Connect with us

Boston, MA

DHS tells lawyer born in Boston she has to leave US

Published

on

DHS tells lawyer born in Boston she has to leave US


An attorney born in Boston has come forward with an account of receiving a deportation notice from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

Pamela Rioles Saeed, a U.S. citizen and immigration attorney based in Tucson, Arizona, said she was stunned to receive an email from DHS instructing her to leave the United States within seven days.

Newsweek reached out to the DHS for comment on Thursday.

Why It Matters

As President Donald Trump continues to carry out his promised mass deportations of undocumented and criminal migrants, there have been reports that other U.S. citizens—including immigration attorneys, doctors, and nonprofit advocates for refugees—have also received deportation notices.

Advertisement

The DHS confirmed that the notices were intended for migrants whose temporary parole status in the U.S. had expired. However, a DHS spokesperson acknowledged in a written statement to NBC News that “notices may have been sent to unintended recipients.”

What To Know

Rioles Saeed, who was born and raised in Boston and works at Goldman & Goldman in Tucson representing asylum seekers and migrants, said she received the notice at her work email address—likely because her contact information is frequently included in her clients’ immigration applications.

“We’ve heard reports of immigration attorneys being targeted, but at first I thought, surely this is for a client. Then I realized, no, this is addressed to me and no one else,” she told The Arizona Republic.

“If you’d asked me that question a year ago, I would have said, no, it was 100 percent a mistake,” she told the outlet. “But I don’t know now. I think it could be an intimidation tactic to send it to immigration attorneys as well.”

A migrant at a tent camp outside La Soledad church in Mexico City shows the CBP One app on his cellphone on January 20, 2025

. AP Photo/Fernando Llano, File

According to the Department of Homeland Security, if migrants listed a nonpersonal contact—such as a lawyer’s professional email—that contact may have been incorrectly targeted.

Advertisement

“CBP is monitoring communications and will address any issues on a case-by-case basis,” the agency told NBC News.

Other U.S. citizens, including immigration attorneys and nonprofit organizations that advocate for refugees, have also received similar notices.

Nicole Micheroni, a partner at Cameron Law Offices in Massachusetts, told Newsweek last week that she initially believed the email was a mistake, as she was born in the U.S. and has no parole status to be terminated.

“It caught me a little off guard. But afterwards, I was like, ‘Wow, I can’t believe they’re sending this out to people it clearly doesn’t apply to.’”

What People Are Saying

A senior DHS official told Newsweek: “CBP has issued notices terminating parole for individuals who do not have lawful status to remain. This process is not limited to CBP One users and does not currently apply to those paroled under programs such as U4U and OAW.”

Advertisement

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, wrote on X, formerly Twitter: “Needless to say, even if they admit error and take it back, this is the kind of thing that can send a lot of fear through communities. The government has a responsibility to slow down and make sure it gets it right in each case. There is a reason we have procedures for things.”

What Happens Next

In recent days, reports emerged that the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency had been given access to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services data to automate the dismantling of the parole system. However, it was not immediately clear how individuals not enrolled in the programs were included on the email lists.



Source link

Advertisement

Boston, MA

Did you follow the local news this week? Take our Greater Boston news quiz.

Published

on

Did you follow the local news this week? Take our Greater Boston news quiz.






Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Boston nightclub where woman suffered medical emergency and died has license reinstated

Published

on

Boston nightclub where woman suffered medical emergency and died has license reinstated


Local News

After hearing testimony from club representatives and the loved ones of a woman who died there Dec. 21, regulators found no violations.

ICON, a nightclub in Boston’s Theater District, had its entertainment license reinstated at a hearing Thursday. Lane Turner/The Boston Globe

A Boston nightclub where a woman collapsed on the dance floor and died last month will have its entertainment license reinstated after the Boston Licensing Board found no violations Thursday.

Anastaiya Colon, 27, was at ICON, a nightclub in Boston’s Theater District, in the early hours of Dec. 21 when she suffered a fatal medical episode. Following the incident, her loved ones insisted that the club’s staff did not respond professionally and failed to control crowds.

Advertisement

City regulators suspended ICON’s entertainment license pending an assessment of any potential violations. During a hearing Tuesday, they heard from attorneys representing the club and people who were with Colon the night she died.

Anastaiya Colon, 27, suffered a fatal medical episode Dec. 21 while at ICON.
Anastaiya Colon, 27, suffered a fatal medical episode Dec. 21 while at ICON. – GoFundMe

As EMTs attempted to respond, crowds inside the club failed to comply with demands to give them space, prompting police to shut down the club, according to a police report of the incident. However, the club and its representatives were adamant that staff handled their response and crowd control efforts properly.

Kevin Montgomery, the club’s head of security, testified that the crowd did not impede police or EMTs and that he waited to evacuate the club because doing so would have created a bottleneck at the entrance. Additionally, a bouncer and a bartender both testified that they interacted with Colon, who ordered one drink before collapsing, and did not see any signs of intoxication.

Angelica Morales, Colon’s sister, submitted a video taken on her phone to the board for them to review. Morales testified Tuesday that the video disproves some of the board’s claims and shows that ICON did not immediately respond to the emergency.

“I ran to the DJ booth, literally bombarded everybody that was in my way to get to the DJ booth, told them to cut the music off,” Morales said. “On my way back, the music was cut off for a minute or two, maybe less, and they cut the music back on.”

Shanice Monteiro, a friend who was with Colon and Morales, said she went outside to flag down police officers. She testified that their response, along with the crowd’s, was inadequate.

Advertisement

“I struggled to get outside,” Monteiro said. “Once I got outside, everybody was still partying, there was no type of urgency. Nobody stopped.”

These factors, along with video evidence provided by ICON, did not substantiate any violations on the club’s part, prompting the licensing board to reinstate their entertainment license at a subsequent hearing Thursday.

“Based on the evidence presented at the hearing from the licensed premise and the spoken testimony and video evidence shared with us from Ms. Colon’s family, I’m not able to find a violation in this case,” Kathleen Joyce, the board’s chairwoman, said at the hearing.

However, Joyce further stated that she “was not able to resolve certain questions” about exactly when or why the club turned off the music or turned on the lights. As a result, the board will require ICON to submit an emergency management plan to prevent future incidents and put organized safety measures in place.

“This plan should outline detailed operational procedures in the event of a medical or any other emergency, including protocols for police and ambulance notification, crowd control and dispersal, and procedures regarding lighting and music during an emergency response,” Joyce said.

Advertisement

Though the club will reopen without facing any violations, Joyce noted that there were “lessons left to be learned” from the incident.

“This tragedy has shaken the public confidence in nightlife in this area, and restoring that confidence is a shared obligation,” she said. “People should feel safe going out at night. They should feel safe going to a club in this area, and they should feel safe getting home.”

Keeana Saxon, one of three commissioners on the licensing board, further emphasized the distinction Joyce made between entertainment-related matters and those that pertained to licensing. Essentially, the deciding factor in the board’s decision was the separation of the club’s response from any accountability they may have had by serving Colon liquor.

“I hope that the family does understand that there are separate procedures for both the entertainment and the licensing, just to make sure that on the licensing side, that we understand that she was only served one drink and that it was absolutely unforeseeable for that one drink to then lead to some kind of emergency such as this one,” Saxon said.





Source link

Continue Reading

Boston, MA

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu should demand better security after Boston Medical Center rape

Published

on

Battenfeld: Michelle Wu should demand better security after Boston Medical Center rape


In the middle of Michelle Wu’s orchestrated inaugural celebration, prosecutors described a senseless hospital horror that unfolded at Boston Medical Center – a rape of a partially paralyzed patient allegedly by a mentally ill man allowed to freely roam the hospital’s hallways.

It happened in September in what is supposed to be a safe haven but too often is a dangerous campus. Drug addicts with needles frequently openly camp in front of the hospital, and in early December a security guard suffered serious injuries in a stabbing on the BMC campus. The alleged assailant was finally subdued by other security guards after a struggle.

In the September incident, prosecutors described in court this week how the 55-year-old alleged rapist Barry Howze worked his way under the terrified victim’s bed in the BMC emergency room and sexually assaulted her.

“This assault was brutal and brazen, and occurred in a place where people go for help,” Suffolk County prosecutor Kate Fraiman said. “Due to her partial paralysis, she could not reach her phone, which was under her body at the time.”

Advertisement

Howze, who reportedly has a history of violent offenses and mental illness, was able to flee the scene but was arrested two days later at the hospital when he tried to obtain a visitor’s pass and was recognized by security. Howze’s attorney blamed hospital staff for allowing him the opportunity to commit the crime and some city councilors are demanding answers.

“This was a horrific and violent sexual assault on a defenseless patient,” Councilor Ed Flynn said. “The safety and security of patients and staff at the hospital can’t be ignored any longer. The hospital leadership must make immediate and major changes and upgrades to their security department.”

Flynn also sent a letter to BMC CEO Alastair Bell questioning how the assailant was allowed to commit the rape.

Where is Wu? She was too busy celebrating herself with a weeklong inaugural of her second term to deal with the rape at the medical center, which is near the center of drug-ravaged Mass and Cass.

If the rape had happened at a suburban hospital, people would be demanding investigations and accountability.

Advertisement

But in Boston, Wu takes credit for running the “safest major city in the country” while often ignoring crimes.

Wu should intervene and demand better security and safety for the staff and patients at BMC.

Although the hospital is no longer run by the city, it has a historic connection with City Hall. It is used by Boston residents, many of them poor and disabled or from marginalized communities. She should be out front like Flynn demanding accountability from the hospital.

Boston Medical Center, located in the city’s South End, is the largest “safety-net” hospital in New England. It is partially overseen by the Boston Public Health Commission, whose members are appointed by the mayor.

BMC was formed in 1996 by the Thomas Menino administration as a merger between the city-owned Boston City Hospital, which first opened in 1864, and Boston University Medical Center.

Advertisement

Menino called the merger “the most important thing I will do as mayor.”

When he was appointed CEO by the hospital board of trustees in 2023, Bell offered recycled Wu-speak to talk about how BMC was trying to “reshape” how the hospital delivers health care.

“The way we think about the health of our patients and members extends beyond traditional medicine to environmental sustainability and issues such as housing, food insecurity, and economic mobility, as we study the root causes of health inequities and empower all of our patients and communities to thrive,” Bell said.

But the hospital has been plagued by security issues in the last few years, and a contract dispute with the nurses’ union. The nurses at BMC’s Brighton campus authorized a three-day strike late last year over management demands to cut staffing and retirement benefits.

Kirsten Ransom, BMC Brighton RN and Massachusetts Nurses Association co-chair, said, “This vote sends a clear message that our members are united in our commitment to make a stand for our patients, our community and our professional integrity in the wake of this blatant effort to balance BMC’s budget on the backs of those who have the greatest impact on the safety of the patients and the future success of this facility.”

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending