Connect with us

New Jersey

New Jersey calls off turkey hunt as state’s bird population in dips

Published

on

New Jersey calls off turkey hunt as state’s bird population in dips


Turkeys, rejoice?

New Jersey’s fall turkey hunt usually starts about a month before the Thanksgiving holiday. But not this year.

State regulators last week announced Fish & Wildlife has canceled the fall 2025 statewide wild turkey hunting season.

The closure, approved by the state’s Fish and Game Council on March 11, takes effect immediately, officials said in the April 8 announcement.

Advertisement

Though there are more turkeys in New Jersey now than there were decades ago, officials said they voted to cancel the hunt until the animal’s population further stabilizes.

New Jersey’s wild turkey population was once as low as 6,200 birds in the mid-1980s, according to state data.

Each year between 2013 and 2020, the total was up to around 23,000. But the state’s 2025 population estimate is 20,000 turkeys statewide, Larry Hajna, a Department of Environmental Protection spokesperson, told NJ Advance Media.

“This is the first time the Fish and Game Council has voted to close the fall either-sex season (hunt),” Hajna said Friday. “This season closure is in effect until the population stabilizes and can support the season.”

During the state’s spring turkey hunt last year a total of 2,321 turkeys were killed, mostly in South Jersey and by hunters here and from over 30 other states.

Advertisement

Most of those turkeys were harvested by shotgun with compound bows and crossbows also used by hunters for just over 100 birds.

“Wild turkey harvest trends have continuously declined since the early 2000s and are similar to population estimates statewide,” the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection said in a summary of the latest decision Tuesday.

The DEP said turkeys face several threats, including habitat loss and predation.

Although the department clarified that hunting was not the sole cause for the turkey population decline, it said the current populace of birds “cannot support a hunting season that includes hen harvest.”

The state believes closing the season will work to increase hen survival and reproduction.

Advertisement

In a brief history on wild turkeys, New Jersey underscored that by the mid-1800s turkeys were nearly wiped out as the state’s habitat changed and because they were killed for food.

Garden State biologists, along with the NJ Chapter of the National Wild Turkey Federation, reintroduced turkeys here in 1977 starting with 22 birds.

Four years later, the population rebounded enough to support a spring hunting season and by 1997 a limited fall season kickstarted too.

Trends have evolved though.

Advertisement

The spring turkey hunt was not affected by the vote this past March to call off fall hunting.

However, state Fish and Game Council data showed declines in the spring harvest as well.

Between 2001 and 2010, on average more than 3,000 turkeys were hunted and killed in the spring (peaking at 3,779 in 2002). Yet, in recent years the spring hunt has yielded closer to between 2,300 and 2,500 birds.

State Fish and Game Council data shows a decline in the turkey hunting season total. The past few years have yielded fewer birds to hunt — between 68 and 111 from 2017 to 2023). The state also said since the early 2000s, the turkey population has dropped from about 23,000 in 2012 to — now — closer to 20,000.Graph by NJ Fish and Game Council

The Fish and Game Council’s nine members considered various options before calling off the state’s fall turkey hunt.

Advertisement

Leaving the season fully open has the potential to “negatively affect future populations,” according to a presentation from the March 11 meeting.

A partial closure of the fall season could have increased a portion of the turkey population. However, the council added, it could have made for uneven and complicated regulations with adverse effects for bird populations in others parts of the state.

Closing just the hen harvest was also considered, as that would make more female birds available to breed. However, the state said that could also needlessly remove male turkey populations for future hunts.

Closing the full season was thought of as the best option. Council members — made up of both hunters and farmers — said the only con by choosing that path was simply the loss of a hunting season.

The response online to New Jersey nixing a fall turkey hunt appears to be even-keeled so far.

Advertisement

“Loss of habitat and changes in farming practices might also play a role,” one Facebook user said in response to a State Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs’ post — while speculating on the cancelation. “I suppose we have to wait and see the results of the monitoring programs in New Jersey and surrounding states.”

In response to losing the fall hunt, another user on a Pennsylvania hunting forum, noted that back in the 1970’s “turkeys were not as numerous as today.”

“If you heard a gobble over on the next ridge, there was a good chance he would come looking, because hens were scarce.”

Our journalism needs your support. Please subscribe today to NJ.com.

Steven Rodas may be reached at srodas@njadvancemedia.com. Follow him on Bluesky at @stevenrodas.bsky.social.

Advertisement



Source link

New Jersey

‘Hard to see’: Jersey Shore town to tear down lifeguard building before it collapses from erosion

Published

on

‘Hard to see’: Jersey Shore town to tear down lifeguard building before it collapses from erosion


The flooring is getting saved from Strathmere’s Beach Patrol headquarters but the building has reached its breaking point as extreme erosion left the 20 year old landmark literally on the edge.

Officials say that the building is in imminent danger of collapse into the ocean after winter storm-driven waves stripped away massive amounts of sand.

“It’s sad. It’s been here for a while,” Dave Pennello, of Upper Township Publics Works, said.

Pilings are now exposed and the building’s foundation is at risk so the township is planning to tear it down.

Advertisement

“The only way we could do it is spending $125,000 to try and reinforce that but there’s no guarantee that the erosion wouldn’t get worse to basically make that totally obsolete,” Upper Township Committee member Sam Palombo said. “As someone that worked at Upper Township Beach Patrol, it’s hard to see, honestly.”

The lifeguards in Strathmere will be temporarily working out of a leased modular trailer.

“My son-in-law is a lifeguard here every year. He’s one of the captains and they got a call the other day that said, ‘Get to the shack and get the stuff out of it,’” Estell Manor resident Bobbie Kenny said.

Uncertainty over beach replenishment funding

Beaches in several Jersey Shore towns are in rough shape after our harsh winter.

Uncertainty over funding for repairs and replenishment from the federal government is adding to concerns.

Advertisement

“It’s incredibly worrying. I mean, we’re out of time,” Upper Township Committee member Sam Palombo said. “After spring, it’s summer and everyone’s going to be down here.”

A spokesperson for the US Army Corps of Engineers told NBC10 that the agency hasn’t gotten any updates about funding for beach projects, so they’re unable to provide any information on potential timetables.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Amid rising antisemitism, law enforcement vows to ramp up security

Published

on

Amid rising antisemitism, law enforcement vows to ramp up security


play

  • “Security is no longer a precaution − it is a necessity that comes at a significant cost,” said Katie Katz, Executive Director of Teach New Jersey.

TEANECK — Local law enforcement vowed to step up security measures ahead of Passover, amid a global surge of antisemitism that has left North Jersey Jews grappling with anxiety.

Nearly 150 people gathered with local leaders and law enforcement at a community safety meeting held at Heichal Hatorah/The Jewish Center of Teaneck on March 25 to discuss strategies for securing houses of worship.

Advertisement

The event, organized by Deputy Mayor Elie Katz, came just a week before the beginning of Passover and in the wake of a March 8 incident in which a 19-year-old Jewish Teaneck resident was shot 10 times with gel pellets outside another Orthodox synagogue.

Days later, a Michigan man rammed an explosives-laden truck into a suburban Detroit synagogue and preschool, the latest in a string of anti-Jewish attacks that have picked up pace since the U.S. and Israel launched a war with Iran.

In Teaneck, home of one of New Jersey’s largest Jewish communities, residents expressed concern about recent antisemitic events and how to combat them. Shari Silverstein, a mother of two college students, asked law enforcement if she can carry pepper spray to defend herself.

She was reassured that she’s legally permitted to carry the substance, but “it’s not the most effective because it tends to get all over the place, including on yourself,” said Seth Kriegel, Deputy Chief of the Teaneck Police Department.

Advertisement

Others were concerned about whether there would be adequate patrols of the neighborhood over the Passover holiday, when many people will likely be walking around the neighborhood late at night to get to and from synagogue and their Passover seder, or ritual feast. Law enforcement officials said they were aware of the unique schedule of each Jewish holiday and would have extra police patrols.

Tim Torell, Jewish Community Security Director at Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey, said the local community has had numerous incidents in which Jewish people were targeted even while walking to and from synagogue. “Things were thrown at them from vehicles and people shouted at them,” he said. “The number of antisemitic incidents are vastly underreported,” he said, emphasizing that it’s important to report every incident, even if it seems minor.

The number of assaults against Jews worldwide has increased by 34% since the joint attack on Iran by Israel and the US, according to research by the Combat Antisemitism Movement, a non-partisan group based in Kansas devoted to fighting antisemitism.

Attacks have multiplied around the globe in recent weeks: In the Netherlands, bombs were planted at Jewish institutions; in Toronto, synagogues were sprayed with gunfire; and in Jackson, Mississippi, a synagogue was set afire by someone who announced he wanted to hurt Jews.

Advertisement

‘Targeted purely because I am Jewish’

Closer to home In Teaneck, police arrested two teens after they reportedly targeted Jewish worshippers on March 8, including a 19-year-old by the pellet gun attack outside of Congregation Bnai Yeshurun. According to authorities, occupants in the car first asked him whether he supported Israel or Palestine.

The victim of that incident − a Yeshiva University student named Netanel who asked that his last name not be used − spoke at the event. He said that on the evening of the attack, he was walking near his synagogue wearing a prominent white kippah, skullcap, and tzitzit, ritual fringes, which were visible against his black clothing.

“I was targeted purely because I am Jewish…The purpose of actions like this is clear: The perpetrators want to instill fear in us so that we feel uncomfortable living openly as Jews in our own neighborhoods. They want us to hide,” he said.

He asserted that he will never hide and never be afraid to be afraid to publicly identify himself as religious Jew.

Advertisement

He urged the prosecutors of their case to “make an example out of these Jew-hating assailants” for anyone else considering a similar hateful act that they will be punished “with the full severity of the law.”

Police, who did not identify the teens because they are minors, said they will be prosecuted in the Family Division of New Jersey Superior Court.

That decision led Elie Rubin of Teaneck to ask the community to push for a tougher punishment. “We have to show that the law matters. If they are old enough to drive a car and serve in the military, why can’t they be charged as adults. This was more than one bias incident. No one stopped them the first time. We need to send a message that they can’t do this.”

But before that incident, Teaneck had heated protests outside of the council chambers and in front of synagogues in which rhetoric against Jews and Israel grew nasty. There were reports that some participants said: “Gas them, you filthy Jews.”

For many Jewish Americans, the shocking uptick in antisemitic incidents have confirmed their worst fears about their safety in America. It also highlights the need to counter the extremism through more education and to take more vigorous measures to defend themselves.

Advertisement

Increased security

As antisemitic crimes have soared in recent years, many synagogues in New Jersey and around the country have installed security systems and hired trained guards. Some Jewish institutions organized a volunteer security force called Community Security Service, which has trained nearly 20,000 volunteers in 20 states since it was established in 2007.

Katie Katz, Executive Director of Teach New Jersey, which advocates for funding for nonpublic schools, said that the dramatic escalation in antisemitism across the country has forced Jewish schools to rethink what it means to keep students safe.

“Security is no longer a precaution − it is a necessity that comes at a significant cost. Since Oct. 7, the average school’s security expenses increased by over 84% over two years and amounted to over 3% of the average school’s budget,” she said. Many schools now spend more than $400,000 annually just on security, she added.

Katz urged the community to lobby their legislators to ensure that safety is a priority for nonpublic as well as public school students. “This is a tight budget year for New Jersey and there will be pressure to cut… We cannot allow security for our children to be one of those cuts.”

While some in the Jewish community have suggested that they should hide their Jewishness to avoid being targeted, most of speakers and the attendees interviewed at the event expressed defiance, asserting that the only way to approach hate is to practice their faith with greater pride.

Advertisement

“We need to be joyous and be proud. Antisemitism is not your fault. You didn’t create it by anything you did,” said Rabbi Daniel Fridman, leader of the Jewish Center of Teaneck in his address to the crowd. He added that it’s imperative that the Jewish community continue to celebrate their traditions and “don’t let them ever take that away from you.”



Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

New Jersey Becomes the 10th State with a Law Barring Local ICE Contracts – Bolts

Published

on

New Jersey Becomes the 10th State with a Law Barring Local ICE Contracts – Bolts


New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill on Wednesday signed legislation banning local law enforcement agencies from partnering with federal immigration authorities, making it the 10th state to adopt laws that prohibit such collaboration. 

The new law codifies a 2018 order by then-Attorney General Gurbir Grewal, known as the Immigrant Trust Directive. That directive barred state and local authorities from entering into ICE’s 287(g) program, which deputizes local officers to enforce federal immigration laws. It also restricted law enforcement from detaining people on ICE’s behalf and asking about citizenship status when it doesn’t relate to a criminal investigation.

The directive forced several local sheriffs to end their partnerships with ICE but it was not codified into law, worrying immigrants’ rights advocates that a governor and attorney general more favorable to Donald Trump’s deportation agenda could come into office and undo those rules. The GOP’s candidate for governor last fall campaigned on ending the 2018 directive and ramping up partnerships with ICE, but he lost to Sherrill by a large margin.

Nedia Morsy, director of immigrant advocacy organization Make the Road New Jersey, told Bolts that the adoption of the law this week signals that “the state legislature and the [Sherrill] administration is recognizing that there is rising authoritarianism and there is a need to act.”

Advertisement

New Jersey joins nine other blue states—California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Maine, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington—in prohibiting participation in the 287(g) program. It’s the fourth state to do this so far this year.

Four states governed by Democrats, including neighboring Massachusetts and New York, still have local or state agencies with 287(g) contracts, though a bill to restrict those agreements is currently on the governor’s desk in Virginia. 

Sherrill also signed two other pieces of legislation aimed at protecting New Jersey’s immigrants: The Privacy Protection Act, which restricts when local and state agencies can collect information about immigration status or share it with the federal government; another law requires ICE agents to show their faces and provide identification before making an arrest. 

“My focus as governor remains on keeping the public safe,” Sherrill said in a statement her spokesperson sent to Bolts on Wednesday after the governor signed the legislation. “As we’ve seen across the country, Donald Trump’s untrained, unaccountable, masked ICE agents are putting people in danger. That’s why in New Jersey, we are protecting our communities—strengthening our protections, banning ICE agents from wearing masks, and protecting residents’ privacy from federal overreach.”

Immigrant rights advocates in New Jersey had long pushed for legislation guarding against ICE abuses, and in January lawmakers passed another bill that codified the Immigrant Trust Directive and also created additional protections.

Advertisement

In one of his final acts in office, Democratic Governor Phil Murphy vetoed the legislation, saying he feared that it would prompt new lawsuits from the Trump administration. Two federal courts, including a Trump-appointed judge, have already upheld the AG’s existing directive, but Murphy said provisions of the bill went beyond that directive and could still invite legal challenges. 

The legislation signed by Sherrill more closely mirrors the Immigrant Trust Directive than the bill that Murphy vetoed in January.

While the legislation still largely prohibits local authorities from keeping someone in jail just because ICE requests it, the version Sherrill signed allows for broader exceptions because it says jails can honor ICE’s detention requests when someone is subject to a final order of removal. Jails can also honor these requests when someone has been convicted of a crime.

In a public statement on Wednesday, Sherrill sounded defiant about defeating any lawsuits over the reform.

“We know the Trump administration has challenged some of these measures in the past,” the governor wrote. “We beat them in court then—and we’re happy to meet them in court again if they decide to sue now.”

Advertisement
New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the restrictions on ICE collaboration into law this week. (Photo via Mikie Sherrill/Facebook.)

New Jersey already banned local jails and sheriffs from entering into Intergovernmental Service Agreements, or IGSAs, to rent out space for ICE to detain immigrants, but a federal appeals court last year allowed private detention centers to continue operating in the state. The centers have drawn large protests over the last year. 

Immigrants’ rights advocates say they’ll keep pressing for additional protections in the state. “As the Trump administration attempts to erode due process protections, it is more important than ever that New Jersey affirmatively stands up for them,” said Ami Kachalia, campaign strategist for the ACLU of New Jersey. She would like to see increased funding for immigrants facing deportations to access legal counsel.

Morsy said that Make the Road New Jersey will continue to educate local officials on how they can protect against ICE. In Hoboken, for example, the city council adopted an ordinance that restricts the city from using its resources on federal immigration enforcement. 

She said her organization plans to stress to local officials that they shouldn’t provide assistance to ICE unless there’s a warrant signed by a judge. They could also agree to commit to reviewing all of their vendors to ensure that data isn’t being shared with ICE, Morsy added.

“I do think it’s important to remember that these bills set a standard for protection, but they aren’t the ceiling,” she said. “Elected officials at all levels of government have the opportunity and are still called to make a very honest assessment about the need and the urgency to go beyond this standard.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending