Connect with us

News

Ron DeSantis drops out of White House race and endorses Trump

Published

on

Ron DeSantis drops out of White House race and endorses Trump

Ron DeSantis has suspended his campaign for president and endorsed Donald Trump as the Republican nominee for the White House in 2024, in a significant blow to Nikki Haley with just two days to go until the New Hampshire primary.

DeSantis announced his decision in a video posted to social media on Sunday afternoon, saying he and his wife, Casey, had “prayed and deliberated on the way forward” after his second-place finish in last week’s Iowa caucuses.

“I can’t ask our supporters to volunteer their time and donate their resources if we don’t have a clear path to victory,” DeSantis said as he confirmed he was suspending his campaign.

The Florida governor said it was “clear . . . that a majority of Republican primary voters want to give Donald Trump another chance,” adding: “They watched his presidency get stymied by relentless resistance and they see Democrats using lawfare to this day to attack him.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

During the campaign Trump attacked DeSantis in brutally personal terms, mocking the governor for apparently wearing shoe lifts, calling him “Ron DeSanctimonious” and saying he needed a “personality transplant.”

On Sunday, DeSantis said he had “disagreements” with Trump but the former president was “superior” to Democratic incumbent President Joe Biden.

“[Trump] has my endorsement because we can’t go back to the old Republican guard of yesteryear, a repackaged form of warmed-over corporatism that Nikki Haley represents,” DeSantis added.

Haley responded to DeSantis’s announcement at a campaign stop in New Hampshire on Sunday afternoon, saying: “He ran a great race. He has been a good governor, and we wish him well. Having said that, it’s now one fella and one lady left . . . may the best woman win.”

The Trump campaign said it was “honoured” by the endorsement, adding that Haley was the candidate of globalists and Democrats, in a statement on X.

Advertisement

DeSantis’s departure from the race comes just two days before the New Hampshire primary, which will now be a clear two-person race between Trump and Haley, the former South Carolina governor who later served as Trump’s ambassador to the UN.

Haley finished in a disappointing third place in last week’s Iowa caucuses, narrowly edged out by DeSantis. But she is betting that a coalition of more moderate Republicans looking for an alternative to Trump, as well as independent voters who are eligible to vote in the New Hampshire primary, will help her usurp her former boss there.

Recent opinion polls, however, illustrate the steep uphill climb Haley is facing heading into Tuesday. The latest FiveThirtyEight average of polls in New Hampshire shows Trump commands the support of just under 49 per cent of likely primary voters, followed by Haley on around 34 per cent. DeSantis trailed in a distant third place, on about five per cent, prior to dropping out.

A year ago, DeSantis, 45, appeared to be the Republican best positioned to take on Trump. The former congressman won re-election as governor of Florida in the 2022 midterms by nearly 20 points, with voters there rewarding him for his handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.

He became known as a warrior against “woke” ideology, launching a hard-charging campaign over progressive views on gender identity and sexual orientation, tossing aside companies like Disney, schools and the media that opposed him. A pro-DeSantis “super Pac”, Never Back Down, amassed more than $130mn for his White House run.

Advertisement

But after state and federal prosecutors launched four criminal cases against Trump, including over charges alleging that he conspired to overturn the 2020 election, Republicans increasingly rallied around the former president. 

Nevada businessman Joe DeSimone, a DeSantis donor, told the FT that DeSantis was a “victim of circumstance,” who could not overcome Republicans’ urge to defend Trump.

“All the legal action that was addressed at Trump seemed to really fire up his base and get them motivated to come out and vote and contribute,” said DeSimone, who will now support the former president.

But DeSantis also made several public mis-steps and his campaign was plagued by overspending and staff infighting. He appeared awkward at times on the campaign trail, and ultimately only appealed to a narrow band of orthodox conservatives.

His super Pac took much of the campaign’s traditional role in fundraising, organising travel, knocking on doors and airing ads. But as DeSantis started to fall in the polls, and Haley started to rise, the relationship between the two organisations, which are legally barred from coordinating, became increasingly strained. 

Advertisement

In the autumn, DeSantis’s biggest donor, Robert Bigelow, a Nevada real estate investor who gave Never Back Down over $20mn, told the FT he was considering backing Trump instead after DeSantis did not call him following his public criticism of the governor’s decision to sign a six-week abortion ban bill. Never Back Down ultimately saw the departure of two chief executives, its board chair, and other staff.

Two DeSantis donors had recently told the FT that their candidate had raised enough money to campaign at least until South Carolina held its vote on February 24. 

But there were signs of his campaign’s imminent collapse. Since the Iowa caucuses on January 15, pro-DeSantis groups have spent less than $100,000 on advertisements, according to AdImpact data. Pro-Haley groups, meanwhile, have spent more than $7.8mn.

David Paleologos, the director of the Suffolk University political research center, said that DeSantis’ decision will help Trump more than Haley in New Hampshire.

“In our last track, the small subset of DeSantis voters broke to Trump 57 per cent to 33 per cent,” Paleologos told the FT.

Advertisement

News

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

Published

on

Supreme Court blocks redrawing of New York congressional map, dealing a win for GOP

The Supreme Court

Win McNamee/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Monday intervened in New York’s redistricting process, blocking a lower court decision that would likely have flipped a Republican congressional district into a Democratic district.    
  
At issue is the midterm redrawing of New York’s 11th congressional district, including Staten Island and a small part of Brooklyn. The district is currently held by a Republican, but on Jan. 21, a state Supreme Court judge ruled that the current district dilutes the power of Black and Latino voters in violation of the state constitution.  
  
GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, who represents the district, and the Republican co-chair of the state Board of Elections promptly appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, asking the justices to block the redrawing as an unconstitutional “racial gerrymander.” New York’s congressional election cycle was set to officially begin Feb. 24, the opening day for candidates to seek placement on the ballot.  
  
As in this year’s prior mid-decade redistricting fights — in Texas and California — the Trump administration backed the Republicans.   
 
Voters and the State of New York contended it’s too soon for the Supreme Court to wade into this dispute. New York’s highest state court has not issued a final judgment, so the voters asserted that if the Supreme Court grants relief now “future stay applicants will see little purpose in waiting for state court rulings before coming to this Court” and “be rewarded for such gamesmanship.” The state argues this is an issue for “New York courts, not federal courts” to resolve, and there is sufficient time for the dispute to be resolved on the merits. 
  
The court majority explained the decision to intervene in 101 words, which the three dissenting liberal justices  summarized as “Rules for thee, but not for me.” 
 
The unsigned majority order does not explain the Court’s rationale. It says only how long the stay will last, until the case moves through the New York State appeals courts. If, however, the losing party petitions and the court agrees to hear the challenge, the stay extends until the final opinion is announced. 
 
Dissenting from the decision were Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Writing for the three, Sotomayor  said that  if nonfinal decisions of a state trial court can be brought to highest court, “then every decision from any court is now fair game.” More immediately, she noted, “By granting these applications, the Court thrusts itself into the middle of every election-law dispute around the country, even as many States redraw their congressional maps ahead of the 2026 election.” 

Monday’s Supreme Court action deviates from the court’s hands-off pattern in these mid-term redistricting fights this year. In two previous cases — from Texas and California — the court refused to intervene, allowing newly drawn maps to stay in effect.  
  
Requests for Supreme Court intervention on redistricting issues has been a recurring theme this term, a trend that is likely to grow.  Earlier last month  the high court allowed California to use a voter-approved, Democratic-friendly map.  California’s redistricting came in response to a GOP-friendly redistricting plan in Texas that the Supreme Court also permitted to move forward. These redistricting efforts are expected to offset one another.     
   
But the high court itself has yet to rule on a challenge to Louisiana’s voting map, which was drawn by the state legislature after the decennial census in order to create a second majority-Black district.  Since the drawing of that second majority-black district, the state has backed away from that map, hoping to return to a plan that provides for only one majority-minority district.    
     
The Supreme Court’s consideration of the Louisiana case has stretched across two terms. The justices failed to resolve the case last term and chose to order a second round of arguments this term adding a new question: Does the state’s intentional creation of a second majority-minority district violate the constitution’s Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments’ guarantee of the right to vote and the authority of Congress to enforce that mandate?    
Following the addition of the new question, the state of Louisiana flipped positions to oppose the map it had just drawn and defended in court. Whether the Supreme Court follows suit remains to be seen. But the tone of the October argument suggested that the court’s conservative supermajority is likely to continue undercutting the 1965 Voting Rights Act.   

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Published

on

Map: Earthquake Shakes Central California

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A minor earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 3.5 struck in Central California on Monday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 7:17 a.m. Pacific time about 6 miles northwest of Pinnacles, Calif., data from the agency shows.

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Source: United States Geological Survey | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Monday, March 2 at 10:20 a.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Monday, March 2 at 11:18 a.m. Eastern.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

Published

on

US says Kuwait accidentally shot down 3 American jets

The U.S. and Israel have been conducting strikes against targets in Iran since Saturday morning, with the aim of toppling Tehran’s clerical regime. Iran has fired back, with retaliatory assaults featuring missiles and drones targeting several Gulf countries and American bases in the Middle East.

“All six aircrew ejected safely, have been safely recovered, and are in stable condition. Kuwait has acknowledged this incident, and we are grateful for the efforts of the Kuwaiti defense forces and their support in this ongoing operation,” Central Command said.

“The cause of the incident is under investigation. Additional information will be released as it becomes available,” it added.

In a separate statement later Monday, Central Command said that American forces had been killed during combat since the strikes began.

“As of 7:30 am ET, March 2, four U.S. service members have been killed in action. The fourth service member, who was seriously wounded during Iran’s initial attacks, eventually succumbed to their injuries,” it said.

Advertisement

Major combat operations continue and our response effort is ongoing. The identities of the fallen are being withheld until 24 hours after next of kin notification,” Central Command added.

This story has been updated.

Continue Reading

Trending