Connect with us

News

Rudy Giuliani’s bankruptcy case thrown out by US judge

Published

on

Rudy Giuliani’s bankruptcy case thrown out by US judge

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani can no longer use bankruptcy proceedings to avoid a $148mn judgment for defaming two US election workers after a judge threw out his case, clearing the way for them to pursue the homes and earnings of the one-time lawyer to Donald Trump.

In his order on Friday, judge Sean Lane said Giuliani had “failed to provide an accurate and complete picture of his financial affairs in the six months that this case has been pending” and had “not even retained an accountant, which is the most rudimentary of steps”.

The 80-year-old filed for Chapter 11 protection in December, after being found liable for spreading a conspiracy theory about a mother and daughter who counted votes in Georgia during the 2020 presidential election, leading to angry mobs gathering outside their home.

Advertisement

Lawyers for Ruby Freeman and Wandrea “Shaye” Moss had argued earlier in the week that Giuliani was using the bankruptcy as a “pause button on his woes”, and was trying to “thwart” creditors’ multiple attempts to collect.

Judge Lane agreed that there had been a “troubling” lack of financial transparency, citing Giuliani’s failure to disclose that he had a contract for an upcoming book, and that he received “at least $15,000 per month for hosting a radio show on WABC and between $100,000 and $150,000 from his work hosting a podcast called America’s Mayor Live”.

His order also barred Giuliani from refiling for bankruptcy within a year.

A lawyer for Freeman and Moss, Rachel Strickland, said her clients had “already waited too long for justice” and were “pleased the court saw through Mr Giuliani’s games”. She added that the duo’s legal team would begin enforcing the judgment against Giuliani “ASAP”.

Giuliani, in a surprising move, did not oppose the dismissal of the bankruptcy case. A spokesman said he had been subjected to “voluminous and overly broad discovery requests . . . intended to harm the mayor and destroy his businesses”.

Advertisement

He added: “we are confident that — in the long run — our system of justice will be restored and the mayor will be totally vindicated.”

Giuliani, who was Trump’s personal attorney during and after the 2020 presidential election, is also facing criminal charges over alleged election interference in Georgia and Arizona. He has pleaded not guilty in both criminal cases and is appealing against the defamation judgment.

In a filing ahead of the decision, lawyers for other creditors, including a woman who has sued Giuliani over an alleged sexual assault, said he had treated the bankruptcy process as a “joke”. He was “hiding behind the facade of an elderly, doddering man who cannot even remember the address for his second multimillion-dollar home and claims impending homelessness if he must sell that [home]”, they added.

Giuliani, who once owned several properties, has an apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, and a condominium in Florida’s Palm Beach. His lawyers said the assets, along with “some jewellery perhaps” would yield about $8mn. Giuliani had previously reported assets of $10.6mn.

Among Giuliani’s moneymaking endeavours is his own branded coffee line, ‘Rudy Coffee’ © Rudy Coffee

A former US attorney for the Southern District of New York, Giuliani had his legal licence in the state revoked this month. His lawyers argued he would have limited earning power as a “80-year-old disbarred attorney”.

Advertisement

Strickland disagreed, saying that “when Mr Giuliani is working for himself . . . he will be hustling for Rudy Coffee and a podcast and all the rest of his moneymaking endeavours”. Giuliani launched a coffee brand earlier this year, with the slogan “fighting for justice”.

By avoiding high legal fees, “creditors will be able to hold America’s Mayor accountable for the harms he has caused”, Strickland added.

Besides the $148mn owed to Freeman and Moss, Giuliani has revealed that he has almost $1mn in unpaid taxes, as well as hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of unpaid legal fees. He is also being sued by voting technology companies Dominion and Smartmatic.

During the bankruptcy proceedings, Giuliani had made dozens of Amazon purchases, buying a tripod apparently for his podcast, an extra-extra-large “Men’s Active Performance Tech T-Shirt”, and a bottle of “tanning moisturiser”, according to court filings.

Advertisement

News

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Published

on

Nasa may ask SpaceX to retrieve astronauts stuck at space station

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Nasa said on Wednesday it is considering tapping SpaceX to shuttle two astronauts back to Earth from the International Space Station following technical difficulties with the Boeing CST-100 Starliner spacecraft they took to get there.

Astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore, who were supposed to return to Earth nearly two months ago, may now stay at the station until February. SpaceX had a mission to the space station planned for later this month to deliver crew and supplies, but the US space agency has now pushed it back until September to weigh whether it should bring the astronauts home.

The SpaceX mission may carry only two astronauts aboard instead of four, leaving two seats to ferry Wilmore and Williams home early next year. Officials from Nasa said they were still evaluating which spacecraft to use to bring Williams and Wilmore back, and the agency would decide in mid-August.

Advertisement

“We’re in a new situation in that we have multiple options,” said Nasa associate administrator Ken Bowersox. “We don’t just have to bring a crew back on Starliner. We can bring them back on another vehicle.”

“Reasonable people could take either path,” he added, but the agency was “getting more serious about evaluating our other options”.

The move would be a blow to Boeing, which is being scrutinised by regulators over the quality and safety of its processes to manufacture commercial aeroplanes. It plead guilty in July to defrauding the US Federal Aviation Administration.

Nasa astronauts Sunita Williams and Barry Wilmore are greeted by the crew of the International Space Station © AP

Starliner is meant to compete with billionaire Elon Musk’s SpaceX to bring crew and supplies to the space station. But the programme has had its own hurdles, coming in billions of dollars over budget and with multiple launch delays even before Williams and Wilmore lifted off from Cape Canaveral, Florida on June 5, with plans for an eight-day mission.

Since lift-off, helium has leaked from the Starliner and five of its thrusters have functioned improperly. Nasa officials said scientists and engineers were studying the problems to determine their cause.

Advertisement

If Nasa decides to transport Wilmore and Williams back to Earth via SpaceX, Boeing and the agency will need to reconfigure certain software parameters so that Starliner can undock from the space station automatically for its return, rather than requiring crew members to steer.

While Boeing was “very confident” that Starliner can bring the astronauts home, Bowersox said, some staff at Nasa were “more conservative”.

“The Nasa community in general would like to understand a little bit more of the root cause and the physics,” said Steve Stich, manager for Nasa’s commercial crew programme.

Boeing said on Wednesday that, “we still believe in Starliner’s capability and its flight rationale”, a term that means it is safe for a mission to continue. “If Nasa decides to change the mission, we will take the actions necessary to configure Starliner for an uncrewed return.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Published

on

Judge rules against majority of claims in Black student's hair discrimination case

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Michael Wyke/AP

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Darryl George of Mont Belvieu, Texas, faced multiple suspensions for not cutting his hair.

Michael Wyke/AP

A federal judge has dismissed most of the claims in a lawsuit filed by a Black Texas high school student who alleged that school officials had violated his civil rights by insisting he cut his hair to fit school policy.

Darryl George’s battle with Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu (a town roughly 40 minutes outside of Houston) began last summer when he faced numerous in-school suspensions over his natural locs.

Advertisement

School officials said George’s locs fell below his eyebrows and ear lobes, according to local media reports, which violates the district’s dress code for male students.

George missed most of his regular classes in his junior year, spending the day in in-school suspension.

“He has to sit on a stool for eight hours in a cubicle,” Darryl’s mother, Darresha George, told The Associated Press at the time. “That’s very uncomfortable. Every day he’d come home, he’d say his back hurts because he has to sit on a stool.”

As a result, George and his mother sued the school district, the district superintendent, his principal and assistant principal as well as Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton for violation of the state’s CROWN Act (Creating a Respectful and Open World for Natural Hair), which bans race-based hair discrimination.

George was initially suspended just a day before the Texas law went into effect statewide on Sept 1 of last year.

Advertisement

In the Tuesday ruling, U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown dismissed the claims against Abbott, Paxton, and the district and school employees.

Brown also dismissed claims that enforcement was primarily being done against Black students, as well as the claim that George’s First Amendment rights had been violated as a result of the district policy. The judge said the school had not shown a “persistent, widespread practice of disparate, race-based enforcement” with its policy. When it came to the free speech claim, he determined there was no precedent to demonstrate that hair length is supported under the First Amendment.

However, George’s claim of sex discrimination stood. In his ruling, Brown wrote: “What is the rationale for the dress code’s distinction between male and female students? Because the District does not provide any reason for the sex-based distinctions in its dress code, the claim survives this initial stage.”

Brown acknowledged that the state’s case had its issues, invoking a similar case from 1970 in which the judge concluded that “the presence and enforcement of the hair-cut rule causes far more disruption of the classroom instructional process than the hair it seeks to prohibit.”

Brown wrote: “Regrettably, so too here.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: 5.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Published

on

Map: 5.2-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes Southern California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 4 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “light,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown. The New York Times

A moderately strong, 5.2-magnitude earthquake struck in Southern California on Tuesday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 9:09 p.m. Pacific time about 14 miles southwest of Lamont, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Aftershocks in the region

An aftershock is usually a smaller earthquake that follows a larger one in the same general area. Aftershocks are typically minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Advertisement

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Wednesday, Aug. 7 at 12:36 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Wednesday, Aug. 7 at 11:40 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending