Connect with us

Connecticut

Connecticut Leaders Vow To Fight For Education Following Trump Executive Order | CT News Junkie

Published

on

Connecticut Leaders Vow To Fight For Education Following Trump Executive Order | CT News Junkie


Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont speaks at the rally for Medicaid on the South Lawn of the state Capitol in Hartford on Tuesday, March 18, 2025. Credit: Doug Hardy / CTNewsJunkie

HARTFORD, CT — State officials and educators decried President Donald Trump’s executive order calling for the federal Department of Education’s closure on Thursday, vowing to fight the administration on education issues.

“Programs like Title I, IDEA, Pell Grants, and Impact Aid are essential to ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality education, regardless of their family’s income,” Gov. Ned Lamont said. “These investments help level the playing field, providing critical resources for low-income students, funding mental health and school safety initiatives, and guaranteeing services for students with disabilities.”

Lamont said the executive order “threatens the strength and stability” of public schools.

The executive order instructs Education Secretary Linda McMahon “to the maximum extent appropriate and permitted by law, take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure of the Department of Education and return authority over education to the States and local communities.” 

Advertisement

It also instructs McMahon to ensure the continued allocation of DOE funds, except to programs and activities that utilize “diversity, equity and inclusion” or “[promotes] gender ideology.” 

The president does not have the power to unilaterally shut down the department. That would require an act of Congress. However, the executive order is the latest step in the Trump administration’s multi-pronged plan to strangle the DOE. Last week, the administration fired 1,300 DOE employees as it continued to downsize the agency.

McMahon said that the executive order was a “history-making action” that sends education back where it belongs.

“Education is fundamentally a state responsibility,” she said in a statement. “Instead of filtering resources through layers of federal red tape, we will empower states to take charge and advocate for and implement what is best for students, families, and educators in their communities.”

McMahon went on to say that the closure of the department would not result in the loss of funds the department coordinates and disperses to schools and programs across the nation.

Advertisement
Woman backed by a group speaks into microphone
FILE PHOTO: Connecticut Education Association President Kate Dias addresses the press on the south side of the state Capitol Building regarding the CEA’s annual members survey. Credit: Jamil Ragland / CTNewsJunkie

Kate Dias, president of the Connecticut Education Association, acknowledged that the order doesn’t formally close the DOE. However, she said the action continues to “devalue” and “deemphasize” the work that goes into public education and the importance of that work. She vowed to fight the administration on education issues,

“We need to lift it up and honor the more than 500,000 students that are engaged in public education here in the State of Connecticut,” she said in a video shared with the media. “So while the feds are going to do what they’re going to do, we here in the State of Connecticut are going to continue to fight for what’s right. And that is protecting and preserving the education for more than 500,000 students across the great State of Connecticut.”

Rep. Joe Courtney, D-CT, honed in on the specific programs that the executive order could affect. 

joe courtney
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney talks with reporters at Bradley International Airport in 2023. Credit: Hugh McQuaid / CTNewsJunkie

“To dismantle the Department of Education is to dismantle the pathways to success local students use every day to build a rewarding and family-sustaining career,” he said. “In just the last year, Thompson and Westbrook high schools in eastern Connecticut used financial assistance from [DOE] to open new and expanded welding labs, which are critically important to connecting students to good-paying manufacturing jobs right out of high school.”

He said 95 percent of K-12 public schools in Connecticut’s Second Congressional District depend on federal Title I funding. Additionally, he said 1,600 teachers, nurses, police officers, and other public servants earned debt relief through the bipartisan Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. Both are administered by the DOE.

Senate Pro Tempore Martin Looney, D-New Haven, and Senate Majority Leader Bob Duff, D-Norwalk, issued a joint statement accusing the president of offering up American children as a “sacrifice” in service of the administration’s pursuit of tax cuts for the wealthiest people in the world. 

According to the senators, Connecticut relies on the DOE for more than $394.5 million in funding, which accounted for more than 10% of the state’s total revenue for education in 2024. DOE funds also support free and reduced-price meals, funding for schools in low-income communities, mechanisms for processing civil rights and disability-based discrimination cases, and management of student aid programs such as Pell Grants.

Advertisement

“This reckless order puts nearly $400 million for Connecticut schools in jeopardy, including funding for school meals and special education,” the senators said. “For weeks, we’ve witnessed a deliberate effort to hollow out the core of this nation’s institutions to facilitate more favorable conditions for the fabulously wealthy elite. As the Trump Administration writes off the future of Connecticut kids as collateral damage, Connecticut Republicans stand idly by.”

House Minority Leader Vincent Candelora, R-North Branford, was more cautious in his statement about the executive order, saying it had ignited “much-needed debate” about the nation’s education bureaucracy and criticizing state Democrats as “defending a broken architecture that drives up college debt and fails K-12 students and educators year after year,”

Candelora said Democrats should “join the conversation about creating real reform that supports educators while ensuring every student gets the education they deserve.”


More news about education

Lamont Addresses School Superintendents On Education Funding, Mental Health, Technology

Gov. Ned Lamont
FILE PHOTO: Gov. Ned Lamont talks to reporters and stakeholders about the Trump administration’s memo freezing funding on Tuesday, Jan. 28, 2025, at the state Capitol in Hartford. Credit: Jamil Ragland / CTNewsJunkie

BRISTOL, CT – Gov. Ned Lamont outlined the state’s priorities for education funding, student mental health, and the role of technology in schools – emphasizing the need to limit distractions in classrooms – during the Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents spring conference on Thursday.

Speaking over breakfast at the Bristol Events Center, Lamont acknowledged the challenges facing national education policy, referencing recent travels during which he observed how other countries approach education, artificial intelligence, and social media regulation.

“There is uncertainty coming out of Washington, D.C.,” he said. “Other countries are already implementing national policies on artificial intelligence and social media regulation. Meanwhile, here in the U.S., our leaders are debating whether to eliminate the Department of Education.”

Advertisement

He stressed the importance of preparing students for a competitive workforce: “We need to ensure that we have the best-trained workforce in the world. We’ve got to make sure that we’re thinking about our kids, not just in terms of school today, but in terms of preparing them for the world they’re going to enter tomorrow.”

Reflecting on the challenges schools have faced in recent years, Lamont noted that student struggles extend beyond the disruptions of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Coming out of COVID, I thought all this anxiety and isolation were just related to the pandemic,” Lamont said. “But years later, we’re seeing these issues persist. Something deeper is going on.”

He pointed to the growing body of research linking screen overuse and social media to rising rates of anxiety, stress, and depression among young people.

“We started seeing a rise in anxiety, stress, and depression long before COVID,” he said. “It’s clear that the overuse of screens and social media is playing a role.”

Advertisement

Lamont also spoke about efforts to reduce distractions caused by smartphones in schools, highlighting districts that have already begun limiting phone use during the school day.

“More and more of you are getting phones out of schools, and I’m hearing from teachers that things are enormously different. Students are able to concentrate and engage in class again.”

He acknowledged that some parents are hesitant about such policies.

“Some parents feel like they need to be in contact with their kids 24/7,” he said. “But even now, I’ve found there’s a lot more relaxation going on, and I think parents are starting to appreciate what it means for their kids.”

Following Lamont’s remarks, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt spoke about the long-term effects of smartphones and social media on child development. Haidt, author of “The Anxious Generation,” has studied the impact of digital habits on mental health, citing data that shows a sharp increase in anxiety, depression, and self-harm among teenagers after 2010.

Advertisement

“There was no trend before 2010,” Haidt said. “Then social media exploded, and everything changed.”

He described what he calls the “great rewiring” of childhood, in which in-person socialization has been replaced by digital interaction.

“The play-based childhood that previous generations experienced has been replaced by a phone-based childhood, and we are seeing the consequences in rising rates of anxiety, depression, and social anxiety,” he said. “If you take a child’s ability to explore, take risks, and problem-solve away from them and instead give them an endless stream of curated digital content, their brain is going to develop differently.”

Haidt recommended delaying smartphone use until at least middle school, prohibiting social media access for children under 16, and implementing phone-free school policies statewide.

Education Commissioner Charlene Russell-Tucker
FILE PHOTO: Education Commissioner Charlene Russell-Tucker Credit: FILE PHOTO / CTNewsJunkie.com

Connecticut Education Commissioner Charlene Russell-Tucker emphasized the importance of addressing student well-being through policy and data-driven decisions.

“More and more students are struggling with anxiety, depression, and stress,” she said. “They watch the same news as we do, they see the same social media trends. This is impacting every zip code in Connecticut.”

Advertisement

She pointed to ongoing legislative efforts, stating that “we have over 50 bills in the legislature right now that could shift the education landscape. We must stay engaged and ensure that policies serve the well-being of every student.”

Lamont reaffirmed the state’s commitment to supporting educators and students.

“We can’t afford to lose a generation to distraction and depression,” he said. “Our kids deserve better – and we’re going to give it to them.”



Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

‘It’s a neighborhood effort’: Improvements made to Quinnipiac River Park

Published

on

‘It’s a neighborhood effort’: Improvements made to Quinnipiac River Park


Neighbors who live in the Elm City’s Fair Haven neighborhood might notice a change of scenery at Quinnipiac River Park.

With city planning and a $250,000 state grant, the walkways were paved, water fountains were installed, and the riverbank was improved to prevent erosion.

It’s come a long way since the area was an industrial site in the 1960s.

“Decades and decades ago, this was a junkyard and it’s just shocking to see what is here now, this beautiful site,” New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker said.

Advertisement

The area eventually became a park that saw a massive cleanup a few years ago. What was once a dump is now frequented by visitors young and old, on wheels and on four legs.

“I’d be the only guy running laps around ad now morning, night, afternoon, there’s people running, there’s people having picnics,” neighbor Eric Murray said.

Elicker said a nicer park with lighting and clean, open space can make visitors feel safe.

“People are less likely to engage in crime if they think that there’s a lot of people to witness and they could get caught,” he said.

The work isn’t done yet. Future plans include picnic tables, a new patio area and welcome gardens. The walkways will become a part of a trail that goes around Fair Haven, according to the mayor.

Advertisement

That requires more funding and the continued work of neighbors who have been keeping the park clean.

The Friends of Quinnipiac River Park take pride in maintaining the beauty here by planting flowers and trees, taking care of them in every season.

“I love planting, especially for the neighborhood,” Sadi Vidro, a member of the Friends of Quinnipiac River Park. “I saw the, the outcome of it and that’s what keeps me going.”

Some trees are decorated with a cross and a message that might stop you on your walk. One tree is planted in memory of Michael Caliz.

“Our friend Rita, this is a tree she planted in memory of her son and Rita comes back faithfully every year,” Tom Burwell, the founder of the Friends of Quinnipiac River Park, said. “She’s definitely has taken ownership in the tree and she’s become a staple. She’s been like a mom to us in the group as well.”

Advertisement

Phase one of the project is complete. Concept plans for phase 2 focus on the northern end of the park.



Source link

Continue Reading

Connecticut

Several beaches closed to swimming due to potential bacteria in the water

Published

on

Several beaches closed to swimming due to potential bacteria in the water


Several Connecticut swimming areas are closed due to the potential of bacteria in the water.

The heavy rain over the past few days is the reason for the concern.

Swimming is prohibited at the West Beach at Rocky Neck State Park, Sherwood Island State Park, Silver Sands State Park in Milford, and Chatfield Hollow State Park in Killingworth.

Water testing at those state parks will be redone on Wednesday with results back on Thursday.

Advertisement

Clinton has also suspended swimming and other water activities at its town beach until further notice. The beach remains open and all other amenities are available, according to the town.

There is no swimming allowed at all Stratford beaches until Friday, according to the Stratford Health Department.

The East Shore Health Department says beaches in East Haven, as well as Clark/Johnson Beach, Stony Creek, and Branford Point in Branford are also closed to swimming. Water samples are being taken on Wednesday and the results are expected on Thursday.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Opinion: A lifeline in CT’s childcare desert

Published

on

Opinion: A lifeline in CT’s childcare desert


​As Connecticut grapples with a persistent childcare crisis, parents are facing a perfect storm: years-long waitlists, skyrocketing tuition at corporate centers, and the grueling logistics of balancing a 9-to-5 with a rigid pickup schedule.

​But while the public debate often centers on expanding massive commercial childcare centers, a quiet, deeply rooted alternative is keeping Connecticut’s working families afloat. It is called family childcare —licensed, professional early childhood care operated out of a provider’s home.

​Far from a fallback plan, family childcare is increasingly the gold standard for parents seeking a blend of high-quality early education, financial sanity, and emotional peace of mind. For families navigating the Nutmeg State’s early childhood landscape, here is why choosing a home-based provider is a powerful, beneficial choice.

Advertisement

​A true “home away from home” environment

​For infants and young toddlers, the transition from a parent’s arms to a bustling commercial facility can be jarring. Large centers often feature bright fluorescent lights, high-density classrooms, and a rotating cast of staff members.

​Family childcare offers the exact opposite: a cozy, familiar home environment. Children learn, play, and nap in spaces that feel like an extension of their own living rooms. This familiar setting significantly lowers stress levels for young children, helping them feel secure enough to explore, socialise, and learn.

​Consistency of care (no staff turnover)

​One of the most disruptive aspects of modern commercial childcare is staff turnover. Because of industry-wide low wages, center teachers frequently move on, meaning a child might have three or four different primary caregivers in a single year.

​In a family childcare setting, the business owner is the teacher. Your child builds a deep, secure attachment to one consistent educator from infancy until they drop their backpacks off for kindergarten. This continuity of care is crucial for healthy emotional and neurological development in a child’s first 1,000 days.

​Mixed-age groupings mirror real life

​Unlike traditional centers that rigidly separate children by age into 12-month increments, family childcare homes naturally feature mixed-age groups. Infants, toddlers, and preschoolers interact throughout the day.

Advertisement

​This model offers profound developmental benefits:

  • For younger children: They learn language, social skills, and behavioral cues rapidly by watching and mimicking older peers.
  • For older children: They develop empathy, patience, and leadership skills by helping and looking out for the littler ones.
  • For siblings: Brothers and sisters can stay together in the same program, rather than being split up into different wings of a building.

​Unmatched flexibility for working class families

​Connecticut’s economy doesn’t just run on a traditional 9-to-5 schedule. Shift workers, healthcare professionals, first responders, and service industry employees are routinely left behind by corporate childcare centers that charge massive penalties if a parent is five minutes past a 5:30 p.m. closing time.

​Home-based providers understand the realities of working families. Because they operate independently, many offer more flexible drop-off and pick-up windows, and some accommodate non-traditional hours or part-time schedules that commercial centers reject.

​Financial sanity in a high-cost state

​Let’s talk numbers. Connecticut routinely ranks among the top ten most expensive states for childcare in the nation, with center-based infant care averaging well over $18,000 a year.

​Family childcare providers offer a much-needed financial breathing room. Because their overhead costs are lower —utilizing their own homes rather than renting commercial real estate— they are able to pass those savings on to parents. On average, family childcare in Connecticut costs 20% to 35% less than center-based care, without sacrificing licensing rigor, safety standards, or educational quality.

​The state standard: Licensed family childcare providers in Connecticut are strictly regulated by the Office of Early Childhood (OEC). They undergo background checks, regular home safety inspections, and must meet the exact same core health, safety, and CPR training requirements as large-scale centers.

Advertisement

​Elevating the profession

​For too long, outdated stereotypes dismissed home-based providers as “babysitters.” Today’s family childcare providers are micro-entrepreneurs, early childhood experts, and community anchors. Many hold degrees in early education, participate in Connecticut’s Sparkler developmental screening initiative, and build robust, play-based curriculums tailored to individual children rather than a corporate mandate.

​As state lawmakers debate how to build a more resilient care infrastructure, they must recognize that family childcare isn’t just an alternative —it is a cornerstone of the system. For Connecticut parents seeking community, affordability, and a nurturing environment where their child is truly known, the best choice might just be right down the street.

Michelle Gagliardi is leader of the CT Family Child Care Coalition.

This <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org/2026/07/08/a-lifeline-in-connecticuts-childcare-desert-why-family-childcare-is-the-right-choice-for-working-parents-michelle/”>article</a> first appeared on <a target=”_blank” href=”https://ctmirror.org”>CT Mirror</a> and is republished here under a <a target=”_blank” href=”https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/”>Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.<img src=”https://ctmirror.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/cropped-CTMirror_bug_rgb-180×180.jpg” style=”width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;”>

<img id=”republication-tracker-tool-source” src=”https://ctmirror.org/?republication-pixel=true&post=1169695&amp;ga4=G-9GVNVL530Q” style=”width:1px;height:1px;”><script> PARSELY = { autotrack: false, onload: function() { PARSELY.beacon.trackPageView({ url: “https://ctmirror.org/2026/07/08/a-lifeline-in-connecticuts-childcare-desert-why-family-childcare-is-the-right-choice-for-working-parents-michelle/”, urlref: window.location.href }); } } </script> <script id=”parsely-cfg” src=”//cdn.parsely.com/keys/ctmirror.org/p.js”></script>

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending