Connect with us

Northeast

Five years after COVID lockdowns: The 5 most bizarre ‘Stop-the-Spread’ moments

Published

on

Five years after COVID lockdowns: The 5 most bizarre ‘Stop-the-Spread’ moments

As the U.S. nears the five-year mark since nationwide lockdowns turned toilet paper into a hot commodity, Fox News Digital took a look back at some of the most controversial mandates – those that sparked debate – and, to some, defied logic.

1. FAUCI’S CONTRADICTIONS

Former NIAID Director Anthony Fauci was a ubiquitous sight throughout the pandemic, during the administrations of both Donald Trump and Joe Biden. 

The octogenarian allergist, who had been with the government since 1968 and appointed head of the NIH’s infectious disease arm by former President Ronald Reagan, was often lambasted for contradictory or questionable medical orders.

Fauci drew heat for apparent contradictions in mask-wearing orders, with critics often locking onto the certainty with which the Brooklynite announced each countervailing development.

In March 2020, Fauci told “60 Minutes” about “unintended consequences” of wearing masks to prevent the spread of COVID-19. 

Advertisement

“People keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face,” he said, suggesting germs and viruses could be spread by too much fidgeting.

Soon after, and for most of the rest of the pandemic, Fauci was adamant that Americans must wear masks nearly at all times in public. 

He raised eyebrows further when he told CNBC it might be time to double up on masks – a stance that clashed with claims from right-wing physicians who warned that excessive face coverings could obstruct breathing.

‘CUOMO CHIP’ LOOPHOLE CRUMBLES AS NY NOW WANTS ‘SUBSTANTIAL FOOD’ SOLD WITH BOOZE

Dr. Anthony Fauci (Getty)

Advertisement

“If you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on it just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective,” Fauci said.

National Review writer David Harsanyi balked at the order at the time, quipping, “No, thanks, Dad.”

Current Secretary of State Marco Rubio also commented at the time about Fauci’s varied orders:

“Dr. Fauci is a very good public-health official. His job is to advise policymakers and inform the public, but his job is not to decide what we can do, where we can go or which places can open or close. His job is not to mislead or scare us into doing the [supposed] right things,” the Floridian said.

Pennsylvania’s most visible shutdown-opposing lawmaker, who later ran for governor on a related “Walk as Free People” slogan, regularly quipped in public remarks at people he would see driving alone in their cars on Interstate 81 while wearing a mask.

Advertisement

“You can’t make this stuff up,” Sen. Doug Mastriano often repeated.

2. WING NUTS 

New York City is known for its pizza, bagels, heros and chopped cheese – but western New York holds another food item just as dear – the Buffalo wing.

The COVID-19 lockdowns proved the love upstaters have for their chicken apps after then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo laid out what “substantive food” a watering hole has to offer in order for patrons to go out for a drink.

“To be a bar, you have to have food available. Soups, sandwiches – More than just hors d’oeuvres, chicken wings; you had to have some substantive food,” he said. 

Advertisement

New Yorkers used to sloshing Frank’s Red Hot on their chicken became Red Hot themselves and lambasted the governor for appearing to define their beloved dish as less than a meal.

The outrage led to a New York state communications official later tweeting a diagrammed-sentence breakdown of Cuomo’s comments, seeking to illustrate that the clause “more than just hors d’oeuvres” was an interjection and that “chicken wings” were to be associated with the “soups, sandwiches” mentioned – but the damage had been done.

In return, bars began charging a dollar or so each for a slice of deli meat, a handful of croutons or a single french fry in order to allow their patrons an end-round around the edict and have a cold one.

PENNSYLVANIA GOV. TOM WOLF THREATENS TO WITHHOLD CORONAVIRUS AID TO COUNTIES THAT DEFY LOCKDOWN ORDERS

Demonstrators gather around state Rep. Russ Diamond at a Reopen PA rally in Harrisburg, May 15, 2020. (IMAGN)

Advertisement

In neighboring Pennsylvania, Gov. Tom Wolf instituted a similar ban – requiring a meal to be purchased before alcohol could be served. The state police’s bureau of liquor enforcement patrolled towns to enforce the mandate and other regulations, warning small-town saloons that their liquor licenses were on the line.

When many restaurants were closed for eat-in dining in Pennsylvania, several lawmakers held a demonstration in Lebanon outside what was then the Taste of Sicily Italian Restaurant.

Several area lawmakers – state Reps. Russ Diamond, Frank Ryan and the late Dave Arnold – joined Mastriano and restaurant manager Mike Mangano to decry “stop the spread” orders that cut off family restaurants’ income.

Flanked by the others, Diamond read from Article I Sec. 2 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which stated “all power is inherent in the people… and they have at all times an inalienable… right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such matter they see fit.”

“That means,” he said, “You can exercise your constitutional right to abolish the interminable b—- of this government, which happens to be the governor’s obtuse, stupid and bass-ackward orders.”

Advertisement

3. SUNDAY DRIVERS BEWARE

In Pennsylvania, Wolf and Health Secretary Rachel Levine were ubiquitous on the airwaves with their lockdown provisions and orders – from traffic-light color-coded maps instructing which counties’ residents could have varying levels of freedom, to Levine’s daily warning on TV to “stay home, stay calm, stay safe.”

Early in the shutdown period, the Wolf administration utilized a seven-decade-old state law aimed at blunting a syphilis outbreak as legal backing for some of their orders.

In April 2020, a York woman was charged under that statute when she tried to quell her cabin fever with a Sunday drive.

Anita Shaffer told local media at the time she had been returning home from a drive when she passed police parked in the town of Yoe. 

Originally stopped for a broken taillight, Shaffer was ultimately issued a $202 ticket for violating the Disease Prevention and Control Act of 1955, which was described to her as the “stay-at-home-act” in force at the time – to which she pleaded “not guilty.”

Advertisement

PENNSYLVANIA LAWMAKER SLAMS PA COVID LOCKDOWNS AS ‘KEYSTONE KOPS’

Supporters of Pennsylvania Sen. Doug Mastriano hold signs emblazoned with his anti-COVID-lockdown slogan, “Walk as Free People.”

Current Pennsylvania Attorney General David Sunday – a Republican who was then York County’s district attorney – later expressed opposition to the state’s lockdown orders and told the York Daily Record he wouldn’t prosecute businesses Wolf’s classifications deemed “nonessential” if they opened before Harrisburg said so.

Police said after the incident: “Sunday drives are not essential travel.”

Drivers on the state’s highways also encountered other unique COVID order roadblocks.

Advertisement

Mastriano spoke at several demonstrations in Harrisburg, Lancaster and beyond, and recounted some such experiences.

Pennsylvania rest areas were briefly closed to “stop the spread,” he noted, adding how incredulous it was to come upon an Interstate 81 rest area on his commute, see it barricaded closed, and then see several big-rigs parked dangerously close to traffic on the shoulder in a line for the ensuing mile.

Republicans in Pennsylvania later drafted a constitutional amendment ballot initiative seeking to claw back some of the restrictions. Some proponents cited what they called a biblical irony in the randomly-assigned bill number – SB 836 – which echoed John 8:36’s admonition “If Christ sets you free, you are free indeed.”

4. NO PARK-ING

Another stop-the-spread order that led to public outcry affected children more than those of-age to travel or drink.

Cities from California to New Jersey began dumping sand into skate parks, playgrounds, and public areas to prevent groups or crowds from the recreation sites.

Advertisement

Tons of sand were dumped into public skate parks in Los Angeles, which enraged professional and amateur shredders alike.

In April 2020, skaters were so fed up with the city of Los Angeles that they brought their own shovels to clear sand from the iconic Venice Beach skate park.

Professional skater Paul Rodriguez told “The Undefeated” at the time that the move was “a little stronger than [the city] needed to do.”

“I was like, damn, that’s aggressive… But as a human, I’m like, we’re going through a pandemic, I mean, we’ve got to do what we got to do,” Rodriguez said.

CA SKATEPARKS FILLED WITH SAND

Advertisement

The Venice Beach skate park was filled with sand to prevent people from using it during the coronavirus pandemic. (Getty)

Skate “bowls” in San Clemente, California, were also filled in with 37 tons of sand after skaters ignored several “No Trespassing” signs.

In Pittsburgh, skaters climbed over closed fences and cut locks, according to the public works department, when local media asked about its own decision to fill the parks with sand.

In other cities, public basketball hoops were removed from backboards, while 2x4s were nailed to cover other baskets in an effort to prevent people from congregating.

5. JUST A COKE, PLEASE

While lockdown policies in many states had either intentional or unintentional consequences on the consumption of alcohol, the Northeast was incongruently affected by such a change in social behavior.

Advertisement

In August 2021, as some states began slowly slackening some of their orders, others retained a tough stance to “stop the spread.”

Virginia, Pennsylvania and several other states employ “state stores” or “ABC” outlets to sell alcohol that is effectively solely available from the state government. 

One state that doesn’t is Delaware. With its regional tax-free shopping mecca in Christiana and the availability of liquor in mega-stores like Total Wine, it is often a draw for higher-tax or socially-stricter states around it.

COVID-19 made the First State no different, as Pennsylvania continued to keep its state stores closed, Philadelphians and others tried to find new ways to get their alcohol legally.

Just as Pennsylvania’s side of its state lines is dotted with fireworks outlets geared toward out-of-state visitors, a liquor superstore stands just yards inside Delaware at I-95 and DE-92.

Advertisement

The store began seeing a major influx of out-of-state patrons who snuck across from Marcus Hook – until Delaware instituted a travel ban and then-Gov. John Carney’s administration gave police authority to pull over any out-of-state-tagged vehicle.

The parking lot of the Total Wine was a hub for such activity, as thirsty Pennsylvanians converged on the market to purchase their drinks of choice and zip home.

DSP Cpl. Michael Austin responded to the situation in a statement to the Delco Times: 

“The primary intent and goal of the Delaware State Police is to uphold their sworn duties by providing information to the public that we serve, in order to gain voluntary compliance with the mandates, and to promote, and further ensure public safety and health.”

Advertisement

Similar dynamics occurred across state lines around the country as well, but not to the high-profile nature media-wise of the “Naamans Road checkpoint.”

Read the full article from Here

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Maine

New legislation would make Maine’s polluters pay | Opinion

Published

on

New legislation would make Maine’s polluters pay | Opinion


Sue Inches is an author, educator and environmental advocate from North Yarmouth.
She writes a regular blog on the environment at susanbinches.substack.com.

Fossil fuel companies are spewing billions of tons of greenhouse gases into the air every year. These gases rise and act like a blanket in the atmosphere, reflecting heat back toward the Earth, where it’s absorbed by the ocean. This is why the Gulf of Maine is one of the fastest warming bodies of water on the planet.

Our rising ocean temperatures are the root cause of more frequent and more severe storms. And these storms are costly. Flooding, high winds and falling trees have cost Maine electric ratepayers over $200 million in each of the past four years. We see these costs in our rising electric bills.

As storms and costs continue to increase, it’s time to hold fossil fuel companies accountable. Maine electric ratepayers should not pay for climate damage they did not cause. Nor should they pay for local infrastructure to protect downtowns, roads, bridges and sewage treatment plants from flooding.

Advertisement

This is the rationale behind “polluter pays” legislation, an important bill before the Legislature this month.

Introduced by state Sen. Stacy Brenner, the “Polluter Pays” bill (LD 1870) would charge fossil fuel companies a fee for climate damage they’ve caused in Maine. The funds would be deposited into a state “climate superfund” and used to pay for storm repair and strengthening local infrastructure.

You may be wondering how polluters will be assessed a pollution fee. Based on decades of research and using advanced computing, it’s now possible to accurately determine the cost attributed to each polluter. Large fossil fuel companies would be charged a fee, based on a formula. The formulas are now in place.

Establishing a state “climate superfund” is a bold move. But there’s legal precedent for it. Vermont and New York passed similar legislation in 2024. Ten other states, including Maine, are proposing similar legislation. This legislation is modeled on the national superfund law (the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act or CERCLA), which passed in 1980.

The national superfund law has been effective. Since it was enacted, 459 sites have been fully cleaned up, with many more in progress. But the national superfund law is limited to cleaning up land and water pollution. There is no law to clean up damage caused by atmospheric pollution. States are now stepping up to address this gap.

Advertisement

Maine’s LD 1870 is modeled on the Vermont climate superfund law. The bill calls for climate damage fees to be assessed retroactively — on emissions from 1994-2024. By making the damage assessment retroactive, the bill avoids the argument that states are regulating emissions, which are outside of state jurisdiction. Because it is retroactive, and because it addresses climate damage and not emissions, many legal experts believe LD 1870 will stand up to legal challenges.

Opponents have not been complacent, however. Lawsuits against Vermont and New
York have been filed by the American Petroleum Institute, a coalition of 22 attorneys general from red states, and now the Trump administration through the Department of Justice. The lawsuits claim that states are regulating emissions, and that this violates interstate commerce laws and the Clean Air Act.

State climate superfund laws and the fight to establish them represent an important paradigm shift. For too long fossil fuel companies have been allowed to externalize the costs of pollution. States and local communities (meaning you and me as taxpayers) end up paying the bill, while oil companies harvest massive profits. These new laws are a first step toward making polluters accountable for pollution they cause.

Once again, Maine is taking the lead on an important issue. Please email or call your state senator and representative and urge them to support LD 1870. Better yet, come to Augusta and stand with people who support this legislation. A demonstration at the Statehouse is scheduled for Jan. 27 from 8-11 a.m.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Massachusetts

Parts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut could soon experience wind chills as cold as -20 with possible storm lurking

Published

on

Parts of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut could soon experience wind chills as cold as -20 with possible storm lurking


In the coming days it could get dangerously cold in southern New England.

According to the National Weather Service, an arctic air mass brings cold temperatures and wind chills near zero tonight and again Tuesday night.

Temperatures warm Wednesday through Friday before another arctic air mass arrives.

There is increasing confidence in an arctic outbreak beginning Friday night with dangerous cold and wind chills, while low confidence remains in a late-weekend coastal storm.

Advertisement

While still several days away, confidence continues to increase in a significant Arctic outbreak impacting southern New England beginning late Friday night and persisting through next weekend. A lobe of the Polar Vortex is forecast to break off and drive much colder air into the region. This cold air mass does not appear to be short-lived, with the Climate Prediction Center (CPC) highlighting much of the Northeast, Upper Midwest, and Great Lakes under a moderate risk for much below normal temperatures into the middle of next week.

For the upcoming weekend, overnight low temperatures and wind chills may fall to around -20F in the higher terrain and -10F across the coastal plain. Raising the potential for Cold Weather Advisories.

Those with outdoor plans this weekend should continue to monitor the forecast closely. Given these conditions, mariners should be prepared for a high likelihood of freezing spray, though the extent and severity remain uncertain at this time.

In addition, there are indications of a potential coastal system late next weekend. While some guidance suggest a system may pass offshore Sunday into Sunday night, confidence remains low.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Hampshire

A celebration of community in Manchester for Martin Luther King Jr. Day

Published

on

A celebration of community in Manchester for Martin Luther King Jr. Day


At Manchester Memorial High School on Monday, the theme of the annual celebration of Martin Luther King Jr. this year was “Uplifting Resistance through Community.”

Sebastian Fuentes, a member of the Martin Luther King Jr. Coalition, which organized the event, said it was a day of community and unity.

“As you know anxiety is all over the place,” Fuentes said. “So we thought: what better way to honor Dr. King’s legacy with getting all those folks doing the work on the streets, doing the work in the community, in one place. Let’s have some music, let’s have some food, let’s have some conversations.”

Isabella Gomez (L) and Ayvah Collier (R) stand in front of a mural that attendees of the 44th Annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Community Celebration could participate in by adding their hand prints. Gomez and Collier are part of the Manchester Memorial High School student club, Open Minds in Action.

Fuentes said roughly 24 organizations came together for the event, including the Business Alliance for People of Color, and the New Hampshire Youth Movement. The day included conversations about building resilience in today’s political climate.

Advertisement
State House Representative Alice Wade and former state senator Melanie Levesque were honored at the event, which is in its 44th year.
State House Representative Alice Wade and former state senator Melanie Levesque, the state’s first Black state senator, were honored at the event, which is in its 44th year.

Melanie Levesque, New Hampshire’s first Black state senator, was given the 2026 Martin Luther King Jr. Award.

Levesque accepted her award on behalf of her parents, whose experience moving to Massachusetts guided her to help pass legislation on civil unions and marriage equality. She remarked on the value of Martin Luther King Jr.’s message in the current moment.

“I feel that we need his influence more than ever right now because we are in tough times,” Levesque said. “He was in tough times, but his words, especially words of community and resilience, are words that we can live by.”

Levesque also announced her intention to run for Executive Council in 2026. She previously ran as a Democrat in 2024 in District 5, where she was defeated by incumbent Republican Dave Wheeler.

State House Representative Alice Wade was also honored with the 2026 Vanessa Washington-Johnson Bloeman Award as an emerging leader in social justice.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending