Connecticut
There is little scrutiny of 'natural' deaths behind bars
Kesha Jackson was preparing for her husband, John, to be home in a few weeks. He was incarcerated in Forrest City federal prison in Arkansas, awaiting a court hearing for early release after 18 years. But then Jackson got a concerning call from other inmates.
Her husband, in the special housing unit, was going in and out of consciousness, the inmates told her. He tried banging on the door for help. Three days later, an officer handcuffed him and tried to give him CPR.
He died soon after. And as she waited for some explanation, Jackson was surprised to learn what prison officials pronounced as the manner of death: “Natural.”
By deeming the death natural, prison authorities were not required to conduct an autopsy for Jackson’s death. It’s how they characterize at least three-quarters of all federal prison deaths since 2009, yet NPR has found “natural” deaths with details that raise questions for family members.
“When his medical records came home after he passed away, I saw that it was MRSA,” Jackson said.
/ Nate Smallwood for NPR
/
Nate Smallwood for NPR
MRSA is a staph infection – caused by a type of dangerous, drug-resistant bacteria. But it is not generally fatal if treated immediately. John contracted it after he was moved to the Forrest City federal prison in 2017. According to his medical records, he still had the infection over two years later.
“Saying that it’s a natural death can sometimes be misleading because I believe that having the proper medical treatment could have possibly saved his life,” Jackson said.
The CDC says natural deaths happen either solely or almost entirely because of disease or old age. Yet 70 percent of the inmates who died in federal prison the last 13 years were under the age of 65. After speaking to some of the families of these inmates, NPR found that potential issues such as medical neglect, poor prison conditions and a lack of healthcare resources were left unexplained once a “natural” death designation ended hopes of an investigation. Meanwhile, family members were left with little information about their loved one’s death.
In Jackson’s case, she called the prison for six hours before she got a response. A correctional officer told her that the warden was in a meeting about her husband and she will get a call back. She says she never did.
“The prison doesn’t have to contact family members unless it’s a matter of life and death, I guess,” Jackson said. “Well he’s dead, so where was the contact? I should have been contacted as soon as there was an incident.”
Jackson remembers multiple calls with her husband where he complained about the lack of hygiene and cleanliness in the prison. He complained of an infected wound in his calf and was asked to wait more than a week for medical attention. After the wound burst in the shower, he was hospitalized for a day and a half and got diagnosed with MRSA. But he wasn’t given medication regularly. He bought aspirin from the commissary and drank lots of water, according to Jackson.
Homer Venters, a federal court monitor of jail and prison healthcare, calls deaths like Jackson’s “jail attributable.”
He says this is when “things that happened behind bars significantly contributed to the outcome of death, despite the fact that a medical examiner ultimately says it was a natural-causes death. This is a very common problem and it’s a commonly missed source of the health risks of incarceration.”
Venters says that calling a death natural often does not provide a full picture.
“So we have this very old, antiquated idea that the coroner or medical examiner, when they say a death was from natural causes or from homicide, that that should somehow determine whether or not people got what they needed behind bars,” Venters said.
/ Nate Smallwood for NPR
/
Nate Smallwood for NPR
The Office of Inspector General for the BOP recently launched an investigation into all non-natural federal inmate deaths in custody from 2014 to 2021. Natural deaths are not included in this investigation.
But NPR spoke with multiple families of inmates who died natural deaths who believed their loved one’s death warrants scrutiny. For instance: an inmate in a prison medical center in Springfield, Mo., waited weeks to be treated for bleeding in his digestive tract. He died soon after hospitalization. An inmate in Arkansas complained of stomach pain for a year and a half before his death. His family was not provided with any more details.
Another inmate in Missouri died of respiratory failure, and his death was pronounced natural. But according to medical examiner records obtained by NPR, his death was later treated as a homicide. His family found out about this information for the first time from NPR.
Andrea Armstrong, a professor at the Loyola University New Orleans College of Law who researches prison and jail conditions, says that categorizing natural deaths differently could make a change.
“It helps us figure out which of these deaths were influenced and, in fact, more likely to be preventable if they had more timely action and intervention,” Armstrong said. “Just saying natural causes obscures the role that medical care that was provided within the facility played in the death and to what extent that actually complied with community standards of care.”
On a Sunday morning in March, Celia Wilson got a Facebook message from an unknown account. It was about her brother, Lenny Wilson, and turned out to be from his prison cellmate.
The message said her brother “was running on the track and collapsed” and then taken to a hospital. After Wilson tried for several hours to get ahold of a prison official, she called three hospitals in the surrounding area before she found one that confirmed her brother had been admitted there.
The first call she got from the BOP came two days later, from her brother’s case manager. He told her not to worry.
“He said that my brother is communicating and we think he’s going to be just fine,” Wilson said. “We were so relieved at that point. And we all sit down, write letters, get him letters in the mail that day.”
But Alison Guernsey, Wilson’s attorney and also a clinical professor at the University of Iowa, found different information in his medical records.
“Celia [Wilson] would say they think that there’s signs of life and maybe vitals are getting better. And then we would ask for those medical records and they wouldn’t actually say that,” Guernsey said.
She had to file public records requests every day for updates on Lenny Wilson’s health after the collapse.
“It was quite difficult to get someone from the Bureau of Prisons to actually tell us what was going on,” Guernsey said.
Two weeks after his collapse, Wilson’s brother died. His death was pronounced natural.
“They wouldn’t give us any information while he was in the hospital,” Wilson said. “I just received a call on Easter Sunday morning that he had passed.”
Wilson later was told by her brother’s cellmate that he had not received help for almost ten minutes after his collapse. She is still waiting to receive his autopsy report.
“Everybody says that it’s someone else’s job to make sure things happen,” Wilson said. “But I can tell you that I am so exhausted from doing this and beating my head against a wall and trying to get just something, give us something so that we can attempt to start to put closure.”
/ Nate Smallwood for NPR
/
Nate Smallwood for NPR
Currently, autopsies are not required for federal prison deaths that are pronounced natural, unless deemed necessary by the warden. However, the BOP does submit a multi-level mortality review report to the Office of Quality Management, which is meant to summarize how the death was handled. This report is not provided to the public or the families of the inmates. NPR submitted a public records request for all mortality review reports since 2009 and have yet to receive them.
The BOP declined NPR’s request for an interview but said that all deaths are investigated thoroughly. A spokesperson also said that there are detailed procedures to notify family members after an inmate’s death.
Wilson, who worked in corrections for 20 years, said she believes the BOP could have done more.
“I still work in government and this is not the system I know,” Wilson said. “My brother didn’t deserve to die in prison.”
Robert Little edited this story. Noah Caldwell produced it. Additional data analysis by Nick McMillan and Dan Wood. Photo editing by Emily Bogle.
Copyright 2024 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.
Connecticut
Crews battle barn fire in East Windsor
Multiple roads in East Windsor were closed for several hours as crews fought an early morning barn fire.
According to the Broad Brook Fire Department, a large barn fire broke out a 365 North Road around 1:30 Friday morning.
Mutual aid from multiple towns are assisting at the scene.
The fire department had route 140 shut down between Harrington Rd and the old Herb Holden Trucking on Broad Brook Rd. closed due to hydrant lines across the street. Main St at Wesley Rd was also blocked.
The fire was knocked down and roads reopened around 5 a.m.
Connecticut
Hartford HealthCare could acquire 2 Prospect hospitals by year end
After years of uncertainty regarding the future of the Connecticut hospitals owned by bankrupt operator Prospect Medical Holdings, two of the three facilities could have a new owner by the end of the year.
On Tuesday, Hartford HealthCare, one of Connecticut’s largest health systems, presented its case to the state’s Office of Health Strategy to purchase Manchester Memorial and Rockville General Hospitals. Under the new expedited approval timeline for hospitals in bankruptcy, state officials must issue a decision by Dec. 30.
During the public hearing, Hartford HealthCare CEO Jeffrey Flaks said the health system plans to bring all its expertise, resources and capabilities to Manchester, Rockville and the surrounding towns.
“The robust apparatus of Hartford HealthCare will be brought to these communities to make health care better. That’s why I’m so confident that we have this very unique opportunity to dramatically improve health care that will be here for generations going forward,” Flaks said.
Hartford HealthCare will spend $86.1 million to purchase the facilities and pledged to invest an additional $225.7 million towards capital improvements, like facility and IT upgrades, over the next three years.
Hartford HealthCare also plans to recruit new physicians to the Manchester and Rockville communities, as well as expand access to specialty care, like oncology, inpatient rehabilitation and vascular and orthopedic surgical services, according to the application submitted to the state.
If approved, the deal would serve as the first step towards concluding a lengthy search to find new buyers for Prospect’s Connecticut hospitals — a process that often seemed on the brink of failure.
In 2022, Prospect signed a deal to sell its three Connecticut hospitals — Manchester Memorial, Rockville General and Waterbury — to Yale New Haven Health for $435 million. But the deal was mired in setbacks and litigation.
In August 2023, a cyberattack crippled operations at Prospect’s facilities around the country. In 2024, Yale New Haven Health and Prospect Medical sued and countersued each other over the true value of the hospitals. In January 2025, Prospect filed for bankruptcy and, by the following month, Yale officials said a deal appeared “impossible.”
In September, Yale agreed to pay $45 million to Prospect to end all disputes over the hospitals’ sale.
Hartford HealthCare stepped in and its acquisitions of the Manchester and Rockville facilities could be finalized by the end of the year. Connecticut’s flagship academic medical institution, UConn Health, seems poised to acquire Waterbury Hospital. A judge for the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Northern Texas approved the UConn deal earlier this week, and now the transaction must obtain state approval.
It’s a speedy transition for the three hospitals, whose ownership had languished in uncertainty for years.
While the Yale deal was pending, Lamont and OHS received broad criticism for the lengthy approval process. That led state legislators to approve a measure earlier this year that allows for an expedited timeline for the acquisition of hospitals that have filed for bankruptcy.
Under the emergency certificate of need timeline, OHS must issue a final decision within 60 days from when the application is deemed complete.
In an emailed statement, Lamont’s spokesperson Rob Blanchard said OHS “met all statutory timelines in the Yale-Prospect [certificate of need review]” and that the legal disputes between the two companies illustrate the transaction’s complexity.
“Yale’s decision to file suit against Prospect less than two months after the agreed settlement raised clear concerns about the parties’ readiness to close the deal. The disputes that prolonged the CON process are now evident in the lawsuit, countersuit, and resulting $45 million settlement,” Blanchard stated in emailed comments.
Erosion of services at Rockville
Despite the promise of new ownership for Prospect’s Connecticut hospitals, the formerly private equity-backed operator will leave a lasting imprint on the state’s hospital system — perhaps most notably in the erosion of services at Rockville General.
When Prospect acquired Eastern Connecticut Health Network, which includes Manchester Memorial and Rockville General Hospitals, both facilities were full-service acute care hospitals. Today, Rockville — which serves a geographic region that’s largely rural — functions as a satellite campus of Manchester, with only an emergency room and behavioral health unit.
A spokesperson for Prospect did not respond to a request for comment in time for publication.
Rep. Tammy Nuccio, R-Tolland, lays the blame for the diminishment of the hospital directly with the state.
“That’s OHS’s failure,” Nuccio said. “They allowed this to happen.”
A 2023 investigation by The Connecticut Mirror found that Prospect began cutting services during the early days of the pandemic, eventually shuttering most of Rockville’s inpatient units without obtaining the required state approvals. Records and employee testimony submitted to the state show that officials were aware of the unauthorized cuts going back as far as 2021.
In February 2022, OHS fined Prospect for some of the service cuts at Rockville, but the operator appealed the penalty. The agency ultimately found it did not have substantial evidence to penalize Prospect, and waived the fine.
In October 2024, OHS launched another investigation into the service cuts. In May of this year, Connecticut officials reached a settlement with Prospect Medical Holdings. OHS fined the operator $300,000, but the agreement also allowed Prospect to shutter all services at Rockville aside from the emergency room and behavioral health, officially making the facility a satellite campus of Manchester.
At the time, then-OHS commissioner Deidre Gifford issued a statement saying the agreement “protects critical resources” for patients and families in the area.
“The agreement also holds the Prospect applicants accountable to the community, requiring public notice of past terminations and development of a strategic plan for the consolidated hospital. The plan must be developed with community input and presented to the community in a public forum,” Gifford’s statement read.
Hartford HealthCare has said as of now they don’t expect service cuts at either Manchester or Rockville. But Nuccio said she’s suspicious based on the company’s history with Windham Hospital, which HHC acquired in 2009.
In 2015, Hartford HealthCare announced the conversion of Windham’s critical care unit to what’s known as a progressive care unit, which can’t handle the same complexity of care. Most recently, the company received strong pushback from the local community over the system’s decision to shutter Windham’s labor and delivery unit, which stopped performing births in 2020.
During the hearing on Tuesday, executives with HHC stated that the system improves the quality of care at all of the hospitals that join its system and that they are proud of the work done with former acquisitions. The company’s certificate of need application states that HHC invested hundreds of millions of dollars in facilities it acquired in the past, resulting in drastically improved quality of care for patients.
Tina Varona, a spokesperson for Hartford HealthCare, declined to make Flaks available for an interview after he testified in Tuesday’s hearing, saying he had to leave immediately.
“We are unable to comment outside of the testimony at this time due to the NDA and pending regulatory review,” Varona stated in an email follow-up after the hearing.
Following Tuesday’s hearing, Attorney General William Tong issued a statement saying he expected Hartford HealthCare to maintain services, including labor and delivery, intensive care and behavioral health. But he called on OHS to hold Hartford HealthCare to its promises.
“Expectations must be matched by accountability: Absent other legal impediments, I would urge the Office of Health Strategy to seek firm commitments to continue these vital services,” Tong said.
Vernon mayor Dan Champagne shared Nuccio’s sentiments in holding the state accountable for what happened to Rockville Hospital, particularly for how long officials took to approve the failed 2022 deal with Yale. But, he said, he’s grateful Rockville has not suffered the same fate as Prospect hospitals in Pennsylvania, which had to close because they couldn’t find a viable buyer.
Champagne said he understands skepticism of what an acquisition by a big hospital system could mean for Manchester and Rockville. But for him, Hartford HealthCare’s bid will guard against the most damaging result: closure of the hospitals and the flight of medical professionals from the communities.
“There are a lot of people who say, ‘big systems can sometimes lead to increased prices or closure of services,’” Champagne said. “We need to go back to what we’re facing here. I’m watching other hospital systems close from Prospect. We have an opportunity to keep this open. That’s the most important thing.”
Connecticut
Connecticut police warn parents about new e-bike laws ahead of holiday shopping
HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – As e-bikes top many teenagers’ holiday wish lists, Connecticut police are reminding parents about new state laws that went into effect October 1 that classify some models as motor vehicles requiring a driver’s license.
More than a million e-bikes were sold in the United States last year, and the devices continue growing in popularity among teenagers and older adults who want to stay active.
“So many kids are buying e-bikes or getting them as gifts, and they can be very powerful,” Chief Joshua Bernegger of the Watertown Police Department said.
The new Connecticut law creates three different classes of e-bikes based on speed and power. All riders must wear helmets regardless of the class.
If the e-bike’s motor is less than 750 watts, there is no age restriction and riders only need to wear a helmet. However, if the motor is 750 watts or more, Connecticut no longer considers it an e-bike but classifies it as a “motor driven cycle.” These require riders to be at least 16 years old and have a driver’s license.
E-bikes with top speeds exceeding 28 miles per hour are not classified as e-bikes under state law.
Bernegger said the new laws address rising safety concerns about e-bike accidents.
“We’ve been seeing a lot of serious accidents in CT over the past year,” Bernegger said. “The number of fatal accidents involving bicycles has risen more than 300% over the prior year, and our emergency rooms are seeing dramatic increase in significant injuries for children and adolescents riding e-bikes.”
The police chief said some e-bikes may be too powerful for young teenagers to handle safely.
“It’s often more of a bike than a young teen, 13, 14, 15-years-old can really handle,” Bernegger said.
Eric Otero, lead salesman at Bikers Edge in Bristol, said e-bikes have transformed his sales floor in recent years.
“Teenagers are kind of taking over the streets on them,” Otero said. “I get calls everyday about them.”
Otero said he sells a couple e-bikes each week, usually to teenagers eager to ride on city streets.
Bernegger advised parents to research their purchases carefully, especially when buying online.
“It’s often more of a bike than a young teen, 13, 14, 15 years old, can really handle,” Bernegger said.
The new law includes specific penalties for violations. Riding without a helmet results in a $90 fine. Riding a modified e-bike costs $100. Riding a motor driven cycle under age 16 or without a driver’s license can result in the bike being impounded.
Otero advised parents to act quickly if they plan to purchase an e-bike for the holidays.
“I’d call now because they’re going faster than you think,” Otero said.
Copyright 2025 WFSB. All rights reserved.
-
Vermont1 week agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
Business1 week agoDeveloper plans to add a hotel and hundreds of residences to L.A. Live
-
Business5 days ago
Fire survivors can use this new portal to rebuild faster and save money
-
Southwest1 week agoFury erupts after accused teen sex predator dodges prison; families swarm courthouse demanding judge’s head
-
Politics1 week agoMajor Pentagon contractor executive caught in child sex sting operation
-
World1 week agoVideo: Russia’s First A.I. Humanoid Robot Crashes Into the Tech Scene
-
World3 days agoFrance and Germany support simplification push for digital rules
-
Technology1 week agoAI-powered scams target kids while parents stay silent