Connect with us

News

Russia targets new cities and calls on foreign ‘volunteers’ to join fight

Published

on

Russia launched air strikes deeper into Ukraine and known as on international “volunteers” to hitch its battle on Friday as Moscow stepped up unfounded allegations over chemical weapons threats.

With the invasion in its third week, Russian jets hit the central Ukrainian metropolis of Dnipro whereas rockets pounded Lutsk within the west, in an indication President Vladimir Putin is widening the scope of an assault that has focused the nation’s largest inhabitants centres.

Chairing a session of his safety council through video hyperlink, Putin ordered his military to deploy international “volunteers” to the battle zone to “assist” residents of Ukraine. Sergei Shoigu, Russia’s defence minister, instructed Putin that 16,000 from the Center East have been ready to battle, many with expertise of battling the fear group Isis.

The Russian president later struck a special tone, talking of “optimistic actions” in peace talks between Russia and Ukraine. Putin instructed Belarusian chief Alexander Lukashenko at a gathering within the Kremlin that Russia’s negotiators had knowledgeable him of “sure optimistic actions” in negotiations with Ukraine, with out providing any additional particulars.

The Russian and Ukrainian international ministers held talks in Turkey on Thursday, the highest-level assembly up to now, however failed to achieve a breakthrough and even set up a short lived ceasefire.

Advertisement

On Friday Russia expanded its aerial assault on Ukraine’s cities whereas shifting elements of an armoured column north of Kyiv into higher positions to renew its stalled offensive on the capital.

A video posted on social media confirmed an enormous explosion and fireball on the outskirts of Dnipro. Emergency providers mentioned the strikes have been close to a kindergarten and an house constructing and that one individual died within the assault.

Urgent a story that has alarmed the west, Moscow requested the UN Safety Council to satisfy on Friday to debate allegations that the US had funded unconventional weapons analysis in Ukraine. The White Home has mentioned the allegations are “preposterous” and warned, together with the UK, that the false claims have been manufactured by Moscow to doubtlessly justify its personal use of chemical or organic weapons.

You’re seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. That is more than likely resulting from being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

Over the course of 16 days, Russia has up to now did not seize any massive metropolis and is much from reaching its aim of disarming Ukraine’s navy and ousting its authorities.

However heavy shelling of Ukrainian cities corresponding to Kharkiv and Mariupol has exacted an enormous human toll and compelled greater than 2mn folks to flee the nation in quest of security. After a summit of its leaders in Versailles, the EU promised on Friday to supply momentary safety to “all battle refugees from Ukraine”.

US vice-president Kamala Harris backed requires a battle crimes investigation into Putin’s invasion, citing civilian “atrocities” attributable to indiscriminate bombing. “Completely there ought to be an investigation, and we should always all be watching,” she mentioned on a go to to Poland.

Advertisement

Russia’s conventional allies, oligarchs and pleasant ex-politicians have made numerous makes an attempt to edge the Russian president in direction of a settlement, together with the previous German chancellor Gerhard Schröder, who met Putin on Thursday, in response to the German information company DPA.

Schröder’s spouse Kim So-yeon posted a photograph of herself together with her fingers clasped collectively as if in prayer, subsequent to a window, with the night-time skyline of Crimson Sq. illuminated behind her.

Russia’s financial system is reeling from sanctions and Europe and the US have continued to tighten curbs on its capacity to commerce, together with exploring whether or not to deprive the nation of “most favoured nation” standing on the World Commerce Group, which might enhance tariffs on its exports.

On Thursday, Putin vowed to grab the Russian belongings of worldwide companies which have suspended or closed their operations within the nation — corporations starting from McDonald’s to Ikea — utilizing “authorized options”.

Ukrainian officers described the state of affairs confronted by civilians trapped in Mariupol, which has been subjected to a remorseless bombardment, as significantly dire.

Advertisement

Residents haven’t any warmth or cellphone service and have been confined for days in freezing shelters, with meals and water provides operating out. Our bodies have been buried in mass graves. Deputy prime minister Iryna Vereshchuk mentioned greater than 1,300 folks had up to now died within the 10-day siege of the town.

“They’ve a transparent order to carry Mariupol hostage, to mock it, to consistently bomb and shell it,” Zelensky mentioned in a video deal with. He accused the Russians of staging a tank assault in an space the place there was presupposed to be a humanitarian hall out of Mariupol.

In an replace, Ukraine’s navy mentioned it had been “repelling and holding again” Russian forces, whose troops made no important advances in a single day.

Britain’s defence ministry famous that persistent logistical points have been nonetheless hampering Russia’s navy and that Moscow was doubtless “to reset and reposture its forces for renewed offensive exercise in coming days”.

Western defence advisers mentioned they believed the huge column north of Kyiv had break up into two elements, making it more durable to assault. One column, considered made up of the elite 1st Guards Tank Military, had now dispersed into the woods and countryside across the capital in preparation for an assault, they mentioned.

Advertisement

The Russian defence ministry introduced that its forces had taken management of Volnovakha, a besieged city in south-eastern Ukraine. It mentioned Russian forces had launched rocket assaults that had disabled navy airfields in Lutsk and Ivano-Frankivsk in western Ukraine and have been advancing on Mariupol.

As Russia’s offensive has faltered round Kyiv and Kharkiv, Ukraine’s largest cities, Moscow’s repeated claims over chemical and organic weapons programmes in Ukraine have raised western issues Putin could resort to the usage of unconventional weapons.

In his late-night deal with, Zelensky described Moscow’s claims as a smokescreen to justify it deploying ever extra inhuman weapons, asking Putin: “What else have you ever ready for us?”

“Allegedly, we’re making ready a chemical assault,” he mentioned within the deal with. “This makes me actually anxious, as a result of we’ve been repeatedly satisfied: if you wish to know Russia’s plans, have a look at what Russia accuses others of [doing].”

A senior US defence official mentioned there have been no American organic weapons labs in Ukraine “or wherever else on the earth”, including that Washington spent $200mn in Ukraine to “remove the remnants” of an unlawful Soviet-era organic weapons programme.

Advertisement

Because the west continued to tighten sanctions in opposition to Russia, the US Senate on Thursday night authorized a $13.6bn spending package deal that features $6.5bn devoted to defence. The invoice will now go to US president Joe Biden to signal into legislation.

Adjusted for inflation, the assist exceeds the landmark $400mn package deal the US offered Greece and Turkey in 1947. That transfer marked the beginning of US chilly battle coverage in Europe and, two years later, the muse of Nato.

Extra reporting by Erika Solomon in Berlin, Aime Williams in Washington, John Paul Rathbone in London and Victor Mallet in Paris

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Published

on

NFL hit with $4.7bn antitrust verdict over ‘Sunday Ticket’ game package

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A California jury has found the US National Football League violated antitrust laws and ordered it to pay $4.7bn in damages to customers who bought a package of its live games over satellite television, in a landmark case that could reshape the market for sports rights distribution.

The verdict comes in a federal class-action lawsuit brought by subscribers to the NFL’s Sunday Ticket package, who alleged the league’s out-of-market games violated antitrust rules by restricting competition for certain Sunday afternoon fixtures to pay-TV.

The case, which was tried in a federal court in Los Angeles, may have wide-reaching consequences for how live sports rights are bundled. It also delivers a significant blow to the world’s richest sports league, as the fines could be tripled under US federal antitrust law.

Advertisement

The NFL said it was “disappointed” with the verdict. “We continue to believe that our media distribution strategy . . . is by far the most fan friendly distribution model in all of sports and entertainment.” It said it would “contest” the verdict and maintained the claims were “baseless and without merit”.

In 1961, US Congress passed the Sports Broadcasting Act, which gives professional sports leagues such as the NFL an exemption from antitrust laws in order to pool sales of its media broadcast rights. Underpinning the act is the idea that professional teams including the Dallas Cowboys and the New York Giants operate as franchises of one business unit — the league — and as such media distribution of their fixtures is not in competition with one another.

Still, there are four time zones across the continental US, and the majority of NFL fixtures take place simultaneously on Sunday afternoons. That has created demand for so-called out-of-network games, which the league sells as its Sunday Ticket package. Viewers can watch fixtures of local teams on their regional Fox or CBS free-to-air network, but must purchase Sunday Ticket to watch games outside their home markets.

Underscoring the seriousness of the case and its implication for the future of live sports rights, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones were among the witnesses testifying for the league during the trial. Goodell told the jury it was the first time he has presented under oath in a federal courtroom since he began his term in 2006, according to a report from the Associated Press.

The league maintained Sunday Ticket is a premium product with premium pricing, and as such would not undercut viewership for free-to-air local games. The package costs between $349 and $449 per year, depending on whether consumers have a subscription with distributor YouTube TV. Sunday Ticket was distributed by satellite provider DirecTV from 1994 until 2023, when the league awarded the rights to Google’s YouTube TV in a record $14bn contract.

Advertisement

The lawsuit was brought by a San Francisco sports bar called the Mucky Duck in 2015 and has since been expanded to a class-action representing millions of subscribers and tens of thousands of similar establishments. The plaintiffs have highlighted, among other evidence, a 2017 internal NFL memo titled “New Frontier”, which suggested the league could divvy up Sunday fixtures across cable channels rather than pool them to satellite TV.

Unlike other US professional leagues, including Major League Baseball and the National Basketball Association, NFL teams do not offer individual TV packages. In his trial testimony, Cowboys owner Jones said he was “completely against each team doing TV deals”, according to the AP, despite the fact that a theoretical direct-to-consumer offering for his team — estimated to be worth $9bn by Forbes, the most valuable professional club in global sport — would likely rake in subscriptions.

Continue Reading

News

At the border, migrants ‘wait and see’ as encounters with Border Patrol dip 40%

Published

on

At the border, migrants ‘wait and see’ as encounters with Border Patrol dip 40%

Border patrol agents pick up migrants waiting to be processed in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Jacumba Valley, Calif. — Encounters between U.S. Customs and Border Patrol and migrants crossing the southern border without authorization decreased by 40% in the three weeks since new asylum restrictions took effect.

In announcing the executive actions on June 4, President Biden said these measures were needed to bring “order to the border.”

His administration points to the latest statistics as proof that the new policies are succeeding.

Advertisement

“The president’s actions are working because of their tough response to illegal crossings,” Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas said at a press conference in Tucson, Arizona on Wednesday.

“We are removing more noncitizens without a legal basis to stay here.”

But the number of people arrested while attempting to cross the border declined over the past five months, and not all of that is attributable to U.S. policy. Mexico also scaled up its enforcement and has been stopping migrants from trekking north toward the U.S.

Mayorkas says the administration has doubled the number of expedited removals in the last three weeks, with more than 100 international repatriation flights to 20 countries. 

According to the DHS, arrests haven’t been this low since January 2021.

Advertisement

Crossings are fewer but still hazardous for those who make the journey

So far on the California border, there’s been a noticeable shift: up until last month, the San Diego sector had been the place with most undocumented migrant crossings.

A migrant woman and her nine-year-old hold each other as they wait for border patrol agents in Dulzara, California. The family of three migrated from Ecuador and is hoping to seek asylum in the U.S. June 25, 2024.

A migrant woman and her nine-year-old hold each other as they wait for border patrol agents in Dulzara, California. The family of three migrated from Ecuador and is hoping to seek asylum in the U.S. June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A sandal can be seen through the busses of the desert in Dulzura, California, on June 24, 2024.

A sandal can be seen through the busses of the desert in Dulzura, California, on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A couple of migrants wait to be processed by border patrol agents in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

A couple of migrants wait to be processed by border patrol agents in Dulzara, California on June 25, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Just weeks ago, hundreds of migrants still waited in campsites scattered throughout California’s Jacumba Valley, a remote area 80 miles east of San Diego. There, they could wait to be picked up by Border Patrol and petition for asylum.

Advertisement

Lately, these locations look mostly empty, and makeshift tents flap in the wind. But some people still cross the border and end up here — including a family with three small children NPR encountered at one of the sweltering desert camps.

One of the children, a 7-year-old, was seriously dehydrated and seemed about to pass out. As humanitarian volunteers gave him first aid, the child’s parents explained that the family had walked for eight hours through the desert.

The journey was challenging– they evaded snakes and mountain lions– but staying in their native Mexico was not an option.

The family owns an auto repair shop in the southern state of Michoacán, where they were extorted and feared for their lives.

The mother, Jazmin Mora, says the family first fled to Tijuana, hoping to make it to the United States where they have family. But after just one month in the Mexican border city, they encountered violence there too, so they decided to try to cross.

Advertisement
A mattress at the southern border in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, on June 24, 2024.

A mattress at the southern border in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

Advertisement

Jazmin Mora puts a cold patch on her forehead to cool down as she and her family wait for border patrol agents in Jacumba Hot Springs, California on June 24, 2024.

Jazmin Mora puts a cold patch on her forehead to cool down as she and her family wait for border patrol agents in Jacumba Hot Springs, California on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

A border patrol agent approaches the informal migrant camp in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, as a child washes her hands on June 24, 2024.

A border patrol agent approaches the informal migrant camp in Jacumba Hot Springs, California, as a child washes her hands on June 24, 2024.

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Zaydee Sanchez for NPR

“We moved around to several other places, but the reality is all Mexico is unsafe for everybody,” said Mora.

Her family’s story embodies what immigration analysts have told NPR about the newer border measures: deterrence policies alone do not work to curtail undocumented immigration in the long run.

Advertisement

Implications for the U.S. presidential election

Although the Biden administration touts these policies as a success, migrants continue to arrive at the border, although they stay on the Mexican side to ‘wait and see’ when to cross.

The announcement of lower numbers of border encounters and higher numbers of removals comes just before the first presidential debate on Thursday, in which immigration is expected to be front and center.

Far away from the politics of Washington D.C., neither migrants nor the locals had much to say about the border policies. They told NPR they see it as politics as usual –no real, lasting solutions.

Continue Reading

News

US Supreme Court rejects Sackler liability releases in Purdue bankruptcy

Published

on

US Supreme Court rejects Sackler liability releases in Purdue bankruptcy

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The US Supreme Court has invalidated a measure in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy that would shield members of the company’s founding Sackler family from future civil liability in exchange for a $6bn contribution, in a closely watched case involving the maker of the opioid OxyContin.

The Department of Justice had sought to invalidate the comprehensive liability releases granted to the Sacklers, saying they could not be justified under existing US law. The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed in a 5-4 ruling.

But the high court’s majority stressed that its decision was a “narrow one” that did not “call into question consensual third-party releases offered in connection with a bankruptcy reorganisation plan”.

Advertisement

This is a developing story

Continue Reading

Trending