Connect with us

Maine

Maine joins 21 states suing Trump over medical research funding cuts

Published

on

Maine joins 21 states suing Trump over medical research funding cuts


Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey is joining 21 other states seeking a federal court order to stop the Trump administration from cutting medical research funding to institutions such as Jackson Laboratory  and the University of Maine.

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, also criticized the new limit on research funding, saying it could disrupt life-saving biomedical research, including ongoing work taking place in laboratories in Maine.

On Friday, the National Institutes for Health announced that it would limit the amount of grant funding that can be used by medical and public health institutes to cover indirect costs associated with their research, including utility costs, equipment, staff and other infrastructure.

Indirect costs have traditionally been negotiated by the researchers and the federal government. The NIH said on social media that average percentage for overhead was about 28%.

Advertisement

The NIH said Friday that no more than 15% of any research grant could be spent on the indirect costs. Recipients spending more than 15% would see their funding reduced.

The NIH said the new cap would save $4 billion a year.

“Contrary to the hysteria, redirecting billions of allocated NIH spending away from administrative bloat means there will be more money and resources available for legitimate scientific research, not less,” White House spokesman Kush Desai wrote in an email to the Washington Post.

The order took effect Monday, leaving little time for affected institutions to respond.

Frey said in a written statement that he was joining 21 other attorneys general in a lawsuit filed Monday in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts against the administration, NIH, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services “to block this unlawful attempt to cut NIH funding.”

Advertisement

“The NIH funds critical public health research throughout the country and right here in Maine,” Frey said. “While the drastic slashing of this funding is being branded an ‘overhead’ savings, it in fact threatens to cripple vital research into areas that touch the lives of many Mainers, including cancer treatment, infectious diseases, neuromuscular disorders, aging, and addiction. The loss of NIH funds will also impact Maine-based organizations that employ Mainers and attract new talent to our state.”

The lawsuit argues that the NIH directive capping indirect costs violates the Administrative Procedure Act, which Frey said prohibits the NIH from requiring “categorical and indiscriminate changes to indirect cost reimbursements.”

Other states joining the lawsuit are: Arizona, California, Connecticut, Colorado, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.

Collins also spoke out Monday against the cap, saying the “poorly conceived” directive could hurt local researchers at institutions like Jackson Lab, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, University of Maine, University of New England and MDI Biological Laboratory. Those groups warned about a stoppage of research and job losses, she said.

“There is no investment that pays greater dividends to American families than our investment in biomedical research,” Collins said in a  written statement. “In Maine, scientists are conducting much-needed research on Lyme disease and other tick-borne illnesses, Alzheimer’s, diabetes, Duchenne’s Muscular Dystrophy, and on how to improve efficiency in drug discovery, helping to lower the cost of prescription drugs, and conducting many other life-enhancing or life-saving research.”

Advertisement

Collins noted that lawmakers have already passed a law prohibiting the NIH modifying rules regarding indirect costs.

Collins said she spoke Monday morning with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has been nominated to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. She said Kennedy, who could face a Senate confirmation vote this week, to her he plans to take a second look at “these arbitrary cuts … as soon as he’s confirmed.”

The lawsuit is the latest to be filed by Maine and other states asking the courts to push back on the Trump administration’s flurry of executive orders orders the last three weeks, which have sought to end birthright citizenship, unilaterally freeze federal grants and loans, and shut down entire agencies.

It also comes as billionaire businessman Elon Musk and his team, known as the Department of Government Efficiency, are moving aggressively to cut federal spending and reshape the federal workforce.

Such actions have led to widespread confusion and fear, as constituents have flooded phone lines here and elsewhere, raising concerns among Maine’s delegation about the amount of power Trump has ceded to Musk, who was not vetted through any confirmation process.

Advertisement

Trump’s moves, especially his administration’s effort to unilaterally cut programs and funding authorized by Congress, have raised concerns about a constitutional crisis that could upend the country’s basic foundation of have three separate and co-equal branches of government, placing more power with the presidency.

Last week, Congress confirmed Russell Vought as the White House budget chief, who believes a 1974 law enacted by Congress requiring the president to spend congressionally approved fund is unconstitutional.

Collins, who travelled with other Republican senators to Mar-a-Lago on Friday to meet with Trump, voted in support of Vought, even though she said she disagrees with his views on withholding congressional approved funding, known as impoundment.

So far, the courts have stopped several of the Trump administration’s moves from moving forward, at least temporarily.

Maine has now joined a total of four lawsuits against the Trump administration. In addition to the research funding conflict, Frey has challenged efforts to end birthright citizenship and gender-affirming care and challenged Musk’s access to sensitive personal information.

Advertisement



Source link

Maine

There’s Something in the Air in South Portland, Maine – Inside Climate News

Published

on

There’s Something in the Air in South Portland, Maine – Inside Climate News


SOUTH PORTLAND—It’s one of Maine’s most desirable locations—home to a vibrant and diverse community, nearby beaches, and close proximity to Portland’s downtown. But for years, residents in South Portland have wondered: With 120 massive petroleum storage tanks dotting the shore and knitted into some neighborhoods here, is the air safe to breathe?

Now the first answers are in, thanks to a year of emissions monitoring along the fencelines of the city’s tank farms. At two of those locations, in particular, the results showed levels of benzene—a known carcinogen—well above the state’s limit.

“We’re about 300 feet from those tanks,” said Ted Reiner, whose home is surrounded by three of the city’s tank farms. It’s where he and his wife raised their two daughters, now 38 and 28. Around Christmas, Reiner had surgery for bladder cancer. Now he’s undergoing immunotherapy, and he can’t help but wonder whether his environment is contributing to his health woes.

“You just don’t know what the cumulative effect is,” he said. “I think about it a lot.”

Advertisement

Reiner lives closest to the Citgo South Portland Terminal, in a part of South Portland known as Turner Island. The tanks there primarily hold gasoline, while others in the city contain an array of petroleum products, including heating oil and asphalt. He and his family are among the more than 12,600 people who live within a mile of the tank farm, according to EPA data.

According to data collected by Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection, the CITGO terminal is one of two tank farms in the city where emissions exceed the state limit. Average benzene levels were measured at 2.18 micrograms per cubic meter, well above Maine’s allowed limit of 1.28 micrograms.

The highest levels in the city—3.05 micrograms—were measured at South Portland Terminal LLC owned by Buckeye Partners, which, unlike Citgo’s tanks, does not have people living nearby. A tank farm owned by Sunoco, meanwhile, had measurements just below the state guideline.

Long-term inhalation of benzene can damage bone marrow and blood-forming cells, suppress the immune system, and increase the risk of leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, there is “no safe level of exposure.”

Each reported number from the state is the average of a two-week continuous sample. Citgo’s final number for the year is the average of all those two-week samples. When examining a year’s worth of data, higher emissions levels get masked. But levels spike: For one two-week period in particular, the average benzene level recorded near the Citgo facility was 11.8 micrograms per cubic meter, nearly 10 times the state limit.

Advertisement

Those shorter-lived “burst emissions” can be dangerous in their own right.

One to 14 days of exposure to higher levels of benzene can cause headaches and breathing issues for sensitive individuals, such as children, older adults, or people with preexisting health conditions. The risk level for short-term exposure for benzene is 30 micrograms per cubic meter. What’s not clear in the state’s data is whether benzene levels get high enough to trigger those responses.

Rich Johnson, a spokesman for Citgo, said the company takes the concerns of South Portland residents seriously and is continuing to work with state regulators. “We believe it is important that any study of air monitoring results support accurate, representative conclusions about community-level air quality,” Johnson said.

Buckeye Partners did not respond to multiple emails requesting comment.

Petroleum companies and oil terminal owners use various technologies to eliminate emissions, but they still happen. Most often, chemicals escape from tank vents, equipment leaks and loading rack operations.

Anna O’Sullivan, a 42-year-old artist and therapist, thinks about all of this. She worries when her 7-year-old son, Henry, plays in the yard. “Is he just, like, absorbing what’s in the air?” she wonders.

Advertisement

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

She’s hesitant to eat anything grown in the soil there. She’s concerned that staying put means poisoning them both.

But she’s also stuck. O’Sullivan bought her three-bedroom cape, built in 1904, with a big backyard for $190,000 in 2017—a charming and impossible find in the market today.

Advertisement

“I can see the tanks from my house,” she said. The feeling is: “I need to move. I can’t raise my kids in an area where it’s just, like, poisonous air.”

But also: “I like my house. … It’s hard to move, it’s hard to buy a house.”

The science supports these emotions.

The readings are high enough “to merit serious attention,” said Drew Michanowicz, a senior scientist at Physicians, Scientists, and Engineers for Healthy Energy, an independent scientific research institute that brings science to energy policy.

Across South Portland, most people don’t live immediately next to the tanks, which lessens their exposure because emissions are quickly dispersed. But especially around the Citgo facility, some live quite close.

Advertisement

Until last fall, when she had to move following a house fire, Jacky Gerry was living near the Citgo tanks. “Did I ever think we were safe? Probably not,” she said. “But did a lot of people have a choice as to where you live? No.”

People in South Portland first became concerned about the tanks in 2019, after the EPA announced consent decrees, a resolution of a dispute without an admission of guilt, with two companies with tanks here—Global Partners LLC and Sprague Energy. In both cases, heated petroleum storage tanks containing asphalt and a thick fuel oil were emitting what are known as volatile organic compounds—chemicals that include benzene—in violation of their state permits. That issue was specific to tanks containing asphalt and number 6 fuel oil, which were previously thought to have no emissions, and is not the situation with the Citgo tanks.

As a result of the consent decrees, the operators installed systems to capture emissions that appear to have worked. In the most recent testing, emissions levels around both tank farms were below Maine’s threshold.

The consent decrees also helped put the tanks on the radar of lawmakers. In 2021, a newly passed law mandated that all petroleum tank farms in the state begin fenceline monitoring for chemicals including benzene. That monitoring began in August 2024, and the first results were released late last year.

Residents here have long taken the fight against industrial emissions into their own hands, including in a high-profile—and successful—fight to keep oil from Canadian tar sands from being piped into the city in 2018.

It was in that spirit that South Portland resident Tom Mikulka, a retired chemist with a Ph.D. in biochemistry from Cornell, opted to analyze the state results so residents would be able to start understanding the implications.

Advertisement

“I wouldn’t want to go to sleep knowing there’s high benzene levels that close to my home,” said Mikulka, referring to the houses that stand just feet from a fenceline monitor mounted along the Citgo property. “While there is diffusion, I can’t imagine the data is much different just a few feet away.”

The state findings validate the concerns he’s had all along. Mikulka first began testing emissions in the neighborhood back in 2020, when he used COVID relief checks to purchase air monitoring equipment. He hung one of the monitors on Reiner’s property, near the swing his grandkids like to play on.

Now, six years later, with official data in hand, Mikulka hopes the findings will be harder for regulators to dismiss.

That’s Jacky Gerry’s hope, too.

“Now that we have these answers, who’s stepping up to the plate to say, ‘Let’s try to fix that?’” she said. “Is it a city problem? An oil company problem? Where does it fall?”

Advertisement

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Advertisement

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Lawmakers advance bill to provide death benefits after two DOT workers killed on the job

Published

on

Lawmakers advance bill to provide death benefits after two DOT workers killed on the job


After a fatal car crash in Waterville killed two Maine Department of Transportation employees in January, state lawmakers are backing a bill to expand death benefits to the families of DOT workers killed on the job.  The Labor Committee unanimously voted Tuesday to advance LD 669, which will make DOT employees eligible for the same […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend

Published

on

Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend


WISCASSET, Maine (WMTW) – A Maine man has been arrested after police say he intentionally set a bed on fire after a dispute with his girlfriend, while they were still in it.

Police responded Monday, March 9, to a report of a fire that had been intentionally set inside a home on Beechnut Hill Road, according to the Wiscasset Police Department.

Investigators say the homeowner, Terry Couture, 41, set the bed on fire following an argument while both he and his girlfriend were in it. Authorities said the fire was extinguished and no serious injuries were reported.

Couture was arrested and charged with attempted murder, arson, aggravated criminal mischief, and domestic violence criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.

Advertisement

The investigation is ongoing.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending