New Hampshire

3-Minute Civics: Where is the democracy in America? – New Hampshire Bulletin

Published

3 years ago

July 4, 2022

3-Minute Civics: Where is the democracy in America? – New Hampshire Bulletin

Wherein department of our nationwide authorities does our democracy really reside?

The reply is actually not the Supreme Court docket. Justices don’t run for workplace, they usually serve till they die or select to retire (just one ever confronted impeachment, greater than 200 years in the past, and the Senate refused to take away him). There’s a double-layered buffer between the citizenry and number of justices, in that justices are nominated by an elected president and confirmed by a majority of elected senators. These buffers insulate justices from democratic pressures. One good thing about this course of could also be that justices is not going to be political actors, however somewhat nonpartisan jurists free to interpret the Structure based on their very own consciences. However some may debate whether or not this a practical purpose (or perhaps a fascinating one), on condition that these justices are appointed by politicians with their very own political agendas.

Some may say democracy lives in Congress. Each state is represented by not less than one consultant, who’s tasked with voting on nationwide laws, approving the federal price range, and deciding whether or not our nation is at peace or at warfare. However are they a democratic proxy for his or her district? A consultant of it? Ought to they take into concern solely the pursuits of the residents who voted for them? Of all residents? Of all authorized residents? Of everybody?

Once you elect a congressperson, do you consider them as a completely empowered consultant who ought to apply their very own private judgment to resolve the problems earlier than them, leaving you solely with the facility to both vote for or towards them within the subsequent election? Or as an alternative, do you suppose they need to be obliged to vote on every problem they confront in the way in which that they really feel the vast majority of their district would favor?

These appear to be fairly fundamental questions. In any case, that is the inspiration of what precisely our representatives are speculated to do to signify us. And these questions are left completely unanswered within the Structure – Congress is empowered to set its personal guidelines of process and to determine the {qualifications} of its personal members, and the citizens merely has to resolve whether or not or to not elect them. For higher or worse, that is the congressional system, and it’s not exceptionally democratic.

Think about, as an alternate actuality, a system whereby a bunch of legislators suggest legal guidelines to most of the people for a yes-or-no vote. Whereas this exists in a variety of small cities in a single variation or one other, on the founding of the federal authorities this could have been a technological impossibility. From its earliest moments, America has been far too geographically huge to realistically anticipate individuals to journey to the capital and vote on each legislative proposal. Paradoxically, such a system appears fairly possible with the arrival of widespread web entry, however I doubt that’s the a part of the Structure persons are keenest to rewrite.

If Congress isn’t essentially the most democratic department of our federal authorities, is it the presidency? The reply is a powerful no. First, the president (much more so than Congress) is free to behave based on his or her personal algorithm. They’ve broad government energy to cross their very own sort of legal guidelines (government orders), to fireplace and rent (with Senate approval) the heads of the assorted administrative departments overseeing the huge bulk of our nation’s legal guidelines, to maneuver the navy into conditions analogous to warfare, and to appoint Supreme Court docket justices (and decrease judges). The president might ballot sections of most of the people to get a way of what these selections may do to re-election odds, however is free to do something chosen throughout the huge limits of his or her powers, common or not.

It could be tempting to say that our specific model of democracy is consultant in nature. Truthful, however how consultant is it for precise People? How typical is it for a congressperson to have a wage and a home corresponding to the typical citizen they signify? Senators weren’t even popularly elected till 1913 however somewhat chosen by state legislators. And the Electoral School that elects the president gives a robust buffer between the desire of the bulk and the number of the top of state – of our 59 presidential elections, 5 have seen the individual with essentially the most votes not win the election as a result of Electoral School. Which means multiple out of each 12 presidential elections has been received by the second-place vote-getter. That’s many issues, however not democratic.

There’s, nevertheless, one zone of our federal authorities that’s completely, purely democratic – the jury. Jurors have near-limitless discretion to make their very own choice of lasting authorized significance. They sit as strangers, are educated as to the information and legislation of a specific dispute, talk about their opinions, after which resolve. No filter, no buffer, only a outcome instantly primarily based on the individuals’s votes.

With such an awesome energy come some limitations, however importantly, none to the precise energy to declare that an individual shouldn’t be responsible of against the law. The decide can restrict what info the jury can hear or take into account, in addition to body what the legislation is and the necessities essential to maintain a verdict; in excessive instances, the decide may even overturn a responsible verdict as not supported by the information. But when a bunch of jurors decides to acquit a defendant, for no matter motive they see match, that defendant is eternally freed from these prices. No matter what legal guidelines Congress handed. No matter what legal guidelines the president enforced. No matter how the Supreme Court docket interpreted the rights at stake.

The jury has the final and most democratic say.

Source link

New Hampshire

Methuen woman airlifted after motor vehicle crash in Pelham, NH

Published

3 hours ago

January 11, 2025

Press Room

Methuen woman airlifted after motor vehicle crash in Pelham, NH

PELHAM, N.H. — A 26-year-old Methuen woman sustained serious injuries in a single-vehicle crash on Friday morning and was airlifted to a hospital for treatment.

The Pelham Police said Nicole Lugo was the driver and sole occupant of the vehicle.

The crash occurred on Main Street and was reported to emergency crews at about 9:50 a.m. When police arrived on scene, they said they found a gray Honda Civic “embedded in a utility pole.”

Police said an investigation revealed that the Civic had veered off the road and collided head-on with the pole.

Lugo was airlifted to a nearby hospital.

The road remained closed for more than four hours while utility crews worked to replace the damaged utility pole.

Police are investigating the crash. They urged any witnesses to contact Cpl. James Locke at jlocke@pelhampolice.com or 603-635-2411.

Follow Aaron Curtis on X, formerly known as Twitter, @aselahcurtis

Source link