Connect with us

Connecticut

Opinion: Let’s protect CT's men and women who keep the lights on

Published

on

Opinion: Let’s protect CT's men and women who keep the lights on


Most people don’t think much about their basic utility services. Electricity, natural gas and water just show up – a testament to the tens of thousands of utility workers across our state and country who keep those services working night and day and regardless of the weather. It’s a hard job, but utility workers are tough.

To keep all these services functioning, utilities must continually invest in the critical infrastructure to ensure those systems work. If you don’t invest in that infrastructure, over time, these systems break down because they are out in the elements, or they simply become old and outdated. Across Connecticut, members of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) are doing this infrastructure maintenance daily to make sure the lights stay on.

Michael Monahan Credit: Michael Monahan

As a leader in the labor union which represents thousands of electrical workers in our state, let me assure you this work never stops to ensure reliable service for customers. But Connecticut may soon not be able to adequately invest in our water, gas and electric infrastructure. And without those investments, our state’s energy system will suffer, as will Connecticut’s utility workers.

This is because several utilities in Connecticut recently had their creditworthiness downgraded by rating agencies. Now, when those utilities go to borrow money from lenders so they can invest in maintaining their infrastructure, those borrowing costs will be higher. These utilities may be forced to forgo investments in their infrastructure because they cost too much, or utility customers are going to be forced to pay higher utility bills to compensate for those higher borrowing costs.

Advertisement

These credit downgrades occurred because the state’s utility regulators have created an uncertain environment that has thrown cold water on investment in our state’s energy system. Worse, unless regulators quickly step in to strengthen our utilities, more credit downgrades are on the horizon.

And this problem is only going to grow – quickly. Connecticut has immediate needs for infrastructure investment. In the case of electricity, we are going to need more power as data centers and electric vehicles proliferate. We need a regulatory environment that protects customers and workers while allowing for continuous and long-term investments in the electric grid. These changes will allow us to meet the needs of tomorrow and to enhance the grid to be more resilient to severe weather.

We are already seeing the direct consequences of the actions which have been taken by leaders in Connecticut. Job growth in this critical sector is at risk, as we have seen our union brothers and sisters see more opportunities outside of Connecticut in neighboring states like Massachusetts, New York, and Pennsylvania. IBEW’s members are neighbors, coaches, volunteers, and active members of their communities in Connecticut. They shouldn’t be worried about whether their jobs are safe in the state they call home because of regulatory policies that have made their job security a riskier proposition.

A failure to improve regulatory certainty will continue to have a detrimental impact on Connecticut’s union workers and residents who rely on utility services. We hope immediate action will be taken to address this issue in Hartford to bring certainty back to Connecticut for the benefit of working men and women and Connecticut’s utility customers.

Mike Monahan is the vice president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), District 2, which covers the New England states.

Advertisement



Source link

Connecticut

Amtrak won’t close shoreline rail bridges during World Cup, reversing earlier proposal

Published

on

Amtrak won’t close shoreline rail bridges during World Cup, reversing earlier proposal


Amtrak says it will not close any railroad bridges along Connecticut’s shoreline during the 2026 World Cup, backing away from a potential proposal that had sparked concerns from boaters, harbor officials, and marine businesses.

In an email Tuesday to NBC Connecticut, Amtrak spokesperson Jason Abrams said: “At this time, in coordination with the Coast Guard, we will not be closing any bridges on the Connecticut Coast Line during the tournament.”

The statement is a shift from a plan previously circulating among members of the boating community. That proposal outlined possible hourslong closures of several movable railroad bridges on the Connecticut shoreline on dates tied to World Cup matches in Foxborough, Massachusetts.

The affected bridges would have included the spans over the Connecticut River, Niantic River, Shaw’s Cove, Thames River and Mystic River.

Advertisement

The proposal had raised alarms among charter boat operators, harbor masters and marine industry leaders, who warned the closures could disrupt navigation during the height of the summer season, create safety risks on crowded waterways and hurt businesses that depend on fishing and recreational boating.

Amtrak also said is “exploring all options to move travelers safely and reliably during the World Cup with minimal interruption and inconvenience to local communities, visitors, and other stakeholders and travelers.”

Fans are expected to use rail service along the Northeast Corridor to travel to matches in the Northeast, including in the Boston area, where passengers would use connecting service to reach the stadium in Foxborough.

Earlier Tuesday, the U.S. Coast Guard told NBC Connecticut it was reviewing Amtrak’s request related to the bridge proposal.

“The Coast Guard has received Amtrak’s request for the bridge closures and are reviewing it to reach a final decision. When that decision is made, the Coast Guard will work with Amtrak. We are also aware of the mariners and boating communities concerns regarding this,” the Coast Guard had said.

Advertisement

It was not immediately clear whether Amtrak had formally withdrawn that request or whether the rail operator’s latest statement means the bridge closures are no longer under consideration.

NBC Connecticut reached out to the Coast Guard to request additional information.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Marylin A. Shields Obituary

Published

on

Marylin A. Shields Obituary


East Windsor, Connecticut — Marylin A. Shields (née Ouellette) passed away peacefully in the early morning hours of Friday, April 3, 2026—Good Friday— while receiving care at a healthcare facility in Windsor, Connecticut. She was surrounded…



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

CEA Testimony Unravels Under Basic Questions at Finance Hearing

Published

on

CEA Testimony Unravels Under Basic Questions at Finance Hearing


Connecticut’s minimum wage didn’t rise overnight. It was the result of a sweeping 2019 law that fundamentally changed how wages are set in the state. Under Public Act 19-4, lawmakers approved a multi-year schedule to raise the minimum wage from $10.10 in 2019 to $15.00 by June 2023. The inc



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending