Connect with us

Rhode Island

R.I. coastal regulators order country club to take down the seawall it built without permission – The Boston Globe

Published

on

R.I. coastal regulators order country club to take down the seawall it built without permission – The Boston Globe


The Quidnessett Country Club had asked the agency to change the classification of waters at the seawall from Type 1 “conservation areas” to Type 2 “low-intensity use,” saying it had built the wall to protect the 14th hole of its golf course from erosion. But in January, the council voted 6 to 0 to reject a petition to reclassify those waters.

And on Tuesday evening, the council voted 6 to 0 to require the removal of the 600-foot-long wall — technically called a riprap revetment — within 120 days. The council called for the country club to submit an “acceptable restoration plan” within 30 days, and to then complete the restoration within 90 days.

Advertisement

Janice Mathews, vice president of The Jan Companies, which owns the Quidnessett Country Club, said the club will attempt to agree on a restoration plan with the CRMC staff that would not require cutting into the golf course. “We are still trying to work it out,” she said.

Topher Hamblett, executive director of Save the Bay, said, “We support the staff’s recommendation and the council’s decision to remove the unauthorized wall, restore the function of the coastal feature, and undo the harm caused.”

But, he said, “By entertaining the water-type change petition in the first place, the politically appointed council has aided Quidnessett Country Club’s efforts to circumvent the law.”

Also, Jed Thorp, Save the Bay’s director of advocacy, said the environmental group is concerned that removal of the wall could be furthered delayed.

During Tuesday’s meeting, the club’s attorney, former council chairwoman Jennifer Cervenka, asked the council to assign the enforcement action to a hearing officer, saying such a step is required in contested cases.

Advertisement

But Coastal Resources Management Council executive director Jeffrey Willis said the club has never disputed the charges that it built the seawall without authorization, removed vegetation at the site, or filled tidal waters.

“We don’t believe this is a contested matter at all,” Willis said. “We actually think it’s a pretty straight-forward matter.”

Cervenka disagreed, saying the vegetation was destroyed by storms, not by the club. Also, she said the club disputes the place at which the agency wants the restoration to take place. She said the proposed line — the “toe of the berm” — would force the club to cut into the golf course, which she said predates the rules the agency is trying to enforce.

“That is material and affects our property rights,” Cervenka said. “The council does not now have jurisdiction to consider this contested enforcement proceeding.”

The council’s attorney, Anthony DeSisto, disagreed. “The issue is the wall itself,” he said, “and there is no contest that wall was constructed without permission.”

Advertisement

The council voted against sending the matter to a hearing officer, suggesting the club would finalize restorations plans with CRMC staff.

But Cervenka said she doubts the dispute over where the restoration line begins can be resolved with staff, and she maintained that a hearing officer should weigh in. “It’s very procedurally unusual, and I don’t think it is appropriate,” she said.

That prompted the council’s newest member, Dr. Michael A. Reuter, to tell Cervenka, “All due respect, building what you did is also procedurally inappropriate, so let’s not split hairs over it,” he said.

Save the Bay said it’s concerned that if a court later determines that a hearing officer was required, that “will not only cause another delay that perpetuates the loss of public access along the shoreline and harm to the coastal ecosystem, it will prove to be yet another example of the council not following its own rules.”

“Enforcing Rhode Island’s coastal laws should not be complicated, and certainly not for such a blatant and admitted violation as Quidnessett Country Club’s illegal wall,” Save the Bay said in a statement. “Removing the agency’s redundant layer of the politically appointed council will streamline coastal enforcement cases like these and move our state forward in efficiently and effectively managing and protecting our coastal resources.”

Advertisement

The General Assembly is entering the final days of the 2025 legislative session. During a budget briefing, House Speaker K. Joseph Shekarchi, a Warwick Democrat, said no money has been budgeted for changing the current structure of the Coastal Resources Management Council. He said legislation calling to overhaul the council remains alive, but neither the House nor the Senate has voted that legislation out of committee.


Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at edward.fitzpatrick@globe.com. Follow him @FitzProv.





Source link

Advertisement

Rhode Island

Lego convention returns to Warwick

Published

on

Lego convention returns to Warwick


Rhode Island’s Lego Fan Convention Returned to the West Warwick Civic Center.

Professional Lego artists from around the country displayed their creations and connect with fans.

There are meet and greet opportunities with Lego celebrities too.

Comment with Bubbles
Advertisement

JOIN THE CONVERSATION (2)

Fans can also show off their own skills in the event’s Brick Pits.



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s 1st Choice for Wedding Was Rhode Island: Why They Pivoted to NYC

Published

on

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s 1st Choice for Wedding Was Rhode Island: Why They Pivoted to NYC


Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce initially had their sights set on a marvelous coastal wedding, multiple sources exclusively tell Us Weekly.

“Taylor and Travis really wanted their wedding in Rhode Island, and June 13 was the date, but security wouldn’t have worked because it could get out of hand with that kind of scale of an event,” an insider says.

Though everything was initially being planned in Rhode Island — where Swift, 36, has a mansion in the lavish Watch Hill neighborhood of Westerly — the insider notes the pop star had booked multiple venues from coast to coast on different dates.

According to the source, “Ocean House [in Westerly] was planned at one point, and then plans changed to New York.”

Advertisement

Taylor Swift’s Wedding Guests Don’t Know Ceremony Location — Yet

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are keeping wedding day details under wraps  — even from their invited guests. “Taylor and Travis told guests to be in NYC. No other location was provided,” a source exclusively tells Us Weekly, noting that invitees only know to be in the Big Apple on Thursday, July 2 and Friday, […]

The insider, meanwhile, tells Us that Swift’s security “had to assess all the venues to see what made sense.”

“Rhode Island wasn’t great because the nature of the access and the perimeters were too difficult to secure,” the source explains. “So the main issue with Rhode Island ended up being security.”

GettyImages-2277907006traviskelcetaylorswiftweddingvenueri.jpg

Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce
Getty Images

“Everything was being planned in Rhode Island,” added a source. “And so many people wanted to come that plans had to change because it became bigger.”

Swift and Kelce, 36, are now rumored to be tying the knot at Madison Square Garden in New York City over the July 4 holiday weekend. While the exact location and date of the nuptials have not yet been confirmed, NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani appeared to hint at the wedding taking place in the city during a June 15 press conference earlier this month.

Advertisement

“I am fully confident in the work of the NYPD, as well as our state partners, in delivering that safe experience,” he told reporters. “We are the biggest city in the country. We are used to big events, and we are incredibly excited for the [World Cup]. We know it coincides with the Knicks’ [NBA] Finals run. We know it coincides with July 4, America 250, Taylor Swift’s wedding — all happening at the same time — and we are so excited to welcome the world here.”

Additionally, a permit was filed with NYC in June, the mayor’s spokesperson Dora Pekec confirmed to Us after The New York Times reported on a permit to close the streets surrounding MSG from July 2 to midday July 4 for an event on July 3.

City sources also confirmed to Us that the Street Activity Permit Office (SAPO), which issues the permits, is in touch with the NYPD regarding a possible influx of street and pedestrian traffic.

Though Swift and Kelce’s Rhode Island wedding plans fell through, the “I Knew It, I Knew You” singer’s Watch Hill mansion had an uptick in action last week when security was spotted swarming the area. A group of unidentified women were reportedly seen on the balcony wearing matching robes — three in black and one in white — sparking speculation about a bachelorette party.

A woman who appeared to be Swift’s childhood friend Abigail Anderson Berard was also seen on the property with her 2-year-old son.

Meanwhile, Travis celebrated what was perceived as his bachelor party in Los Angeles and San Diego. The Kansas City Chiefs tight end and his brother, Jason Kelce, as well as Travis’ teammate Patrick Mahomes and others, were spotted at a Chris Lake concert, a Dave Chappelle comedy show, a night out at the members-only Bird Street Club and more.

Swift and Kelce began dating in the summer of 2023 and got engaged in August 2025.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Rhode Island

When will RI see promised Time-Varying Rates on electric bills? | Opinion

Published

on

When will RI see promised Time-Varying Rates on electric bills? | Opinion


play

  • Rhode Island Energy is installing advanced smart meters for all electricity customers.
  • The new meters allow for Time-Varying Rates, which can lower costs for customers and the grid.
  • While the utility profits from the $188 million meter investment, the system for customer benefits is delayed.
  • The utility is currently seeking to increase its profit margin in a new rate case before state regulators.

Rhode Island Energy is currently installing advanced smart meters for all electricity customers. Clean energy and environmental advocates have championed advanced metering for decades because the systems enable incentives for conservation, solar integration and energy storage. The primary vehicle for realizing these benefits is Time-Varying Rates (TVR).

Unlike legacy meters, advanced meters track when electricity is used, not just how much is used. TVR encourages customers to shift heavy usage, like running a clothes dryer or charging an electric vehicle, to off-peak overnight hours when wholesale power is cheap and cleaner. This flattens the grid’s peak demand, brings down wholesale energy costs for everyone and reduces our reliance on polluting “peaker” power plants.

The Rhode Island Public Utility Commission (PUC) is charged with balancing the interests of utility customers with value to utility shareholders. It sets the formulas by which the utility is compensated.

The primary means the utility is compensated is based on a Return on Equity invested (ROE) that is predetermined by the PUC and currently set at 9.275%.  Rhode Island Energy’s capital investments are funded through roughly 51% equity (shareholder capital) and 49% debt. For every $100 million the utility spends on infrastructure, about $51 million is financed via equity, allowing shareholders to collect an annual pre-tax profit of 9.275% on that portion, or roughly $4.73 million. The more the utility spends, the more their shareholders earn.

At a cost of over $188 million for the new meters, Rhode Island Energy shareholders will collect nearly $9 million a year in profit for 20 years from the equity portion of that investment alone, while also saving money on labor by eliminating the need for truck based drive-by meter readers. 

Advertisement

But advanced metering was supposed to benefit ratepayers as well as the utility. Though the meter expenditures were approved by the PUC in 2023 and the meters installations are expected to be completed by the end of this year, it is expected to take until at least 18 months after the meter rollout is completed to implement the billing system infrastructure needed to enable Time-Varying Rates.

The upgrades that deliver more profit to the utility bottom line was fast tracked, while the investment needed to implement the primary benefits to ratepayers is being slow walked. Why weren’t the software upgrades and hardware deployment run in parallel?

Right now, the PUC is weighing a huge general rate case (Docket No. 25-45-GE). Rhode Island Energy has proposed aggressively hiking its profit margin, seeking to raise its ROE from 9.275% to 10.75% and expand its equity share from 51% to 57%.

Advertisement

In their 2022 advanced metering filing, Rhode Island Energy suggested the new infrastructure would yield $729 million in benefits over 20 years. So far, the utility is seeing plenty of that benefit on its bottom line, while ratepayers have mostly seen higher costs. The PUC should reject the utility’s requested rate increases, preserve the current rate structure, and insist that Time-Varying Rates be fully operational before any further rate changes are considered.

Fred Unger is a retired energy project developer and clean energy advocate based in Providence.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending