Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.
By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.
Please enter a valid email address.
Four protesters are suing Judge Beverly Cannone over a “buffer zone” that they say unlawfully keeps them too far away from the courthouse where Karen Read’s retrial on murder and other charges is underway in Massachusetts.
“Cannone has issued this order primarily to quash criticism directed at her, as…the only protests that have been documented have been the Plaintiffs in this case, who have quietly held signs criticizing Cannone,” the lawsuit alleges.
Advertisement
Those plaintiffs are Massachusetts residents Jason Grant, Allyson Taggart, Lisa Peterson and Samantha Lyons. Their lawsuit also names Geoffrey Noble, the state police superintendent, and Michael d’Entremont, the chief of police in Dedham, where the courthouse is located.
In their lawsuit, they are asking a federal court to declare the “buffer zone” an unconstitutional “prior restraint” on free speech and an injunction, plus legal fees.
KAREN READ JURY SELECTION: DOZENS IN POOL ALREADY HAVE AN OPINION ON THE CASE
Karen Read appears with her attorneys during the first day of jury selection in the retrial of Read at Norfolk Superior Court on Tuesday, April 1, 2025 in Dedham, Mass.(Nancy Lane/The Boston Herald via AP, Pool)
The court established a 200-foot buffer zone around the courthouse building itself and a parking lot behind the nearby Norfolk County Registry of Deeds building ahead of Read’s first trial last year.
Advertisement
The lawsuit takes issue with the expansion of that zone to extend to 200 feet around Bates Court, Bullard Street, Ames Street and Court Street for her second trial.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
A map of downtown Dedham, MA, showing the judge’s “buffer zone” around the Norfolk Superior Court building.
“Buffer zones that over-zealously prohibit all First Amendment activity are almost always unconstitutional and this one is no different,” said Mark Trammell, a lawyer for the plaintiffs and the executive director of the Center for American Liberty. “The Karen Read trial continues to inspire passionate public debate—and citizens must be allowed to protest peacefully outside their own courthouse.”
HAVE A NEWS TIP? CLICK HERE
Advertisement
David Gelman, a Philadelphia-area defense attorney who has been following the case, told Fox News Digital the lawsuit is likely to fail.
“The judge is not saying they can’t protest – the judge is saying they just can’t protest at the courthouse,” he said. “The reasons are legit too. It could sway a jury each day they enter and leave the building.”
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Jason Grant, a protester who has been critical of Judge Beverly Cannone, holds signs outside the Norfolk Superior Court in a photo included in his lawsuit seeking to undo a “buffer zone” around the building.(US District Court for Massachusetts)
Similar orders have been upheld around the country, he added.
“The judge is 100% within her right to do this and will prevail,” he said. “It’s the most common gripe among protesters. All speech is not free speech.”
Protesters both for and against Read have been regularly attending many of her court dates since she was charged in 2022 with the murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend, John O’Keefe, 46.
GO HERE FOR FULL COVERAGE OF THE 2ND KAREN READ TRIAL
Read the lawsuit here:
A nor’easter tore through the region on the morning he was found dead – Jan. 29, 2022. An autopsy found he had died from trauma to the head and hypothermia. However, the medical examiner left the manner of death “undetermined.”
Advertisement
Groups both for and against a Karen Read conviction protest outside court. Blogger Aidan Kearney fires up Karen Read supporters outside a Norfolk Superior Court hearing in Dedham, Massachusetts for motions to dismiss some charges against Karen Read on Friday, Aug. 9, 2024.(Pool Images- Greg Derr USA Today Network)
The 45-year-old Read’s first trial over O’Keefe’s death ended with a hung jury last year.
Jury selection for the do-over began Tuesday. It is expected to take six to eight weeks after opening statements.
KAREN READ AND JOHN O’KEEFE: INSIDE EVOLUTION OF BOSTON MURDER MYSTERY SINCE JULY MISTRIAL
Karen Read giving John O’Keefe a kiss on the side of his head in an undated photograph.(Courtesy of Karen Read)
Advertisement
Read is charged with second-degree murder, manslaughter and leaving the scene of a deadly accident. She could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top charge.
Read denied the charges, pleaded not guilty and claimed that she is being framed as part of a police cover-up.
Officer John O’Keefe poses for his official headshot. O’Keefe’s girlfriend, Karen Reed, is currently on trial for a second time on murder and other charges after he was found dead outside of a Massachusetts home in January 2022.(Boston Police Department)
Cannone warned potential jurors at the start of jury selection Tuesday not to be influenced by protesters outside.
Advertisement
Critics of Karen Read gather outside the courthouse in Dedham, MA on Friday, June 28, 2024. Read is facing three charges, including second-degree murder of her Boston police officer boyfriend John O’Keefe in January 2022.(Patriot Pics/Backgrid for Fox News Digital)
“John Adams said that we are a government of laws, not of men, and that the law must be deaf to the clamoring of the public,” she said, referring to the Founding Father with deep Boston roots.
“He meant that while the public opinion about a given subject may ebb and flow, the law must be steady, reliable, and even-handed.”
In or about and between December 2023 and April 2024, both dates being approximate and inclusive, within the Eastern District of New York and elsewhere, the defendants MALIK BEASLEY, also known as “Beas,” “Bease,” “MB” and “5,” WILLIAM BROWN, also known as “Willo,” EDWARD DAVIS, also known as “Ed,” “ED” and “E Davis,” ROBERT GORODETSKY, also known as “Rob,” ERNESTO PLASCENCIA, also known as “Ernie,” “Erny,” “Ernie P” and “Erny P,” and PAOLO ZAMORANO, also known as “PZ,”
together with others, did knowingly and intentionally conspire:
(a)
to conduct one or more financial transactions in and affecting
interstate commerce, which transactions in fact involved the proceeds of specified unlawful activity, to wit: (i) wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 and (ii) sports bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 224, knowing that the property involved in the transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, and with the intent to promote the carrying on of the specified unlawful activity, contrary to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1956(a)(1)(A)(i);
(b)
to conduct one or more financial transactions in and affecting interstate commerce, which transactions in fact involved the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, to wit: (i) wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343 and (ii) sports bribery, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 224, knowing that the property involved in the transactions represented the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, and knowing that the transactions were designed in whole and in part to conceal and disguise the
A Scottish man who died after collapsing outside a Boston pub while visiting for the World Cup is being remembered as a devoted soccer fan who was “Tartan Army to his core.”
Thomas Murty, known as “Tam,” died June 19 after collapsing near The Dubliner pub in downtown Boston a day earlier, according to a GoFundMe fundraising campaign to return Murty’s body to Scotland and pay for funeral expenses.Murty was born in 1963.
“Tam was Scotland daft his whole life,” the GoFundMe page reads. “He lived for it — the highs, the heartbreaks, the songs, the hope that never died no matter how many years went by. Following Scotland wasn’t just something he did; it was who he was.”
Murty had waited three decades to see Scotland play in the World Cup. Watching the Scottish team compete in the tournament was “the dream of a lifetime,” the fundraising page said.
Advertisement
Oram McGonagle, who owns The Dubliner, said he was at the pub when Murty collapsed. He said he saw a Scottish fan with an oxygen tube standing by a pillar outside the building. McGonagle said employees called an ambulance when they realized he needed help.
Caitlin McLaughlin, public relations director for Boston EMS, confirmed that medics took a patient from The Dubliner to an area hospital around 4:30 p.m. that day.
McGonagle later learned from a media report that Murty had died.
The Dubliner has donated 1,000 pounds, or about $1,325, to the fundraiser.
“We had a really good few weeks with the Scottish people,” McGonagle said Monday. “This felt like a way to give some back to them.”
Advertisement
Murty is the second Scottish soccer fan known to have died in Boston while visiting for the World Cup tournament. Donny Strathie, 76, died June 14 after collapsing in a hotel in Norwood. Fans paid tribute to Strathie in the 76th minute of Scotland’s game against Morocco in Foxborough on June 19.
About 2,800 people have donated more than$85,000 to the GoFundMe campaign set up for Murty’s family, as of Monday afternoon.
Ariela Lopez can be reached at ariela.lopez@globe.com. Follow her on X @ariela__lopez.
