Connect with us

Boston, MA

Massachusetts rarity: Greater Boston town rejects immigrant protection petition

Published

on

Massachusetts rarity: Greater Boston town rejects immigrant protection petition


Massachusetts towns and cities are proceeding with caution as the Trump administration steams ahead in its crackdown on illegal immigration, with residents in one suburb rejecting a “safe communities” petition.

As some municipalities rushed to reaffirm their commitment to protecting all immigrants after Donald Trump won re-election last November, Mansfield is taking a different approach.

The suburb of roughly 24,000 people, about 30 miles southwest of Boston, has turned down a citizen’s petition to block town funds and resources from being used to enforce federal immigration law.

Resident Marcia Szymanski sponsored the petition that residents overwhelmingly rejected at a town meeting that drew a turnout of just over 480 locals. She argued that the measure would not have created a sanctuary town nor exposed Mansfield to federal funding “retaliation.”

Advertisement

“This article simply codifies what the town and the police force are already doing,” Szymanski said at the meeting on Wednesday. “The intent is to affirm the town’s commitment to the values of freedom, justice and equality for all Mansfield residents and visitors.”

“To take this action at this time is a vital contribution to public safety and a sense of community,” she added.

Police Chief Ron Sellon clarified that local resources are not being directed to enforcing federal laws, as is, connecting Mansfield’s status to a 2017 state Supreme Judicial Court ruling.

Under the so-called Lunn decision, local law enforcement cannot hold aliens based solely on a civil immigration detainer issued by federal officials beyond the time they would otherwise be released from custody.

That means aliens must be released even if federal immigration authorities issue a civil immigration detainer.

Advertisement

Sellon called the petition “moot,” while raising concerns about how support of the resolution could have prompted federal funding uncertainty as Mansfield faces financial struggles. The police department is relying on roughly $500,000 in federal grants to “offset” cuts, he said.

Mansfield residents also voted against a $2.7 million tax increase for the upcoming fiscal year.

Last August, Mansfield Police arrested Akim Marc Desire, 18, a Haitian national living in Massachusetts unlawfully, on a charge of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14.

“I will just be straight up and honest about it: I don’t know what the result is going to be,” Sellon said. “Donald Trump can’t find Mansfield on a map, but we don’t know if this is going to be the trigger that draws it for him.”

Mansfield’s rejection of the petition came two days after Trump signed an executive order directing his attorney general to work up a list of the country’s ‘sanctuary cities’ and warn them that they could lose funding or face other consequences.

Advertisement

Sanctuary policies are “a lawless insurrection against the supremacy of Federal law and the Federal Government’s obligation to defend the territorial sovereignty of the United States,” according to the president’s order.

Trump’s previous attempts to withhold funding to sanctuary cities and towns have been blocked in the courts.

While there is no strict “sanctuary jurisdiction” definition, the term is often used to describe those with policies that prevent local law enforcement agencies from enforcing federal laws or holding detainees longer than they normally would based on a civil detainer.

The exact number of sanctuary towns and cities in Massachusetts is unclear. Boston, Somerville, Northampton, Amherst, Cambridge, Concord, Lawrence and Newton had been grouped into that category for years, but some now say they have never been defined as a sanctuary.

Concord Town Manager Kerry Lafleur told the Select Board just a week after Trump retook office that the town is “not a sanctuary city,” the hyperlocal Concord Bridge has reported. Police Capt. Brian Goldman told the outlet that listing the town as a sanctuary city is “misstated.”

Advertisement

“What was put forward in 2017 was a ‘Welcoming Community,’” Goldman told the Bridge in January. “So it’s a little different mix of words.”

Other municipalities, in the wake of Trump’s re-election, adopted sanctuary-like policies barring employees from inquiring about or collecting information regarding citizenship or immigration status unless required by federal or state law.

The Natick Select Board in December declared its policy as not a true sanctuary city directive, “like Somerville and Cambridge,” while the Medford City Council also approved a similar ordinance in January, making it a so-called “Welcoming City.”

Medford has purchased 8,000 “know your rights” cards slated to be distributed to immigrants, alerting them of their Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights of not allowing agents to enter their homes without a signed warrant and not speaking to or answering questions from them, according to Boston 25.

On Beacon Hill, House Democrats rejected a Republican-led effort to reform the SJC’s 2017 Lunn decision that would have allowed local law enforcement to detain someone wanted by federal immigration authorities for up to 12 hours after their court proceedings end.

Advertisement

The rejection, during a debate on the House’s $61 billion fiscal year 2026 budget last week, triggered Republican gubernatorial candidate Mike Kennealy to sound off against the Democratic supermajority.

“Unlike Maura Healey, I will never allow politics to dictate decisions that put the safety of Massachusetts residents at risk,” Kennealy said in a statement. “Let’s be clear: if your laws protect illegal immigrants from federal enforcement, you are, by definition, a sanctuary state. That must end.”

Gov. Healey has repeatedly declared that Massachusetts is not a sanctuary state, even after federal authorities reportedly arrested 370 illegal aliens during an “enhanced operation,” which largely focused on transnational organized crime and gangs, including the notorious MS-13, Tren de Aragua, Trinitarios, and 18th Street.

Of the 370 people arrested in the March effort, 205 had significant criminal convictions or charges, ICE Boston reported. Border czar Tom Homan quickly vowed to return to the Bay State, as he said there is more “work to do.”

Healey has questioned Homan’s “fixation” on Massachusetts.

Advertisement

“To be quite honest, we’re a very safe state,” the governor told reporters after Homan’s initial visit. “We’re not a sanctuary state. Local, state, and federal law enforcement continue to work with and partner with one another.”

Before a Congressional committee probing sanctuary cities in early March, Mayor Michelle Wu touted Boston as the “safest major city” in the country, taking a swipe at the federal administration for spreading fear and undermining police work.



Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Giannis to Boston is a possibility. Should the Knicks be worried?

Published

on

Giannis to Boston is a possibility. Should the Knicks be worried?


According to ESPN, Boston has emerged as a leading destination in the Giannis Antetokounmpo sweepstakes. No deal is on the table (that we know of), but the mere possibility might raise a few concerns.

Concern numero uno is obvious. Giannis is one of the handful of players capable of altering the championship picture by himself. Pairing him with Jayson Tatum would create an impressive combination of size, athleticism, versatility, and star power. The question is whether Brad Stevens and the Celtics can actually pull it off without creating a new set of problems for themselves.

Boston’s path to Giannis is narrower than it first appears. The Celtics would almost certainly need to move Jaylen Brown, either directly to Milwaukee or through a third team. Reports indicate Brown has little interest in joining the Bucks (in paraphrase: “Milwaukee?! Yuck!”), which complicates matters further. We start moving from a blockbuster trade to a three-team puzzle involving contracts, draft compensation, and competing agendas.

Even if Boston finds a way through that maze, there’s no guarantee the resulting team will succeed.

Advertisement

Giannis may be a better asset than Brown, but championships are not won by comparing players one-for-one. They’re won by building complete teams (case in point: YOUR WORLD CHAMPION NEW YORK KNICKERBOCKERS ).

Brown averaged more than 28 points per game last season while defending multiple positions. He can create his own offense, punish smaller defenders, and absorb primary scoring responsibilities when Tatum is unavailable (as Tatum was for most of last season, recovering from a torn Achilles). Replacing him with Giannis raises Boston’s ceiling, perhaps, but also changes the structure of the roster.

The Celtics have spent years building an ecosystem around two star wings. Remove one and the supporting cast suddenly becomes more important, which means Stevens would have many more decisions to make before the start of training camp.

What catches me up is, if the Bucks believed that Giannis has more great years ahead of him, would they so quickly offload him to a conference rival? Might he actually be a distressed asset?

Giannis will turn 32 this season. He has generally been durable over his career but has dealt with increasing lower-body issues (especially calves and knees) in recent years, leading to more missed time. To wit:

Advertisement

• 2022–23: 63 GP / 19 missed

• 2023–24: 73 GP / 9 missed

• 2024–25: 67 GP / 15 missed

• 2025–26: 36 GP / 46 missed

Wouldn’t that just be the worst if the Celts parted with Brown to get him, and then Giannis missed extended time due to injury? Like, the absolute worst? (Insert diabolical laughter.)

Advertisement

A healthy Tatum-Giannis pairing would present unique challenges for New York. The Knicks would need to defend relentless downhill pressure while also containing one of the league’s best bucket creators. But, given their depth, New York may be better equipped than most teams to handle it.

So if the Celtics’ pursuit of Giannis causes an initial flutter of worry, you can let that just drift on by. The scenario only noses toward Red Alert if Boston nabs him while somehow also acquiring a guard who makes up for what they’d lose with Brown’s departure.

But wait! This just in: Chris Haynes has pushed back on the idea that a Giannis Antetokounmpo-to-Boston deal is close. He writes that Boston does not appear to be a promising destination and suggested the situation could extend into July. Additionally, Marc Stein reported that the Celtics are frustrated by speculation involving Jaylen Brown, while Brian Windhorst said Brown has not been formally offered in a trade. So, to quote the great William Goldman (also a Knicks fan), “Nobody knows anything.”

It’s worth noting that the Miami Heat are also reportedly in the mix. We’ve heard that the lack of income tax is alluring to the Greek Freak. Plus Florida offers sunny, warm weather, which is not a defining feature of Wisconsin. In the end, though, joining Boston would allow Giannis to keep all his favorite green-themed items in his wardrobe, and shouldn’t looking good be a priority, too?



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston Bruins are retiring Patrice Bergeron’s No. 37 next season

Published

on

Boston Bruins are retiring Patrice Bergeron’s No. 37 next season


BOSTON — The Boston Bruins said Thursday they are retiring Patrice Bergeron’s No. 37 as part of a ceremony next season.

The date will be shared later, following the NHL schedule release that is expected next month.

Bergeron is set to join fellow 2011 Stanley Cup champion Zdeno Chara with his number in the rafters. Bergeron, when it happens, will be the 14th player to have his number retired by the storied franchise.

He spent his entire 19-year career in the league with the Bruins, playing 1,464 games counting the regular season and playoffs. That included the title run in 2011 and more trips to the final in ’13 and ’19.

Advertisement

“Patrice was the kind of rare, generational talent that every team wanted,” owner Jeremy Jacobs said in a statement. “He was a deftly skilled playmaker and the undeniable greatest defensive forward in the NHL’s history. But it was the leadership he provided on the ice and in the locker room that made him truly stand apart and an all-time legend of the Boston Bruins.”

Bergeron succeeded Chara as captain in 2020 and served three seasons in that role before retiring. He called this an honor that is difficult to put into words.

“When I arrived in Boston as an 18-year-old, I could never have imagined receiving this recognition one day,” Bergeron said. “I have always believed that any success I had was only possible because of the people around me. I was fortunate to play alongside incredible teammates, learn from outstanding coaches and staff and be supported by an organization that believed in me from the very beginning.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Brensley: Craig Ferguson is Boston Strong

Published

on

Brensley: Craig Ferguson is Boston Strong


Craig Ferguson set out on foot from Los Angeles with a remarkable goal: to walk 3,500 miles across America. It took him 109 days.

Last week, I had the privilege of joining him for his final steps into Boston. In those first moments after completing his journey, I asked him what the experience had been like. Without hesitation, he called it the hardest thing he had ever done.

What began as a mission to raise money for SAMH, a Scottish charity that provides mental health and social care support, became something far greater. Along the way, Craig inspired thousands of people and helped raise more than $1 million. His arrival in Boston also came amid the excitement surrounding Scotland’s appearance in the World Cup, giving his home country even more reason to celebrate.

Craig’s commitment to mental health advocacy is perhaps best expressed in his own words: “Mental health doesn’t care who you are or where you’re from. It can meet you along the road, sometimes when you least expect it.”

Advertisement

Those words resonate deeply with me. I was raised by a mother who faced significant mental health challenges, and I know firsthand how important support systems can be for individuals and families. Organizations like SAMH provide hope when people need it most. Equally important is continuing to normalize conversations about mental health and recognizing that it is a health issue that touches every community and every walk of life.

There are countless routes Craig could have taken and many cities where he could have chosen to conclude this extraordinary journey. The fact that he finished in Boston is something we should be proud of.

Boston has always been a city defined by resilience, compassion, and perseverance. Those qualities are why “Boston Strong” means so much to so many people. Craig Ferguson may be Scottish by birth, but through his determination, his generosity, and his commitment to helping others, he has embodied that spirit.

As we welcome him to our beautiful and sports-loving city, we thank him for reminding us that even the longest journeys begin with a single step, and that no one should have to walk through life’s struggles alone.

Craig Ferguson is Boston Strong.

Advertisement

Anne Brensley is the Republican-endorsed candidate for Lieutenant Governor of Massachusetts. 



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending