Connect with us

News

Skydance sweetens Paramount bid with $3bn cash infusion

Published

on

Skydance sweetens Paramount bid with bn cash infusion

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Skydance and Shari Redstone’s holding company are offering a $3bn investment in Paramount in an effort to win support for a complex merger that has frustrated investors and led to the departure of the Hollywood group’s chief executive.

The offer, which includes $2bn in cash to common shareholders, came as Paramount chief executive Bob Bakish resigned on Monday, raising new questions about the future of the Hollywood group behind The Godfather

Redstone said on Monday: “The board and I thank Bob for his many contributions over his long career . . . we wish him all the best.”

Advertisement

Redstone and Paramount’s board, which she chairs, have been trying to agree a deal to merge the company with David Ellison’s Skydance, the production company backed by his billionaire father, Larry Ellison, as well as RedBird Capital and KKR. 

Under the latest terms of the deal, Skydance would buy Redstone’s National Amusements for less than $2bn, not as much as previously discussed between the two sides, said people briefed about the matter.

Those people added that Paramount would then merge with Skydance, valuing Ellison’s company at about $5bn in an all-stock deal. The combination would value the existing common shares of Paramount about 30 per cent above its current trading share price.

The Ellison-led consortium would also invest a further $3bn in the combined company, the people said. Two-thirds of the investment would pay cash to holders of common shares by buying back their stock, with the remainder used to reduce Paramount’s debt.

Shareholders would have the option to either sell their shares in Paramount or keep the stock of the combined company, or a combination of the two, as the buyback would be limited to a maximum amount of $2bn. Paramount’s Class B common shares have a current market capitalisation of about $7bn.

Advertisement

Paramount has a dual-class shareholding structure. Redstone’s NAI controls nearly 80 per cent of voting rights, but holds only 10 per cent of equity ownership. Many Paramount shareholders baulked at a previously proposed merger structure, which they argued would benefit Redstone at the cost of common shareholders. 

Redstone would remain an investor in the combined Paramount-Skydance, a move that aims to show her conviction that the Ellison-led group would turn round the fortunes of Paramount, which has struggled to compete with larger rivals such as Netflix in an expensive “streaming war”.

“There will be more alignment between [Redstone’s] interest and shareholders than before,” said one person familiar with the arrangement.

The Paramount board has set up a special committee to evaluate the plan.  

Paramount on Monday said a team of three executives — George Cheeks, Chris McCarthy and Brian Robbins — would replace Bakish, establishing an “office of the CEO”.

Advertisement

Bakish, who had worked at the company and its predecessor Viacom for a quarter of a century, had previously been an ally of Redstone, who promoted him to chief executive of Viacom in 2016. But their relationship has deteriorated in recent months, according to several people familiar with the matter.

Bakish was paid a total of $31.5mn in 2023, according to a regulatory filing. 

Private equity group Apollo, in partnership with rival studio Sony, is also preparing to bid on Paramount as soon as this week, according to people familiar with the situation. Paramount recently rejected Apollo’s $26bn all-cash offer, and four members of the Paramount board have since withdrawn their names for re-election in June.

Paramount on Monday reported a net loss of $554mn on $7.7bn in revenue in the first quarter. The company did not take questions on its earnings call, which lasted less than 10 minutes.

“There’s no dressing this up — looks like a car crash with clear divisions among key stakeholders,” said analyst Paolo Pescatore at PP Insights.

Advertisement

“The latest chapter in this ongoing saga looks to be taking another turn for the worse.”

News

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Published

on

Lawmakers threaten Attorney General Bondi with contempt over incomplete Epstein files

Attorney General Pam Bondi, accompanied by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche (L) and FBI Director Kash Patel (R), speaks during a news conference at the Justice Department on Nov. 19. Some lawmakers said the department’s release of files relating to Jeffrey Epstein had too many redactions as well as missing information.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

Two lawmakers are threatening a seldom-used congressional sanction against the Department of Justice over what they say is a failure to release all of its files on convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by a deadline set in law.

Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie spearheaded the effort to force the Epstein files’ release by co-sponsoring the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but both have said the release had too many redactions as well as missing information.

“I think the most expeditious way to get justice for these victims is to bring inherent contempt against Pam Bondi,” Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, told CBS’s Face the Nation on Sunday. “Basically Ro Khanna and I are talking about and drafting that right now.”

Advertisement

Inherent contempt refers to Congress’ authority to fine or arrest and then bring to trial officers who are obstructing legislative functions. It was last successfully used in the 1930s, according to the American Bar Association.

Khanna, a California Democrat, noted that the House would not need the Senate’s approval to take such action, which he said would result in a fine for Attorney General Pam Bondi.

“I believe we’re going to get bipartisan support in holding her accountable,” he told Face the Nation.

Justice Department defends partial release

The Justice Department on Sunday defended its initial, partial release of documents, some of which were heavily redacted.

“The material that we released on Friday, or the material that we’re going to release over the next a couple of weeks, is exactly what the statute requires us to release,” said Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on NBC’s Meet the Press, referring to the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

Advertisement

Blanche said the administration has hundreds of lawyers going through the remaining documents to ensure that victims’ information is protected. Still, lawmakers from both parties remain unsatisfied.

“Any evidence or any kind of indication that there’s not a full reveal on this, this will just plague them for months and months more,” said Republican Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky on ABC’s This Week. “My suggestion would be — give up all the information, release it.”

Blanche told NBC he was not taking the threats of contempt seriously.

“Not even a little bit. Bring it on,” he said, adding that lawmakers who have spoken negatively about Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel “have no idea what they’re talking about.”

Back and forth over Trump photo

The trove of documents released Friday contained little new information about Epstein, prompting accusations that the department wasn’t complying with the law. There was a photograph included in Friday’s release that showed a desk full of photos, including at least one of President Trump. It was among more than a dozen photographs no longer available in the Justice Department’s “Epstein Library” by Saturday, NPR found.

Advertisement

On Sunday, the Justice Department re-uploaded the photo of the desk, and provided an explanation on X.

“The Southern District of New York flagged an image of President Trump for potential further action to protect victims,” the post read. “Out of an abundance of caution, the Department of Justice temporarily removed the image for further review. After the review, it was determined there is no evidence that any Epstein victims are depicted in the photograph, and it has been reposted without any alteration or redaction.”

The Justice Department did not offer an explanation for the other photos whose access had been removed.

Blanche told NBC the Justice Department was not redacting information around Trump or any other individual involved with Epstein. He said the Justice Department had removed photos from the public files “because a judge in New York has ordered us to listen to any victim or victim rights group, if they have any concerns about the material that we’re putting up.

“And so when we hear concerns, whether it’s photographs of women that we do not believe are victims, or we didn’t have information to show that they were victims, but we learned that there are concerns, of course, we’re taking that photograph down and we’re going to address it,” he said.

Advertisement

Earlier Sunday, the Justice Department also posted to X a new version of the 119-page transcript of grand jury proceedings in the case of Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell. The original version had been entirely redacted.

“Here is the document now with minimal redactions. Documents and photos will continue to be reviewed consistent with the law and with an abundance of caution for victims and their families,” the Justice Department wrote in its post.

Continue Reading

News

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

Published

on

Russia says talks on US peace plan for Ukraine ‘are proceeding constructively’

FILE – Russian Presidential foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov, left, U.S. President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, center, U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff, foreground right, and Russian Direct Investment Fund CEO Special Presidential Representative for Investment and Economic Cooperation with Foreign Countries Kirill Dmitriev, behind Witkoff, arrive to attend talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Senate Palace of the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia, Dec. 2, 2025. (Alexander Kazakov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP, File)

The Associated Press

Continue Reading

News

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

Published

on

Video: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

new video loaded: First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

transcript

transcript

First Batch of Epstein Files Provides Few Revelations

The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

Put out the files and stop redacting names that don’t need to be redacted. It’s just — who are we trying to protect? Are we protecting the survivors? Or are we protecting these elite men that need to be put out there?

Advertisement
The Justice Department, under pressure from Congress to comply with a law signed by President Trump, released more than 13,000 files on Friday arising from investigations into Jeffrey Epstein.

By McKinnon de Kuyper

December 20, 2025

Continue Reading

Trending