Maine
Study shows body camera use expanding among Maine law enforcement, but policies not keeping up • Maine Morning Star
The vast majority of Maine’s law enforcement agencies now use body-worn cameras amid a national expansion that criminal justice experts and communities have pushed for to increase accountability in policing. But despite that proliferation, Maine agencies have not kept pace with the latest evidence-based policies governing their use, making the cameras’ effectiveness unknown.
That’s according to a new report released earlier this week, which surveyed most of Maine’s law enforcement agencies and found a steadily increasing percentage of sheriff offices, campus safety offices and municipal police departments equipping officers with body cameras. This year, 70% of 107 agencies that responded to the survey said they used cameras, and another 21% said they were considering using them.
“Body-worn cameras are now becoming part of the uniform,” said George Shaler, senior research associate at the Catherine Cutler Institute at the University of Southern Maine, who coauthored the report commissioned by the Maine Attorney General’s office. “You will see even more agencies over the next couple of years adopt them as part of their toolkit.”
Research has shown that when high-profile events occur, there is an expectation that video footage exists and public pressure on law enforcement officials to release that footage, the report said. The presence of a body-worn camera is one of the most important tools in the evaluation of allegations of use of force in police-civilian encounters, according to public perception.
Maine’s agencies agree, with most sharing they support the use of body cameras to increase transparency and community relations, address civilian complaints and enhance officer safety.
However, while Maine’s police departments and sheriffs have invested thousands of state and federal dollars to equip officers with body cameras, many details about their use and effectiveness remain unclear. To what extent the cameras are being used, when they’re being turned on or off, how the footage is being stored and recorded and who can have access to it are still unknown due to the absence of a statewide policy or law governing body-worn camera use and transparency.
While 43% of respondents said their agency had not recorded a single instance of use of force, and 36% said there had been 10 or fewer incidents filed in the past 12 months, it is not clear whether these findings were revealed or otherwise impacted by the use of body cameras. Similarly, most Maine law enforcement agencies have had two or fewer complaints against officers in the past year, but what role body-worn cameras played in limiting this number is also unknown.
That leaves incomplete data statewide on the effectiveness of a tool the majority of law enforcement agencies are investing in, making it harder to determine whether the use of body cameras is actually resulting in more transparency, less police violence and fewer complaints about police officers.
“I think it’s great that on so many different levels that departments are moving in this direction,” Shaler said. “But that utility could be even greater if we had some uniformity when it comes to policies at the agency level.”
A steady increase in body camera use
Maine has followed the nationwide increase in body camera use. The number of agencies using body-worn cameras across the state more than doubled since 2017, when only 40% of agencies used them. Three years ago, that number was still less than half, with a quarter of all respondents to a 2021 survey saying they were considering them.
That increase has been despite a failed legislative attempt in 2019 to require their use. But now that body cameras have almost become part of the uniform for Maine sheriffs offices and police departments, some legislative guidelines would benefit the state in making sure their use is governed by best practices, Shaler said.
The expansion of body cameras has generally been received well by law enforcement leaders (most survey respondents were in leadership at their agency). Seventy percent said officers’ mental and physical health was improved by using body-worn cameras, and 68% said interactions with the public were also improved. Almost every survey respondent agreed that they were a useful evidentiary tool.
Body-worn camera policy needs updates
Many departments that use cameras rely on the Maine Chiefs of Police Association model policy, which has not been updated since it was published in 2015. Despite having some valuable components, the report noted the policy may need some revisions to keep up with the latest evidence-based practices.
“When it comes to using evidence to update and revise policy, we’re lagging a little behind on that right now,” Shaler said.
Of the 75 agencies using cameras who responded to the 2024 survey, 99% reported having a policy in place, and 70% of those with a policy indicated that it was publicly available.
Currently, policies around releasing footage also varies by agency, and is reliant upon interpretation of public records laws, the report found.
Purchasing cameras and storing video footage is an expensive endeavor for police departments. Nearly two-thirds of respondents — 65% — reported associated costs of $10,000 or less annually, the report said. That cost was the most common limiting factor for agencies that do not yet use them, and is another reason why the report’s authors recommend a statewide policy committed to regular updates to make sure use of body cameras is optimized, Shaler said.
“This ongoing oversight should balance the interests of the public while also promoting best use of technology and highest performance of law enforcement agencies,” the report said.
Maine
NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion
Robert Bryan is a licensed forester from Harpswell and author or co-author of numerous publications on managing forests for wildlife. Paul Larrivee is a licensed forester from New Gloucester who manages both private and public lands, and a former Maine Forest Service forester.
In November 2025, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved a conservation plan and forest management plan as mitigation for impacts from the NECEC transmission corridor that runs from the Quebec border 53 miles to central Maine.
As professional foresters, we were astonished by the lack of scientific credibility in the definition of “mature forest habitat” that was approved by DEP, and the business-as-usual commercial forestry proposed for over 80% of the conservation area.
The DEP’s approval requires NECEC to establish and protect 50,000 acres to be managed for mature-forest wildlife species and wildlife travel corridors along riparian areas and between mature forest habitats. The conservation plan will establish an area adjacent to the new transmission corridor to be protected under a conservation easement held by the state. Under this plan, 50% of the area will be managed as mature forest habitat.
Under the forest management plan, a typical even-aged stand will qualify as “mature forest habitat” once 50 feet tall, which is only about 50 years old. These stands will lack large trees that provide wildlife denning and nesting sites, multiple vegetation layers that mature-forest birds use for nesting and feeding habitats and large decaying trees and downed logs that provide habitat for insects, fungi and small mammals, which in turn benefit larger predators.
Another major concern is that contrary to the earlier DEP order, the final approval allows standard sustainable forestry operations on the 84% of the forest located outside the stream buffers and special habitats. These stands may be harvested as soon as they achieve the “mature forest habitat” definition, as long as 50% of the conserved land is maintained as “mature.”
After the mature forest goal is reached, clearcutting or other heavy harvesting could occur on thousands of acres every 10 years. Because the landowner — Weyerhaeuser — owns several hundred thousand acres in the vicinity, any reductions in harvesting within the conservation area can simply be offset by cutting more heavily nearby. As a result, the net
mature-forest benefit of the conservation area will be close to zero.
Third, because some mature stands will be cut before the 50% mature forest goal is reached, it will take 40 years — longer than necessary — to reach the goal.
In the near future the Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) will consider an appeal from environmental organizations of the plan approval. To ensure that ecologically mature forest develops in a manner that meets the intent of the DEP/BEP orders, several things need to change.
First and most important, to ensure that characteristics of mature forest habitat have time to develop it is critical that the definition include clear requirements for the minimum number of large-diameter (hence more mature) trees, adjusted by forest type. At least half the stocking of an area of mature forest habitat should be in trees at least 10 inches in diameter, and at least 20% of stands beyond the riparian buffers should have half the stocking in trees greater than or equal to 16 inches in diameter.
Current research as well as guidelines for defining ecologically mature forests, such as those in Maine Audubon’s Forestry for Maine Birds, should be followed.
Second, limits should be placed on the size and distribution of clearcut or “shelterwood” harvest patches so that even-aged harvests are similar in size to those created by typical natural forest disturbance patterns. These changes will help ensure that the mature-forest block and connectivity requirements of the orders are met.
Third, because the forest impacts have already occurred, no cutting should be allowed in the few stands that meet or exceed the DEP-approved definition — which needs to be revised as described above — until the 50% or greater mature-forest goal is reached.
If allowed to stand, the definitions and management described in the forest management plan would set a terrible precedent for conserving mature forests in Maine. The BEP should uphold the appeal and establish standards for truly mature forest habitat.
Maine
Rage Room in Portland, Maine, Developing ‘Scream Room’ Addition
For a lot of people throughout Maine, there’s some built up frustration that they’ve just been keeping inside.
That frustration can come in a lot of different forms. From finances to relationships to the world around you.
So it makes plenty of sense that a rage room opened in Portland, Maine, where people can let some of that frustration out.
It’s called Mayhem and people have been piling in to smash, crush and do dastardly things to inanimate objects that had no idea what was coming.
But Mayhem has realized not everyone is down with swinging a sledgehammer. So they’ve decided to cook up something new.
Mayhem Creating ‘Scream Room’ at Their Space in Portland, Maine
Perhaps the thought of swinging a baseball bat and destroying a glass vase brings you joy. The thought of how sore your body will be after that moment makes you less excited.
Mayhem Portland has heard you loud and clear and is developing a new way to get the rage out. By just screaming.
Mayhem is working on opening their very first scream room. It’s exactly what you think it is, a safe place to spend some time just screaming all of the frustration out.
There isn’t an official opening date set yet but it’s coming soon along with pricing.
Mayhem in Portland, Maine, Will Still Offer Rage Rooms and Paint Splatter
While a scream room is on the way, you can still experience a good time at Mayhem with one of their rage rooms or a paint splatter room.
Both can be experienced in either 20-minute or 30-minute sessions.
All the details including some age and attire requirements can be found here.
TripAdvisor’s Top 10 Things to do in Portland, Maine
Looking for fun things to do in Portland, ME? Here is what the reviewers on TripAdvisor say are the 10 best attractions.
This list was updated in March of 2026
Gallery Credit: Chris Sedenka
Top 15 of The Most Powerful People in Maine
Ever wonder who the most powerful players are in Maine? I’ve got a list!
Gallery Credit: Getty Images
Maine
Maine competition gives creative entrepreneurs the chance to win money
BANGOR, Maine (WABI) – If you’ve ever wondered what goes into pitching a good business idea, you might want to stop by a Big Gig event.
The Big Gig Entrepreneurship Pitch Off brings professionals from across the state together to network and pitch their early-stage business ideas for a chance to win $500.
Tuesday’s competition was held at the Salty Brick Market in Bangor, and it drew a lot of spectators.
“The winners of each semifinal event get $500 and the opportunity to compete for $5,000, so that can make a huge impact on a business that’s just getting off the ground,” said Renee Kelly, a Big Gig organizer.
The winner of the competition, Colin McGuire, was also grateful for the opportunity to showcase his idea “Art on Tap,” which would connect local artists with local venues trying to put on events.
“The support tonight is huge, and it’s just giving me more enthusiasm for running with the idea,” he said.
The season finale of the competition will be held May 19th.
The location is yet to be determined.
If you’d like to apply to compete in the contest, you can go to biggig.org.
Copyright 2026 WABI. All rights reserved.
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Wisconsin4 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Maryland5 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida4 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Massachusetts3 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling