Who: Pittsburgh Penguins (2-2-0, 4 points, 4th place Metropolitan Division) @ Los Angeles Kings (1-2-1, 3 points, 5th place Pacific Division)
Pittsburg, PA
Game Preview: Pittsburgh Penguins @ LA Kings 10/16/25
How to Watch: Locally broadcast on Sportsnet Pittsburgh and Fanduel Sports Network, streaming on ESPN+
Pens’ Path Ahead: This seems like the first time in forever the Pens go out west to either California or the upper Canadian swing and don’t have to play a back-to-back while on the trip. Pittsburgh finishes their Cali journey up in San Jose on Saturday night, before heading home to play Vancouver at PPG Paints on Tuesday. Then the Pens are right back to a warm venue a week from tonight down in Sunrise, Florida to play the Panthers. Kinda a bummer for them that they’re using up all these warm weather locales before winter has even got a chance to hit.
Opponent Track: Challenging start for the Kings, they opened up at home losing 4-1 to Colorado last Tuesday and them embarked on a 1-1-1 road trip with stops in Vegas (shootout win), Winnipeg (3-2 regulation loss) and Minnesota (shootout loss). It’s probably worth noting that so many of those games were very close and they’ve now had two days off since their last game. LA stays at home after tonight for a Saturday night visit from Carolina.
Season Series: The Kings come to Pittsburgh in a few weeks on Sunday November 9th to wrap up the season series early. Last year the Pens went 2-0-0 against LA (with an OT game to make it a 0-1-1 record for the Kings).
Hidden Stat: Los Angeles has been short-handed an NHL high 22 times this young season in just four games and at 68.2%, their seven goals allowed on the PK ranks tied for the most in the league as of Wednesday.
Getting to know the Kings
Andrei Kuzmenko – Anze Kopitar? – Adrian Kempe
Kevin Fiala – Qunton Byfield – Joel Armia
Warren Foegele – Philip Danault – Trevor Moore
Jeff Malott – Alex Turcotte – Alex Laferriere
Brian Dumoulin / Drew Doughty
Joel Edmundson / Brandt Clarke
Mikey Anderson / Cody Ceci
Goalies: Anton Forsberg and Pheonix Copley
Scratches: Samuel Helenius, Jacob Moverare, Darcy Kuemper (injured)
IR: Corey Perry, Kyle Burroughs
—Kopitar sounds like a true ‘game time decision’ after missing practice yesterday with an undisclosed injury. The Kings didn’t alter the rest of the lines, it sounds like they’re hopeful but uncertain that he will be able to play.
—There is less optimism around Kuemper, who it’s looking like won’t be available to play today with an injury. That puts Forsberg in-line to start tonight, the Kings just re-acquired Copley from Tampa via a trade yesterday (who LA recently lost to the waiver wire to TB) as Copley continues to bounce around to a team in need of a backup goalie.
—It’s an “old guys rule” theme today for Pittsburgh sports on a night where ancient QB’s Aaron Rodgers and Joe Flacco are going to duel it out. The Kings/Pens have plenty of their own elder statesmen between Kopitar, Perry, Doughty, Kuemper, Crosby, Malkin, Letang and Karlsson all being 35+ years old with several pushing 40, though Perry won’t be joining in tonight.
—The Kings and Pens are also similar that if you only look at their top two forward lines they look pretty impressive. Then you get to the lower halves and defensive part of the lineup…
- Kempe is in a contract year and has been a major problem for the Penguins (10 goals and 15 points in 14 career games). He’s certainly the player to circle on the board in the lockerroom as the one to watch. Kempe is always dangerous and usually is going to get his against Pittsburgh.
- Kopitar, a 2005 draft pick, has announced his retirement at the end of this season. He’s getting to that age, but his play hasn’t dropped off much at all lately (scoring 74, 70 and 67 points in the last three seasons). He’s off to a good start in what will be the final year of his decorated career, always a little bitter to see the curtain come down on such a great player, and unfortunate to see that he might not be able to play against the Pens tonight.
- Last season, Darcy Kuemper returned to LA as a hero after two rocky seasons in Washington. Kuemper was a Vezina finalist, posting a 31-11-7 record with a 2.02 GAA and .922 save%. Obviously it’s very early, but his start is about as far from Vezina-worthy as possible behind a Kings team that also needs to make a lot of improvements to help support their goalie defensively. And now he’s hurt, which makes the short-term look even worse with a Forsberg-Copley tandem for the near future.
- Getting a top-5 pick is great in theory and often in execution, but 2019 fifth overall Alex Turcotte hasn’t found his footing in the NHL (30 points in 104 career games). The Kings were able to get big wins with top draft picks of Quinton Byfield and the blossoming Brandt Clarke from their fairly quick post-Cup rebuild that took place from 2018-21 but it’s worth wondering in the big picture if they stocked up on enough elite talent to be a true contender. Tangential, but that can be the danger with a high pick to end up unknowingly pass on Moritz Seider, Dylan Cozens, Matt Boldy types and select a player who isn’t worthy of the draft spot. The Kings have had enough other material to not have that pick emerge as a damaging miss, but in the long run it represents a big lost opportunity and shows a potential trouble/pressure of needing to nail such important picks.
The Kings’ biggest off-season moves were to sign Brian Dumoulin and Cody Ceci, who signed for three and four years respectively at $4.0m and $4.5m cap hits. The moves were immediately panned as unwise and clowned all over social media, and in the early going of the season that has come to pass in a major way. Dumoulin/Ceci as a pair were outshot 28-13, outscored 5-0 and had to be split apart. Figuring out how to utilize these two former Penguins is going to be a tall task and a potentially lingering issue for LA for the foreseeable future, it brings no joy to show that in a very brief sample that Dumoulin has dragged Doughty down to a 38 xGF%. They had no choice but to eliminate a disaster Dumoulin/Ceci pair, but now the trade off means those players split up could negatively effect even more of the team on separate pairings.
It hurts more since the team lost Vladislav Gavrikov, who signed with NYR for a $7.0 million cap hit. In theory, replacing the one player in the aggregate with multiple ones may pay off in some disciplines but the issue was the age and ability of what the Kings went out and got at this point of the careers of Ceci and Dumoulin.
Rickard Rakell – Sidney Crosby – Bryan Rust
Anthony Mantha – Evgeni Malkin – Justin Brazeau
Tommy Novak – Ben Kindel – Philip Tomasino
Connor Dewar – Blake Lizotte – Filip Hallander
Parker Wotherspoon / Erik Karlsson
Matthew Dumba / Connor Clifton
Goalies: Arturs Silovs, Tristan Jarry
Potential Scratches: Noel Acciari, Caleb Jones, Harrison Brunicke
IR: Kevin Hayes (upper body, week-to-week), Jack St. Ivany (week-to-week, lower body), Rutger McGroarty (indefinite, upper body), Joel Blomqvist (week-to-week, lower body)
- The Penguins had an off day yesterday, without any practice inputs we’ll keep the lines in tact from what was used last game – fully knowing that the lineup subject to change and almost certainly will be tweaked will being as Dan Muse has rotated through players with some frequency early on. To that end, I would imagine the Kings are not seen to have the skating/speed that Anaheim did, which might draw Acciari back into the lineup, and there certainly are no shortage of forwards from the lower lines that could be scratched for the night to make way for that.
- Defensively, you’d probably think they’re not going to keep Brunicke watching and not playing for a continuous amount of time, complicated by the point that the most obvious player to take out of the last lineup (Dumba) is also the most experienced/accomplished right-shot defender playing on the left side. The Pens did try a Letang/Brunicke pair in practice earlier in the week, that could be something they circle back to, though with Kris Letang struggling on his own it might not be the time to pair him with a rookie who can be a question mark positionally/defensively on his own.
- Muse has rotated the goalies evenly so far going Silovs-Jarry-Silovs-Jarry, is there any reason to expect that not to continue? If it holds, that would put Silovs back in the net tonight and give him a chance to play a team other than the Rangers for the first time this season. Jarry wasn’t necessarily the team’s biggest problem on Tuesday but an 18 save on 22 shot performance in a loss doesn’t exactly scream “I’m taking the ball and running with it”, either.
The Penguins only have seven 5v5 goals through the four games that they’ve played. Just imagine where the team would be without Justin Brazeau’s three 5v5 goals! (Who would have imagined that would be a sentence with all those words touching even 10 days ago?)
On the bright side, at least the Pens are creating chances and getting good looks but they need to start finishing. Unfortunately that last statement is an all too common in this post-playoff era of the Penguins. It would be one thing if they weren’t good enough to generate chances, but failing to be able to convert into goals has been a cruel twist of fate for a team that as recently as 2021 scored 201 5v5 goals on 168 xGF, held strong in 2021-22 with 180 goals vs 178 xGF in the last year they made the playoffs. Since then, it’s been over a cliff:
- 168 goals vs 202 xGF in 2022-23
- 179 goals vs 186 xGF in 2023-24
- 157 goals vs 178 xGF in 2024-25
Show me a team that develops a consistent trend of failing to convert on their chances and I’ll show you a bad team. In a related note, there are disturbing signs that song is starting all over again already with the Pens netting 7 goals against their 10 xGF in the early going of 2025-26.
It doesn’t help that Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin have a goose egg in 5v5 goals, though Malkin has three 5v5 assists and Crosby has two. Bryan Rust has only played two of the games and been held without a goal. Rickard Rakell’s only ES goal came off a deflection last game, he’s yet to score a goal from a shot he’s generated himself. Despite the playmaking inputs (which do count for something), any instance where those four star players combine for only a single goal over a four-game stretch means the chances are the Pittsburgh offense isn’t in a good place in that time. And it’s hasn’t been with only 2.16 goals/60. Those four combined for 69 5v5 goals last season, sooner or later they will start filling the net with more frequency based on the chances they are generating but for now it’s a sore spot that they have run cold. (In fact, one could see signals that the turnaround is already showing signs of taking place: Crosby was on the ice for absolutely zero 5v5 goals for in the first three games of the season, but then assisted on two 5v5 goals last game against Anaheim).
To compound the matter, the third and fourth lines put together only have one 5v5 goal, via rookie Ben Kindel. Those lines aren’t expected to produce in spades, but one goal in 24-combined man games from the bottom six is an uninspiring contribution in totality.
The defense has matched that meager output with one goal through their own 24-combined man games, via rookie Harrison Brunicke. That’s to be expected, last year the Pens only received 21 5v5 goals from all their defensemen all season. Blueliners aren’t counted on to produce 5v5 goals themselves, and at least Ryan Shea was sending in deflectable point shots to boost the forwards.
So you can cut the defense a break here, but the outlook has to be less charitable for the forwards. The helpers aren’t helping out much. That of course doesn’t apply to the one-man wrecking crew known as Brazeau, and to a lesser degree of Anthony Mantha who was able to chip in his first 5v5 goal last game, which is more than all the rest of the forwards not named Kindel or Rakell can say.
The good news is that you would think tonight could be a chance to start getting right. The Kings have been a hot mess defensively this season in terms of breakdowns and conceding goals against, 16 in the four games. As mentioned in the hidden stat, a lot of that bleeding has come on their penalty kill but the circumstance should be right for Pittsburgh. The Pens will likely see 32-year old backup Forsberg in net, who has a career GAA north of 3 (3.05 to be exact) and a losing record of 75-81-14. This Pittsburgh team is going to have to pick its spots and exploit the teams where they can, tonight ought to be a pretty good opportunity for the offense to come to life.
Focus on: the penalty kill
The Pens’ penalty kill has perhaps been their biggest culprit in their last two games, which not so coincidentally doubles as both of their losses in the season. It’s certainly one of the most visible and glaring issues the team has right now, given the late penalty and almost immediate goal against with 1:27 to go that turned getting at least a point in overtime into a stone cold regulation loss. The Pittsburgh PK is only 6 for the last 10, giving up a pair of goals while shorthanded in each of their losses. An underlying issue can be readily seen by the team stress-testing their penalty kill with 10 opponent power plays in two games, which creates a tough spot to be at in the first place.
LA’s power play has scored a modest three power play goals in their four games, on 13 attempts on the season (23.1%). Kopitar has factored into all three PPG the Kings have this year with assists, and he figures to be at less than 100% today — if he is even able to play at all while dealing with his injury.
The Penguins may not win this game even with a great night on the PK, but if they get rung up for a PPG against (or two..or three..) the odds of losing sky rocket. That will be a focus to watch and see tonight; first if Pittsburgh can effectively stay out of the penalty box more than they have been in recent games, and second to limit the damage and steady their ship in that regard when they are shorthanded.
Pittsburg, PA
Pittsburgh International’s T. rex could soon disappear from view
Pittsburg, PA
‘It began right here in the Hill District’: Bill from Rep. Lee seeks national honor for Freedom House
Pittsburg, PA
Behind the build: engineering Pittsburgh’s new airport terminal
Hear from the Buro Happold team on the engineering behind Pittsburgh International Airport’s new landside terminal.
When Pittsburgh International Airport opened its new landside terminal in November 2025, it wasn’t just a ribbon‑cutting – it was a reset. The project replaced a 30‑year‑old layout designed for a hub airline that no longer exists, transforming the airport into a streamlined, Pittsburgh‑first operation built around the people who actually use it.
The Terminal Modernization Program (TMP) did more than link a new 800,000 ft² landside terminal directly to the existing concourses. It rethought a half‑mile disconnect between tickets and gates, retired the underground tram called the Automatic People Mover (APM), and re‑established clarity, comfort, and efficiency as the organizing principles of the passenger journey.
For Buro Happold, the challenge was both technical and cultural: engineer a right‑sized terminal that would feel effortless to travelers while quietly delivering resilience, efficiency, and long-term operability. In this Q&A, the team walks through the decisions behind the systems – from displacement ventilation to microgrid integration – and the choreography required to modernize an airport without ever shutting it down.
Meet the engineering team behind the new terminal
A building shaped by use, not nostalgia
The old Pittsburgh terminal felt stuck in the early 1990s: a mall‑like landside building, security, and then a tram ride to a distant airside concourse. It was a spatial diagram designed for connections, not for the 98% of travelers who now begin or end their journeys in Pittsburgh. The new plan positions the landside terminal directly against the airside concourses. “The split made a stressful trip more stressful,” said Joe Gaus, associate principal. “Now the sequence is straightforward: check in, central screening, and a short connector – no train, fewer unknowns.” The modernization project reversed the logic. Ticketing, screening, and arrivals were consolidated into a single hall linked directly to the gates, cutting time and uncertainty while opening up generous meet‑and‑greet spaces for a city that prefers to walk inside to welcome family and friends.
The architecture – led by Gensler and HDR, in association with luis vidal + architects – doesn’t hide its regional references: an undulating roof suggestive of rolling hills; columns branching like trees; fiber‑optic “stars” that glance off glass at night. What it does hide, by design, is the machinery of comfort. “You see the nature,” Gaus says, “and only when you look closer do you realize the technology is doing the work in the background.”
Integrating today with yesterday – while never closing
Modernizing a live airport is not a matter of swapping parts. The new terminal was built “separate ‑through‑construction,” as Yelena Nelson, senior mechanical engineer, describes it, to preserve operations until the moment of carefully sequenced tie‑in. That meant temporary routes, scaffolding, and wayfinding choreographies that changed as the building neared the old concourse. “The challenge wasn’t wiring old equipment to new,” Nelson says. “It was delivering next to a live airport without breaking its rhythm.”
Phasing became the delivery mechanism: one package for everything underground – utilities, stormwater, and the remnants of the train infrastructure – and another for everything above. The connector bridge formed a new passage aligning the security exit with the existing concourse. “LED walls, the bridge motif – it’s a reveal that feels like Pittsburgh,” says Mike Weleski, who led portions of the MEP and site integration. “All while the airport kept moving.”
Behind the scenes, the team wrote a white paper for the airport authority on its building management system. Do they double down on the incumbent platform or open the market to competition? Matt Hochberger, the project lead, explains the calculus: keep the operator workflows and alarm philosophies that staff know, but design the new terminal’s BMS to interoperate – not lock in. The owner chose open bid, preserving flexibility without sacrificing a seamless handoff to facilities. It’s the kind of decision passengers never feel, but operators make every day.
Power that protects operations
Pittsburgh International Airport is powered by a 23‑megawatt microgrid – a blend of on‑site natural gas generation and solar – capable of operating independently from the regional grid. The new terminal had to integrate seamlessly into that system. “We tied in at medium voltage with new 3.5 kV switchboards, then stepped down to 480V for the building,” says Jeremy Hall, associate electrical engineer. That strategy allowed the team to shrink the diesel generator to life‑safety loads – emergency lighting, egress, fire/life safety – and to rely on the microgrid’s redundancy for optional standby, cutting emissions and fuel risk.
Where the power system provides resilience, the controls framework ensures efficiency. The design incorporates daylight‑responsive dimming, occupancy and vacancy controls, and a full LED specification that cuts lighting power density to roughly 30 percent below ASHRAE code. The result is an automated, low‑waste operation that performs without demanding attention. It’s engineering that works in the background – constantly optimizing, rarely seen.
Comfort engineered into the background
If the project has a signature technical move, it’s displacement ventilation. In halls of this scale – soaring ceilings, long sightlines, and air volumes that would typically demand brute‑force conditioning – Buro Happold rethought the physics. Instead of pushing large quantities of air from high above, the team supplied conditioned air low and slow, allowing natural stratification to lift heat and contaminants clear of the occupied zone.
“The airflow isn’t felt – no drafts,” Hochberger says. “You’re calmer in the place people are usually most anxious: baggage claim.”

Those lofty ceilings, a defining architectural element of the new hall, were made possible precisely because the engineering retreated from them. By delivering air at the floor and letting the upper volume act as a quiet thermal buffer, the team avoided cluttering the roofline with the typical web of ducts, grilles, and mechanical hardware. The height could read as pure architecture – light, airy, unbroken.
Function followed form: diffusers are integrated into benches, walls, and carousel surrounds, preserving valuable floor‑to‑floor height and keeping the focus on the sweep of the roof instead of the machinery behind it. “We worked carefully with the design team to hide the big openings,” Nelson adds. The result is a space that feels open and intuitive, while the engineering works invisibly in the background to keep it comfortable at every scale.
Modeling as risk management
The integration platform for all of this was BIM. “We modeled space by space with exact elevations,” says Rachel Weaver, an electrical engineer who helped with BIM coordination. The point wasn’t just clash detection; it was construction intent. Electrical conduits and feeders were pre‑cut from the model to minimize waste. On the plumbing side, the team used Revit to thread storm piping through the undulating structure – a challenge made more urgent when the plumbing group proposed a stormwater reuse system that hadn’t been in the initial brief. “You have a roof this large,” Weleski says. “Why not capture and treat a portion for the landscape terraces and reduce domestic water demand?” The owner agreed.
A local project with global reach
The talent bench shifted as the program matured: early concept work drew on Buro Happold’s global aviation experience, then moved through New York and Pittsburgh for design and construction administration. What never shifted was proximity.
“We were on site weekly,” Gaus says. “Half the time it was faster to drive to the airport than to the office.” Problems that might have lingered on emails resolved in thirty‑minute hallway meetings or impromptu field walks with the contractor and architect.
Jeremy Snyder is direct about why that mattered: “It’s the airport’s building. They have to operate it. We moved efficiently and treated the owner as part of the team making decisions on design.”
What people will notice – and what they won’t
Travelers will recognize the ‘Pittsburgh-ness’ of the new hall immediately: the lift of the roofline, the light from all sides, the constellations overhead. They’ll also notice what’s missing. The tram is gone; the walk is shorter; the signage reads clearly. Much of what makes that possible is deliberately invisible – air delivered where people are; power and data routed where they need to be; sensors adjusting light to the day – so the building can do more with less.
For the engineers who lived with it for years, the pride is more granular. “We had to keep a complex campus breathing while we changed a lung,” Hochberger says, smiling at the metaphor. Weleski calls it a legacy project. “You don’t build a new airport here every decade,” he says. “I came to work on this. I can’t wait to fly out of it.”
In the end, the terminal modernization reflects the spirit of the city it serves: a clarity of purpose, an economy of means, and an insistence on doing the hardest work out of view so the experience feels effortless. It is, as the team repeatedly noted, an airport for Pittsburgh, by Pittsburgh – engineered to carry the region forward.

For us, the measure of success wasn’t just opening a new terminal – it was giving Pittsburgh an airport that feels effortless to use and resilient to operate. When engineering disappears into the experience, that’s when we know we’ve done our job.”
— Jeremy Snyder, US Aviation Director
-
World2 days agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Montana1 week ago2026 MHSA Montana Wrestling State Championship Brackets And Results – FloWrestling
-
Louisiana5 days agoWildfire near Gum Swamp Road in Livingston Parish now under control; more than 200 acres burned
-
Oklahoma1 week agoWildfires rage in Oklahoma as thousands urged to evacuate a small city
-
Denver, CO2 days ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Technology7 days agoYouTube TV billing scam emails are hitting inboxes
-
Technology7 days agoStellantis is in a crisis of its own making





