie Sanders joins picket line in southwest Detroit

Kevin Moore, president of the Michigan Teamsters, introduces U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, who speaks to picketers outside of the Marathon Petroleum Refinery in southwest Detroit on Oct. 6, 2024.

It’s a snowy morning in Vermont.

While the winter weather looks pretty, that doesn’t make it easier to drive on.

Advertisement

According to the Vermont 511 system, which provides real-time road map information that you can check out here, traffic is running quickly and smoothly as of Thursday morning.

There are currently three major road closures within state lines of Vermont, two that began in fall of this year and that will continue into the next year and one that began just a day ago.

In the Burlington area, driving conditions are currently categorized as normal, according to the map.

Other parts of the state, such as Lamoille County, are categorized as fair. No where is categorized as difficult or hazardous as of 9 a.m.

“Pavement may be partially snow covered, please drive with care,” a comment about Lamoille County and Caledonia County on the map said.

Advertisement

According to weather forecasts on the Vermont 511 map, expect snow showers throughout the coming week with a possible rain shower on Monday and Tuesday in the Montpelier and Burlington area.

“Multiple rounds of snow will continue to move through the region today through early Friday. Winds will continue to be gusty as well, likely producing areas of blowing and drifting snow, which could impact travel at times,” the National Weather Service in Burlington forecast discussion said.

Orange County road closures

Here’s what Vermont 511 had to say about road closures in Orange County.

Advertisement

“The Floating Bridge on VT-65 in Brookfield, over Sunset Lake, is CLOSED for the 2024-2025 winter season,” the website said. “Please seek an alternate route in this area. Updates will be issued in Spring 2025 upon reopening.”

This road closure began Nov. 1, 2024 and is set to continue until May 15, 2025.

Addison County road closures

Here’s what Vermont 511 had to say about road closures in Addison County.

“Lincoln Gap Road between Lincoln and Warren is CLOSED to all traffic as of October 15th for the 2024-2025 winter season.”

This road closure began Oct. 15, 2024 and is set to continue until May 15, 2025.

Advertisement

Lamoille County road closures

Here’s what Vermont 511 had to say about road closures in Lamoille County.

“TRAFFIC ALERT: 12/4 12:30 PM: Scenic VT-108 Smugglers Notch is CLOSED for the 2024/2025 Winter Season.”

This road closure began on Dec. 4, 2024, and had no end date.

Rin Velasco is a trending reporter. She can be reached at rvelasco@gannett.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Vermont

Vermonters hunted fewer bucks in 2024 than 2023, preliminary estimate finds – VTDigger

Published

on

Vermonters hunted fewer bucks in 2024 than 2023, preliminary estimate finds – VTDigger


Nick Fortin is a deer and moose project leader at the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department. He demonstrated how he tracks deer through the woods of Ferdinand on December 08, 2023. File photo by Glenn Russell/VTDigger

The Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department estimates that hunters in Vermont harvested more than 17,200 deer during fall 2024 — but the final tally won’t be released until March. 

That translates to roughly 3.4 million servings of venison, according to a Monday press release from the department. 

The buck harvest tally is expected to decline slightly in 2024, with hunters taking an estimated 9,200 bucks compared with 9,848 in 2023, and an average of around 9,500 in the previous three years. Officials attributed the drop to a slower November hunting season, which was down 10% from the previous year, according to the release.

Although the department relies on hunting data to assess the deer population, Nick Fortin, the department’s head deer biologist, said he wouldn’t conclude that the population is declining. 

Advertisement

“The change from one year to the next really doesn’t mean a whole lot,” Fortin said. “It’s the longer-term trends that will be important.”

Fortin said climate-related changes are playing a role in shaping deer populations and influencing hunting results. However, he emphasized that the decline in the buck harvest was likely driven by a combination of factors, with milder winter temperature only being one of them.

Wild divide: A debate over wildlife management in Vermont runs deep


Advertisement

One other factor is that this year, the department prioritized harvesting more antlerless deer, issuing more permits than previous years. The total of harvested antlerless deer, a group primarily composed of females, is expected to reach around 8,000 — an increase from the previous three-year average of 7,188. 

The reason for that change: “We’re just trying to control deer numbers in response to those milder winters,” Fortin said, adding that mild winters are good for deer as they have better food availability.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Vermont

Commentary | Vermont’s housing crisis: A call for decisive action

Published

on

Commentary | Vermont’s housing crisis: A call for decisive action


Abundant housing is the cornerstone of an affordable, vibrant and inclusive Vermont. Yet today that vision of our beloved state is at risk as we face an unprecedented housing shortage that threatens not only our economy but the very fabric of our communities.

The statistics are stark: Vermont has the second-highest homelessness rate in the country. The median home price has soared beyond the reach of working Vermonters. Half of all renters are cost-burdened, and one in four spend more than half of their income on housing. Yet despite these intense demand pressures, for the past 15 years the state’s growth rate of new, permanent homes has only been about 1/3 the rate of the 1980s. These numbers point to a simple but painful truth: too many Vermonters cannot afford a place to call home.

The housing crisis doesn’t exist in isolation—it ripples through every corner of our state’s social and economic systems. With Vermont’s population aging, the lack of housing exacerbates challenges in health care and education, making these systems increasingly unaffordable and unsustainable. Unless we change course, we face the closing of more rural hospitals and schools, further hollowing out many communities.

Advertisement

Instead, we must step up with impactful solutions that rebuild and reinvigorate our state. Addressing the housing crisis isn’t just about shelter — it’s about creating a larger tax base, bringing more families into our state and children into our schools, and fostering vibrancy and diversity in our towns.

A report by the Vermont Housing Finance Agency (VHFA) last summer highlighted the scale of the challenge: Vermont needs 30,000 new homes by the end of 2029. To achieve this, we must double our housing production rate from the last decade and sustain it. This is a tall order, but it is possible — if we commit to decisive, sustained action.

We’ve seen what’s achievable when we make housing a priority. From 2012 to 2024, Burlington increased its housing production by 400%. This was no accident; it was the result of targeted regulatory changes, quadrupled investment in the local Housing Trust Fund, major infrastructure upgrades, and public-private partnerships like those at CityPlace and Cambrian Rise.

What worked in Burlington can work across Vermont, but it requires a statewide effort. This crisis is not an accident; it is largely the result of decades of overly restrictive land use and development policies that have made it far too difficult to build the homes we need. The HOME Act and Act 250 reforms of last two-years were important steps in the right direction, but that legislation is just a start. In the coming biennium we need bold reforms and investments in three key areas:

Infrastructure Investment: Only a small percentage of Vermont is served by adequate water and sewer infrastructure, and even in those areas, new housing often requires significant upgrades. Expanding this infrastructure is essential, and revenues generated by new housing can fund this investment. However, Vermont’s restrictive and convoluted tax increment financing (TIF) laws make it difficult to direct those revenues back into housing infrastructure. A new Housing Infrastructure Program could transform how Vermont funds the essential upgrades needed to support housing development.

Advertisement

Appeals Reform: Vermont’s current appeals system gives a single individual the power to delay, or even derail, housing projects our communities have planned for and need. This “vetocracy” drives up costs and kills projects before they can get off the ground. Public engagement must happen early in the process, during discussions about growth areas and land use policies. Once those policies are set, property owners and housing developers need the ability to move forward “by right,” without the threat of years of costly delays.

Act 250 Tier Maps that Enable Growth: Last year’s reforms to Act 250 represent a promising step, but the process of drawing tier maps is in early stages, leaving considerable uncertainty about whether the reforms will ultimately significantly expand housing opportunities or simply lead to more of the same. We need to finish the job and ensure that in the future Act 250 supports, rather than hinders, the housing development in established communities and targeted growth areas that Vermont desperately needs.

But policy changes alone won’t be enough. To truly solve this crisis, we must embrace a vision of Vermont’s future that balances our cherished natural beauty with the need for growth and diversity. A Vermont where everyone who wants to live, work, and raise a family here can do so.

There is a movement building to achieve this vision—a Vermont that is bigger, more dynamic, and more inclusive. It will take all of us to make it a reality. To learn more and join the effort, visit letsbuildhomes.org.

Together, we can create a future where everyone has a place to call home.

Advertisement

Miro Weinberger is a former affordable housing developer and mayor of Burlington (2012-2024), and is currently a visiting fellow at Harvard Kennedy School’s Taubman Center for State and Local Government. The opinions expressed by columnists and op-ed writers do not necessarily reflect the views of Vermont News & Media.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Support for Laura Sibilia speakership grows

Published

on

Support for Laura Sibilia speakership grows


MONTPELIER — An independent representative’s campaign for speaker of the Vermont House of Representatives is gaining more traction. 

“As Vermont’s legislative session nears, 21 Democratic, Progressive, and independent lawmakers have pledged support for Rep. Laura Sibilia’s candidacy to become Speaker of the Vermont House,” Lucy Rogers, campaign chief, said in an announcement. “This movement signals a call for change in leadership following significant electoral shifts in November.” 

The election for the speaker is scheduled for Wednesday, the opening day of the next legislative session. Democrat Rep. Jill Krowinski is seeking reelection. 

Advertisement

The announcement follows an article in VTDigger entitled, “A significant number of legislators tell VTDigger they back Laura Sibilia’s bid for speaker of the Vermont House.” She would need at least 75 votes to win and 55 Republicans are entering the House this week, the outlet reported. 

“Our numbers tell us that if the Republicans join their Democratic, independent and Progressive colleagues who are voting for change, I’m going to win,” Sibilia said in a statement. 

VTDigger reported, “That so many members outside the Republican caucus plan to support Sibilia’s bid suggests her support is broader than has been previously reported — and could potentially lead to a close outcome. It also underscores how the GOP caucus, even without a majority of House seats, could well determine the next speaker in what would be an early flex of its increased power.”

Sibilia lives in Dover and represents the Windham-2 district. She joined Legislature in 2014 after defeating incumbent John Moran for the seat. 

BRATTLEBORO — A Windham County legislator was unseated in Tuesday’s voting, as independent …

Advertisement

On Dec. 27, Sibilia officially notified the secretary of state of her candidacy for speaker of the House. With two candidates, the election is expected to be conducted by secret ballot.

“I believe in a leadership style that prioritizes openness, collaboration, and respect,” Sibilia said in a statement after filing the notice. “This campaign is about creating a culture in the House that is grounded in transparency, fairness and trust — qualities that are essential for us to meet the moment and deliver results for Vermonters.”

Advertisement

Sibilia also expressed gratitude for the bipartisan support and advice she has received throughout her campaign, saying that she’s “inspired by conversations with members from across the political spectrum.”

“Your insights have strengthened my commitment to building a legislature where every member’s expertise and talents are valued,” she said. 

Her campaign emphasizes “transparency, collaboration, and accountability, with a focus on making progress addressing Vermont’s most pressing issues,” according to a news release. 

DOVER — One of Windham County’s two independents will be asking her colleagues to select her…

Advertisement

In a recent newsletter, Sibilia said her nomination for speaker was debated in the House Democratic Caucus in December. She wasn’t present but described appreciating “the courage and thoughtfulness of those who supported me.”

“Ultimately, the caucus chose not to nominate a non-Democrat by a vote of 60-18,” she said. “I respect the Democratic Caucus’ decision but also see the debate as a sign that more legislators are open to the inclusive, coalition-driven leadership I am offering.”

Heading into the next legislative session, Sibilia said she’s “continuing my work to bring people together and make progress for Vermont.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending