Connect with us

News

Russians risk arrest to mourn Alexei Navalny with vigils and flowers

Published

on

Russians risk arrest to mourn Alexei Navalny with vigils and flowers

Svetlana, a Russian literary scholar, knew she was risking arrest when she emerged from the Moscow metro to join hundreds of others drawn to the Solovetsky Stone to mark the death of opposition leader Alexei Navalny.

“I will never forget how I hid flowers under my jacket, exiting the metro station that was surrounded by police vans,” said Sveltana, declining to give her full name out of fear of potential retribution.

By Saturday evening, the monument to the victims of political repression was buried under a pile of flowers, with queues forming outside the nearest flower shops. Police allowed mourners to approach the stone one by one before demanding they leave immediately.

“Most people didn’t talk; there was a gloomy silence. At most, they lay flowers, took photos, crossed themselves, cried and left. But it’s already a lot and courageous in today’s times,” Svetlana said.

At least two of those who came to the memorial to pay tribute to Navalny, who died in an Arctic penal colony on Friday, were detained, human rights group OVD-Info reported.

Advertisement

The small, unsanctioned Moscow gathering was just one of the many spontaneous vigils for Navalny that sprung up in hundreds of cities over the weekend, from the far east of Russia to European, Asian and American capitals.

In Russia, the vigils led to mass detentions, a sign that even in death, Navalny, one of President Vladimir Putin’s greatest antagonists, remained a threat to the Kremlin.

“Navalny is a name. It’s a brand. It is a set of ideological constructs. It will not disappear with Navalny’s death and this is going to be a problem for the authorities,” said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Russia Eurasia Center. “They will now start to crush everything that emerges.”

Demonstrators mourn Alexei Navalny in front of the Russian Embassy in Berlin © CLEMENS BILAN/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Across Russia, more than 340 people had been arrested at memorials for Navalny in the 24 hours following his death, OVD-Info reported.

Social media channels showed men in plain clothes desecrating memorials for the late opposition leader around Moscow and shoving bouquets of flowers into black garbage bags, sometimes under police supervision.

Advertisement

In Omsk, a Russian man said that he had been forced to provide his passport details when leaving flowers at a makeshift Memorial for Navalny.

Further west, in St Petersburg, Grigory Mikhnov-Vaitenko, an Orthodox priest, was detained after he announced he would hold a Memorial service for Navalny, his wife said on Facebook on Saturday.

The mood at the Navalny memorials in Russia was in stark contrast to a rally of more than 50,000 people who marched through the centre of Moscow in February 2015 with flags and huge banners to commemorate Boris Nemtsov, the opposition leader who was murdered on the bridge next to the Kremlin.

Compared with the bigger gatherings outside the country, the Russian vigils underscored how effective the Putin regime has been in strangling political dissent. It also emphasised the degree to which the anti-Putin opposition now resides outside Russian borders.

In Tbilisi — one of the focal points for the new wave of Russian emigration sparked by Russia’s full-blown invasion of Ukraine almost two years ago — many of those gathered at the memorial admitted they simply “wanted to be among people”.

Advertisement

As in other cities, people carried candles, flowers and posters with slogans, ranging from anger — “Putin, drop dead” — to hope — “Don’t give up”. A girl, with a strained voice, alternately shouted, “Putin is a killer” and “I’m fed up!”

In Berlin, hundreds of people gathered outside the Russian embassy in the shadow of the Brandenburg Gate, laying flowers in Navalny’s memory and holding signs accusing the Kremlin of his murder.

“All red lines have been crossed,” Olga Smirnova, a 50-year-old former Muscovite, said, choking back tears. “The last three years the activities of Putin’s regime are bringing catastrophe to the whole world and unfortunately I don’t see an end.”

A man lights a candle during a rally outside the Russian embassy in Tbilisi, Georgia © DAVID MDZINARISHVILI/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

There was both a sadness for Navalny and his family at the demonstration and a deep-rooted cynicism about how little his death would probably change Russia.

“A lot of people in Russia continue to support Putin. I have a lot of acquaintances who support him. My parents support him — or rather feel neutral towards him,” said Alexei Zhurvalyov, 34, who emigrated to Berlin from Russia last year and came to the memorial with his two young daughters. “A lot of the people who could influence things left.”

Still, many said they found comfort in seeing others, however limited. “People were hugging each other, some were crying. It was obvious that in the first place, we came there just to see each other,” said Viktoria Kokareva, a 31-year-old native of the Russian city of Voronezh who attended a memorial service in Naples.

Advertisement

Svetlana, the literary scholar, said she was surprised by her courage to attend the vigil in Moscow, describing herself as “a weak person, not at all brave”.

“Usually, I’m afraid to attend rallies, fearing beatings and detentions,” she added. “But this time I was overwhelmed and I couldn’t stay at home”.

After the memorial, she felt better. “I don’t feel so timid and powerless. It’s unbearable to be alone with myself right now.”

Advertisement

News

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Published

on

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Members of the National Guard stand in front of a large image of U.S. President Donald Trump that hangs from the the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building on May 18, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a strongly worded letter to the head of Michigan’s National Guard, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reiterated troops from her state are only to be used for operations surrounding America 250 celebrations in Washington, D.C., and not for President Trump’s long-running — and controversial — joint task force to fight crime. She said that she would pull her troops from the city if that is not the case, in the letter obtained by NPR.

“Please take all necessary measures to ensure the Michigan National Guard is only supporting the narrow and limited America 250 Mission and is in no way supporting the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Mission,” wrote Gov. Whitmer, referencing the official name for the federal task force.

Trump deployed hundreds of troops to Washington, D.C., in August of 2025, in what experts said was a stunning departure from governing norms. He said he did so to address rampant crime, despite declining crime rates at the time. The number of troops in the city has increased over time to more than 4,800 from Washington, D.C. and almost two dozen states, which until recently were exclusively Republican-led.

Advertisement

Michigan — which has 161 guard members currently in the city — is one of four Democratic-led states that sent members of their National Guard to D.C. in recent weeks, ahead of an influx of tourists for America 250 celebrations. North Carolina and Kentucky each sent one member of their guard, while Minnesota sent more than a hundred last week.

Kentucky confirmed to NPR Monday that it had recalled its one guard member over the weekend, after that member was “diverted to the task force by the federal government without the knowledge or consent of Gov. Beshear of the Kentucky Guard,” Scottie Ellis, a spokesperson for Gov. Beshear, wrote to NPR in an email.

When contacted by NPR, spokespeople for each respective Democratic governor’s office made it clear that their guard members were sent to help specifically with America 250, not for law enforcement purposes as part of the larger ongoing federal joint task force operation. All four states have been clear about their opposition to the Trump administration’s ongoing deployment of National Guard troops to D.C., filing an amicus brief in support of litigation challenging it as recently as May.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Ethics Committee dismisses complaint against Sen. Ruben Gallego

Published

on

Senate Ethics Committee dismisses complaint against Sen. Ruben Gallego

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., walks out of the Senate chamber on Oct. 1, 2025.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The Senate Ethics Committee has dismissed a complaint brought against Sen. Ruben Gallego involving allegations of campaign finance violations and potential sexual misconduct.

The allegations against the Arizona Democrat were brought to the committee in April by a fellow member of Congress, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla. But in a letter to Gallego dated June 26, the committee said it had uncovered no wrongdoing.

“Based on the investigation of the Committee, the Committee did not find evidence that your actions violated Federal law, Senate rules, or related standards of conduct,” the panel wrote.

Advertisement

The panel also said it appreciated Gallego’s “full cooperation” throughout the investigation.

Gallego welcomed the findings, saying in a statement that the dismissal “reaffirms what I have said about these accusations from the beginning: they were right-wing conspiracies peddled by far-right activists like Anna Paulina Luna, the White House, and their allies.”

“I look forward to an apology from Rep. Luna for weaponizing the ethics process while refusing to investigate historic corruption that’s making life harder for families,” he continued.

Whispers about potential misconduct by Gallego began to circulate in April following the resignation of Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. Swalwell stepped down in response to a swell of sexual assault and misconduct allegations. NPR has not independently verified the allegations against Swalwell, but he has adamantly denied them.

Swalwell and Gallego were close friends, and during Swalwell’s short-lived 2020 presidential campaign, it was Gallego who served as campaign chair.

Advertisement

In the immediate aftermath of Swalwell’s resignation, Gallego denied knowledge of any alleged history of sexual misconduct, though he acknowledged to reporters that their close friendship may have made it difficult for him to accept rumors about Swalwell and his behavior toward women.

“My friendship with him, our family’s friendship together with him, clouded my judgment, and I was wrong — I deeply, deeply regret that,” Gallego said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Native Americans celebrate victory at the Battle of Little Bighorn, 150 years later

Published

on

Native Americans celebrate victory at the Battle of Little Bighorn, 150 years later

Horse mounted riders circle atop a hill at the Battle of Little Bighorn National Monument, near Last Stand Hill, on June 25.

Kadin Mills/NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Kadin Mills/NPR

CROW AGENCY, Mont. — Under the expansive Montana sky, hundreds of members and descendants of 19 tribal nations gather at one of America’s most famous battlefields. They’re here to watch as Native American riders on horseback charge onto the same land their ancestors did 150 years ago when they defeated the U.S. Army’s 7th Cavalry under the command of Lt. Col. George Armstrong Custer.

The riders race across the dry landscape — kicking up clouds of dust before circling at the top of a hill at Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument. Some of them are wearing headdresses and regalia, others are wearing tank tops and T-shirts. Many of them are carrying their tribal flags in a show of unity — the same unity that made possible their swift victory on June 25, 1876.

“It was so important then, 150 years ago. … It’s important today still,” said Gaby Strong, who is Sisseton-Wahpeton and Mdewakanton. “Our victories are still possible.”

Advertisement

Custer’s goal was to force Native Americans onto reservations. After the 1874 discovery of gold in the Black Hills, Indigenous peoples living off reservations were directed to report to their U.S. field offices, called Indian Agencies, or be deemed hostile.

Native American leaders, including Crazy Horse and Sitting Bull, organized villages and tribes together in a resistance effort.

Several battles broke out in what is now Montana and South Dakota as military forces attempted to push remaining groups onto reservations.

“Crazy Horse, he went from band to band, leader to leader, to tell them about this idea of our relatives coming together for a much greater cause than themselves,” said Christopher Eagle Bear. He is Sicunga Lakota from the Rosebud Sioux Tribe.

In 1876, Custer was tracking a nomadic village of various peoples, including the Oceti Sakowin (Sioux), Cheyenne and Arapaho. Custer was tracking that camp with the help of about three dozen Arikara and Crow scouts. Scouting for the U.S. government was a common practice among many tribes.

Advertisement

Custer divided his forces of around 700 men into three columns, hoping to surround the village.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending