Connect with us

New Hampshire

Distant Dome: Lots of Options for Education Funding Changes

Published

on

Distant Dome: Lots of Options for Education Funding Changes


By GARRY RAYNO, Distant Dome

The 2025 session of the New Hampshire legislature began with a number of hot button issues that have garnered headlines from universal Education Freedom Accounts to restricting abortion rights.

But there is a very large elephant in the room that could overwhelm other discussions depending on what the state Supreme Court decides in the appeals of the Rand and ConVal education funding suits.

The issue of state aid to public education is beginning to resonate with state residents who are beginning to understand what was usually a local issue to debate has been severely impacted by what lawmakers have done in Concord over the years and in the past few years particularly.

At the Kearsarge Regional School District deliberative session earlier this month, an attempt to focus the rising property taxes on local decisions by proposing a spending cap which lawmakers enabled just last session, instead the attention was turned to the state’s minuscule aid compared to all but one or no other states in the country.

At some point in this legislative session, you can expect to see the Supreme Court rulings released.

The Rand ruling concerns the Statewide Education Property Tax and how it is administered could be addressed fairly easily but will impact the most property wealthy communities in the state and everyone knows how the legislature looks out for the ones with the most.

A ConVal ruling siding with the plaintiffs will require more political will and courage if lawmakers decide to address the inequities in the current education funding for both students and property taxpayers.

Advertisement

The House Education Funding Committee has bills that could upend the school funding system and others that tweak around the edges.

The committee heard one bill last week, House Bill 550, sponsored by the ranking Democrat on the committee Rep. David Luneau, D-Hopkinton, which would set the state per-pupil adequacy aid at $7,356 for next school, up from about $4,200.

The bill also adds various “necessary specific resource elements” needed for an adequate education outlined in Judge David Ruoff’s decision siding with the plaintiffs that include some things that are currently not in the adequate education definition in law, like transportation and facilities operation and maintenance.

House Bill 651 would raise the base cost to the same figure and also increase state differential aid for special education, low-income and English-as-a-second-language students.

The fiscal note on House Bill 550 indicates the change would add about $500 million to the cost of state aid for education.

Advertisement

Another bill with House Republicans leaders Joe Sweeney, R-Salem, and Jason Osborne, R-Auburn, would raise the Statewide Education Property tax about $5 per $1,000 of equalized evaluation to bring the state aid to the $7,356 mark.

The bill would also cap school budgets to the past three-year average, and anything over that would require a two-thirds majority to pass.

The bill, House bill 675, really does not change where the money is coming from, it would continue to use property taxes to pay for about 71 percent of the cost of education, but would raise it in a more equitable way so that property wealthier communities would subsidize the property poor communities and restart the war between donor and receiver towns, but that may happen anyway if the Supreme Court upholds Judge Ruoff’s Rand decision.

A bill sponsored by Rep. Glenn Cordelli, R-Tuftonboro, would keep the current system in place allowing the property wealthier communities to retain their excess revenue and use it for other education costs and adds municipal services as acceptable uses as well.

Another bill would replace the SWEPT with “a local contribution,” which would be what the town paid for the SWEPT the last year of its existence or what the town’s adequacy amount is under the formula. The community would pay whichever is less. 

Advertisement

The figures would then be used to determine additional state education aid. The bill has the effect of lowering property taxes for the poorer communities.

Several other bills would increase what the state pays in additional aid for special education services both in the current distribution formula and also by raising state aid to nearly $30,000 for each special education student, which is about what it costs for an average special education student.

Another bill would stop the practice of prorating catastrophic special education aid to schools and require the state to pay the full amount, a bone of contention with most school districts because Education Commissioner Frank Edelblut has not asked for additional money for a number of years, while costs have skyrocketed.

The money would come from the Education Trust Fund and not the general fund as it does now.

Other bills before the House Ways and Means Committee concern education funding as well.

Advertisement

Two bills sponsored by Rep. Tom Schamberg, D-Wilmot, would flip the formula for the business tax revenue split between the General Fund and the Education Trust Fund.

Currently 59 percent of the revenue collected under the business profits and business enterprise taxes goes into the general fund, and 41 percent into the Education Trust Fund.

Under Schamberg’s bills, 59 percent would go into the Education Trust Fund and 41 percent into the General Fund.

More importantly, Schamberg’s House Bill 503 would reinstate the Interest and Dividends Tax, and repeal recent reductions in the rates of the Business Profits Tax, from 7.5 percent to 8.5 percent, the Business Enterprise Tax, from .5 percent to .75 percent, and the Rooms and Meals Tax, from 8.5 percent to 9 percent and the additional revenue raised would go into the Education Trust Fund. 

A rough estimate of what that would be annually would be about $300 million in the first year.

Advertisement

There are also bills that take a backdoor approach to education funding like House Bill 283, sponsored by Rep. Dan McGuire, R-Epsom.

The state has defined an adequate education by using the state’s minimum standards and the subject matters that must be taught.

While that makes it difficult to determine what the real cost of an adequate education is, whether it is $10,000 per student as the ConVal Superintendent testified in that case, the $7,356 Judge Ruoff set “as a conservative figure” or the state’s claim of $4,100.

McGuire’s bill would remove a number of the 11 required subject areas that need to be taught under law.

They are:(1) English/language arts and reading. (2) Mathematics. (3) Science. (4) Social studies, including civics, government, economics, geography, history, and Holocaust and genocide education. (5) Arts education, including music and visual arts. (6) World languages. (7) Health and wellness education, including a policy for violations of RSA 126-K:8, I(a). (8) Physical education. (9) Engineering and technologies including technology applications. (10) Personal finance literacy. (11) Computer science.

Advertisement

Under McGuire’s bill, all the specifics after social studies would be removed, as well as all of 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11.

That would leave only six subject areas with one now open ended. That should be able to reduce costs for public education.

And House Concurrent Resolution 11 would declare “the directives of the judicial branch in the Claremont cases that the legislative and executive branches define an ‘adequate education,’ adopt ‘standards of accountability,’ and ‘guarantee adequate funding’ of a public education are not binding on the legislative and executive branches.”

A number of the House Republican leadership are sponsoring the concurrent resolution, which would have the force of law if passed by the senate for this two-year term, but would likely be ruled unconstitutional by the courts because it would give both the Legislature and the Executive Branch more far reaching authority than the courts.

Well if you can’t get the three-fifths majority you need to pass a proposed constitutional amendment through the House and Senate, try a resolution that would only need a majority.

Advertisement

The legislature has never approved a proposed constitutional amendment to remove the courts from education issues, but tried many times and failed.

Education funding will certainly have a broad discussion before lawmakers this session, — this is just what the House has proposed — but whether they take any meaningful action remains to be seen.

Garry Rayno may be reached at garry.rayno@yahoo.com.Distant Dome by veteran journalist Garry Rayno explores a broader perspective on the State House and state happenings for InDepthNH.org. Over his three-decade career, Rayno covered the NH State House for the New Hampshire Union Leader and Foster’s Daily Democrat. During his career, his coverage spanned the news spectrum, from local planning, school and select boards, to national issues such as electric industry deregulation and Presidential primaries. Rayno lives with his wife Carolyn in New London.



Source link

Advertisement

New Hampshire

Longtime Blue Jays organization member Tamargo tasked with leading New Hampshire Fisher Cats

Published

on

Longtime Blue Jays organization member Tamargo tasked with leading New Hampshire Fisher Cats





Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

Meet Garret, Your Newest Morning Show Host on 97.5 WOKQ

Published

on

Meet Garret, Your Newest Morning Show Host on 97.5 WOKQ


Are you ready for your mornings reimagined?

Hi! I’m Garret Doll (like Ken, but less hair and not as handsome), and I’m teaming up with Katie Killourhy for 97.5 WOKQ’s new morning show, Garret & Katie in the Morning!

You ready to join us?

So, Who Is Garret Doll?

Advertisement

I’ve learned something about myself… I don’t like clutter. Unless it’s my clutter. Then it’s not clutter, it’s a system.

That’s probably a pretty accurate starting point for who I am. A little self-aware, a little stubborn, and definitely someone who knows what he likes. I like tacos, steak tips and lobster rolls. (Fun fact: I’ve never had a lobster roll until moving here.)

How It All Started

This whole radio thing started for me when I was 15. My mom helped me land a job at a radio station in my hometown (cause she worked there), and I fell in love with radio. I’ve never left this career.

I’ve spent my entire adult life doing this job, and I still feel like I lucked into the best job in the world. No two days are the same. One minute you’re talking about life, the next you’re playing your favorite songs, then suddenly you’re out in the community meeting people who feel like friends you’ve known forever.

Advertisement

Most of my career took me to places like Denver, Charleston, and Richmond. Now, somehow, it’s brought me here to New Hampshire.

Honestly, I look at it like a “this is exactly where I’m supposed to be” moment. It’s a new start on life, so to speak. You will learn more about that as we get to know each other and you listen to the show on 97.5 WOKQ.

Why WOKQ Matters to Me

WOKQ is one of those stations you hear about in radio. It’s got history. It’s got heart. And it’s built around a community that actually cares about local connection and country music throughout New England.

That matters to me.

Advertisement

I don’t want to just “be on the radio.” I want to be part of what’s happening here. The towns, the events, the random conversations at a bar, the places you tell your friends they have to check out.

That’s the fun part of all of this.

What I’m All About

I’m a pretty simple dude:

I’m the guy who would give you the shirt off my back

Advertisement

Glass half full (even when it probably shouldn’t be)

Always smiling

Authentic… sometimes too authentic

And yeah, there are definitely moments where I say something before thinking it all the way through.

So if you ever hear me and think, “Did he really just say that?” There’s a decent chance the answer is yes.

Advertisement

Some Quick Hits About Me

Coffee order: Americano

Drink Order: Old Fashioned or just a good local beer

Favorite food: Tacos (not even close)

Guilty pleasure show: The Big Bang Theory

Advertisement

Pet peeve: Close talkers… and people who are late

Random fact: I once got a tattoo of Dopey from the Seven Dwarfs because a girl I was dating wanted one. We got them together. (Don’t worry, it’s been covered up by a microphone and a rose… and I haven’t heard from her in about 20 years)

Let’s Do This Together

I’m new to town, which means I could really use your help.

Where’s your go-to spot when you just want to get outside? Best place to hike? Kayak? Local bar? Just disappear for a few hours?

Advertisement

READ MORE: Hidden Gems in New Hampshire: 5 Secret Places Worth Discovering

Drop me your favorites, because if there’s one thing I know, it’s that the best recommendations don’t come from Google… they come from you! The ones who actually live it.

And I’m ready to start exploring and getting to know you. So make sure to tune in to Garret & Katie in the Morning! See you there.

BankNH Pavilion: Summer Show Lineup, 2026

Gallery Credit: Sarah Sullivan





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

New Hampshire

2 Hudson, NH, residents arrested after cats found abandoned

Published

on

2 Hudson, NH, residents arrested after cats found abandoned


HUDSON, N.H. — An animal cruelty investigation led to the arrest of two former tenants who police say left three cats behind in the apartment they were evicted from.

The Hudson Police Department said officers responded to 19 Oliver Drive on Nov. 25 after the town’s animal control officer received a report that multiple cats had been left behind in an apartment previously occupied by Faith Byers, 48, and Kevin Greene, 57.

The pair had reportedly been evicted a week earlier, on Nov. 18.

Police said that attempts to reach Byers and Greene by phone were unsuccessful, and the property owner later confirmed that the two had moved out without taking the cats or arranging for their care.

Advertisement

With the owner’s permission, police entered the apartment and found three cats alone inside the unoccupied residence.

Police said they determined the cats had been left unattended for several days in conditions lacking adequate airflow, sunlight, litter and consistent access to food or water. Police added that no care plan had been made for the animals, and neither former tenant indicated any intention to return for them.

The animals were safely removed and transported to the Animal Rescue League of New Hampshire in Bedford, where they are now receiving care.

Arrest warrants were issued for Byers and Greene, who are each charged with one count of cruelty to animals, a Class A misdemeanor. They were arrested on Friday and released on personal recognizance bail.

They are scheduled to appear in 9th Circuit Court Nashua District Division at 1 p.m. April 28.

Advertisement

Follow Aaron Curtis on X @aselahcurtis, or on Bluesky @aaronscurtis.bsky.social.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending