Connect with us

Vermont

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board. – VTDigger

Published

on

30 years ago, downtown Rutland decided its future. Today, it’s back to the drawing board. – VTDigger


Downtown Rutland features a series of murals, including “Beginner’s Mind by artist Lmnopi. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

Thirty years ago, in the fall of 1994, Rutland City leaders eagerly awaited news of final plans for the cornerstone of their long-germinating downtown revitalization efforts: A new $20 million corporate headquarters for the state’s then-largest electric utility, Central Vermont Public Service Corp.

They didn’t anticipate the bombshell headlines about to hit.

The utility would drop what it determined to be a prohibitively expensive project that November, the Rutland Herald went on to report. That led municipal officials to turn to a surprising Plan B: Walmart, the big-box chain the National Trust for Historic Preservation had tagged “Sprawl Mart” the year before when it listed Vermont as one of its 1993 “Most Endangered Historic Places.”

The country’s biggest retailer had stores in every other state when Rutland City leaders offered what few other Vermonters would: An invitation to operate — but only in an existing, soon-to-be empty downtown anchor space instead of the new Diamond Run Mall under construction two miles south in neighboring Rutland Town.

Advertisement

The smaller-than-average Walmart would open and thrive in the city’s center in 1997. The Goliath of a mall, six times larger yet plagued like its peers nationally by financial problems, would eventually shrivel and shut down by 2019.

Then this fall, local leaders were jolted by another explosive headline.

Walmart is planning to leave its Rutland Plaza anchor location, it announced in September, and build a threefold-bigger “supercenter” with a grocery store and pharmacy at the site of the former mall.

The chain anticipates it will need at least two years to complete the local and state permit process and construct a new store for a projected move in 2027. That’s both bad and good news for Rutland City leaders eyeing the change — and the chance to develop their next Plan B.

“Rutland is a city that is built for 30,000 people and it’s currently being sustained by about 15,000,” Mayor Mike Doenges said in an interview. “I have a growth mindset right now, so when we hear Walmart say, ‘We’re going to move out,’ although it may put us on our heels, I think we have a real opportunity. My inclination is to lean forward and say, ‘OK, what do we need to do next?’”

Advertisement
Walmart has operated its downtown Rutland store since 1997. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Rutland hasn’t been cutesified’

When Vermont Life magazine profiled Rutland in 1988, it began by opining, “Although it has many historically important buildings and has always figured prominently in Vermont’s colorful past, Rutland is not a quaint and comely town with a picturesque center.”

“Rutland hasn’t been cutesified,” the late Herald reporter and longtime resident Yvonne Daley wrote in the piece. “Rather it’s a working-class community with a strong and diversified ethnic heritage.” 

Shut off from interstate highways and seemingly forever in the shadow of Vermont’s largest city of Burlington, Rutland nonetheless can boast a history as the state’s capital from 1784 to 1804 and, rising as a rail crossroads after the Civil War, its most populous municipality for one brief shining moment in 1880.

Rutland returned to second place on the state census by 1890 and remained there for a century. The city was about to dip to third place (it’s currently fifth after Burlington, Essex, South Burlington and Colchester, but still the biggest community outside of Chittenden County) when Walmart opened in 1997.

That year, Oprah Winfrey named the Rutland-inspired novel “Songs in Ordinary Time” — penned by Mary McGarry Morris, a 1960 graduate of the city’s Mount St. Joseph Academy — as her latest Book Club selection. Soon, the television host’s nearly 20 million viewers were reading a gritty drama, set in 1960, that painted a less-than-flattering picture of a hardscrabble community past its prime.

Advertisement

Local leaders, wincing at that depiction, hoped a revitalized downtown would help people turn the page.

The Diamond Run Mall, gathering weeds and graffiti, has been closed since 2019. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘The nature of retail has shifted’

Walmart’s 1997 debut capped a decade-long effort that also ushered in a new adjacent supermarket and nine-screen cinema, the nearby Asa Bloomer state office building and Amtrak train service to New York. It also introduced the Rutland Redevelopment Authority and Downtown Rutland Partnership management and marketing organization.

“We have to be bold enough,” then-Mayor Jeff Wennberg told Vermont Life, “to plan our future.”

But three decades later, much of that progress is now in the past.

Lyle Jepson, executive director of the recently combined Rutland Region Chamber of Commerce and Rutland Economic Development Corporation — the new entity is called the Chamber & Economic Development of the Rutland Region — is based in The Hub CoWorks building that once housed stores.

Advertisement

“The nature of retail has shifted,” Jepson said in an interview. “What we expect has changed.”

People who once shopped downtown now can find greater selection online, he noted, leading to not only the closure of smaller businesses but also Walmart’s desire to relocate from its current 76,000-square-foot space to a coming 170,995-square-foot one.

“For Walmart to be successful,” Jepson said, “they need to offer a complete experience, including a grocery store and pharmacy.”

Hal Issente, executive director of the Downtown Rutland Partnership, spoke to local business upon business upon the announcement of Walmart’s coming move. None have felt threatened by the big-box store, he said, as they specialize in merchandise — men’s suits at the three-generation family-owned McNeil and Reedy, for example, or classic and current literature at the local independent Phoenix Books — not sold by the discounter.

Instead, several expressed worry about the loss of what they consider to be downtown’s largest customer magnet.

Advertisement

“There are mixed feelings,” Issente said. “Businesses do see people go to Walmart and then come to them to shop.”

A recycled-metal locomotive by artist Guohua Xu stands near downtown Rutland’s train station. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Everybody has their ideas’

Some locals want to replace the downtown Walmart with a similar chain such as Target.

“Everybody has their ideas,” Doenges said. “I’ve heard everything from ‘Make it an Amazon distribution center’ to ‘Move the library there.’”

That’s why the mayor is forming a task force of residents and government representatives to collect and consider suggestions.

“We want to be thoughtful about what comes next,” Doenges said of the larger picture. “What’s the next 30 years look like, and what do we want to try that can sustain the city?”

Advertisement

At the same time, developers are working on several other projects on nearby Center Street, which Rutland is aiming to redesign into a pedestrian-friendly counterpart to Burlington’s Church Street Marketplace.

The largest proposal is a $35 million, seven-story hotel building on the corner of Center and Wales streets, site of the Berwick Hotel from 1868 until a 1973 fire leveled it into a current parking lot known as “The Pit.”

Developer upon developer over the past half-century has proposed new construction there, only to be stymied by the prospect of brownfield cleanup estimated at $500,000 a decade ago and $5 million today, according to city figures.

This time, the local Belden Company has received a $700,000 state Community Recovery and Revitalization Program award for the 99-room hotel, which also would include 26 “market-rate” apartments.

Although Belden has just applied for a building permit for what the mayor will only say is a “major brand” hospitality chain (an artist concept includes a sign for Cambria), it’s aiming to open the property by 2027.

Advertisement

“If things continue the way they’re going,” Doenges said, “we’ll see a hotel within the next few years.”

“The Pit” parking lot on Center and Wales streets is the proposed site of a new downtown Rutland hotel. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘It’s about expanding and enhancing’

Across the street, the Paramount Theatre is undergoing a $6 million renovation and expansion to a playhouse that opened in 1914, moved to “talking pictures” in 1931 and returned after a 25-year closure and floor-to-ceiling restoration in 2000. 

The 838-seat facility now offers more than 150 performances and programs annually. Its 60,000 yearly patrons, in turn, generate between $2.5 million to $3 million in economic impact, its management reported as part of the most recent Americans for the Arts’ national Arts & Economic Prosperity study.

With crews now adding more lobby, restroom and conference space, “the numbers will only grow,” Eric Mallette, the Paramount’s executive director, said of a project set for completion by the end of 2026.

Doenges,meanwhile, is searching for a cinema to replace the downtown Movieplex that closed during the Covid-19 pandemic. Municipal leaders also are set to hold public meetings this winter on a plan to relocate their offices and the Rutland Free Library to vacant space at the partially occupied Asa Bloomer state office building on Merchants Row.

Advertisement

Both City Hall, built around 1900, and the library, originally constructed as a post office and courthouse in 1858, are in need of repairs, but a series of past renovation or relocation plans have fallen through.

“It’s very exploratory right now,” the mayor said of the latest proposal, “but we think to have the city, state and library all in one building, to have kind of a service-oriented civic center, would be really beneficial.”

The merger also would allow the current City Hall and library buildings to be renovated into apartments.

“As much as I want to look at developing commercial entities throughout the city, without people here, it’s not going to work,” Doenges said. “We need to develop housing, too.”

A sign at downtown Rutland’s Depot Park directs visitors to area attractions. Photo by Kevin O’Connor/VTDigger

‘Headed in a growth direction’

To make all the proposals more attainable, Rutland City is applying for state approval to form a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district so it can improve public infrastructure to draw private development that, in turn, would boost the municipal tax base and pay off the work.

Advertisement

Under the plan, for example, the city would help with the brownfield cleanup at “The Pit” parking lot that would allow construction of the hotel.

Local leaders hope to formalize the TIF district early next year and start infrastructure projects in 2026. They estimate that could spur the creation of 385 housing units and other private development totaling $63 million in increased property value and $3 million of additional general fund revenue over 20 years.

“But for the city putting in this effort,” advisor Stephanie Clarke told the Rutland Board of Aldermen at a recent meeting, “this development isn’t happening.”

In the meantime, A2Z Real Estate Inc. of Pennsylvania, owner of the Diamond Run Mall, is seeking permits for the new Walmart “supercenter.” A2Z didn’t respond to VTDigger’s request for comment, but Joe Anthony, its chief executive officer, told the Rutland Town Select Board at a recent meeting: “We’ve been trying to get to this point for more years than I care to count.” 

For its part, the Brixmor Property Group, operator of the downtown Rutland Plaza, is searching for a new anchor tenant.

Advertisement

“While we don’t have any new updates to share at this time, Brixmor is committed to attracting best-in-class retailers that will meet the needs of the Rutland community,” spokesperson Maria Pace said in a statement.

Walmart will continue to operate in its current location until the move. Rutland City leaders hope to make the most of that time.

“I look at it from an investment standpoint,” Doenges said. “You don’t want to invest in a company when it’s at its peak and maxed out. Rutland is headed in a growth direction. That’s when you want to invest because it’s less expensive now and you get to reap the benefits for the next 15, 20 years. My hope is that we can pitch Rutland on its potential and the opportunity that’s here.”





Source link

Advertisement

Vermont

The nation is craving protein, but Vermont dairy isn’t cashing in

Published

on

The nation is craving protein, but Vermont dairy isn’t cashing in


Dozens of dairy farmers from across the state drove to Grand Isle on July 2 with the intention of talking about a recent dairy plant closure. Instead, a larger issue emerged: Some dairy processors are giving up on Vermont, and the state is failing to cash in on a national investment in dairy amid a craze for protein.

A recent wave of three dairy plant closures in just two months has highlighted pressures facing the local industry, including high overhead costs and aging infrastructure. As large processing plants move West, where land is cheaper and production is more dynamic, Vermont farms are buckling under consolidation, increased prices and low profitability.

The result? Vermont dairy farms are being left in the dust by the competition from states like Texas where the economics of dairy farming are more favorable.

VTDigger analyzed U.S. Department of Agriculture data and found that dairy farming costs exceed sales by the largest margin in Vermont compared with 18 other states. Vermont farmers face a $8.65 loss per 100 pounds of milk produced, while California farmers, for instance, see $2.49 in profit.

Advertisement

For one Vermont farmer, the costs of overhead stack up to as high as $72,000 per month.

“I’ve spent a lot of time trying to figure out how to budget those numbers, and I can’t move them. It’s really just because of where we’re located,” Kylie Chittenden, who operates a family dairy farm in Shoreham, said at the meeting. Lt. Gov. John Rodgers and other elected officials and state agency representatives turned up to listen to farmers’ concerns.

Chittenden said she pores over the numbers each month when she financially benchmarks her farm against dozens of others across the country. Steep fees unique to operating in Vermont, including transportation surcharges due to poor road quality in the state, leave her at a disadvantage, she said.

As the concerns reach a flashpoint, larger questions loom about the future of the hallmark industry in a state built heavily around it, where dairy racks up $5.4 billion in annual economic impact — nearly 12% of the state’s gross domestic product.

“Vermont is definitely at a tipping point, and it’s heartbreaking to see, and I don’t know what the answer is, other than the farmer just can’t meet the demands of the overhead anymore,” said Kassie Stannard, who produces small-scale dairy products for her Vermont homestead.

Advertisement

Sign up for Morning Wire:
Our flagship newsletter breaks down the biggest headlines of the day.

Advertisement

Dairy in Vermont had a big setback in June when Dairy Farmers of America, a national farmer-owned cooperative, announced that it would shut down operations at its St. Albans milk processing plant and the adjoining St. Albans Creamery & Supply in August, putting roughly 80 employees out of work. The news from the large facility came after similar announcements from other dairy production plants, including HP Hood, which in April closed the Booth Bros. dairy manufacturing plant in Barre, and Franklin Foods, which announced in June plans to shutter its plant in Franklin County. Perrigo, which uses dairy for its products, also said in March that its infant formula production facility in Franklin County would close, affecting more than 400 workers.

“We potentially may continue to see an exodus of dairies from the state,” said Kevin Kouri, chair of the Vermont Dairy Producers Alliance and director of nutrition and sales at Phoenix Feeds & Nutrition. “And the trickle-down effect that that has not only to local communities and what these dairies bring in terms of employment opportunities in rural Vermont, but also the infrastructure and the allied businesses like mine.”

‘Increasing pressures’

For years, the dairy industry has been on the decline in the state, with the number of cow dairy farms decreasing nearly 50% over the past decade.

“I remember when my husband’s grandfather was still alive, he wrote down 54 names he could call off the top of his head of dairy farmers in the town of Corinth in his lifetime — 54 farms. Now we are just one of two operating dairy farms,” Stannard said.

The trend of consolidation — fewer farms but larger remaining ones — has largely been fueled by high overhead costs, leading smaller farms to struggle from low profitability while larger operations are able to produce milk at a lower per-unit cost.

Advertisement

As farms have consolidated, the cooperatives that market the milk have too. DFA, the large cooperative, is one of a few co-ops that control nearly 85% of all milk marketed by U.S. producers, according to one study, and it covers large regions, leaving some members to feel a loss of local control.

DFA said its decision to close the St. Albans plant was driven by broader operational and network changes. Tom Bellavance, who represents Vermont on the DFA board, provided more specific reasoning at the Grand Isle meeting: Milk production rates have been flat over recent years in Vermont, while demand from Americans for protein — including protein powder and yogurt — has risen.

American dairy consumption, in pounds, has increased by around 60% from 2010 to 2024, according to USDA data on per capita dairy product consumption.

Vermont needs more cows to compensate for stagnant production, Bellavance said, and while farms out West have increased their ability to meet the new demand, in New England capacity is shrinking.

“The idling of the St. Albans plant is just an example of changing dynamics in the milk market,” Bellavance said.

Advertisement

To meet demand for milk-based protein, dairy processors throughout the country have invested $11 billion in 19 states through 2028, according to the International Dairy Foods Association. Vermont was not one of those states, with aging infrastructure among the reasons processors choose to go elsewhere where it’s less expensive to build.

As Vermont lags behind the protein craze, Bellavance said the state should “embrace those changes,” because they will “deliver higher value,” putting more money into farmers’ milk checks.

But right now, for farmers’ checks, the processing plant closure does not seem like a positive.

The St. Albans plant’s “idling,” as DFA put it, means day-to-day production will end, but the group will retain ownership of the facility. What’s more, farmers have to pay to transport their milk out of Vermont to DFA facilities in nearby states, adding an unknown sum of money to members’ hauling fees.

“I guess our immediate concern is this is going to probably lead to some financial stress on some smaller dairies within the state, and we don’t want to see our dairy population, in terms of licensed dairies, shrink any further,” said Kouri, of the Vermont Dairy Producers Alliance.

Advertisement

Vermont DFA members also raised alarms about the money they have already poured into the facility.

As farmer-owners, DFA members financially contribute to the cooperative. Vermont dairy farmer Josh Blake questioned how members can trust the cooperative with their money given the shutdown, especially as DFA previously invested $30 million in an upgrade to the St. Albans plant that will now sit idle.

“How does an upgraded plant of $30 million invested into it now have water quality problems? That makes zero sense to me. And who do we hold accountable in DFA for this?” Blake asked.

The St. Albans plant has faced significant environmental enforcement over recent years, including more than $200,000 in civil penalties for dumping milk into the local wastewater system. DFA admitted to the allegations to settle the case last year.

Aging infrastructure, such as pipe infrastructure to handle wastewater volumes, is cited as a reason why, despite large investments, plants still struggle under regulatory pressure.

Advertisement

“We have a lot of aging infrastructure, but you go to places like Texas, where you can build a brand-new facility, and it’s going to cost them a lot less to do that than to try to invest in an old building here,” said Mary White, a Vermont dairy farmer and president of the Vermont Farm Bureau. “And that’s regulations again. That’s based on what you need for climate, regulatory, etc.”

Dairy farms and processing plants are, in fact, increasing in Texas, and the West at large, while many die out in the Northeast. Of 66 new dairy processing plants that are currently underway or recently opened across the country, funded by the $11 billion investment, none are in New England, while several are concentrated in Texas and the Midwest. As DFA closes up shop on its plant in St. Albans, and in May closed another in Connecticut, the cooperative is simultaneously investing in the Midwest, recently opening a plant in Michigan that produces in-demand products like whey protein powder.

Profitability is especially hard to come by for small farmers because they do not set their prices for their products. Milk prices, which are the minimum prices dairy processors must pay farmers for their milk, are established by the USDA in a multi-step process. Although prices have risen over the years, some farmers say they have not increased enough to keep pace with inflation.

“Our family works pretty hard, and we take very little salary away from the farm,” Tim Taft, a dairy farmer in Huntington, said in a statement at the Grand Isle meeting. “We reinvest it for the future. It’d be nice if the state felt the same. Currently, they say they are a farm first state? I think they need to prove it to us.”

‘What can we do?’

As farmers bring their concerns to the fray, elected officials and local agencies say they are seeking to make reforms to support the local dairy industry.

Advertisement

U.S. Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt., and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., recently introduced legislation aimed at combating consolidation in the industry by creating a government program that helps small and midsize dairy farms manage milk supply and demand. The bill would also match the national dairy production to national demand in an attempt to fight against volatile milk prices.

“The idling of the DFA’s St. Albans plant is heartbreaking news for the plant’s workers, Vermont’s dairy farmers, and this community,” Welch wrote in a statement to VTDigger ahead of introducing the bill. “I’m working with local, state, and federal partners to support plant workers and Franklin County as they navigate next steps.”

Rodgers, the lieutenant governor, said at the Grand Isle meeting that he thinks “there is opportunity sometimes when the door closes,” referring to the national craving for protein, though he didn’t offer a specific plan.

Rep. Lisa Hango, R-Berkshire, is worried about the lingering impacts of the plant closures, particularly on the state’s tourism and overall brand.

“Vermont tourism, which is one of our biggest revenue drivers in Vermont, depends on aesthetics, upon what our state looks like,” Hango said. “If that landscape changes due to declining working lands, tourism will most certainly suffer.”

Advertisement

Stannard has already seen it change.

“You always see pictures like grazing cows, grazing on the mountainside, and that’s the way it used to be when I was a kid,” she said. “There was so many more farms in the area, and I would just turn down any road and there’d be a farm. It is not like that anymore.”

___

This story was originally published by VTDigger and distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Pick 3, Pick 3 Evening results for July 12, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at July 12, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from July 12 drawing

Day: 9-9-7

Evening: 0-7-4

Advertisement

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from July 12 drawing

Day: 8-3-1-8

Evening: 7-6-8-2

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from July 12 drawing

12-21-39-46-48, Bonus: 02

Advertisement

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Advertisement

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont’s McCarthy picked in second round of MLB Draft by Atlanta Braves

Published

on

Vermont’s McCarthy picked in second round of MLB Draft by Atlanta Braves


CHESTER — History has been made. Kaiden McCarthy, a hard-throwing right-handed pitcher from Chester and graduate of Vermont Academy in Saxtons River, was selected by the Atlanta Braves in the second round (48th overall) of the Major League Baseball draft on Saturday, the highest draft choice ever for a Vermont baseball player.

The Chester native compiled a 3-0 record with a 0.72 ERA and 42 strikeouts while helping Vermont Academy (15-6) earn a berth in the Lake Region championship game this past season.

McCarthy, a two-time Lake Region Pitcher of the Year, earned the 2026 Gatorade award as Vermont’s top baseball player and garnered strong praise from baseball scouts around the country despite being undersized at 6-foot, 190 pounds.

Advertisement

The 17-year-old reclassified to be eligible for the 2026 MLB Draft and previously committed to the University of Tennessee. After finishing up his high school career, he appeared in two games in June with the Vermont Lake Monsters of the Futures League, a wood-bat summer baseball league for college players.

“From what I saw, he has a very, very high ceiling and I’m excited for him,” Lake Monsters manager Matt Fincher told the Burlington Free Press on Saturday.

McCarthy is one three high school prospects featured in Season 2 of “The Prospect,” a three-episode original docuseries from GameChanger and MLB Network. McCarthy’s parents, Matt and Shanna, and Vermont Academy baseball coach Russ Williams were also interviewed for the series. The first two episodes can be found on GameChanger’s YouTube page.

McCarthy said he’s become accustomed to all the attention, ever since people started noticing how hard he threw even as a 14-year-old.

“I feel like I’ve dealt with it pretty well, being from Vermont,” he said in a recent phone interview from his home in Chester. “There haven’t been a ton of people drafted out of Vermont, because it’s a small state. Baseball is not super popular here, obviously. I feel like there’s definitely been a lot of attention on me, just due to the fact of what I’ve done so far.

Advertisement

“The big thing for me is I want to be able to give back to my community,” said McCarthy, who has volunteered locally as a youth baseball coach and has maintained a B average in the classroom. “I know I’ve got to go out there and perform, and I know the community is going to support me, so if I can support them back and help them, that’s going to be huge for me.”

Only two Vermonters have ever been selected in the top five rounds, most recently when the Pirates took Owen Kellington from Randolph in the fourth round in 2021.

“It’s definitely awesome,” McCarthy said. “I feel like it can put a lot of pressure on me, but I feel like I’ve pushed through it really well. You want to accomplish something, especially if it’s not been done before. I could be the first (from Vermont) to get picked at a higher round and everything, but it’s been pretty great.”

McCarthy can make more history if he reaches the major leagues: there has only been one high schooler from Vermont (Mike Rochford, South Burlington) to get drafted (by the Red Sox in 1982) and make it to the big leagues in the six decades since the draft was instituted.

It is somewhat fitting that the Braves picked McCarthy, since the franchise has a notable baseball connection to Southern Vermont. The then-Boston Braves signed Brattleboro’s Ernie Johnson as an amateur free agent in 1942. Johnson, also a right-handed pitcher, played most of his career with the Boston/Milwaukee Braves and went on to become a legendary broadcaster with the team after it moved to Atlanta.

Advertisement

McCarthy, who turns 18 next month, is expected to sign with the Braves and begin his professional career right away rather than go to Tennessee. The slot value for the No. 48 overall pick in this year’s draft is $2.08 million.

We’ll have more on McCarthy’s historic draft selection in Tuesday’s print edition of the Reformer and online at reformer.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending