Connect with us

News

One Cure for Pandemic Doldrums: Walking Every Street in Your City

Published

on

One Cure for Pandemic Doldrums: Walking Every Street in Your City

There have been additionally the logistical challenges of strolling in the course of the pandemic. In spring 2020, when many of the nation was shut down, the pair continued their walks however would attempt to keep six ft aside and put on masks. Stopping at a gasoline station to make use of the restroom or at a McDonald’s to purchase espresso instantly appeared dangerous, so that they packed extra snacks and introduced units that might enable them to discreetly relieve themselves outdoor.

“We simply bought artistic,” mentioned Ms. Hosbrough, a counselor. “We had been decided to not shorten the size of our walks.”

There have been perks to pandemic strolling, too. Justin Robbins, who walked each avenue in Longmont, Colo., in late 2020 and early 2021, mentioned the pandemic appeared to encourage extra formidable Christmas decorations in his metropolis.

“Individuals went huge — greater than they usually would,” mentioned Mr. Robbins, a software program engineer who had grown bored strolling the identical route close to his home, and who credited his 586-mile tour of Longmont with enhancing his bodily and psychological well being.

However the pandemic additionally caused a rise in reckless driving and, in some locations, report numbers of pedestrian deaths. Crashes killed greater than 6,700 pedestrians in 2020, up about 5 % from the estimated 6,412 the 12 months earlier than, in accordance with the Governors Freeway Security Affiliation. The Peoria police mentioned there had not been a rise in pedestrian deaths there.

Advertisement

Each Ms. Hosbrough and Ms. Jacobsen-Wooden, who’re 50 and who grew up within the Peoria space, mentioned they noticed their walks as a option to counter what they thought of to be a pervasive however unwarranted fatalism in how some Peorians seen their metropolis. Native journalists typically joined them on their strolls.

Peoria, located about midway between Chicago and St. Louis, has seen its inhabitants stagnate at round 110,000 residents in current many years. Caterpillar, the producer of development and mining tools, moved its headquarters out of the town just a few years in the past. And homicides surged to report ranges in the course of the pandemic, in accordance with The Peoria Journal Star, main some commenters on the Pedestrians in Peoria Fb web page to query whether or not it was secure for the ladies to stroll via sure neighborhoods.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

News

China imposes restrictions on fentanyl chemicals after pressure from US

Published

on

China imposes restrictions on fentanyl chemicals after pressure from US

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

China is to impose controls on the production of critical chemicals for the manufacture of fentanyl, in a sign of rising co-operation between Beijing and Washington over efforts to crack down on the deadly synthetic opioid.

The Biden administration on Tuesday said China would impose regulations and controls on three essential chemicals used in fentanyl from September.

The move — a process known as “scheduling” — marks the first time China will impose restrictions on the production of ingredients for the drug in six years.

Advertisement

The White House said it was a “valuable step forward” that followed a meeting between senior US and Chinese officials in Washington last week.

Washington has been pressing Beijing for several years to crack down on the production of ingredients used in fentanyl, which it estimates claimed the lives of almost 75,000 Americans in 2023.

US officials say the illicit drug has become the leading cause of death for Americans between the ages of 18 and 45.

The enhanced US-China co-operation stems from an agreement reached between President Joe Biden and President Xi Jinping at a summit in San Francisco in November 2023.

The two leaders agreed to create a working group to tackle the fentanyl issue as part of an effort to stabilise turbulent relations between the two powers.

Advertisement

In 2019, China took measures to stem exports of fentanyl to the US, causing Chinese groups to shift their focus to making the chemicals needed to produce the drug. They have been sending the chemicals to cartels in Mexico which produce fentanyl for distribution in the US market.

In a statement, the Chinese government said it would subject three chemical ingredients — 4-AP, 1-boc-4-AP, and Norfentanyl — to controls from September 1.

“China has always attached great importance to international counter-narcotics co-operation and is willing to co-operate with countries worldwide including the United States,” said Liu Pengyu, the Chinese embassy spokesperson in Washington. “We hope that the US side can work with China in the same direction, and continue our co-operation based on mutual respect, managing differences, and mutual benefits.”

UN member states in 2022 agreed to impose international controls on the same chemicals, but China had until now not subject them to corresponding domestic controls.

Congress has become increasingly vocal in its criticism of China over the fentanyl crisis.

Advertisement

In a report in April, the House China committee blamed Beijing for the fentanyl epidemic and accused it of creating programmes to reward companies for exporting fentanyl and other illegal drugs to the US. The Chinese government has rejected the accusation.

Fentanyl is expected to be a significant election issue as vice-president Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump battle for the White House.

According to a Morning Consult/Bloomberg poll earlier this year, 44 per cent of respondents said the approach to the drug was a “very important” in deciding who they would vote for in November.

The Biden administration last week urged Congress to pass legislation that would designate fentanyl-related substances as “Schedule I” drugs — which have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse — that would lead to higher penalties for distribution and possession.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

The ‘Blue Walz’: How a low-key Midwestern governor shot to the top to be Harris’ VP pick | CNN Politics

Published

on

The ‘Blue Walz’: How a low-key Midwestern governor shot to the top to be Harris’ VP pick | CNN Politics


Philadelphia, PA
CNN
 — 

Tim Walz was in the midst of his interview with Vice President Kamala Harris’ vetting team when he told them there was something important they needed to know.

He doesn’t use a teleprompter, the Minnesota governor said. He doesn’t even have one, in fact. So if he was the pick, Walz said, Harris’ team would have to get him a teleprompter and teach him how to use it.

It was a lighter moment, but it was also part of an interview process with Harris’ team that Walz aced, multiple sources familiar with the meeting told CNN. The Minnesota governor was upfront about his vulnerabilities, noting he wasn’t from a swing state or a household name. He also said he was a bad debater.

But Walz made it clear he would be a team player.

Advertisement

Asked how he saw his role as VP, Walz said he would perform the job however Harris wanted him to. Asked if he wanted to be the last person in the room before Harris made a decision, Walz said only if she wanted him to be there.

And asked if he had ambitions to run for president himself one day, Walz said he did not, a point that sources said was not lost on a team looking to minimize the potential for any internal drama in a future Harris administration.

“He had a very clear understanding that it was to be a partner, but to support the president, go out and connect with America and be that governing partner,” said Cedric Richmond, a former Louisiana congressman and Biden White House adviser who was deeply involved in the selection process. “It’s not the easiest of positions, but it’s a very important position.”

The vetting interview  was a key step for Walz to ultimately lock up the selection that Harris made after sitting down with the three finalists, including Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro and Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, for one-on-one interviews at her residence on Sunday.

“It was a home run,” said one source familiar with Walz’s meeting with Harris’ vetting team. “Everyone loved him.”

Advertisement

Beyond the personal chemistry Harris and her team felt toward Walz, people familiar with the interview process said that Walz was also someone Harris felt could attract the kinds of voters that Democrats have lost to Donald Trump— voters that Harris may not be able to connect with on her own.

“He hunts, he fishes, you want to have a beer with him,” said the source familiar with Walz’s meeting. “He will play in Michigan, Wisconsin, Western Pennsylvania, Georgia, North Carolina.”

A longtime Democratic operative who has known Walz for years agreed, saying: “He talks and looks like a lot of the voters we’ve lost to Trump.”

By Tuesday, staffers at the Harris campaign headquarters were already joking about the “Blue Walz,” referencing the key midwestern battleground states that they hope he will help her lock up.

Shapiro – who was favored by some of the Democratic Party and anti-Trump Republicans as a more moderate selection – did not go over as well with Harris’ team during his vetting interview, sources familiar with the process told CNN. While Walz came across as deferential and cooperative, Shapiro struck some as overly ambitious, with “a lot of questions” about what the role of the VP would be.

Advertisement

And while Shapiro did “very well” in his in-person meeting with Harris on Sunday, multiple sources said, Walz was seen as a pick that would come with less drama and palace intrigue – both on the campaign trail and, if they win in November, at the White House.

“It was a striking contrast” between the two, said the source familiar with the meeting.

Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro arrives at Temple University's Liacouras Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Tuesday, August 6.

Walz was an unexpected contender to become the No. 2 on the Democratic ticket – he was hardly mentioned among the potential contenders when Joe Biden dropped out a little over two weeks ago. But sources familiar with the selection process described Walz as the walk-on player who was ultimately picked for the team over the five-star recruits because he was a Midwestern governor who can campaign as a natural on the stump as a fellow “happy warrior.”

Walz, who was a 24-year Army National Guard veteran and high school teacher before entering politics, brought a “joy and excitement” to the process that ultimately won Harris and her team over, said another source.

Walz was the running mate option that Harris knew the least — but he won over the Democratic nominee, as well as her team, by making clear he would adapt to her style and policies.

Harris had not been expecting Walz to say he didn’t plan to run for president, a source familiar with her thinking told CNN. But afterward, as she sat around the same dining room table in the Naval Observatory, Walz’s answer stuck with her.

Advertisement

“That showed his willingness to say, ‘Look I’m not concerned about my image or my approval rating or what’s next for me in the next chapter of life. I’m going to stay in this moment, be your vice president, run through walls, fight for the American people and demonstrate our values,” said Richmond. “That’s a strong and compelling argument.”

‘At ease and very natural’

The elevation of Walz was the culmination of a remarkable whirlwind, a capstone to a two-week campaign to join the Democratic ticket – first, with a goal of catching the attention of the Harris team and second, to win over the vice president herself.

“He was at ease and very natural,” said a senior Democratic adviser who was briefed on Walz’s face-to-face interview with Harris. “It was a ‘know-it-when-you-see-it’ type of thing.”

While much of the attention around the vetting process focused on the work being done by former Attorney General Eric Holder and former White House counsel Dana Remus, the questions beyond the paperwork and biographical scrubs really started last Friday with video interviews for the candidates being considered.

The Zoom calls also featured an until-now secret three-person committee: Richmond, former Boston mayor and Labor Secretary Marty Walsh and Nevada Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto.

Advertisement

Richmond has become a top adviser to Harris. Walsh and Harris grew close during his time in the Biden administration. Cortez Masto was elected the same year to the Senate with Harris, but they’d also previously served as attorneys general together through the landmark multistate mortgage settlement that became a defining moment for both their careers in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

The three-person group was picked for geographic diversity, different skill sets and background. But most of all, they were picked because they were who Harris trusted to help figure out whom she could trust, which many who know her acknowledge is often the hardest thing for Harris.

Richmond and Walsh, who both went from being elected officials to members of Biden’s administration, were there to help answer a question very much on Harris’s mind after her own experience as vice president: “She wanted to make sure that we could ask questions like, ‘You’re going to go from a principal to a hybrid principal/staffer. Can you make that transition?’” according to one source familiar with the process.

Of the nine options vetted, and six who met virtually with the committee, Walz and Shapiro entered the rushed final weekend as the clear favorites, three people involved in the process told CNN. Kelly was included as a third option.

Walz was propelled by support from across the Democratic Party – progressive and moderate factions alike – in a sophisticated campaign guided by some of the party’s most seasoned operatives. He had former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on his side – old allies from his 12 years in Congress representing a rural Minnesota district – as well as glowing words from former President Barack Obama, who said in a statement Tuesday of Walz, “He has the values and the integrity to make us proud.”

Advertisement

Obama also served as a “sounding board for Vice President Harris to talk through how she was thinking about it,” said one senior aide.

As Walz gained traction online for his comment that Republicans were “weird,” Harris was watching, too.

“She likes the way he operates,” said a person involved with the process. “She liked how it became a thing then. It was funny, it was pointed, but it wasn’t over the top.”

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz speaks before the arrival of President Joe Biden at Dutch Creek Farms, Wednesday, November 1, 2023, in Northfield, Minnesota.

While Harris and Walz did not have much of a previous relationship  a fact that some around Walz worried might be his downfall in the process  aides said Harris grew increasingly enthusiastic by how Walz carried himself during the process. A courtesy call between Harris and Walz on July 21, the same Sunday afternoon Biden stepped aside, sparked a formal vetting process that ultimately led him to the top of the ranks of finalists.

Along the way, many Democratic leaders believed Shapiro was the frontrunner in the sudden race to become Harris’ running mate. Extensive polling and focus groups conducted by the Harris campaign showed no nominal difference among the final contenders, but two Democratic advisers close to the search process acknowledged Shapiro, who is Jewish, had become something of a lightning rod for Gaza protests that Harris was not eager to revisit, an issue that’s divided Democrats throughout the 2024 campaign.

“Nobody wanted to rip that scab back open,” one of the Democrats said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss a confidential process. But other sources close to the vetting process pushed back on the notion that the Gaza protests had anything to do with Harris’ decision to pick Walz over Shapiro.

Advertisement

In the end, the bigger hurdle for Shapiro was his face-to-face meeting with Harris, where he posed “very specific” questions about the role of a vice president, including what decisions he would be included in making, should they win election.

“He was negotiating the job with her, while Walz was saying ‘What can I do to help?’” said the Democratic adviser, who added that Shapiro was unquestionably a rising star in the party but just didn’t meet the moment and forge a comfortable connection with Harris.

For Walz, the evolution from being seen as a moderate Democrat – winning a Republican-leaning congressional district in 2006 – to becoming a leading progressive governor impressed Harris and her team about his appeal.

Walz’s deferential style was also a huge factor in his appeal with Harris, sources said.

“She wanted to make sure that people understood there are going to be times when you’ll have great influence and there are going to be times when something’s happening and you’re told about it at the last minute,” said one of the people involved in the vetting process. “She said, ‘That’s just the nature of the job and you have to be OK with that.’”

Advertisement

Donuts and a teleprompter

Ahead of Harris’ three interviews on Sunday with Walz, Shapiro and Kelly, a panel of close advisers presented findings and recommendations to Harris at her residence at the Naval Observatory.

As they did, other senior campaign staff prepared videos and logos and merchandise for the various options. They waited, not knowing which way Harris would go. They wrestled with wrapping their minds around how different the options really were, and what each would mean for the campaign and for them.

According to sources familiar with the process, Harris was immediately leaning toward Walz after the Sunday meetings. But she felt torn through the end.

Harris slept on it Sunday. By Monday, she was quietly closing in on selecting Walz, informing only a small group of advisers of where her thinking stood that evening, a source familiar with the matter said. Harris went to bed Monday morning without making any official decision.

Small teams of staffers were sent to be on location for each of the final three options, none of them knowing when they woke up on Tuesday morning what the day was going to bring.

Advertisement

Speeches for Tuesday night’s rally in Philadelphia were written in advance for all the options.

When Harris finally called Tuesday morning, Walz was at home with his wife and two children, along with his sister and brother-in-law. He didn’t answer the first call that came through that morning because it was from a blocked number and he didn’t want to miss a call from Harris.

She got him on the second try.

Walz was handed his speech shortly after Harris called to officially tell him he was the pick.  After a small family celebration, Walz brought donuts to staffers who were there with him and hopped on a call with a wider group of staff to thank them for their work.

After arriving in Philadelphia for the first joint Harris-Walz rally Tuesday, a source said that Walz practiced using the teleprompter ahead of taking the stage for his speech.

Advertisement

CNN’s John King, Arlette Saenz and Betsy Klein contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Americans wounded in rocket attack on Iraq base

Published

on

Americans wounded in rocket attack on Iraq base

Seven US personnel were wounded in a rocket attack by Iran-backed militias on a base in Iraq, underscoring the threat to American forces amid intensified diplomatic efforts to ease tensions between Iran and Israel.

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin said the attack on Ain al-Assad, the main base hosting American forces in Iraq, “marked a dangerous escalation and demonstrated Iran’s destabilising role in the region”, according to a Pentagon readout of a call with his Israeli counterpart.

The assault on Monday was the first time in months that American troops in Iraq have been wounded, and followed a US strike against Iran-backed Iraqi militias last week.

Two rockets hit the airbase at about 9pm local time on Monday, wounding five US soldiers and two American contractors, a US defence official said. Two were evacuated from Iraq for further treatment and all are in a stable condition, the official said.

The Ain al-Assad attack took place as Washington and its Arab allies sought to reduce soaring regional tensions following the back-to-back assassinations of senior leaders of the Lebanese militant movement Hizbollah and Hamas last week.

Advertisement

Both Iran and Hizbollah have vowed to retaliate against Israel after Fuad Shukr, a Hizbollah commander, was killed by an Israeli strike on Beirut, and Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas’s political leader, was assassinated in Tehran.

US secretary of state Antony Blinken said Washington was “engaged in intense diplomacy pretty much around the clock with a very simple message: all parties must refrain from escalation, all parties must take steps to ease tensions”.

An Iranian official told the Financial Times that the US had sent messages to Tehran through Jordan, Oman and Qatar urging the republic not to escalate the situation, saying that would not be in its interests. But Iran’s response has been that “we have made our decision”, the official said. 

US defence secretary Lloyd Austin said the attack ‘marked a dangerous escalation and demonstrated Iran’s destabilising role in the region’ © Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Hizbollah’s leader on Tuesday said the group would respond to the killing of its most senior military commander, regardless of international diplomacy and “no matter the consequences”.

“Our response will come. Alone, or with the Axis [of Resistance],” Hassan Nasrallah said, referring to the network of Iran-backed groups in the region, in a speech marking a week since Israel’s assassination of Shuk.

Advertisement

“These are all possibilities,” he said, adding that the uncertainty over the retaliation was psychological warfare and was part of Israel’s punishment.

Blinken said to “break this cycle”, there needed to be a ceasefire to end the 10-month war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza, urging the sides to accept a deal.

The US, along with Qatar and Egypt, have for months been seeking to broker a deal to secure the release of hostages in Gaza and halt the war in the besieged strip, which is considered vital to ending the regional hostilities that erupted after Hamas’s October 7 attack.

But they have struggled to get the parties to agree a deal, and mediators have warned that the killing of Haniyeh, Hamas’s main negotiator, has further set back the talks.

The fear is that a robust retaliation to the assassinations by Iran and Hizbollah will trigger an Israeli counter-response and push the region closer to a full-blown war.

Advertisement

Hizbollah and Israel continued to trade fire on Tuesday, with Lebanese authorities saying at least six people were killed in Israeli strikes, one of which targeted the town of Mayfadoun, some 30km inside Lebanon. At least four of those people were Hizbollah fighters. 

Israeli health authorities said seven people were wounded, including one critically, after a Hizbollah barrage, although the Israel Defense Forces later clarified that one of its own air defence interceptor missiles “missed the target and hit the ground, injuring several civilians”. The IDF said the incident was under review. 

There are also concerns that Iran could mobilise the militant groups in the so-called Axis of Resistance, which includes Houthi rebels in Yemen and militias in Iraq and Syria, as well as Hizbollah and Hamas.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

The US has moved additional military assets, including warships and fighter jets, to the region to help defend Israel and in a show of deterrence. But there is a risk that its forces are sucked into combat.

There are about 2,500 American troops in Iraq and about 900 in Syria, where they have been part of an international coalition fighting Isis, the jihadi group.

Advertisement

Iran-backed militias have launched multiple rocket and drone strikes against US forces since the October 7 attack and Israel’s retaliatory offensive in Gaza triggered a wave of regional hostilities.

Those attacks had diminished in intensity after the US launched air strikes against Iran-affiliated targets in Syria following an attack on a US base on the border between Jordan and Syria that killed three American soldiers in January.

Ain al-Assad base has been targeted at least twice in the past month.

The Houthis have also launched attacks against US navy vessels that have been patrolling the Red Sea in an effort to prevent the Yemeni rebels’ assaults on merchant shipping in the key maritime trade route.

Iranian leaders stepped up their threats against Israel on Monday as the region braced for the Islamic republic’s response, with President Masoud Pezeshkian warning that Tehran would “definitely” respond to Haniyeh’s killing.

Advertisement

He said Iran was not seeking to “expand the scope of war” in the region but Israel “will definitely receive a response for its crimes and insolence”.

Israel has neither denied nor confirmed responsibility for Haniyeh’s killing.

Additional reporting by Raya Jalabi in Beirut and Neri Zilber in Tel Aviv

Continue Reading

Trending