Connect with us

News

TUCKER CARLSON: What really happened to the Nord Stream pipeline?

Published

on

TUCKER CARLSON: What really happened to the Nord Stream pipeline?

NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!

I hate to begin a Tuesday night on a grim observe, however one of many environmental catastrophes, one of many nice environmental catastrophes of our time, is unfolding tonight off the coast of Denmark. The Nord Stream pipelines, that are huge Russian owned conduits that carry pure fuel from Russia to Western Europe, have been breached.  

As we converse, Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 are pouring thousands and thousands of cubic meters of pure fuel into the Baltic Sea. Photos from the air, which now you can see in your display screen, present a poisonous bubble area greater than half a mile vast. You’ll be able to solely guess at what number of marine mammals are being killed proper now – numerous. However the lasting injury could also be to the environment.  

Pure fuel is comprised of as much as 90% methane. Methane, as Joe Biden has typically informed you, is the important thing driver of world warming, which is, in fact, an existential menace to humanity and the planet. So, for those who’re apprehensive about local weather change, what simply occurred to the Nord Stream pipelines is as near the apocalypse as now we have ever come. So, the query is, how did this occur? And it seems it was not an accident.  

At the exact same time that leaks in these pipelines have been detected, Swedish officers recorded two highly effective undersea explosions, every considered one of which was equal to a whole lot of kilos of TNT. Nothing in nature can account for that. Virtually instantly, the pipelines started leaking in three separate locations. So, there’s just one rationalization for what occurred. This was an act of business terrorism. That was very apparent to the prime minister of Poland and he wasted no time in saying so.  

Advertisement

PINK FLOYD FOUNDER ROGER WATERS CANCELS CONCERTS IN POLAND OVER BACKLASH TO VIEWS ON RUSSIA’S WAR IN UKRAINE 

MATEUSZ MORAWIECKI, POLISH PRIME MINISTER: At present we’re additionally coping with an act of sabotage. We have no idea the main points of what occurred but, however we will clearly see that it’s an act of sabotage, an act that most likely marks the following stage within the escalation of the state of affairs we’re coping with in Ukraine. 

We will clearly see, he stated, this was an act of sabotage, an act of terrorism. Effectively, sure, we will see that. So, the query is, who did it? And naturally, the prime suspect is clear. It could be the identical man who prompted home inflation right here within the U.S. and stole the 2016 election from Hillary Clinton. That be Vladimir Putin. The Washington Submit acquired proper to it. “Putin,” they declared, “is now weaponizing the Nord Stream pipelines.”  

In keeping with the Canadian ambassador to the U.N., Vladimir Putin has determined to make use of “air pollution as an act of struggle.” Progressive Twitter strongly endorsed this conclusion. Putin did it and that is sensible till you considered it for only a second. Vladimir Putin could also be evil. They inform us that he’s evil, however is he silly? Most likely is not silly and but and, this is the unusual half, for those who have been Vladimir Putin, you would need to be a suicidal moron to explode your individual power pipeline. That is the one factor you’d by no means do.  

UN HUMAN RIGHTS INVESTIGATORS SAY UKRAINIAN POWS APPEAR TO BE FACING ‘SYSTEMIC’ MISTREATMENT 

Advertisement

Pure fuel pipelines are the primary supply of your energy and your wealth and most critically, your leverage over different nations. Europe wants your power now greater than ever with winter approaching. If you cannot ship that power, then nations like Germany don’t have any want to concentrate to what you need. You are in the course of a struggle, an all hands-on deck struggle, so that you want all of the leverage you will get. Beneath these circumstances, there is no such thing as a probability you’d blow up Nord Stream 1 or 2.  

Not now, clearly. In truth, it is so apparent that at the same time as our famously dim secretary of State, Tony Blinken, appeared to acknowledge it, sabotaging Nord Stream, he stated in the present day is “clearly in nobody’s curiosity.” Proper, however actually solely half proper. It’s true that blowing up Nord Stream doesn’t assist Vladimir Putin. He wouldn’t do this. Why would he? However that does not imply that different nations would not contemplate doing it. They’d contemplate it and we all know they’ve thought-about it as a result of at the least considered one of them has stated so in public. In early February, lower than three weeks earlier than the struggle in Ukraine started, Joe Biden prompt on digital camera that he may take out these pipelines. Watch.  

PRESIDENT BIDEN: If Russia invades meaning tanks or troops crossing the border of Ukraine once more. Then there shall be, there shall be now not a Nord Stream 2. We’ll convey an finish to it.  

REPORTER: However how will you. How will you do this, precisely, for the reason that undertaking and management of the undertaking is inside Germany’s management?  

BIDEN: We’ll. I promise you, we’ll be capable to do it.  

Advertisement

PUTIN ‘LOSING’ WAR IN UKRAINE, FORCING ANNEXATION REFERENDUM TO SECURE ‘POLITICAL VICTORY,’ KEANE SAYS 

U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on what he calls the “continued battle for the Soul of the Nation” in entrance of Independence Corridor at Independence Nationwide Historic Park, Philadelphia, U.S., September 1, 2022.
(REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY/File Photograph)

Discover how he phrased it and he is the president. He does not phrase issues by chance, significantly his studying off playing cards. He did not say, I’ll pause the supply of fuel from Russia to Germany. He stated there will not be a Nord Stream 2. We’ll put an finish to it. Will take it out. Will blow it up.  

How will you do that? He was requested. I promise you we can do it. They thought this by way of and but these watching, very a lot together with us, did not take Biden significantly when he stated it.  

That is the president who has declared local weather change probably the most urgent emergency within the historical past of the world. That is the person who lectures you about utilizing a woodstove or driving an SUV due to its emissions. That is the man who spent billions making an attempt to mitigate cow flatulence as a result of methane. Would that man actually blow up a methane pipeline in the course of the Baltic Sea? It was exhausting to think about.  

Advertisement

That will be an unimaginably reckless act. That will be the sort of factor you’d do for those who needed to begin a nuclear struggle. It could be insane and but looking back, it is apparent they have been interested by this as a result of Joe Biden wasn’t the one particular person to recommend it. Toria Nuland on the State Division stated just about the exact same factor. Nuland is a lifelong struggle cheerleader. She labored to convey concerning the Iraq invasion, by no means apologized, saved going. She helped engineer the coup that overthrew the Ukrainian authorities some years again. So succesful, clearly she’s able to something… however environmental terrorism? Even for Toria Nuland, that appeared an excessive amount of too excessive, and but right here she is in January.  

RUSSIAN OLIGARCH’S YACHT RAIDED IN GERMANY 

VICTORIA NULAND: With regard to Nord Stream 2, we proceed to have very sturdy and clear conversations with our German allies and I wish to be clear with you in the present day. If Russia invades Ukraine, a technique or one other, Nord Stream 2 is not going to transfer ahead.  

In some way, we’ll cease Nord Stream. Now, wanting again, these phrases appear chilling eight months later, as pure fuel pours into the Baltic Sea and is within the environment. So, you must ask, may the Biden administration actually do one thing like this? We won’t say for certain. We do not know for certain. We will let you know that shut allies of the Biden White Home consider they actually did do it. Radek Sikorski is a Polish politician who’s chairman of the EU USA delegation within the European Parliament.  

He is linked. He is additionally the husband of regime stenographer Anne Applebaum of The Atlantic journal. Sikorski is so near Joe Biden that he is acquired an image of the 2 of them collectively in his Twitter profile. So, when the pipelines blew up, Sikorski responded instantly and this is what he wrote. “Thanks. USA.”

Advertisement

So as soon as once more, did the Biden administration actually do that? It is exhausting to consider. On condition that it is an atrocity, it is successfully an act of terrorism, we do not wish to make that accusation, however we should always let you know that possibly not coincidentally, in the present day, a brand-new pipeline was unveiled, a pipeline that carries non-Russian pure fuel in roughly the identical areas, Nord Stream 1 and a pair of. That is known as the Baltic Pipe. It was inaugurated in Poland. It’s going to carry pure fuel from Norway by way of Denmark to Poland and different nations close by. And it is more likely to do very properly, since now it has much less competitors.

Making sense? What does the White Home say about this? How are they accounting for what occurred in the present day?  

GERMANY WARNED BY CIA OF POSSIBLE ATTACK ON NORD STREAM GAS PIPELINE WEEKS IN ADVANCE: REPORT 

Effectively, they don’t seem to be precisely enthusiastically denying accountability for it. As a substitute, they’re wanting on the upside. Here is the president’s publicist, noting that the destruction of yet one more power pipeline is yet one more alternative so that you can purchase an electrical automotive. 

KARINE JEAN-PIERRE: As you all know, these pipelines weren’t pumping fuel into Europe right now and NS2 was by no means operational, as you guys know. NS1 has not been operational for weeks as a result of Putin has weaponized power and now we have stated this, many occasions earlier than. This simply drives dwelling the significance of our efforts to work collectively to get different fuel provides to Europe and to help efforts to scale back fuel consumption and speed up true power independence by shifting to wash power financial system.  

Advertisement

Oh. “Shifting to wash power” say that individuals who very might be liable for letting methane into the Baltic Sea and into the environment at a scale that most individuals cannot think about. The individuals lecturing you about your SUV might have blown up a pure fuel pipeline and created one of many nice catastrophes of our time in its impact on the setting.  

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre speaks during a briefing at the White House, Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2022, in Washington. 

White Home press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre speaks throughout a briefing on the White Home, Tuesday, Sept. 13, 2022, in Washington. 
(AP Photograph/Evan Vucci)

WHITE HOUSE SAYS ‘WE WELCOME’ RUSSIANS APPLYING FOR US ASYLUM AMID PUTIN CONSCRIPTION 

In the event that they did this, this shall be one of many craziest, most harmful issues any American administration has ever finished. However it could even be completely in step with what they do. What do they do? They destroy. These individuals constructed nothing, not one factor. As a substitute, they tear down they usually desecrate from historic statues to the Structure to power infrastructure and nobody in Congress is making an attempt to cease any of it. They’re simply making ready for the inevitable fallout. Tonight, the Senate simply superior a spending invoice with $35 million for the Division of Power to “put together for and reply to potential nuclear and radiological incidents in Ukraine.” What? 

The spending invoice additionally brings the overall U.S. expenditure on Ukraine, the struggle, but additionally funding its authorities and power for Ukraine to $67 billion on the eve of what may very well be an enormous financial disruption right here to our financial system, $67 billion. How a lot is that? Effectively, it is greater than Russia’s whole army price range final 12 months, and Congress is predicted to totally go the invoice later this week with Republicans nodding alongside just like the zombies they’re. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

Advertisement

What can be the impact of this? Each motion has a response, equal and reverse. Blow up the Nord Stream pipelines? Okay, we have entered a brand new section, one wherein america is immediately at struggle with the biggest nuclear energy on the planet. It does not imply we’ll go nuclear instantly, but it surely does recommend there may very well be penalties. If we truly blow up the Nord Stream pipelines, why would not Russia sever undersea web cables? 

What would occur in the event that they did that? What would occur if banks in London could not talk with banks in New York? Simply that one piece of it, leaving apart its potential results on our energy grid, however let’s simply say the banks could not talk with one another for someday. What would the financial impact of that be? We’d cascade downward into your own home. We will have an precise collapse. We may wind up in a short time in third world circumstances. These are the stakes. Have the individuals behind this, the geniuses like Toria Nuland, thought-about the consequences? Possibly they’ve. Possibly that was the purpose.  
 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

Nato’s Mark Rutte praises Donald Trump for making Europe ‘pay in a BIG way’

Published

on

Nato’s Mark Rutte praises Donald Trump for making Europe ‘pay in a BIG way’

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte has praised Donald Trump for making Europe “pay in a BIG way” on increased defence spending, in a private message that the US president shared on his social media platform.

“Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world,” Rutte wrote ahead of a Nato summit that begins on Tuesday, referencing the US president’s demand that all allies commit to raising defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP.

“You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done,” he added, according to screenshots of his text message posted by Trump to Truth Social on Tuesday.

Advertisement
Screenshots of a text message sent by Mark Rutte to Donald Trump, posted by the US president to Truth Social on Tuesday © Donald J. Trump/Truth

“It was not easy but we’ve got them all signed onto 5 per cent!” Rutte wrote. “Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win.”

Rutte also praised Trump’s “decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do”.

A Nato official confirmed the message’s authenticity.

The screenshots appeared on Truth Social as the US president flew to The Hague for a Nato summit that begins on Tuesday evening.

Trump had asked all members of the alliance to spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence over the next decade or risk losing the US security guarantees that have underpinned the continent’s security for decades.

Advertisement

While many European allies including Germany, France and the UK have committed to meet Trump’s new target, Spain has secured an opt-out, increasing the likelihood of a clash at the meeting.

On Tuesday, Rutte sought to reassure allies that as long as they drastically increase their defence spending, Trump would not withdraw US guarantees.

“There is total commitment by the US President . . . to Nato,” Rutte said ahead of the event. “However it comes with an expectation that we will deal with this . . . huge irritant that we are not spending enough.

“My message to my European colleagues is: stop worrying so much . . . Stop running around being worried about the US. They are with us,” he added.

To meet Trump’s demands, Rutte has drawn up a plan for allies to allocate 3.5 per cent of their GDP to core military spending and 1.5 per cent on areas such as cyber and infrastructure by 2035, to fill gaps in European capabilities.

Advertisement

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said that a massive defence spending plan presented to his cabinet on Tuesday showed that Europe’s largest nation was a “strong and reliable” partner.

“We’ve showed our allies we can be relied upon,” he told German MPs before departing for The Hague. “Germany is back on the international stage.”

Germany plans to boost military spending by more than two-thirds over the next four years, reaching 3.5 per cent of GDP in core military spending in 2029, faster than France and the UK.

But Spanish prime minister Pedro Sánchez has refused to commit to the overall 5 per cent target and secured an opt-out by pledging to meet the Nato capabilities goal at what it estimates will be a lower cost.

Other capitals have also requested the same “flexibility” that Rutte has granted Madrid, increasing the risk for the summit to end in acrimony and triggering Trump’s ire over what he sees as European allies freeloading on American largesse.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Who will be the Democratic nominee for NYC mayor? Millions are betting live

Published

on

Who will be the Democratic nominee for NYC mayor? Millions are betting live

Major decisions about who will be New York City’s next top mayoral candidate are set to be made Tuesday, and millions of Americans are betting live on their election odds.

Event contract platform Kalshi recently launched market predictions for multiple NYC election-related prompts, including who will reign in the top spot for Democratic mayoral nominee and the overall race winner.

The 2025 race for New York City mayor is tightening, with former Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s lead shrinking less than a week ahead of the crucial primary, a poll indicated. Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Democratic socialist state assemblyman from Queens, stands in second place in the poll.

Advertisement

As of Tuesday morning, Kalshi showed Mamdani with a 56% chance of winning the Democratic Party nomination this year, and Cuomo with a 44% chance. Bettors have poured more than $8 million into the total series volume, according to Kalshi’s website.

ELECTION ‘WHALE’ BETTOR MADE MUCH MORE ON TRUMP WIN THAN ORIGINALLY THOUGHT, ANALYSIS SHOWS

Buying a “yes” share for Mamdani costs roughly $0.57 while a “no” share costs $0.46; Cuomo’s “yes” share can be bought for roughly $0.46 and a “no” share for $0.56.

Kalshi market bettors are buying their last shares before NYC’s mayoral primary election closes at 9 p.m. ET Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (Getty Images)

One Kalshi user posted in the comment section that his $984.75 investment on Mamdani being confirmed as the Democrats’ nominee would make a return of $1,968.96.

Advertisement

Another prediction market asks bettors who will reign as the NYC mayoral race winner between a Democrat, Republican or current Mayor Eric Adams. Eighty-two percent of bettors predicted a Democrat will win, with 12% for Eric Adams and 7% for a Republican.

Because of the large consensus for a Democratic candidate winning the blue city election, buying a “yes” share costs $0.83 and a “no” share costs $0.19.

In general, prediction markets like Kalshi and other platforms, including Polymarket and PredictIt, allow users to trade on the outcome of future events with yes-no questions. Individual trades are between $0 and $1, and contracts pay $1 if the event occurs.

While primary voting will take place until 9 p.m. ET Tuesday, more than 384,000 Democrats cast ballots in early voting, which ended on Sunday.

Advertisement

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The winner of the Democratic Party primary is traditionally seen as the overwhelming frontrunner in the November general election in the Democrat-dominated city.

However, this year, the general election campaign may be a bit more unpredictable with incumbent Adams running for reelection as an Independent and his approval ratings sinking to historic lows.

READ MORE FROM FOX BUSINESS

Advertisement

Fox News’ Paul Steinhauser and Pilar Arias contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

UK defence funding will hit 5% of GDP by 2035, Starmer to tell Nato summit

Published

on

UK defence funding will hit 5% of GDP by 2035, Starmer to tell Nato summit

Unlock the White House Watch newsletter for free

Sir Keir Starmer will pledge to Nato that the UK will raise spending on national security to 5 per cent of GDP within a decade, as members attempt to convince US President Donald Trump to stick with the alliance.

The pledge would raise core defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2035, with an additional 1.5 per cent on security related infrastructure such as cyber security and border protection.

The UK prime minister had already pledged to raise defence spending from around 2.3 per cent currently to 2.6 per cent by 2027, with an ambition to increase it to 3 per cent in the next parliament.

Advertisement

But the new pledge of 3.5 per cent on core defence spending means billions more pounds will eventually flow into the army, navy and air force as the UK attempts to reinforce itself against Russian aggression and prove to the US it is pulling its weight.

Nato secretary-general Mark Rutte has pushed for the 5 per cent figure — including the 1.5 per cent on adjacent security spending — partly to boost the headline number for Trump’s eyes, given the US president’s focus on Europe’s lower levels of defence spending in recent decades.

While almost all Nato members have agreed to the spending level, Spain opted out on Sunday, in a blow to the cohesiveness of the group as it tries to present a united front to Trump.

The UK’s funding will make possible many of the plans outlined in this month’s strategic defence review, which recommended a greater use of drones, autonomous vehicles and artificial intelligence alongside new nuclear warheads, submarines and fighter jets.

Carl Emmerson at the Institute for Fiscal Studies said the increase, in today’s terms, would be like adding approximately £30bn to the 2027 target of around spending £75bn on core defence.

Advertisement

The pledge will raise questions, however, over how the increase will be funded, and whether other public services will face cuts, at a time when the UK is facing a financial squeeze.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to have to raise taxes in the autumn to give her financial headroom, and the government is already facing resistance to plans to cut the UK’s welfare budget.

UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer: ‘This is an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato’ © Simon Wohlfahrt/Bloomberg

Starmer said the UK must “navigate this era of radical uncertainty with agility, speed and a clear-eyed sense of the national interest” to provide security for “working people”.

“This is an opportunity to deepen our commitment to Nato and drive greater investment in the nation’s wider security and resilience,” Starmer added.

The 1.5 per cent of non-core spending has been billed by the government as “homeland security” and “resilience” investment and is expected to cover things such as civil preparedness, cyber threats, border and energy security and other areas with defence-adjacent purposes, with the details to be agreed at the Nato summit.

Advertisement

It was not immediately clear, however, whether this will attract any additional spending.

Once adjacent spending was included, the government said UK security spending would be 4.1 per cent of GDP by 2027 — the same year that core defence spending is expected to reach 2.6 per cent.

That implies the adjacent spending is already close to 1.5 per cent of GDP, if it is to reach that level within two years.

Downing Street said more details of the spending plans would be laid out at the Nato summit on Wednesday and Thursday, which Trump is expected to attend.

Defence secretary John Healey
Defence secretary John Healey during a visit to open the new BAE Systems artillery factory in Sheffield in June © Danny Lawson/PA

The UK played up its need to become less reliant on allies, as the Trump administration threatens to reduce support for Europe.

“In a more transactional world, the report determines that building our own sovereign, independent capabilities in strategically important areas will reduce our dependency on other nations,” the government said.

Advertisement

Ministers hope the additional spending will also help boost the UK economy, calling the national security strategy “a call to action that our entire society needs to become more resilient”.

It added: “Recognising that national security means more than it used to — from the security of our borders to the health of our economy, from supply chains to food prices and from safety on our streets to the online world.”

“Faced by this reality in a world of increasing ‘grey zone’ threats, we cannot take a piecemeal approach that enhances the security of one part of our critical national infrastructure but leaves gaps elsewhere for our adversaries to exploit.”

Additional reporting by Sam Fleming

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending