Connect with us

News

Publicis raises guidance as tech client spending picks up

Published

on

Publicis raises guidance as tech client spending picks up

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Publicis, the Paris-based advertising agency, has raised its full-year guidance following a recovery in spending among US tech clients despite continued macroeconomic uncertainties.

Publicis said on Thursday that revenue grew by a stronger than expected 7.7 per cent in the first half of the year, to €7.7bn, while earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation climbed by 4.9 per cent to €1.4bn.

This growth was based on a rebound in spending among tech companies, it said, with revenue from the sector about 11 per cent higher year on year in both of the first two quarters.

Advertisement

Arthur Sadoun, chief executive of Publicis, told the Financial Times that US tech clients were “starting to invest again” after cutting their marketing budgets last year. He added that the company was upgrading forecasts “against all odds” — pointing to the still challenging background caused by the political uncertainty in the US, France and UK as well as geopolitical tensions. 

Sadoun said that Publicis was also benefiting from its investment in technology, adding that more clients were using its services to create and distribute campaigns personalised for individual consumers at scale. This would be further developed with the increasing use of artificial intelligence tools, he added.

Publicis is now targeting annual net revenue organic growth of between 5-6 per cent, compared with previous guidance of between 4-5 per cent. It stuck to existing guidance on financial ratios, targeting an operating margin of 18 per cent and between €1.8bn and €1.9bn in free cash flow, before changes in working capital.

Advertising executives have become more confident this year amid signs that brands are increasing their marketing spend again, and boosted by revenues generated by large events ranging from the European Championship football tournament to the Olympics in Paris. This week, PwC predicted that advertising revenues would top $1tn in 2026, forecasting that revenues in 2028 would double those recorded in 2020.

However, Publicis has also outperformed the rest of the industry, on the back of investments over the past decade that helped launch its data consulting and technology arms. The group will invest a further €100mn this year in developing its AI tools and resources as part of a €300mn AI strategy designed to allow it to better tailor and personalise ads.

Advertisement

Publicis clients could already use its technology to target individual consumers with the “right message at the right time”, he said. The use of AI would have a further benefit, he added, in helping the agency “create, produce and distribute content”. 

Sadoun said that the French market now only accounted for 6 per cent of sales but remained important as its headquarters. He said that the market had also grown in the past six months despite the political and economic challenges facing France.

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending