Connect with us

Connecticut

Caitlin Clark endures tough playoff debut as seasoned Sun disrupt young Fever squad

Published

on

Caitlin Clark endures tough playoff debut as seasoned Sun disrupt young Fever squad


play

UNCASVILLE, Conn. — As Caitlin Clark goes, so go the Indiana Fever. That was true throughout a remarkable regular season of rookie joy, uplifting achievement and unexpected triumph. 

Advertisement

It also was true on Sunday afternoon, when the rough-and-tumble reality of the WNBA postseason came crashing down on a Fever starting five that had never played a second in the playoffs before they stepped onto the court for Game 1 against the formidable and seasoned Connecticut Sun.

For Clark, the day began fabulously. She finished fourth in WNBA voting for Most Valuable Player, an award won appropriately and unanimously by Las Vegas star A’ja Wilson. Clark also collected three honors from the Associated Press: Rookie of the Year, unanimously; All-WNBA First Team and All-Rookie Team. 

So the morning was terrific for Clark. The afternoon, not so much. 

In a 93-69 loss to the Sun, Clark received a black eye, both literally and figuratively. Poked in the right eye in the game’s first 90 seconds by the Sun’s DiJonai Carrington, Clark ended up with quite a shiner. It was logical to ask if that had anything to do with her 4-for-17 shooting, including 2-of-13 from 3-point range, but, after the game, she quickly shut down that theory.

Advertisement

“Obviously, got me pretty good in the eye. I don’t think it affected me, honestly, I felt like I got good shots, they just didn’t go down. Obviously, a tough time for that to happen. I got some really good looks. I had two, three pretty wide open 3’s in the first half that you usually make,” Clark said. 

“So that’s tough, but I felt like I battled and tried my best, took care of the ball better than I usually do (she tied her season low with two turnovers), which is a positive.”

Clark said the Fever still were in it until things got out of hand late as the relentless Sun poured it on at the end. 

“Like coach (Christie Sides) said in the locker room, we’re down three first quarter, down five (more) second quarter, and then lost by three (more) in the third — we were right there, and it felt like we just played a crappy game, like the flow of the game was really bad,” she said.

Advertisement

GAME 1 RECAP: Fever, Clark struggle in playoff loss to Sun

But as for her eye, she made it crystal clear: “It didn’t bother me. Obviously, it didn’t feel too good when it happened. But it is what it is.”

As they prepared for this best-of-three series, the Fever had talked about how they were hoping their youthful exuberance might carry the day. They were buoyed by what had worked over the past month, a Clark-fueled adrenaline rush of a run leading to a 9-5 post-Olympics record, including an 84-80 victory over Connecticut in Indianapolis August 28. Clark and her running mate Kelsey Mitchell had finished the summer on a tear, with a supporting cast that rose to the occasion over and over again, including some magnificent play by Aliyah Boston and Lexie Hull, among others.

Could that be the formula for success in a short series against a far more experienced foe? Connecticut’s players came into Sunday’s game having played a combined 222 playoff games. The entire Fever roster had played just 19.

WNBA PLAYOFF PICKS: Will Fever advance and will the Aces repeat?

Advertisement

The answer to that question was obvious as the game wore on: not on this day. Connecticut was just too physical, just too good. Clark ended with 11 points, eight assists, four rebounds and three steals.

Sun Coach Stephanie White decided to switch things up after losing that August game to Indiana, putting 6-4 veteran DeWanna Bonner on the 6-0 Clark.

“So much about this game is about comfort, it’s about rhythm, it’s about timing, it’s about all those things,” White said. “How can you make an adjustment that disrupts some of that? … Credit to (Bonner) for accepting this challenge. It gave us a different look at the point and I really liked that.”

Now Connecticut is one win away from taking the series and eliminating the Fever, while Indiana needs a victory in Game 2 here Wednesday to force a decisive Game 3 in Indiana Friday.

Advertisement

In the Fever camp, there was optimism. “These guys are going to shoot the ball a lot better on Wednesday,” Sides said, “and that’s going to make a huge difference.”

With a grand total of one playoff game now on her resume, Clark and her teammates will do the only thing they can do in this series. They’ll go right back at it. 

Editor’s note: Christine Brennan is writing a book on Caitlin Clark and the revolution in women’s sports to be published by Scribner in spring/summer 2025.

Follow Christine Brennan on social media @cbrennansports





Source link

Advertisement

Connecticut

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery

Published

on

The Great Westport Sandwich Contest kicks off with event at Old Mill Grocery


People in Westport have the chance to pick the best thing between sliced bread.

The Westport Weston Chamber of Commerce held a kick-off event at Old Mill Grocery on Monday for The Great Westport Sandwich Contest.

The contest runs throughout March with 21 restaurants, delis and markets competing in 10 categories to be crowned the best sandwich maker.

Residents can vote in the following categories: Best chicken, best steak, best vegetarian, best combo, best club, best NY deli, best pressed sandwich, best breakfast sandwich, best wrap, and best fish/seafood sandwich.

Advertisement

After people sample sandwiches, they can vote for their favorites in each category on the chamber’s website. They will also be placed into a drawing to win a free sandwich from one of the 10 winners.

“Of course, the goal is to have people come to Westport and check out restaurants, our markets and our delis. This is a great promotion. I mean it is a competition, but mostly it’s to bring people to the restaurants. It also gives a great community activity because they are the ones who get to vote who makes the best one,” says Matthew Mandell, the chamber’s executive director.

Winners will be announced in April and receive a plaque.

The chamber has held similar contests to determine what establishment has the best pizza, burger, soup and salad.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels

Published

on

Lawmakers again push to restore Shore Line East service to 2019 levels


Connecticut lawmakers are again looking to restore Shore Line East rail service to its pre‑pandemic levels, a proposal that could add about 90 more trains per week.

Lawmakers are also weighing a separate cost‑saving proposal to shift the line from electric rail cars back to diesel.

The plan comes as ridership remains well below 2019 numbers, though state data shows those numbers have begun to climb.

The Department of Transportation provided the General Assembly’s transportation committee with the following data:

Advertisement
  • 132 trains per week today versus 222 trains per week in 2019, according to the CTDOT commissioner.
  • In 2019, most weekday SLE trains traveled between New Haven Union Station and Old Saybrook. This allowed SLE to operate with only five train sets in the morning and four train sets in the afternoon.
  • It should be noted that 2019 SLE service levels were very different due to constrained infrastructure; 2019 service levels had a reduced number of SLE trains serving New London (13 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today), while other stations had increased service (36 trains per day Monday through Friday, as opposed to 20 today).

“2019 levels beyond Old Saybrook to New London would require more crews and more train sets than were used in 2019, requiring significantly more financial resources,” the department wrote in its written testimony.

The department said the governor’s FY2027 budget does not include funding for a full restoration. In other words, even if the legislature requires additional trains, the funds are not included in the current financial plan.

Governor Lamont said on Monday to remember that the state subsidizes the line more than any other rail right now.

“There’s not as much demand as there are for some of the other rail services in other parts of the state, so that’s the balance we’re trying to get right,” Lamont said.

At a public hearing on Monday, concerns about the line’s reliability and schedule were a central focus in the testimony.

“We’re making the line less attractive, some would say. The schedules are very, very difficult to manage,” said Sen. Christine Cohen of Guilford, the co-chair of the committee.

Advertisement

The current schedule for eastbound morning commuters is difficult. The train either arrives in New London just after 7 a.m. or after 9 a.m.

“So obviously not really … conducive to a typical workday,” Cohen said.

Cohen, who represents communities along the line, said she continues to reintroduce the bill to expand service year after year, pushing the state to do more with the line.

She thanked the department for the work it was able to do with the recent funding to establish a through train to Stamford.

“What do we need to do, and what are the challenges that you face in terms of expansion at this time?” Cohen asked.

Advertisement

Commissioner Garrett Eucalitto responded that the biggest hurdle is the cost of labor and access fees to Amtrak, which owns the territory.

“The cost to provide rail service is very expensive,” Eucalitto said.

He said CTDOT knows the current schedule is “not ideal,” but the economics of a work-from-home society are difficult.

“People expect 100% of the trains that they had in 2019, but they only want to take it two days a week,” Eucalitto said.

Asked about the eastbound schedule, the commissioner explained Shore Line East still operates on a model that sends trains toward New Haven in the morning rather than toward New London.

Advertisement

Changing that would require more equipment, more crews, and a second morning operations base, as well as negotiations with Amtrak, which owns the tracks.

Amtrak is “protecting their slots to be able to run increased Northeast Regional service as well as increased Acela service,” Eucallito said. “They’re going to look at us and question, ‘Well, how does that impact our need for Amtrak services?’ They’ll never give you an answer upfront, it’s always: ‘show us a proposal and then they’ll respond to it.’”

Cohen, who chairs the Transportation Committee, touted how a successful Shoreline East benefits the environment, development along the line, and reduces I-95 congestion.

“We need to start talking about how much money this costs us and think about all of the ancillary benefits,” Cohen said during the hearing.

Cohen said there is multi-state support for extending the line into Rhode Island.

Advertisement

“We will need some federal dollars. But as you say, there are other businesses up the line in New London,” Cohen said. “We’ve got Electric Boat. We’ve got Pfizer up that way. If we can get those employees on the transit line, we’re all the better for it.”

Rider advocates said the issue is familiar.

“I’d rather see solutions, and not things that are holding it back,” said Susan Feaster, founder of the Shore Line East Riders’ Advocacy Group.

She said she worries the line is facing a transit death spiral, with reduced service leading to lower ridership and falling fare revenue.

“They have to give us the money,” Feaster said. “It shouldn’t have to be profitable.”

Advertisement

Like other train lines across the country, Shore Line East relies on subsidies.

“We’re not asking for everything to be done overnight, but just incrementally,” Feaster said.

The line received $5 million two years ago, which increased service levels.

The proposal comes as the state reviews whether to return to diesel rail cars that are more than 30 years old.

The state says the switch would save about $9 million, but riders have said it would worsen the passenger experience.

Advertisement

NBC Connecticut asked Cohen whether she’ll ask DOT to reverse that proposal.

“I really want to,” Cohen said. “I appreciate what CTDOT was trying to do in terms of not cutting service as a result of trying to find savings elsewhere. This isn’t the way to do it.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections

Published

on

Iranian Yale scholar in Connecticut celebrates fall of regime, calls for free elections


HARTFORD, Conn. (WFSB) – Thousands of Connecticut families with ties to Iran are watching and waiting as their home country undergoes a historic change.

Among them is Ramin Ahmadi, a Yale doctor, human rights activist and founder of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. He has spent decades advocating for freedom in Iran from his home in Connecticut.

Ahmadi moved to the United States when he was 18. On Saturday morning, he learned of military strikes in Iran and the death of the country’s supreme leader.

Ahmadi said protests for democracy and human rights in Iran intensified in December, drawing millions of participants — including his own family and friends.

Advertisement

“The situation in Iran was a humanitarian emergency and it needed an intervention,” Ahmadi said.

He said he celebrated when he heard the news Saturday morning.

“I was celebrating along with all other Iranians inside and outside the country,” Ahmadi said. “I do regret that we cannot bring him to a trial for crimes that he has committed against humanity.”

Ahmadi said he spoke with his sister in Iran after she celebrated in the streets. She was later told to return home for her safety.

He shared a message she relayed from those around her.

Advertisement

“They said do not let our death be exploited because worse than that is having to live with the criminals who have done this to us for the rest of our lives,” Ahmadi said. “We do not want to do that.”

For those questioning whether the conflict was America’s to engage in, Ahmadi offered a direct response.

“We will all be affected,” he said. “And to those that tell you that the U.S. and Israel are beating the drums of war in Iran, one has to remind them that it was not like before this Iranian people were listening to Beethoven’s Symphony No. 9 in D minor. We had a war already declared on us by this regime. We were being slaughtered on a daily basis.”

Ahmadi said he believes the path forward begins with young military officers forcing out what remains of the regime, followed by free elections.

“Everyone’s life will be safer in the future and not just Iranians,” Ahmadi said.

Advertisement

Connecticut lawmakers are also responding to the U.S. strikes on Iran.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending