Connect with us

Maine

Did Maine’s $45 Million Job Growth Investment Work?

Published

on


(TNS) — In 2017, Maine voters permitted borrowing $45 million to pay for personal sector growth, inspired by the promise of latest jobs and financial development the funding was anticipated to generate.

Cash from this system, often called the Maine Know-how Asset Fund, was awarded to almost 30 non-public corporations in grants starting from lower than $100,000 for software program enhancements to a Brunswick name middle to greater than $12 million for a mouse breeding facility in Ellsworth.

5 years later, practically all the cash has been spent. However figuring out its influence on the state’s economic system is sophisticated by secrecy constructed into the legislation that created the Maine Know-how Institute, the quasi-state nonprofit that administers the grant program.


In some instances, main public funding helped set up new tools, construct workplaces and state-of-the-art factories, and add a whole lot of jobs.

Advertisement

However different instances are much less clear-cut. A high-rise headquarters in Portland funded with a $9 million grant stays unfinished. A venture awarded $3 million by no means materialized. An industrial catastrophe at a paper mill worn out tens of millions in public funding.

Based mostly solely on direct job creation, one of many few items of knowledge made public about this system, the investments’ success has been modest. To this point, fewer than 1,000 new positions have been created at 27 corporations.

That is Confidential

This system’s wider advantages are tougher to discern as a result of practically every thing about grant-funded non-public initiatives is taken into account confidential below state legislation.

Corporations granted awards are required to file common experiences with the Maine Know-how Institute and are solely reimbursed for prices after assembly sure benchmarks, in accordance with the institute. However what these benchmarks are, how they’re decided and the exact nature of the initiatives paid for with taxpayer cash shouldn’t be made public. Even the small print of an preliminary financial influence report that estimated that this sizable state funding would end in greater than 5,000 direct jobs and over $1 billion in financial profit to the state over three years are secret.

Advertisement

Brian Whitney, president of the Maine Know-how Institute, stated such confidentiality is important to defend firm funds, commerce secrets and techniques, enterprise plans and different privileged data.

“As a public instrumentality, we now have to offer confidence to buyers and Maine corporations that their mental property goes to be protected,” he stated.

Fundamental details about which corporations have obtained grants and loans, whether or not the cash they obtained has been spent and what number of jobs have been created are explicitly public below the legislation, however little else.

To judge this system, the Maine Know-how Institute says it collects ample data, together with how a lot the businesses it funds spend on Maine merchandise and distributors in addition to their wages and advantages, job numbers, company taxes paid, analysis and growth initiatives, and extra investments they make or obtain on account of public financing.

However these figures for the recipients of the $45 million aren’t publicly obtainable, or at the least not but.

Advertisement

“We’re certainly due for a extra thorough progress evaluation at this level,” Whitney stated.

The Institute’s Accounting

Public funding spurred matching non-public funding value greater than $200 million, in accordance with Whitney. Corporations that obtain grants should match the cash with funding from different sources. It helped corporations giant and small set up new tools, construct new workplaces and factories, enhance expertise and add jobs.

It additionally inspired analysis and growth, an space by which Maine lags behind the nation, stated Heather Johnson, the state’s Financial and Neighborhood Growth Commissioner.

“State investments in innovation not solely assist create jobs, however it might probably assist to draw non-public funding, help the creation of upper wage employment alternatives and contribute to the general diversification of our economic system,” Johnson stated in a press release.

A forthcoming analysis of the state’s financial growth investments — the primary in 4 years — will study the expertise asset fund, “striving to make sure that all investments are correctly using taxpayer {dollars} to assist drive development in sectors key to our state’s financial future,” Johnson added.

Advertisement

The $45 million permitted by voters was meant to assist corporations in seven particular sectors put money into new buildings, infrastructure, equipment, tools and expertise upgrades. Voters had been informed within the poll query that with taxpayer-funded funding matched by non-public financing, corporations that received funding from the state might achieve and preserve market share, enhance income and broaden and preserve employment.

In 2019, the Maine Know-how Institute awarded the cash to 18 corporations throughout the state. An influence report from that yr — one of many program’s solely public paperwork — acknowledged the funding was anticipated to immediately end in 5,350 jobs and $1.4 billion in financial influence inside three years.

The truth is much completely different from these projections, which had been generated in a confidential financial influence evaluation.

In accordance with an evaluation of job figures obtained by the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram, simply 979 direct jobs had been created via the funding as of this yr, a price of practically $46,000 per job. Just one third of the 18 corporations awarded grants in 2019 met three-year employment expectations. 5 corporations have fewer staff now than they did after they obtained the state cash.

Whitney stated the true downside was not that far fewer jobs than anticipated had been created. It was that the preliminary assertion about what number of jobs can be created via the funding was not worded precisely.

Advertisement

The doc ought to have clarified, he stated, that the overall variety of jobs anticipated to outcome from this system can be a mix of direct hires by the funded corporations, “oblique” jobs at their suppliers and subcontractors, and “induced” jobs from the financial exercise generated by the funding.

“We might have been clearer,” Whitney stated in an e-mail. “I might characterize it as an editorial oversight on my half.”

Whereas the variety of direct jobs could seem small, the funding might have created a tough estimate of as many as 3,500 oblique and induced jobs, Whitney stated. The three-year interval of job creation referenced within the report, he famous, does not finish till 2023.

On the peak of their hiring, earlier than the pandemic, the businesses that obtained cash created greater than 1,700 direct jobs, properly forward of projections. That works out to about $25,000 per job, an affordable return on funding for an financial growth program, Whitney stated.

However quite a lot of these job positive aspects eroded within the disruption from pandemic and an ultra-competitive job market later, he stated. At the very least two corporations that obtained cash now have double-digit job openings, Whitney stated.

Advertisement

“Job creation and retention is a bellwether” for the general public and coverage makers, Whitney added. “I nonetheless suppose the job numbers inform a very good story, however it’s inferior to we wish.”

Checking Up

In truth, regardless that job creation numbers are among the many solely data that this system makes publicly obtainable, they don’t seem to be central to how the funded corporations report progress and get evaluated.

State bonds just like the $45 million borrowed for this system can solely be spent on exhausting belongings — infrastructure, tools and expertise upgrades — and corporations receives a commission parts of the cash they have been awarded as they attain milestones within the initiatives they stated they’d undertake. In accordance with this system guidelines, they should make common experiences to the institute and have 5 years to speculate the cash.

For instance, a Portland-based veterinary expertise firm, Covetrus, which on the time it was awarded funding was Vets First Alternative, received $9 million — this system’s second-biggest grant — to assist finance a $20 million headquarters within the metropolis’s India Road neighborhood. In 2018, the corporate claimed the headquarters would maintain 1,500 staff throughout a four-story workplace complicated.

4 years later, the workplace constructing nonetheless has not been completed. Since its award was permitted, Vets First Alternative merged with a veterinary merchandise firm, grew to become a controversial publicly traded agency referred to as Covetrus and is now being taken non-public by its fairness capital financiers. To this point, Covetrus has been paid $4.6 million of its award.

Advertisement

A Covetrus spokesperson didn’t reply to a number of interview requests concerning its state award and the plans for its headquarters.

Whitney stated he lately toured the practically accomplished constructing and is anticipating to obtain a reimbursement request from Covetrus for its remaining award.

Verso Corp. obtained $4 million via this system for a $17 million venture to restart a shuttered pulp line and convert a paper machine to make packaging at its paper mill in Jay. About 120 staff had been employed in consequence. In 2019, Verso Corp. offered the mill to Pixelle Specialty Options, which in flip was lately acquired by H.I.G. Capital, an alternate funding agency.

In April 2020, a pulp digester on the mill exploded, taking a lot of the new investments offline. The mill now employs 323 folks, about 70 fewer than it did when it was awarded funds.

The paper machine funded by the grant is now idle, “however we’re persevering with to analyze different potential merchandise that the machine might produce,” Pixelle spokesperson Alan Ulman stated.

Advertisement

Success Reported

The Jackson Laboratory, the Bar Harbor-based genetic analysis nonprofit, was granted $12.5 million, this system’s largest award, to broaden a brand new vivarium — or construction by which to breed its mice — in Ellsworth.

State help from the Maine Know-how Asset Fund helped add 262 jobs at Jackson Laboratory, together with 150 in Ellsworth, the corporate stated — practically 100 extra jobs than had been projected.

“MTAF funding not solely accelerated the general venture, it additionally supplied proof of precept {that a} trendy vivarium might be constructed at a a lot bigger scale utilizing superior automation techniques,” stated Katy Longley, Jackson Laboratory’s chief working officer, in a press release.

However measuring the native influence of the state’s funding is sophisticated.

Extra Jackson Laboratory staff have moved to Ellsworth, purchased property and stimulated the town’s economic system, stated Ellsworth’s Financial Growth Director Janna Richards. The world across the laboratory, which had a number of vacant parcels, has crammed up and drawn curiosity for added industrial and housing developments.

Advertisement

“It is exhausting to not suppose the rationale why these are being proposed right here has a relationship to Jackson Laboratory,” Richards stated.

However many individuals moved to the Ellsworth space within the wake of coronavirus, unconnected to the laboratory. A scorching housing market and demand for brand new development exists even with out its presence. So sifting out what advantages investments in Jackson Laboratory introduced is difficult.

“We all know that it’s a vital contribution to the town of Ellsworth and our economic system. You possibly can’t deny it. It’s only a matter of quantify that — it’s sort of troublesome,” Richards stated.

In Kittery, Good-to-Go used a $150,000 grant from the state fund to assist improve packaging tools for its dried to-go tenting and backpacking meals.

Co-founder Jen Scism stated the funding allowed her tiny firm to beat a manufacturing bottleneck, serve prospects sooner and broaden.

Advertisement

“It was an enormous assist for us, not just for the automation and efficiencies — it continued with a development trajectory for the corporate” Scism stated. The workers has expanded from 13 to 24 staff and is rising into a brand new meals mixing area and workplace area.

Funding additionally appeared to spur main development for different corporations, although they weren’t obtainable to debate if the connection between the funding and the expansion was direct.

Prepared Seafood, which didn’t reply to a number of requests to debate the funding, was given $2.25 million for a brand new state-of-the-art processing manufacturing unit in Saco. The corporate has grown from 72 to over 400 staff, triple its job projections.

Nice River Lumber, which additionally didn’t reply to a request to debate its grant, received $4.2 million to improve a Dover-Foxcroft sawmill with the intention to course of small logs and balsam fir that lacked markets in Maine. Since its award, Nice River has employed greater than 50 folks, above its projected job creation.

In a single case, the institute awarded funds to a venture that by no means materialized.

Advertisement

Smartlam, a Montana-based specialist in cross-laminated timber, was permitted for a $3 million grant to construct a $22.5 million manufacturing facility in Maine. The corporate was unable to execute its plans, no contract was executed and no cash flowed, Whitney stated.

The funding Smartlam would have obtained was redirected to 10 corporations in 2020. These embody American Unagi, which is elevating eels for the U.S. sushi market in Waldoboro; Springworks Farm, which grows aquaponic lettuce in Lisbon; and Acadian Composites, a Nobleboro firm creating constructing supplies from recycled plastic.

Most of the publicly funded initiatives, Whitney stated, are creating revolutionary merchandise and attracting extra non-public financing. However he acknowledged the shortage of public data and consciousness of their achievements is a disadvantage.

“We’ve not gotten the phrase out in addition to we should always have,” he stated. “Folks see these items and so they do not realize the state has performed a job in serving to develop these corporations.”

(c)2022 the Portland Press Herald (Portland, Maine) Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

Maine State Police respond to dozens of highway crashes amid Saturday snow

Published

on

Maine State Police respond to dozens of highway crashes amid Saturday snow


Maine State Police responded to more than 50 crashes and road slide-offs Saturday after southern Maine woke up to some light snowfall.

Police were responding to several crashes on the Maine Turnpike (Interstate 95) and Interstate 295 south of Augusta, state police said in a Facebook message posted around 10 a.m. Saturday.

Maine State Police spokesperson Shannon Moss said that as of early Saturday afternoon, more than 50 crashes had been reported on the turnpike and I-295.

Advertisement

“The Turnpike has seen 24 crashes and slide offs primarily between Kittery and Falmouth with a higher concentration in Saco,” Moss wrote in an email. “The interstate has seen about 30 crashes and slide offs also in the Falmouth area but now in Lincoln and heading north.”

Moss said no injuries have been reported in any of the crashes.

“So far it appears visibility and driving too fast for road conditions are the causation factors,” Moss said.

State police reminded drivers to take caution, especially during snowy conditions, in the Facebook post.

“Please drive with extra care and give yourself plenty of space between you and the other vehicles on the roadway,” the post said. “Give the MDOT and Turnpike plows extra consideration and space to do their jobs to clear the roadway. Drive slow, plan for the extra time to get to your destination and be safe.”

Advertisement

« Previous

One man killed, another seriously hurt in New Gloucester crash

Next »

Creating vintage fashion at Lost & Found Markets in Portland



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine real estate mostly unaffected by commission changes

Published

on

Maine real estate mostly unaffected by commission changes


New rules that went into effect in August changing who pays real estate commissions have resulted in more paperwork and some anxiety for home buyers and sellers but have had little, if any, impact on home prices in the state’s hot real estate market.

The changes, which stem from a settlement in a lawsuit accusing real estate agents of conspiring to keep their commissions high, altered the way commission fees are set nationally. 

For decades, most home sales in the United States have included a commission fee, typically between 5 and 6 percent of the sale price.

The typical Maine home went for around $400,000 this fall. A 5 to 6 percent commission on a $400,000 home would be between $20,000 and $24,000, split between the agents for the buyer and the seller.

Advertisement

Before the changes in August, the split for each agent was predetermined by the seller, who paid the fee for both agents. That usually resulted in fees being baked into the list price of a home.

In some states (although not in Maine) agents were able to search the multiple listing service, a catalogue of homes for sale, by the commission split, which critics said incentivized agents to steer clients toward more expensive properties with higher commissions.

Now, fees are negotiated sale-by-sale. Buyers and sellers are now each responsible for paying their own agents, meaning a buyer may have to come with more cash up front if a seller doesn’t want to pay the commission fee for a buyer’s agent. Sellers are also no longer allowed to include commission fees in their listings.

Tacy Ridlon, a listing agent with Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate The Masiello Group in Ellsworth, who has been in real estate for 32 years, said it is a bit jarring to have a conversation with buyers about whether they are willing to pay part of their agent’s commission. 

Once the commission is established and the agreement signed, she said, the buyer’s agent then approaches the seller’s agent to see what part of their commission the seller is willing to cover, if any.

Advertisement

Ridlon said 3 percent for the buyer’s agent is a typical starting point. 

“We have to start high. If the seller is willing to offer 2 percent for the buyer’s agent, then our buyer only has to pay one percent… If the seller is not offering anything, then we ask the buyer to pay a certain amount. Some can pay and some can’t. For some it’s very difficult because they don’t have a lot of money to play around with.”

The change has resulted in some confusion for many buyers and even some agents around the country, as rules differ from state-to-state. Photo by Kate Cough.

Some agents said they found the changes minimal; others find the paperwork and negotiating with buyers daunting. One agency owner said the ruling has done little to bring prices down.

“This ruling has done nothing to save buyers or sellers any money,” said Billy Milliken, a designated broker and owner of Bold Coast Properties, LLC, in Jonesport. “If anything, it’s made the cost of buying a home even more expensive.”

Milliken said his sellers have had no problem agreeing to pay both buyers’ and sellers’ commissions. The cost has been embedded in the price of the property. 

Advertisement

“The real loser is first time home buyers who are not educated in buying a home and also have limited cash resources,” said Milliken. “It puts them at a disadvantage.”

The change has resulted in some confusion for many buyers and even some agents around the country, as rules differ from state-to-state. 

People are slowly getting used to the changes, said Monet Yarnell, president of the Midcoast Board of Realtors, who owns her own agency, Sell 207 in Belfast, adding that Maine’s real estate practices were already more transparent than many other areas of the country. 

“I think it was a little confusing in the beginning, more doom and gloom,” said Yarnell. But sellers are still incentivized to offer something to the buyers’ agents, she said. And the changes have increased the level of communication between agents and their clients.

“It’s more how the money flows rather than the actual dollars.”

Advertisement

Ridlon, in Ellsworth, said she has been fortunate that most sellers have offered some compensation toward the buyer’s agent commission. “I have not had a buyer who can’t do the 3 percent.”

Ridlon had one seller who was not willing to pay any part of the buyer’s agent’s commission. The property had a lot of showings, but many of the buyers asked for closing costs to be covered or for concessions in lieu of picking up part of the commission.

“That didn’t really work for my seller either,” she said. “Then he relented and said he would pay one percent.” 

The property sold.

Debbie Walter sold her condominium in Stockton Springs via Yarnell and then bought another condominium in New London, N.H., with another real estate agent. 

Advertisement

“We’re kind of guinea pigs,” said Walter. “We were very concerned about that whole piece, both as sellers and buyers.”

Fearful the sale of their house might not proceed smoothly the couple readily agreed to pay a 3 percent commission for the buyer’s agent.

When they made their offer to buy the condominium in N.H., they offered as buyers to cover their buyer’s agent’s commission as well. But the seller in that case took an equally cautious approach and offered to cover 2.5 percent of the buyer’s agent’s commission, which Walters’ agent accepted.

“It was very stressful,” Walter said. Offering to cover their buyer’s agent’s commission, she said, created “one less headache for the whole closing procedure.”

Tom McKee, president of the Maine Realtors Association, said the settlement and new rules have had little impact.

Advertisement

“It hasn’t changed anything for me,” said McKee, who is with Keller Williams in Portland. Now that the commission split is no longer listed in the M.L.S., said McKee, “there are just more questions in the transaction.”

McKee said there is no set percentage, that everything is negotiable.

“If we do our job right and are meeting with the client first, they already understand.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine’s highest court proposes barring justices from disciplining peers

Published

on

Maine’s highest court proposes barring justices from disciplining peers


The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has proposed new rules governing judicial conduct complaints that would keep members of the high court from having to discipline their peers.

The proposed rules would establish a panel of eight judges — the four most senior active Superior Court justices and the four most senior active District Court judges who are available to serve — to weigh complaints against a justice of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court. Members of the high court would not participate.

The rule changes come just weeks after the Committee on Judicial Conduct recommended the first sanction against a justice on the Maine Supreme Judicial Court in state history.

The committee said Justice Catherine Connors should be publicly reprimanded, the lowest level of sanction, for failing to recuse herself in two foreclosure cases last year that weakened protections for homeowners in Maine, despite a history of representing banks that created a possible conflict of interest. Connors represented or filed on behalf of banks in two precedent-setting cases that were overturned by the 2024 decisions.

Advertisement

In Maine, it’s up to the Supreme Judicial Court to decide the outcome of judicial disciplinary cases. But because in this case one of the high court’s justices is accused of wrongdoing, the committee recommended following the lead of several other states by bringing in a panel of outside judges, either from other levels of the court or from out of state.

Connors, however, believes the case should be heard by her colleagues on the court, according to a response filed late last month by her attorney, James Bowie.

Bowie argued that the outcome of the case will ultimately provide guidance for the lower courts — a power that belongs exclusively to the state supreme court.

It should not, he wrote, be delegated “to some other ad hoc grouping of inferior judicial officers.”

The court is accepting comments on the proposal until Jan. 23. The changes, if adopted, would be effective immediately and would apply to pending matters, including the Connors complaint.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending