Address Newsletter
Our weekly digest on buying, selling, and design, with expert advice and insider neighborhood knowledge.
Connecticut
Connecticut Leaders Vow To Fight For Education Following Trump Executive Order | CT News Junkie
HARTFORD, CT — State officials and educators decried President Donald Trump’s executive order calling for the federal Department of Education’s closure on Thursday, vowing to fight the administration on education issues.
“Programs like Title I, IDEA, Pell Grants, and Impact Aid are essential to ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality education, regardless of their family’s income,” Gov. Ned Lamont said. “These investments help level the playing field, providing critical resources for low-income students, funding mental health and school safety initiatives, and guaranteeing services for students with disabilities.”
Lamont said the executive order “threatens the strength and stability” of public schools.
The executive order instructs Education Secretary Linda McMahon “to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities.”
It also instructs McMahon to ensure the continued allocation of DOE funds, except to programs and activities that utilize “diversity, equity and inclusion” or “[promotes] gender ideology.”
The president does not have the power to unilaterally shut down the department. That would require an act of Congress. However, the executive order is the latest step in the Trump administration’s multi-pronged plan to strangle the DOE. Last week, the administration fired 1,300 DOE employees as it continued to downsize the agency.
McMahon said that the executive order was a “history-making action” that sends education back where it belongs.
“Education is fundamentally a state responsibility,” she said in a statement. “Instead of filtering resources through layers of federal red tape, we will empower states to take charge and advocate for and implement what is best for students, families, and educators in their communities.”
McMahon went on to say that the closure of the department would not result in the loss of funds the department coordinates and disperses to schools and programs across the nation.
Kate Dias, president of the Connecticut Education Association, acknowledged that the order doesn’t formally close the DOE. However, she said the action continues to “devalue” and “deemphasize” the work that goes into public education and the importance of that work. She vowed to fight the administration on education issues,
“We need to lift it up and honor the more than 500,000 students that are engaged in public education here in the State of Connecticut,” she said in a video shared with the media. “So while the feds are going to do what they’re going to do, we here in the State of Connecticut are going to continue to fight for what’s right. And that is protecting and preserving the education for more than 500,000 students across the great State of Connecticut.”
Rep. Joe Courtney, D-CT, honed in on the specific programs that the executive order could affect.
“To dismantle the Department of Education is to dismantle the pathways to success local students use every day to build a rewarding and family-sustaining career,” he said. “In just the last year, Thompson and Westbrook high schools in eastern Connecticut used financial assistance from [DOE] to open new and expanded welding labs, which are critically important to connecting students to good-paying manufacturing jobs right out of high school.”
He said 95 percent of K-12 public schools in Connecticut’s Second Congressional District depend on federal Title I funding. Additionally, he said 1,600 teachers, nurses, police officers, and other public servants earned debt relief through the bipartisan Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. Both are administered by the DOE.
Senate Pro Tempore Martin Looney, D-New Haven, and Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, issued a joint statement accusing the president of offering up American children as a “sacrifice” in service of the administration’s pursuit of tax cuts for the wealthiest people in the world.
According to the senators, Connecticut relies on the DOE for more than $394.5 million in funding, which accounted for more than 10% of the state’s total revenue for education in 2024. DOE funds also support free and reduced-price meals, funding for schools in low-income communities, mechanisms for processing civil rights and disability-based discrimination cases, and management of student aid programs such as Pell Grants.
“This reckless order puts nearly $400 million for Connecticut schools in jeopardy, including funding for school meals and special education,” the senators said. “For weeks, we’ve witnessed a deliberate effort to hollow out the core of this nation’s institutions to facilitate more favorable conditions for the fabulously wealthy elite. As the Trump Administration writes off the future of Connecticut kids as collateral damage, Connecticut Republicans stand idly by.”
House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, was more cautious in his statement about the executive order, saying it had ignited “much-needed debate” about the nation’s education bureaucracy and criticizing state Democrats as “defending a broken architecture that drives up college debt and fails K-12 students and educators year after year,”
Candelora said Democrats should “join the conversation about creating real reform that supports educators while ensuring every student gets the education they deserve.”
More news about education
Lamont Addresses School Superintendents On Education Funding, Mental Health, Technology
BRISTOL, CT – Gov. Ned Lamont outlined the state’s priorities for education funding, student mental health, and the role of technology in schools – emphasizing the need to limit distractions in classrooms – during the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents spring conference on Thursday.
Speaking over breakfast at the Bristol Events Center, Lamont acknowledged the challenges facing national education policy, referencing recent travels during which he observed how other countries approach education, artificial intelligence, and social media regulation.
“There is uncertainty coming out of Washington, D.C.,” he said. “Other countries are already implementing national policies on artificial intelligence and social media regulation. Meanwhile, here in the U.S., our leaders are debating whether to eliminate the Department of Education.”
He stressed the importance of preparing students for a competitive workforce: “We need to ensure that we have the best-trained workforce in the world. We’ve got to make sure that we’re thinking about our kids, not just in terms of school today, but in terms of preparing them for the world they’re going to enter tomorrow.”
Reflecting on the challenges schools have faced in recent years, Lamont noted that student struggles extend beyond the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic.
“Coming out of COVID, I thought all this anxiety and isolation were just related to the pandemic,” Lamont said. “But years later, we’re seeing these issues persist. Something deeper is going on.”
He pointed to the growing body of research linking screen overuse and social media to rising rates of anxiety, stress, and depression among young people.
“We started seeing a rise in anxiety, stress, and depression long before COVID,” he said. “It’s clear that the overuse of screens and social media is playing a role.”
Lamont also spoke about efforts to reduce distractions caused by smartphones in schools, highlighting districts that have already begun limiting phone use during the school day.
“More and more of you are getting phones out of schools, and I’m hearing from teachers that things are enormously different. Students are able to concentrate and engage in class again.”
He acknowledged that some parents are hesitant about such policies.
“Some parents feel like they need to be in contact with their kids 24/7,” he said. “But even now, I’ve found there’s a lot more relaxation going on, and I think parents are starting to appreciate what it means for their kids.”
Following Lamont’s remarks, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt spoke about the long-term effects of smartphones and social media on child development. Haidt, author of “The Anxious Generation,” has studied the impact of digital habits on mental health, citing data that shows a sharp increase in anxiety, depression, and self-harm among teenagers after 2010.
“There was no trend before 2010,” Haidt said. “Then social media exploded, and everything changed.”
He described what he calls the “great rewiring” of childhood, in which in-person socialization has been replaced by digital interaction.
“The play-based childhood that previous generations experienced has been replaced by a phone-based childhood, and we are seeing the consequences in rising rates of anxiety, depression, and social anxiety,” he said. “If you take a child’s ability to explore, take risks, and problem-solve away from them and instead give them an endless stream of curated digital content, their brain is going to develop differently.”
Haidt recommended delaying smartphone use until at least middle school, prohibiting social media access for children under 16, and implementing phone-free school policies statewide.
Connecticut Education Commissioner Charlene Russell-Tucker emphasized the importance of addressing student well-being through policy and data-driven decisions.
“More and more students are struggling with anxiety, depression, and stress,” she said. “They watch the same news as we do, they see the same social media trends. This is impacting every zip code in Connecticut.”
She pointed to ongoing legislative efforts, stating that “we have over 50 bills in the legislature right now that could shift the education landscape. We must stay engaged and ensure that policies serve the well-being of every student.”
Lamont reaffirmed the state’s commitment to supporting educators and students.
“We can’t afford to lose a generation to distraction and depression,” he said. “Our kids deserve better – and we’re going to give it to them.”
Luxury Homes
Kathie Lee Gifford and her late husband, football legend Frank Gifford, purchased the house in 1994.
Former “Today” show host Kathie Lee Gifford is selling her sprawling 13,163-square-foot Connecticut home. The asking price? $100,000,000.
Dubbed “Cedar Cliff,” the Greenwich estate at 108 Cedar Cliff in the Riverside section of town, was once owned by railroad tycoon Henry F. Shoemaker. Kathie Lee Gifford and her late husband, football legend Frank Gifford, purchased the house in 1994 for $7.8 million . The 13,163-square-foot, 29-room estate has eight bedrooms and 14 bathrooms (nine full, five half).
“They added a substantial addition to the house to make it work for their lifestyle,” listing agent Leslie McElwreath of Sotheby’s International Realty said. That addition is the east wing of the house, constructed in the early 2000s, which includes a private theater and wine cellar.
The eight bedrooms are similarly sized and have views of Greenwich Cove. The primary bedroom and two guest bedrooms have a balcony as well. The estate has a greenhouse, a screened porch, a sun room, a tennis court, and a billiards room currently containing Frank Gifford memorabilia. There are 10 fireplaces throughout the house.
Within the 2.91-acre gated peninsula is a spa, pool, and pool house.
McElwreath said “empty nester” Gifford is selling the property because “her children are grown and are married with their own children. Kathie Lee spends most of her time in Tennessee and is no longer using the house full-time.”
The house has a recently installed Ludowici terra cotta roof, sun decks that have been rebuilt, and there is access to a full-property generator as well as a private beach.
McElwreath said there are additional aspects that make this property worth the monstrous price tag.
“The setting is extraordinary. Elevated high above the water with over 1,250 feet of frontage, the property offers the rare combination of commanding panoramic views and direct waterfront access via a private pier and deep water dock,” she said.
McElwreath said the kind of buyer looking at this property is attracted to Greenwich for its high quality of life and proximity to Midtown Manhattan.
”High net-worth buyers do not compromise. They seek exceptional properties in prime locations. Cedar Cliff is a one-of-a-kind opportunity and will attract buyers looking for privacy and resort-like amenities,” McElwreath said.
The task of selling the estate was entrusted to McElwreath by Gifford after McElwreath represented the seller of Copper Beech Farm in Greenwich, which sold for just under $139,000,000 in 2023.
“[Copper Beach] is still the highest sale ever in Greenwich and the state of Connecticut. I plan to use the full resources of Sotheby’s International Realty to find the buyer for Cedar Cliff,” McElwreath said. “I also represented the seller of 100 Field Point Circle, the second highest sale in Greenwich at $50 million. My proven track record, combined with the marketing expertise of Sotheby’s, will prove to be a winning combination.”
Connecticut
Hailey Van Lith waived by Connecticut Sun after just nine games, marking second cut in under a month
Hailey Van Lith’s rocky WNBA start took another unexpected turn Thursday.
The Connecticut Sun waived Van Lith after just nine games with the team, including three starts.
CHICAGO, IL – AUGUST 25: Hailey Van Lith #2 of the Chicago Sky high five during the game against the Las Vegas Aces on August 25, 2025 at the Wintrust Arena in Chicago, IL. (Photo by Melissa Tamez/NBAE via Getty Images) ((Photo by Melissa Tamez/NBAE via Getty Images))
TCU’s Hailey Van Lith poses before the WNBA basketball draft in New York on April 14, 2025. (Pamela Smith/AP)
Van Lith was once one of college basketball’s brightest stars at Louisville, but her path has become increasingly turbulent in recent years. After a disappointing stint at LSU stalled her momentum, Van Lith revived her draft stock with a standout final season at TCU.
CHICAGO SKY WAIVE HAILEY VAN LITH ONE YEAR AFTER SELECTING HER WITH THE 11TH OVERALL PICK
The former NIL standout was selected 11th overall by the Chicago Sky in the 2024 WNBA Draft. She struggled to establish herself as a rookie, averaging 3.5 points and 1.6 assists in 12.4 minutes per game across 29 appearances before Chicago waived her on May 4.
Hailey Van Lith’s brief stint with the Connecticut Sun ended Thursday after the franchise waived the former first-round pick. (Photo by Ali Gradischer/Getty Images) ((Photo by Ali Gradischer/Getty Images))
Hailey van Lith drives past opponents during the women’s 3×3 basketball bronze medal game between the United States and Canada at the Olympic Games Paris 2024 on Aug. 5, 2024, in Paris, France. (Matthew Stockman/Getty Images)
TCU’s Hailey Van Lith jogs onto the court during introductions before the first half in the second round of the NCAA college basketball tournament game against Louisville in Fort Worth, Texas, on March 23, 2025. (Tony Gutierrez/AP)
Van Lith also helped Team USA win a bronze medal in 3×3 basketball at the 2024 Paris Olympics.
Connecticut quickly gave Van Lith a second chance, but the reunion lasted just over two weeks.
“The Connecticut Sun has activated Leïla Lacan,” the team announced on X. “In a corresponding move, Hailey Van Lith has been waived.”
EX-WNBA STAR CRITICAL OF SKY ROOKIE HAILEY VAN LITH, BELIEVES POPULARITY PLAYED ROLE IN DRAFT SELECTION
The move comes as Lacan — the No. 10 overall pick in the 2024 draft — returns after averaging 10.4 points and 3.7 assists with Connecticut last season.
Van Lith appeared in Wednesday’s 71-61 loss to Portland, finishing with seven points, no assists and two turnovers in 13 minutes.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
Van Lith averaged 8.1 points and 2.2 assists in nine appearances with Connecticut before Thursday’s move, marking her second waiver in less than a month.
The Connecticut Sun waived Hailey Van Lith on Thursday, ending the former college star’s nine-game stint with the franchise. ((Photo by Mollie Handkins/NBAE via Getty Images))
Send us your thoughts: alejandro.avila@outkick.com / Follow along on X: @alejandroaveela
The following article was submitted by Brody and Associates, LLC. It is posted here with permission.
The Connecticut legislature passed broad artificial intelligence legislation May 11, 2026 that includes a new framework governing the use of AI in employment-related decisions.
The bill, known as SB 5, is awaiting Gov. Ned Lamont’s signature, which is expected shortly.
Once enacted, Connecticut will join a growing list of jurisdictions that are imposing transparency and accountability requirements on employers that use AI tools in recruiting, hiring, promotion, discipline, scheduling, and termination decisions.
The statute regulates what it calls automated employment-related decision technology.
In general, AEDT refers to technology that processes personal data and generates an output that is a substantial factor in an employment decision.
The definition is broad enough to potentially cover resume-screening software, applicant ranking systems, video-interview analytics, skills assessments, productivity tools, and certain workforce management platforms when those tools materially influence personnel decisions.
What Does the Law Require?
The purpose of the law is to reduce the risk that algorithmic systems will continue or worsen historic discrimination while also giving applicants and employees more visibility into how these systems are used.
One of the most important features of the new law is its notice requirement.
Beginning Oct. 1, 2027, employers that deploy AEDT intended to interact with applicants or employees must disclose, in plain language, that the individual is interacting with such technology unless it would be obvious to a reasonable person.
When the tool’s output will be used as a substantial factor in making an employment-related decision, the employer must also provide a written notice before the decision is made.
The law does include protection for proprietary or trade secret information.
Notice must identify the purpose of the tool, the categories and sources of personal data being analyzed, how data will be assessed, and contact information for the employer.
If such employment-related decision is “adverse,” employers must provide a high-level statement disclosing the principal reasons for the decision, including “the degree to which, and manner in which” an AEDP output contributed to the decision, the type of data used, and the right to examine or correct such data.
The law does include protection for proprietary or trade secret information, but employers should not assume that vendor confidentiality excuses them from compliance.
If an employer withholds certain information regarding the AEDP based on a third party’s confidentiality claim, the employer must nevertheless disclose that the information is being withheld and identify the legal basis for the withholding.
As a practical matter, this means employers that rely on outside vendors for screening, testing, or candidate evaluation should begin reviewing vendor contracts now to ensure they can obtain the information needed to satisfy Connecticut’s notice obligations.
Anti-Discrimination and Related Obligations
The law also makes clear employers cannot avoid liability by blaming an algorithm.
Connecticut’s anti-discrimination framework will expressly provide the use of AI or automated systems is not a defense to a discrimination claim.
The employer may still be responsible even if the challenged output came from a third-party platform.
In other words, if an AEDT disproportionately screens out candidates or influences decisions in a way that has an unlawful discriminatory effect, the employer may still be responsible even if the challenged output came from a third-party platform.
This provision reinforces a principle regulators have increasingly emphasized nationwide: employers remain accountable for employment decisions, whether those decisions are made by people, software, or a combination of both.
What Employers Should Do Now
For employers, the immediate takeaway is AI governance can no longer be treated as an IT issue.
Human resources, legal, compliance, and procurement teams should collaborate to identify all tools used in recruiting or personnel management, assess whether those tools materially affect employment decisions, and determine what disclosures this new law may require.
Even companies that already use AI responsibly may need to formalize review procedures.
Employers should also assess whether internal policies, vendor agreements, and recordkeeping practices are sufficient to support compliance.
Even companies that already use AI responsibly may need to formalize review procedures, conduct bias testing, and create documentation explaining how automated outputs are considered by human decision-makers.
Connecticut’s new law reflects a broader regulatory trend: employers may continue using AI, but they must do so transparently, carefully, and with meaningful human accountability.
About the authors: Robert Brody is managing partner at Brody and Associates, LLC, which he founded in 1997. Matthew Chiota is a law clerk at Brody and Associates, awaiting admission to the Connecticut and New York Bar associations. Contact them at [email protected] or 203.454.0560.
-
Technology3 minutes agoFake grant email promises $4.5 Million but could steal your identity
-
Business9 minutes agoAnother tech company says it will cut hundreds of jobs amid pivot to AI
-
Entertainment15 minutes agoThis Puerto Rican filmmaker honored his family with an unconventional movie called ‘TheyDream’
-
Lifestyle21 minutes agoL.A. Affairs: I went on 53 first dates in one summer. Here’s a look at my spreadsheet
-
Politics27 minutes agoTrump holds Situation Room meeting to decide on Iran deal
-
Science33 minutes agoOxnard man smuggled baby crocodiles, among 1,700 reptiles, gets 5 years
-
Sports39 minutes agoA new board game mocks Shai Gilgeous-Alexander for ‘foul baiting.’ He wants it destroyed
-
World51 minutes agoIsrael, Russia among new additions on UN sexual violence ‘blacklist’
