Connect with us

New Jersey

Details of proposed major overhaul of U.S. immigration law, global aid package unveiled – New Jersey Monitor

Published

on

Details of proposed major overhaul of U.S. immigration law, global aid package unveiled – New Jersey Monitor


WASHINGTON — U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Sunday night released a $118.28 billion global security package that includes a long-anticipated overhaul of immigration law negotiated by a bipartisan trio of senators.

“The United States and our allies are facing multiple, complex and, in places, coordinated challenges from adversaries who seek to disrupt democracy and expand authoritarian influence around the globe,” Schumer, a New York Democrat, said.

The nearly 400-page package includes bipartisan immigration legislation that reportedly would raise the bar for migrants claiming asylum, curb the White House’s use of parole authority to temporarily grant protections to migrants, and end the practice of allowing migrants to live in the United States while they wait for their cases to be heard by an immigration judge.

The immigration provisions, negotiated by the White House and Sens. James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, Chris Murphy, a Democrat from Connecticut, and Kyrsten Sinema, an independent from Arizona, would be the biggest changes to immigration law in nearly 40 years if it is enacted.

Advertisement

Schumer said the deal those three senators worked on for four months “is a real opportunity for Congress to address our borders and make progress towards a more efficient and well-resourced system.”

“This agreement improves an adjudication system that has been underfunded for decades by hiring more frontline personnel, asylum officers, and creating new processes to provide faster and fair decisions,” Schumer said.

Option to shut down the border

The legislation would give the option for the U.S. to shut down the border if there are more than 4,000 encounters recorded with migrants in a day, Sinema said during a Sunday morning interview on the CBS show “Face the Nation,” If that number reaches 5,000 encounters, the U.S. would be required to shut down the border.

Sinema said the proposed policy would be a “powerful tool.”

“The reason we’re doing that is because we want to be able to shut down the system when it gets overloaded, so we have enough time to process those asylum claims,” Sinema said.

Advertisement

Votes could come as early as Wednesday for the package that would provide funding to Ukraine, Israel, the Indo-Pacific region and U.S. border security.

Enacting the bill into law will be an uphill battle, even though President Joe Biden has committed to supporting the deal, as his administration contends with the largest number of migrant encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border in 20 years.

House Republicans have fallen in line behind former President Donald J. Trump’s opposition to an agreement. Trump’s GOP-leading 2024 presidential campaign has used fears of immigration at the southern border as a central theme.

House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana has argued that Biden has the authority to make immigration policy changes, and does not need Congress to take action.

The release of the long-anticipated immigration bill text and global aid package accompanies a drive by House Republicans to impeach U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas over what critics say is policy differences, but it’s unclear if the GOP’s razor-thin majority will prevail. A vote is expected in the coming week.

Advertisement

Johnson has a slim two-vote majority, and even if Mayorkas is impeached, the Democratic-controlled Senate likely would acquit the secretary, meaning he would not be removed.

Sinema says no more ‘catch and release’

Sinema said the bill would end the policy of allowing migrants who are detained to live in U.S. communities while they await having their asylum cases heard by an immigration judge, known colloquially as “catch and release.”

Instead of that practice, Sinema said those migrants would be taken to a  short-term detention center, where a quick asylum interview would determine whether that migrant meets the asylum requirements or should be swiftly removed.

Sinema said that those migrants who cannot be detained, such as families, would have a three-month asylum review.

“For folks that we can’t detain, like families, for instance, (we) will ensure that we’re supervising them over the course of just three months and conduct that interview with that new higher standard, requiring them to show more proof early on about whether or not they qualify for asylum and to return them to their country if they do not have the evidence or the proof that they qualify for asylum,” Sinema said.

Advertisement

She added that those who do qualify for asylum will be on a rapid path for approval, within about six months.

There currently is a backlog of more than 3.2 million cases in immigration court, pending under roughly 600 immigration judges, according to the Syracuse University’s Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, or TRAC, which compiles immigration data.

Many migrants have initial court dates set years in the future. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has estimated that an additional 700 — so 1,349 total — immigration judges would need to be hired in order for the backlog of immigration courts to be cleared by fiscal year 2032.





Source link

Advertisement

New Jersey

Severe Storms, Dangerous Heat Targets NJ Friday

Published

on

Severe Storms, Dangerous Heat Targets NJ Friday


“Dangerous heat is expected to continue across much of our region through today, with several record highs likely to be challenged again. High temperatures are forecast to peak into the low to mid 90s across most of the area,” the National Weather Service said Friday.

A Heat Advisory is in effect until 8 p.m. across the state except for Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland and Salem counties.





Source link

Continue Reading

New Jersey

New Jersey man sentenced to 6.5 years for fatal Lehigh Valley plane crash

Published

on

New Jersey man sentenced to 6.5 years for fatal Lehigh Valley plane crash


Philip McPherson II, a 37-year-old from Riverside, New Jersey, was sentenced Thursday, June 11, to 78 months in prison for his role in a 2022 plane crash in Lehigh County that killed a student pilot, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Sentencing and charges for fatal Lehigh Valley crash

What we know:

Advertisement

United States District Judge John M. Gallagher sentenced McPherson to 78 months in prison, three years of supervised release, a $5,000 fine, a $4,300 special assessment, and $19,530 in restitution. Judge Gallagher also barred McPherson from working in the aviation industry.

McPherson pleaded guilty in October to involuntary manslaughter, conspiracy to commit wire fraud, obstruction of an administrative proceeding, and 40 counts of serving as an airman without a certificate.

Advertisement

The backstory:

Court filings show that on September 28, 2022, McPherson took off from Queen City Airport in Allentown as the pilot-in-command with student pilot K.K. and crashed shortly after, resulting in K.K.’s death.

Prosecutors said McPherson acted with gross negligence, knowing he was not competent to fly as pilot-in-command. He had two prior crashes, nearly a third, and failed a reexamination for his pilot’s certificate in September 2021.

Advertisement

McPherson voluntarily surrendered his pilot’s certificate in October 2021 and let his Temporary Airman Certificate expire in November 2021, acknowledging his inability to meet FAA standards.

He admitted to flying with passengers without a valid FAA pilot’s certificate between October 12, 2021, and September 20, 2022.

Advertisement

Investigators from the U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Inspector General, FAA, and Salisbury Township Police Department worked on the case, which was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Robert Schopf and Special Assistant United States Attorney Marie Miller.

What we don’t know:

Authorities have not released further details about the circumstances leading up to the crash.

Advertisement

The Source: Information from the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Crime & Public SafetyNews



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Jersey

Historic South Jersey bell to ring Sunday to celebrate independence festival

Published

on

Historic South Jersey bell to ring Sunday to celebrate independence festival


From Camden and Cherry Hill to Trenton and the Jersey Shore, what about life in New Jersey do you want WHYY News to cover? Let us know.

On Sunday, June 14, a bell will ring at the Historic Olde Courthouse in Mount Holly, New Jersey, as part of a festival to commemorate the nation’s 250th anniversary.

In the summer of 1776, officials rang the same bell at the courthouse in Burlington City, the seat of Burlington County at the time, after the Declaration of Independence was signed.

The bell was moved to Mount Holly in 1796 when that city became the Burlington County seat.

Advertisement
An ancient bell rung in 1776 will ring again in Burlington County, N.J. on Sunday to celebrate the nation’s 250th anniversary. (Courtesy Burlington County)

Marisa Bozarth, Burlington County’s museum curator of history, said courthouse bells were rung in the 1700s to signify that something important was taking place.

“They would have rung it when there was a large court case of any significance, when the jury was coming back, so people knew to return to the courthouse to hear the verdict,” she said. “The bell was also rung any time there was any public reading of any sort of important document. It was their way to get the information out to the masses quickly.”

After the wording of the Declaration of Independence was finalized and the document was signed, every state received a copy so it could be shared with the people living there. At the time, some Burlington County residents wanted to remain loyal to Britain, while others supported the movement for independence, Bozarth said.

“I would think it was a bit of a scary time because when the Declaration of Independence was finally signed and then presented, it meant we were really going to war,” she said. “We were declaring our independence, but we weren’t officially an independent nation yet. It meant a scary time was coming because Britain wasn’t going to accept that and just let us walk away.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending