Connect with us

New York

Can Zohran Mamdani, a Socialist and TikTok Savant, Become NYC Mayor?

Published

on

Can Zohran Mamdani, a Socialist and TikTok Savant, Become NYC Mayor?

In the crowded race for mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani has become a magnet for attention, ascending in the polls and raising money through a mix of social media savvy and a plain-spoken, everyman approach.

He has paid house visits to some of his thousands of small donors and taken a New Year’s Day plunge into the ocean to dramatize a rent-freeze. He broke a Ramadan fast by eating a burrito on the Q train, then faux apologized for the breach of subway etiquette — all in a breezy style more reminiscent of “Saturday Night Live” than a political ad.

But for Mr. Mamdani, a 33-year-old state assemblyman from Queens, winning the Democratic primary in June still represents a daunting challenge that goes beyond trying to convert social media virality into votes.

While many of his progressive rivals in the race have adopted more centrist positions on certain issues like policing and public safety, Mr. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, continues to embrace left-leaning views that have become less popular with voters in New York.

It has nonetheless proved to be an effective campaign strategy. Mr. Mamdani has become the standard-bearer for progressive Democrats as a fresh-faced alternative to his more veteran rivals, most notably former Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, Mayor Eric Adams and Brad Lander, the city comptroller.

Advertisement

But winning an election on a hyper-progressive platform will be a challenge. Mr. Mamdani acknowledges this and knows he must get his supporters — many on the far left and outside the city’s traditional power structure — to turn out in droves.

In a primary that rarely sees turnout exceed one-fourth of eligible voters, winning over new voters could offer Mr. Mamdani outsize influence in its outcome.

At a recent campaign visit to the MAS Bronx Muslim Center in the East Bronx’s Little Yemen neighborhood, Mr. Mamdani implored those gathered to more fully use their electoral power. More than 350,000 of New York’s roughly one million Muslims are registered to vote, according to figures from the Council on American-Islamic Relations. But in the last mayoral election, only about 12 percent of them cast a ballot.

“I don’t blame anyone in our community for not voting, because oftentimes it feels like there isn’t much to vote for,” Mr. Mamdani told the group of about 100 people. “But this June 24, in this Democratic primary, we have a chance — an opportunity — to tell the world that Muslims don’t just belong in New York City but that we belong in City Hall.”

He asked congregants whether they had enough money to pay for rent, groceries, child care and their electric bills. Many sat at rapt attention, nodding their heads as he spoke. He recited the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad in arguing that their shared goal should be to make people’s lives better.

Advertisement

“Spread glad tidings,” Mr. Mamdani said to the group in explaining that his campaign was focused on making the city more affordable, calling it “a campaign to allow New Yorkers to dream once again.”

Mr. Mamdani underlined his campaign’s core staples: free buses, a rent freeze and city-owned grocery stores.

Campaigns typically target so-called triple prime voters who have cast ballots in three consecutive primaries. Mr. Mamdani has turned his attention to those who do not regularly hear from political campaigns. He is betting that his unrelenting focus on the cost of living will resonate with people who feel ignored by the government — a strategy he hopes will appeal to disaffected Trump voters, especially in the working-class neighborhoods outside Manhattan.

Even the conservative Manhattan Institute recognizes Mr. Mamdani’s momentum, citing his appeal to people whom the pollster John Della Volpe from the firm SocialSphere called “discontented strivers” — working-class New Yorkers who are progressive but concerned about public safety and feel that getting ahead is too difficult.

“I want you to entertain the idea that socialist Zohran Mamdani could actually become the next mayor of New York City,” the Manhattan Institute’s newsletter read. “I know it sounds crazy, but we live in strange times.”

Advertisement

Mr. Mamdani has already raised roughly $7 million since entering the race in October, including public matching funds. In spite of his once-limited name recognition, he now boasts more than 16,000 individual donors. Most polls show him in third place, just behind Mr. Adams and candidates with citywide political pedigrees.

“He is creating excitement within an electorate that doesn’t always see themselves reflected in leadership in New York City,” said Jasmine Gripper, a co-director of the left-leaning Working Families Party. “He is talking to a base of voters who are excited to have a candidate that holds their values, who looks like them, comes from their community, and he’s leaning in to that.”

Younger voters have been turning out with more frequency. Roughly one in five voters under 40 cast a ballot in the 2021 mayoral primary, up from about 13 percent of those voters in 2013, according to findings from the New York City Campaign Finance Board. Overall turnout, at about 27 percent of registered voters, was among the highest in recent election years.

Under the ranked-choice system, which allows voters to choose as many as five candidates in order of preference, an expansion of Mr. Mamdani’s base could help some of his more like-minded rivals. If he finishes third or worse, his votes could go to his supporters’ next-ranked candidate.

Mr. Mamdani has already committed to cross-endorsing at least one yet-unnamed opponent in an effort to stunt the momentum of Mr. Cuomo, who leads polling by a wide margin. The Working Families Party will also endorse a slate of progressive candidates and is encouraging voters to “D.R.E.A.M.” — Don’t Rank Eric or Andrew for Mayor. Several candidates, including Mr. Mamdani, support the idea.

Advertisement

Mr. Cuomo has already made running against the “far left” a feature of his campaign without mentioning Mr. Mamdani by name. The former governor often calls defund the police the “three dumbest words ever uttered in politics,” even though he signed some police reforms into law. Mr. Mamdani, by contrast, has called for some cuts to police spending in areas like its communications office and strategic response groups.

Trip Yang, a Democratic strategist who is not associated with any mayoral campaign, said Mr. Mamdani’s outreach to young voters in Brooklyn and Queens, and increased interest from Southeast Asian voters and Muslims, could stretch the electorate in a way unseen in recent memory.

“His policy proposals don’t seem radical,” Mr. Yang said, referring to Mr. Mamdani’s affordability platform. “The only thing radical about Zohran is probably his open democratic socialist affiliation.”

The New York City Democratic Socialists of America view that as a positive. The group has added 1,500 new members from more diverse racial and age groups since it endorsed Mr. Mamdani in October, its leaders said. They pointed to Mr. Mamdani’s heated confrontation of Tom Homan, the White House’s top immigration enforcer, at the State Capitol in Albany recently as a moment when he successfully channeled many New Yorkers’ frustrations.

“People want to fight, defend their rights and fight the authoritarian policies of the Trump administration,” said Gustavo Gordillo, the group’s co-chair. “But that’s not enough — we also have a vision for going on offense, and Zohran’s campaign has provided a vehicle for that vision.”

Advertisement

Some of Mr. Mamdani’s rivals have taken note of his potential, and sought to attack him where he may be vulnerable.

New York City is home to the largest Jewish population outside of Israel, and Mr. Mamdani has been criticized for accusing Israel of committing genocide in the war in Gaza. He has sponsored a bill that would prohibit New York charities from funding certain organizations that he said were tied to “Israeli war crimes.”

Whitney Tilson, a hedge fund manager and mayoral candidate, recently sent out a fund-raising email with the subject line “Stop Mamdani” citing his “far-left platform,” “fiery rhetoric against N.Y.P.D. and Israel” and support from professors at Columbia University, where his father is a professor. The Trump administration has accused the university of not doing enough to quell antisemitism on campus.

But Mr. Mamdani’s opponents also have their own vulnerabilities to deal with.

At some of the mosques where Mr. Mamdani has appeared, members have approached him with stories, and occasionally pictures, of Mr. Adams speaking to them. They recalled how the mayor spoke about growing up in a working-class household and pledged that his administration would be about “delivering the dignity they’d been denied” at City Hall.

Advertisement

“The reason that we’re in this moment is that he betrayed those voters,” Mr. Mamdani said of the mayor. “We’re trying to keep our promise.”

New York

Essential New York City Movies Picked by Ira Sachs and Blondie’s Debbie Harry and Chris Stein

Published

on

Essential New York City Movies Picked by Ira Sachs and Blondie’s Debbie Harry and Chris Stein

Film

Advertisement

Leo McCarey’s “Make Way for Tomorrow” (1937). The Criterion Collection

‘Make Way for Tomorrow’ (1937), directed by Leo McCarey

The log line: After the bank forecloses on their home, an elderly couple must separate, each living with a different one of their adult children. 

Advertisement

The pitch: “It’s a film that Orson Welles famously said ‘would make a stone cry,’” says Sachs, 60, about McCarey’s movie, singling out a long sequence at the end that depicts “a date through certain lobbies and bars of New York City that offers a snapshot of Midtown in the ’30s.” 

Advertisement

Tippy Walker (left) and Merrie Spaeth in George Roy Hill’s “The World of Henry Orient” (1964). United Artists/Photofest

‘The World of Henry Orient’ (1964), directed by George Roy Hill

The log line: A wily 14-year-old girl and her best friend follow a ridiculous concert pianist, on whom they have a crush, around the city.

Advertisement

The pitch: Hill’s 1960s romp inspired Sachs’s film “Little Men” (2016), which is about boys around the same age as these protagonists. “It’s an extraordinarily sweet film that also seems, to me, very honest,” he says. 

Advertisement

Rip Torn (left) in Milton Moses Ginsberg’s “Coming Apart” (1969). Courtesy of the Everett Collection

‘Coming Apart’ (1969), directed by Milton Moses Ginsberg

The log line: Rip Torn plays an obsessive psychiatrist who secretly films all the women passing through his home office, inadvertently capturing his own mental breakdown. 

Advertisement

The pitch: Shot in one room with a fixed camera, Ginsberg’s film “really feels of a time,” says Sachs. It’s also “very sexual and very free,” reminding him of what’s possible when it comes to making movies. 

Advertisement

Don Murray and Diahn Williams in Ivan Nagy’s “Deadly Hero” (1975). Courtesy of the Everett Collection

‘Deadly Hero’ (1975), directed by Ivan Nagy

The log line: A disturbed, racist cop saves a cellist from a crook, only to become her tormentor. 

Advertisement

The pitch: Harry, 80, and Stein, 76, were extras in Nagy’s film, which stars Don Murray, Diahn Williams and James Earl Jones as the cop, the cellist and the crook, respectively. The pair call the movie “[expletive] weird,” but also say that their day rate — $300 — “was the most money we’d ever made on anything” up to that point.

Advertisement

Chantal Akerman’s “News From Home” (1976). Collections Cinematek © Fondation Chantal Akerman

‘News From Home’ (1976), directed by Chantal Akerman

The log line: An experimental documentary by Akerman, a Belgian filmmaker who moved to New York in her early 20s, the film features long takes of the city and voice-over in which the director reads letters from her mother. 

Advertisement

The pitch: “I’m intrigued by how beauty contains sadness in the city,” says Sachs. Not only is her film a “beautiful record of the city” but it captures “what it is to be alone here, to have left some sort of community and, in particular for Chantal, separated from her mother.”

Advertisement

Michael Wadleigh’s “Wolfen” (1981). Orion/Courtesy of the Everett Collection

‘Wolfen’ (1981), directed by Michael Wadleigh

The log line: Albert Finney stars as a former N.Y.P.D. detective who returns to the job to solve a violent and bizarre string of murders. 

Advertisement

The pitch: Wadleigh’s film is not only a vehicle for Finney, says Stein, it also “has a lot of footage from the South Bronx when it was still completely destroyed” by widespread arson in the 1970s.

Advertisement

Seret Scott in Kathleen Collins’s “Losing Ground” (1982).

‘Losing Ground’ (1982), directed by Kathleen Collins

The log line: Collins’s film — the first feature-length drama for a major studio directed by an African American woman — observes a rocky relationship between a college professor and her painter husband.

Advertisement

The pitch: Sachs calls “Losing Ground” “a revelation.” The characters are “so human and fascinating and extremely modern,” he says, adding that he loves a movie that “exists in some very complete version of the local.”

Advertisement

Griffin Dunne in Martin Scorsese’s “After Hours” (1985). Mary Evans/Ronald Grant/Everett Collection

‘After Hours’ (1985), directed by Martin Scorsese

The log line: In Scorsese’s black comedy, an office worker (Griffin Dunne) has a surreal and bizarre evening of misadventure while trying to get back uptown from a woman’s apartment in SoHo. 

Advertisement

The pitch: Harry and Stein recommend this zany tale and borderline “nightmare” for the way it captures a bygone era of New York. “It’s this great image of [Lower Manhattan] when it was still raw, you know, Wild West territory,” Stein says. 

Advertisement

A scene from Edo Bertoglio’s “Downtown 81” (1980-81/2000). Courtesy of Metrograph Pictures

‘Downtown 81’ (shot in 1980-81, released in 2000), directed by Edo Bertoglio

The log line: Bertoglio’s film is a striking portrait of a young artist who needs to raise money so he can return to the apartment from which he’s been evicted. 

Advertisement

The pitch: Jean-Michel Basquiat stars as the artist in this snapshot of life in New York during the ’80s. Despite all the drama surrounding it — postproduction wasn’t completed until 20 years after filming, and for many years the movie was considered lost — the film is notable, says Stein, because “it’s got all the characters and all our buddies in it.”

These interviews have been edited and condensed.

Advertisement

More in Film

See the rest of the issue

Continue Reading

New York

13 Actors You Should Never Miss on the New York Stage

Published

on

13 Actors You Should Never Miss on the New York Stage

Theater

Quincy Tyler Bernstine

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

A master of active stillness, the 52-year-old Bernstine (imposing in the 2024 revival of John Patrick Shanley’s “Doubt,” above) has that great actorly gift of making thought visible. A natural leader onstage, she compels audiences to follow her.

Advertisement

Victoria Clark

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

One of the theater’s best singing actors, with Tonys for Adam Guettel and Craig Lucas’s “The Light in the Piazza” (2005) and David Lindsay-Abaire and Jeanine Tesori’s “Kimberly Akimbo” (above, 2022), Clark, 66, performs not on top of the notes but through them, delivering complicated characterization and gorgeous sound in each breath.

Susannah Flood

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Advertisement

Flood, 43, is a true expert at confusion, a good thing because she often plays characters like the twisted-in-knots Lizzie in Bess Wohl’s “Liberation” (above, 2025). What makes that confusion thrilling is how she grounds it not in a lack of information or purpose but, just like real life, in an excess of both.

Jonathan Groff

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

The rare musical theater man with the unstoppable drive of a diva, Groff, 41, sweats charisma, as audience members in ringside seats at Warren Leight and Isaac Oliver’s Broadway musical “Just in Time” (above, 2025) recently discovered. Giving you everything, he makes you want more.

Advertisement

William Jackson Harper

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Advertisement

Unmoored characters are often unsympathetic. But whether playing a confused doctor in the 2024 revival of Anton Chekhov’s “Uncle Vanya” or a delusional bookstore clerk in Eboni Booth’s “Primary Trust” (above, 2023), Harper, 46, makes vulnerability look easy, and hurt hard.

Joshua Henry

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

There are singers who blow the roof off theaters, but the 41-year-old Henry’s voice is so huge and deeply connected to universal feelings that he seems to be singing inside you. Currently starring in the Broadway revival of “Ragtime” (above, by Lynn Ahrens, Stephen Flaherty and Terrence McNally), he blows the roof off your head.

Advertisement

Mia Katigbak

Superb and acidic in almost any role — in distress (Annie Baker’s 2023 “Infinite Life,” above) or in command (2024’s “Uncle Vanya”) — Katigbak, 71, finds the sweet spot in even the sourest truths of the human condition.

Advertisement

Judy Kuhn

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

With detailed intelligence and specific intention informing everything she sings, Kuhn, 67, is (among other things) a Stephen Sondheim specialist — her take on Fosca in “Passion” (above, 2012) was almost literally wrenching. It requires intellectual stamina to keep up with the master word for word.

Laurie Metcalf

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Advertisement

The fierce, sharp persona you may know from her years on “Roseanne” (1988-97) is about a tenth of the blistering commitment Metcalf, 70, offers onstage in works like Samuel D. Hunter’s “Little Bear Ridge Road” (above, 2025). She goes there, no matter the destination.

Deirdre O’Connell

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

For 40 years an Off Broadway treasure, O’Connell, 72, handles the most daring, out-there material — including, recently, a 12-minute monologue of cataclysmic gibberish in Caryl Churchill’s “Kill” (above, 2025) — as if it were as ordinary as barroom gossip.

Advertisement

Conrad Ricamora

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Advertisement

Revealing the Buddy Holly in Benigno Aquino Jr. (in the 2023 Broadway production of David Byrne and Fatboy Slim’s “Here Lies Love”) or the queer wolf in Abraham Lincoln (in Cole Escola’s “Oh, Mary!,” above, last year), Ricamora, 47, is uniquely capable of great dignity and great silliness — and, wonderfully, both together.

Andrew Scott

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

It’s a tough competition, but Scott, 49, may have the thinnest skin of any actor. Whether he’s onstage (playing all the characters in Simon Stephens’s Off Broadway “Vanya,” above, in 2025) or on film, every emotion — especially rue — reads right through his translucence.

Advertisement

Michael Patrick Thornton

Advertisement

Sara Krulwich/The New York Times

Some actors are hedgehogs, projecting one idea blazingly. Thornton, 47, is a fox, carefully hoarding ideas and motivations. Keeping you guessing as Jessica Chastain’s benefactor in the 2023 revival of Henrik Ibsen’s “A Doll’s House” or as a pathetic lackey in last year’s production of Samuel Beckett’s “Waiting for Godot” (above, center), he holds you in his thrall.

More in Theater

See the rest of the issue

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New York

How a Geologist Lives on $200,000 in Bushwick, Brooklyn

Published

on

How a Geologist Lives on 0,000 in Bushwick, Brooklyn

How can people possibly afford to live in one of the most expensive cities on the planet? It’s a question New Yorkers hear a lot, often delivered with a mix of awe, pity and confusion.

We surveyed hundreds of New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save. We found that many people — rich, poor or somewhere in between — live life as a series of small calculations that add up to one big question: What makes living in New York worth it?

Advertisement

Here’s one way to make New York more affordable: triple your income. After moving from Baton Rouge, La., in 2016 to attend graduate school, Daniel Babin lived mostly on red beans and rice or homemade “slop pots,” renting rooms in what he called a “cult house” and a building on a block his girlfriend was afraid to visit.

Then, in January, he got a job as a geologist with a mineral exploration company, with a salary of $200,000, plus a $15,000 signing bonus. A new city suddenly opened up to him. “I can take a woman out on a $300 dinner date and not look at the check and not feel bad about it,” he said. He also now has health insurance.

Advertisement

Mr. Babin, 32, a marine geologist who also leads an acoustic string band, now navigates two economic worlds, one shaped to his postdoctoral income of $70,000 a year — when his idea of a date was a walk in Central Park — and the other reflecting his new income. In this world, he is shopping for a vintage Martin Dreadnought guitar, for which he will gladly drop $4,000.

Finding a New Base Line

On a recent morning at Mr. Babin’s home in Bushwick, Brooklyn, where he shares a 6,800-square-foot cohousing space with 17 roommates, he was still figuring out how to manage this split.

Advertisement

Daniel Babin lives in a cohousing space modeled on the ethos of Burning Man, the annual arts festival in Nevada.

Advertisement

“I’m feeling less inclined to just let it rip than I was a few months ago,” he said of his spending habits. He socks away $1,500 from each paycheck, and has not moved to replace his 2003 Toyota Corolla, an “absolute dump” given to him by his father. “Hopefully, I’m returning a little bit to some kind of base-line lifestyle that I’ve established for myself over the last five years,” he continued. “Because the fear is lifestyle inflation. You don’t want to just make more money to spend more money. That’s not the point, right?”

Lightning Lofts, the cohousing space where Mr. Babin has lived since January 2024, bills itself as part of a “social wellness movement” and seeks to continue the ethos of Burning Man, the annual communal art and cultural festival in the Nevada desert.

For a room with an elevated loft bed and use of common areas, Mr. Babin pays $1,400 a month in rent, plus another $250 for utilities and weekly housecleaning.

Advertisement

He was first drawn to the organization through its events, including open mic “salons” where he played music or read from his science fiction writings. These were free or very cheap nights out, unpredictable and fascinating.

“You would see dance and tonal singing, and some dude wrote an algorithm that can auto-generate A.I. video based on what you’re saying — beautiful storytelling,” he said.

Advertisement

“So I just showed up every month, basically, until they let me live here.”

The room was a good deal. He had looked at a nearby building where the rent was $1,900 for a room in a basement apartment that flooded once a month. “Ridiculous,” he said.

Advertisement

But beyond its financial appeal, Mr. Babin liked the loft’s social life. “I used to be chronically lonely, and I just don’t feel lonely anymore,” he said. “Which is fantastic in a crazy place like New York. It’s so alive and it’s so isolating at the same time.”

Splurging on Ski Trips

Before Mr. Babin got his new job, he used to go to restaurants with friends and not eat, trying to save up $35 for a “burner” party — in the spirit of Burning Man — or Ecstatic Dance, a recurring substance-free dance party. He loved to ski but could not afford a hotel, so he would carry his old skis and beat-up boots to southern Vermont and back on the same day.

Advertisement

“Going on a hike is a pretty cheap hobby,” he said, recalling his money-saving measures. “Living without health insurance is a good one.”

He still appreciates a good hike, he said. But on a recent ski trip, he splurged on new $700 boots and another $300 worth of gear. “I’m like, this is something I’ve wanted for 10 years, so I deserve it,” he said.

Advertisement

He bought a $600 drone to take pictures for his social media accounts, and then promptly crashed it into the Caribbean (he’s now replacing the rotors in hopes of returning it to health).

He cut out the red beans and rice, he said, but his usual meal is still a modest $13 sandwich from the nearby bodega or $10 for pizza. “If I’m getting takeout and it’s less than $17, I don’t feel too bad about it,” he said.

Advertisement

A Future After Cohousing

A big change is that dating is much more comfortable now, and he feels more attractive as a marriage prospect. “It turns out that a lot more people pay attention to you if you offer them dinner instead of a walk in the park,” he said.

He is now thinking of leaving the cohousing space — not just because he can afford to, but because his work has kept him from joining house events, like the regular potluck dinners. “I sometimes feel like a bad roommate, because part of being here is participating,” he said. “I feel like there might be someone who would enjoy the community aspect more than I’m capable of contributing right now.”

Advertisement

He sounds almost wistful in discussing his former economizing. If it weren’t for the dating issue, he said, he would not need the higher income or lifestyle upgrades. “I never really felt like I was compromising on what I wanted to do,” he said.

He paused. “It’s just that what I was comfortable with has changed a little bit.”

Advertisement

We are talking to New Yorkers about how they spend, splurge and save.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending