Connect with us

Massachusetts

As child care costs soar, Healey administration pledges to simplify access to financial support – The Boston Globe

Published

on

As child care costs soar, Healey administration pledges to simplify access to financial support – The Boston Globe


As parents across the state continue to face soaring child care costs, Governor Maura Healey’s administration is taking steps to make it easier for Massachusetts families to pay those bills, officials said Monday.

The new policies from the Department of Early Education and Care will cut down on paperwork and simplify the application process for help covering the cost of early education, particularly for low-income families and those facing homelessness or who have disabilities, Healey’s office said in a statement.

Healey said the “changes will help break down barriers for our low-income families and early education programs, making government services more user friendly and equitable.”

Advertisement

Eastern Massachusetts has some of the highest child care costs in the United States, with families in Middlesex and Norfolk counties paying more than $26,000 a year for infant center-based child care, or about 20 percent of median family budgets, according to data released by the US Department of Labor this year. They trailed only Arlington County in Virginia and San Francisco County in California, where the costs are even higher.

Suffolk and Essex counties also ranked in the top 20, and all 14 Massachusetts counties appeared in the top 100, among the more than 2,800 counties nationwide for which data were available.

The changes announced Monday also come as pandemic-era federal funding for child care through the American Rescue Plan came to an end over the weekend. An analysis by the Century Foundation predicted that the end of these funds could result in more than 56,000 Massachusetts children losing access to care.

Under the new regulations, communication with families will be simplified through email and texting campaigns that reach parents directly and help them through the application process, officials said, while duplicative paperwork and reporting requirements are being eliminated.

The state is also updating “provider employment definitions and requirements to reflect the changing nature of work, including more flexibility for hourly wage earners and those working from home,” the statement said.

Advertisement

The state will also begin waiving fees for homeless families and “easing reporting requirements” for people who have disabilities or are participating in substance use treatment, officials said.

The Department of Early Education and Care will work closely with the departments of Transitional Assistance and Children and Families “to streamline processes and reduce administrative burdens for families,” the statement said.

Healey’s office said the department will also incorporate more inclusive language “that supports the dignity of receiving child care financial assistance, and is inclusive of LGBTQ+ families and families with disabilities.” The policies will eventually be explained in up to 14 languages to make the process more accessible.

Material from previous Globe stories was used in this report.


Advertisement

Nick Stoico can be reached at nick.stoico@globe.com. Follow him @NickStoico.





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Massachusetts

Mass. gives noncompliant towns more time to meet MBTA zoning regulations

Published

on

Mass. gives noncompliant towns more time to meet MBTA zoning regulations


The Healey administration filed emergency regulations late Tuesday afternoon to implement the controversial law meant to spur greater housing production, after Massachusetts’ highest court struck down the last pass at drafting those rules.

The Supreme Judicial Court upheld the MBTA Communities Act as a constitutional law last week, but said it was “ineffective” until the governor’s Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities promulgated new guidelines. The court said EOHLC did not follow state law when creating the regulations the first time around, rendering them “presently unenforceable.”

The emergency regulations filed Tuesday are in effect for 90 days. Over the next three months, EOHLC intends to adopt permanent guidelines following a public comment period, before the expiration of the temporary procedures, a release from the office said.

“The emergency regulations do not substantively change the law’s zoning requirements and do not affect any determinations of compliance that have been already issued by EOHLC. The regulations do provide additional time for MBTA communities that failed to meet prior deadlines to come into compliance with the law,” the press release said.

Advertisement

Massachusetts’ Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the state’s attorney general has the power to enforce the MBTA Communities Law, which requires communities near MBTA services to zone for more multifamily housing, but it also ruled that existing guidelines aren’t enforceable.

Follow NBC10 Boston:
https://instagram.com/nbc10boston
https://tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
https://facebook.com/NBC10Boston

https://bsky.app/profile/nbcboston.com

The MBTA Communities Act requires 177 municipalities that host or are adjacent to MBTA service to zone for multifamily housing by right in at least one district.

Cities and towns are classified in one of four categories, and there were different compliance deadlines in the original regulations promulgated by EOHLC: host to rapid transit service (deadline of Dec. 31, 2023), host to commuter rail service (deadline of Dec. 31, 2024), adjacent community (deadline of Dec. 31, 2024) and adjacent small town (deadline of Dec. 31, 2025).

Under the emergency regulations, communities that did not meet prior deadlines must submit a new action plan to the state with a plan to comply with the law by 11:59 p.m. on Feb. 13, 2025. These communities will then have until July 14, 2025, to submit a district compliance application to the state.

Advertisement

Communities designated as adjacent small towns still face the Dec. 31, 2025 deadline to adopt compliant zoning.

The town of Needham voted Tuesday on a special referendum over whether to re-zone the town for 3,000 more units of housing under Massachusetts’ MBTA Communities law.

Follow NBC10 Boston:
https://instagram.com/nbc10boston
https://tiktok.com/@nbc10boston
https://facebook.com/NBC10Boston

https://bsky.app/profile/nbcboston.com

Like the old version of the guidelines, the new emergency regulations gives EOHLC the right to determine whether a city or town’s zoning provisions to allow for multi-family housing as of right are consistent with certain affordability requirements, and to determine what is a “reasonable size” for the multi-family zoning district.

The filing of emergency regulations comes six days after the SJC decision — though later than the governor’s office originally projected. Healey originally said her team would move to craft new regulations by the end of last week to plug the gap opened up by the ruling.

Advertisement

“These regulations will allow us to continue moving forward with implementation of the MBTA Communities Law, which will increase housing production and lower costs across the state,” Healey said in a statement Tuesday. “These regulations allow communities more time to come into compliance with the law, and we are committed to working with them to advance zoning plans that fit their unique needs.”

A total of 116 communities out of the 177 subject to the law have already adopted multi-family zoning districts to comply with the MBTA Communities Act, according to EOHLC.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Revere city councilor slams Massachusetts officials for being ‘woke’ after migrant shelter bust

Published

on

Revere city councilor slams Massachusetts officials for being ‘woke’ after migrant shelter bust


A Revere city councilor says the state’s right-to-shelter law is a “perfect example” of how “woke” ideologies are harmful, as he addressed the arrest of a migrant who allegedly had an AR-15 and 10 pounds of fentanyl at a local hotel.

Originally Published:



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Massachusetts senator seeks to extend deadline for TikTok ban | TechCrunch

Published

on

Massachusetts senator seeks to extend deadline for TikTok ban | TechCrunch


Senatory Ed Markey (D-Mass.) is planning to introduce legislation to extend the TikTok ban deadline by 270 days. TikTok has warned of a looming shutdown in just five days, but the new legislation, officially called the Extend the TikTok Deadline Act, would give TikTok more time to divest from its Chinese parent company ByteDance, if approved by Congress.

TikTok is currently expected to “go dark” on January 19, unless the Supreme Court intervenes to delay the ban. The Supreme Court is weighing the ban, and is expected to decide sometime this week whether the law behind the ban violates the First Amendment.

“As the January 19th deadline approaches, TikTok creators and users across the nation are understandably alarmed,” Markey said in a Senate floor speech on Monday. “They are uncertain about the future of the platform, their accounts, and the vibrant online communities they have cultivated. “These communities cannot be replicated on another app. A ban would dismantle a one-of-a-kind informational and cultural ecosystem, silencing millions in the process.”

Markey noted that while TikTok has its problems and poses a “serious risk” to the privacy and mental health of young people, a ban “would impose serious consequences on millions of Americans who depend on the app for social connections and their economic livelihood.”

Advertisement

Markey and Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.), along with Congressman Ro Khanna (CA-17), recently submitted a bipartisan amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to reverse the D.C. Circuit Court’s decision that upheld the TikTok ban. The trio argued that the TikTok ban conflicts with the First Amendment.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending