Connect with us

Massachusetts

Lucas: Bay State bullied by Ayotte, DeSantis

Published

on

Lucas: Bay State bullied by Ayotte, DeSantis


Gov. Maura Healey ought to put the Massachusetts National guard on alert.

That is because if Republican Kelly Ayotte is elected governor of New Hampshire, the Bay State could be caught in a two-front “war.”

Under Healey the state is already involved in a war of words with Gov. Ron DeSantis and Florida.

New Hampshire could be next if Healey is up to the challenge. She is, after all, from New Hampshire.

Advertisement

The Florida war began with the exodus of thousands of Massachusetts residents seeking lower taxes, less crime and a better quality of life, abandoned Massachusetts for the Sunshine state. They are still fleeing.

The problem was exacerbated when DeSantis boldly flew in 50 illegal immigrants, mostly Venezuelans, into toney Martha’s Vineyard, catching everyone off guard.

Martha’s Vineyard residents welcomed them,  but could not get them off the island fast enough.

Despite a lawsuit from a civil right group accusing DeSantis of conducting a “fraudulent and illegal scheme” by sending the illegal immigrants to Massachusetts, none have petitioned to return home.

Healey, meanwhile, has retaliated by attacking DeSantis and erecting billboards in Florida and Texas bragging about Massachusetts being a welcoming state.

Advertisement

Now Ayotte, a former New Hampshire attorney general and U.S. senator, is using Massachusetts as a whipping post in her campaign for governor. Veteran fellow Republican Gov. Chris Sununu is not seeking re-election.

What does Ayotte think of Massachusetts?

“I’m running for governor because New Hampshire is one election away from becoming Massachusetts,” she said. Ouch.

But she may be right. The thousands of people leaving high-tax Massachusetts for Florida, are also moving to nearby low-tax New Hampshire. And they are politically turning New Hampshire into Massachusetts.

Many of these newcomers live in New Hampshire but work in Massachusetts or work remotely for Massachusetts companies.

Advertisement

A New Hampshire grudge against them — and Massachusetts — is that these estimated 100,000 workers pay income taxes to Massachusetts, not New Hampshire. The Granite State has no income tax.

Ayotte took another shot at Massachusetts when she talked about tougher penalties for drug dealers who are shipping the deadly drug fentanyl into New Hampshire from Lawrence and Lowell.

She said of New Hampshire, “I was born here and raised here. I raised my kids here. And you know what? I am going to die here because this state and its people are different. What we have here is worth fighting for.”

Perhaps it is, but times are changing in New England and in the “Live Free or Die” state.

In Maine, there is a hassle over the state flag between conservatives who like the 115-year-old current flag and state seal, which depicts a farmer and a fisherman, and liberals who want to replace it with an earlier flag that depicts a pine tree and a star.

Advertisement

In Massachusetts, a special commission established in 2021 is still working to come up with a different design to replace the state seal and flag which dates to 1898.

That Massachusetts seal shows a Native American holding a bow and arrow beneath an arm holding a sword. The Latin motto around the seal reads, “By the sword we seek peace, but peace under liberty.”

It is not exactly “Live free or Die,” but it has been around longer.

Massachusetts has not had a good skirmish with New Hampshire in almost 50 years. That was when House Majority Leader William “Biff” McLean proposed sending undercover state cops to spy on Massachusetts residents loading up on lower-taxed and lower-priced booze in New Hampshire.

Under the plan, alerted cops on the Massachusetts side of the border would nab them and their liquor-laden loads once they crossed.  Biff estimated that Massachusetts was losing millions in liquor taxes to New Hampshire.

Advertisement

It did not work out, however.

Healey should forget all of that. Instead of billboards in Florida and Texas, she should set them up on the New Hampshire border. They would simply say to the thousands of Massachusetts motorists heading north, “Please come home. All is forgiven.”

Peter Lucas is a veteran Massachusetts political reporter and columnist.



Source link

Advertisement

Massachusetts

Disciplinary hearing for suspended Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor continued to 2nd day

Published

on

Disciplinary hearing for suspended Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor continued to 2nd day


Suspended Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor’s Trial Board disciplinary proceedings will go on to a second day.

Proctor’s trouble publicly began when he testified during the murder trial of Karen Read last summer. During a tense examination by the prosecution and even more intense cross examination, Proctor admitted to inappropriate private texts that he made as the case officer investigating Read.

“She’s a whack job (expletive),” Proctor read from compilations of text messages he sent to friends as he looked at Read’s phone. The last word was a derogatory term for women that he at first tried to spell out before Judge Beverly Cannone told him to read it the way he wrote it.

“Yes she’s a babe. Weird Fall River accent, though. No (butt),” he continued under oath on June 10, 2024.

Advertisement

He also texted them “no nudes so far” as an update on the search through her phone. He also testified that he told his sister that he hoped that Read would kill herself.

On Wednesday, Proctor sat through a full day of trial board proceedings at MSP general headquarters in Framingham. When that concluded in the late afternoon, the board decided to continue for a second day on Feb. 10. Neither Wednesday’s proceeding nor the second day is open to the public.

Proctor was relieved of duty on July 1 of last year, which was the day the Read trial concluded in mistrial. He was suspended without pay a week later. The State Police finished its internal affairs investigation last week and convened the trial board to determine the next step in the disciplinary process.

The trial board makes disciplinary recommendations to the superintendent, who determines the final outcome.

“A State Police Trial Board shall hear cases regarding violations of Rules, Regulations, Policies, Procedures, Orders, or Directives,” states the Department’s Rules and Regulations.

Advertisement

“In the event that the Trial Board finds guilt by a preponderance of the evidence on one or more of the charges, the Trial Board shall consider the evidence presented by the Department prosecutor pertaining to the accused member’s prior offenses/disciplinary history, and shall make recommendations for administrative action,” the rules and regulations state.

Read, 44, of Mansfield, faces charges of second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter and leaving the scene of a collision causing the death of O’Keefe, a 16-year Boston Police officer when he died at age 46 on Jan. 29, 2022. Read’s second trial is scheduled to begin April 16.

Originally Published:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Local startups recovering from the burst tech funding bubble – The Boston Globe

Published

on

Local startups recovering from the burst tech funding bubble – The Boston Globe


Tech startups based in Massachusetts finished 2024 with a buzz of activity in venture capital fundraising.

In the fourth quarter, 191 startups raised a total of $4.1 billion, 20 percent more than startups raised in the same period a year earlier, according to a report from research firm Pitchbook and the National Venture Capital Association. For the full year, local startups raised $15.7 billion, about the same as in 2023.

The stability ended two years of sharp declines from the peak of startup fundraising in 2021. Slowing e-commerce sales, volatility in tech stock prices, and higher interest rates combined to slam the brakes on startup VC activity over the past three years. The 2024 total is less half the $34.7 billion Massachusetts startups raised in 2021.

Advertisement

But local startup investors have expressed optimism that VC backing will continue to pick up in 2025.

The fourth quarter’s activity was led by battery maker Form Energy’s $455 million deal and biotech obesity drugmaker Kailera Therapeutics’ $400 million deal, both in October, and MIT spinoff Liquid AI’s $250 million deal last month. Two more biotech VC deals in October rounded out the top five. Seaport Therapeutics, working on new antidepressants, raised $226 million and Alpha-9 Oncology, developing new treatments for cancer patients, raised $175 million.

Massachusetts ranked third in the country in VC activity in the quarter. Startups based in California raised $49.9 billion and New York-based companies raised $5.3 billion.

Advertisement

Venture capital firms, however, had an even harder time raising money in 2024 compared to earlier years. Massachusetts firms raised $5.9 billion, down 7 percent from 2023 and the lowest total since 2018. That mirrored the national trend, as VC firms across the country raised $76.1 billion, down 22 percent from 2023 and the lowest since 2019.

Only one Massachusetts-based VC firm raised more than $1 billion in 2024, a more common occurrence in prior years, according to the report: Flagship Pioneering in Cambridge raised $2.6 billion in July for its eighth investment fund plus another $1 billion for smaller funds. The firm, founded by biotech entrepreneur Noubar Afeyan, helps develop scientific research for startups in addition to providing funding.

The next largest deals were Cambridge-based Atlas Ventures’ $450 million biotech-focused fund announced last month and Engine Ventures $400 million fund investing in climate tech startups announced in June.

The decline comes as VC firms have had trouble getting a return on their investments, because so few startups have been able to go public. Just six biotech companies based in Massachusetts and no tech companies went public last year.


Advertisement

Aaron Pressman can be reached at aaron.pressman@globe.com. Follow him @ampressman.





Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Mass. gives noncompliant towns more time to meet MBTA zoning regulations

Published

on

Mass. gives noncompliant towns more time to meet MBTA zoning regulations


The Healey administration filed emergency regulations late Tuesday afternoon to implement the controversial law meant to spur greater housing production, after Massachusetts’ highest court struck down the last pass at drafting those rules.

The Supreme Judicial Court upheld the MBTA Communities Act as a constitutional law last week, but said it was “ineffective” until the governor’s Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities promulgated new guidelines. The court said EOHLC did not follow state law when creating the regulations the first time around, rendering them “presently unenforceable.”

The emergency regulations filed Tuesday are in effect for 90 days. Over the next three months, EOHLC intends to adopt permanent guidelines following a public comment period, before the expiration of the temporary procedures, a release from the office said.

“The emergency regulations do not substantively change the law’s zoning requirements and do not affect any determinations of compliance that have been already issued by EOHLC. The regulations do provide additional time for MBTA communities that failed to meet prior deadlines to come into compliance with the law,” the press release said.

Advertisement

Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the state’s attorney general has the power to enforce the MBTA Communities Law, which requires communities near MBTA services to zone for more multifamily housing, but it also ruled that existing guidelines aren’t enforceable.

Follow NBC10 Boston:
https://instagram.com/nbc10boston
https://tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
https://facebook.com/NBC10Boston

https://bsky.app/profile/nbcboston.com

The MBTA Communities Act requires 177 municipalities that host or are adjacent to MBTA service to zone for multifamily housing by right in at least one district.

Cities and towns are classified in one of four categories, and there were different compliance deadlines in the original regulations promulgated by EOHLC: host to rapid transit service (deadline of Dec. 31, 2023), host to commuter rail service (deadline of Dec. 31, 2024), adjacent community (deadline of Dec. 31, 2024) and adjacent small town (deadline of Dec. 31, 2025).

Under the emergency regulations, communities that did not meet prior deadlines must submit a new action plan to the state with a plan to comply with the law by 11:59 p.m. on Feb. 13, 2025. These communities will then have until July 14, 2025, to submit a district compliance application to the state.

Advertisement

Communities designated as adjacent small towns still face the Dec. 31, 2025 deadline to adopt compliant zoning.

The town of Needham voted Tuesday on a special referendum over whether to re-zone the town for 3,000 more units of housing under Massachusetts’ MBTA Communities law.

Follow NBC10 Boston:
https://instagram.com/nbc10boston
https://tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
https://facebook.com/NBC10Boston

https://bsky.app/profile/nbcboston.com

Like the old version of the guidelines, the new emergency regulations gives EOHLC the right to determine whether a city or town’s zoning provisions to allow for multi-family housing as of right are consistent with certain affordability requirements, and to determine what is a “reasonable size” for the multi-family zoning district.

The filing of emergency regulations comes six days after the SJC decision — though later than the governor’s office originally projected. Healey originally said her team would move to craft new regulations by the end of last week to plug the gap opened up by the ruling.

Advertisement

“These regulations will allow us to continue moving forward with implementation of the MBTA Communities Law, which will increase housing production and lower costs across the state,” Healey said in a statement Tuesday. “These regulations allow communities more time to come into compliance with the law, and we are committed to working with them to advance zoning plans that fit their unique needs.”

A total of 116 communities out of the 177 subject to the law have already adopted multi-family zoning districts to comply with the MBTA Communities Act, according to EOHLC.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending