Connect with us

News

Margherita Della Valle, the woman trying to turn Vodafone around

Published

on

Margherita Della Valle, the woman trying to turn Vodafone around

Company insiders joke that Margherita Della Valle’s “blood runs Vodafone red”. Such is the 58-year-old’s passion for the company where she has spent just over half of her life.

But the group’s Italian chief executive is now having to do some bloodletting of her own. She plans to sell Vodafone Italia as part of a sweeping restructuring to streamline company operations that will see 11,000 employees culled. The potential deal to offload its Italian business to Swisscom — announced this week — is like “selling the home she grew up in”, according to a person close to her.

Della Valle, who was appointed CEO last year after three decades climbing the ranks from her initial role as marketing analyst, is seeking to turn around the telecoms company. This comes amid recent criticism from investors and analysts of underperformance and the group’s sprawling portfolio. Her priority? Simplifying the business.

Insiders say she has already brought a very different approach to the last Italian to have helmed the group, Vittorio Colao, or her predecessor Nick Read. Unlike Read, she already looks set to deliver on significant deals.

Silvia Candiani, vice-president of telco and media at Microsoft who worked with Della Valle at the start-up Omnitel Pronto Italia, which later became Vodafone Italia, says she was known internally as “fair and transparent”. Candiani adds that Della Valle has been a “great role model” who shows it is possible to have a “softer style” while remaining “authoritative and decisive”.

Advertisement

A native of Rome, Della Valle graduated from Bocconi University in Milan with a masters in economics. She is married with two sons and now lives in London where she has spoken about enjoying walks along the Thames in her leisure time.

Della Valle is described as direct, but also as someone who is interested in the perspective of others, by multiple people who have worked with her. Under her leadership, individuals at the company are “feeling they can have an impact”, says one employee.

Vodafone provides mobile and fixed services to more than 300mn customers in 17 countries across Europe and Africa. But the state of the group today is a far cry from its heyday at the turn of the century when it pulled off a mega-deal to acquire German company Mannesmann for £113bn. Now, Vodafone is set to exit European markets that were once core to its business. Its retrenchment begs the question of what will be next for the company.

As well as slimming down the company, Della Valle is seeking to accelerate growth and improve customer service. Industry rivals acknowledge her efforts at transformation and her M&A credentials, but say she will have to prove these changes are working and that Vodafone can grow in the markets it remains in.

“To me, they are still quite slow, a huge international lumbering group and they don’t feel particularly agile,” an employee at one competitor says.

Advertisement

If the Italy deal goes ahead, Della Valle will have completed a trio of structural changes she’d been seeking in markets which have not been making a return on the cost of capital. In June, Vodafone announced a proposed merger with CK Hutchison’s Three, which is expected to create Britain’s largest mobile operator. In October, it announced the sale of its Spanish business.

Despite this, shares in the UK-based telecoms group have dropped around 30 per cent in the past year. Vodafone “has got to go through shrinking pain to establish itself”, a long-standing employee acknowledges, as Della Valle’s moves to streamline the business take hold.

Focus has shifted to the company’s operational side, where she faces a range of challenges. These include regulatory changes in Germany, Vodafone’s largest market, where the company returned to growth last year. “The jury is still out on whether that can turn around,” says Karen Egan, head of telecoms at Enders Analysis. Analysts also expect Vodafone to have to cut its dividend, which may prompt anguish among investors.

Della Valle is making internal changes too. Notably, she has moved to eliminate the “macho culture” in what had been perceived as an old boys club, according to one employee, who says Vodafone has become a more pleasant environment in which to work. Another insider says the company is more inclusive under her leadership.

Nor is Della Valle the only woman shaking up what has traditionally been a male-dominated industry. Last month, she was joined in the FTSE 100 by Allison Kirkby, the new BT chief executive while Christel Heydemann heads up Orange, which recently received approval from Brussels for its joint venture with MasMovil in Spain. Della Valle will be hoping to follow suit — the UK’s competition regulator is currently investigating its planned tie-up with Three UK.

Advertisement

In a keynote speech this week at a global telecoms conference in Barcelona, alongside the chief executives of Spain’s Telefónica and Germany’s Deutsche Telekom, Della Valle and Heydemann called on regulators to allow operators in the struggling sector to scale via consolidation. Della Valle said it was “not economic” to have four different 5G networks everywhere.

Julie Sweet, the chief executive of consultancy Accenture, who was also at the event, says the Vodafone boss stands out for combining a bold vision with the ability to execute at speed. “She has a really good sense of humour, she doesn’t take herself too seriously and she builds trusted relationships,” Sweet says.

The two bonded over the experience of “leading big companies through change”, Sweet adds. Last year they announced a strategic partnership to accelerate the commercialisation of Vodafone’s shared services operations, which Della Valle set up in 2011, and in which Accenture will invest.

The rapid succession of moves Della Valle has made since becoming boss has not gone unnoticed. One senior banker who knows the company well says that, despite her long service there, she has “brought an impressive objectivity” to her new position. “It is going to look and feel rather different to where it was when she started.”

yasemin.cm@ft.com

Advertisement

News

Map: 5.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of California

Published

on

Map: 5.1-Magnitude Earthquake Strikes off the Coast of California

Advertisement

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

A moderately strong, 5.1-magnitude earthquake struck in the North Pacific Ocean on Wednesday, according to the United States Geological Survey.

The temblor happened at 5:45 a.m. Pacific time about 40 miles west of Petrolia, Calif., data from the agency shows.

Advertisement

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aftershocks detected

Subsequent quakes have been reported in the same area. Such temblors are typically aftershocks caused by minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Advertisement

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Advertisement

When quakes and aftershocks occurred

 All times are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement

Sources: United States Geological Survey (epicenter, aftershocks, shake intensity); LandScan via Oak Ridge National Laboratory (population density) | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Wednesday, June 3 at 6:03 a.m. Pacific time. Aftershocks data is as of Wednesday, June 3 at 8:01 a.m. Pacific time.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

News

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Published

on

California’s primary for governor is undecided as candidates vie to be in the top two

Xavier Becerra, Democratic gubernatorial candidate for California, and Steve Hilton, Republican gubernatorial candidate for California, shake hands while arriving for a gubernatorial debate at KRON Studios in San Francisco in April.

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jason Henry/Getty Images North America

SAN FRANCISCO — The primary election for California governor is too close to call, with vote counting continuing Wednesday. Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican business executive Steve Hilton lead the field with Democrat Tom Steyer in third place.

In California’s unusual primary system, all candidates, regardless of party, appear on a single ballot open to any registered voter. The top two candidates then move on to the general election, even if they’re from the same party. This year, voters had 60 names for governor to choose from.

Advertisement

The winner will lead the country’s most populous state, where leaders often take on national political prominence. Incumbent Gov. Gavin Newsom is at his two-term limit and could be a Democratic contender for president.

Becerra, former Health and Human Services secretary under President Joe Biden, pitched himself to voters as an experienced political leader who isn’t afraid of President Trump, but his lead caps one of the most surprising and dramatic comebacks in recent state political history. As recently as April, polls were showing Becerra — also a former member of Congress and California attorney general — languishing in single digits in a crowded field.

In his remarks at his watch party in Los Angeles, Becerra noted his underdog status.

“Here in Hollywood’s hometown, we love a good underdog success story,” he said, drawing parallels between his campaign and his immigrant parents’ success story in California. “Guess what? The underdog stayed in the fight. Like my parents, I never gave up. Never stopped putting one foot in front of the other. Never stopped believing in the beacon-like goodness of California. And thankfully, neither did you.”

Hilton is a former Fox News commentator who also served as a political adviser to former British Prime Minister David Cameron. He was endorsed by President Trump in April, helping him to pull ahead of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, the other major Republican in the race. Hilton has campaigned on the idea that California needs change after 16 years under total Democratic control.

Advertisement

The race is narrowing down after a tumultuous campaign

At his watch party in Huntington Beach, the British-born candidate — who became an American citizen five years ago — said it was the “honor of his lifetime” to receive over 1 million votes so far.

“Change is coming to California and it’s long overdue,” Hilton said. “We’re not there yet, but it’s looking good. It looks very much as if Californians really will have the chance to vote for change in November and take our state in a new direction.”

Democratic billionaire activist Steyer spent more than $213 million of his own money to boost his candidacy and push a progressive, populist message. While he was trailing Becerra and Hilton on Tuesday night, he said at his watch party in San Francisco that he remains confident he can close the gap in the days ahead.

“Together, we’ve scared the hell out of the corporate interests used to getting their way,” Steyer said. “It might take some time to figure out where this is going. We’re going to wait until every ballot is counted. We’re gonna give democracy a time to work. And we know we finished really strong.”

The early results are not certain to hold, in part because of unusual voting patterns in this primary election: Ballot-tracking data heading into Tuesday evening showed that Republicans were more likely to vote early by mail, while Democratic voters in this deep-blue state held onto their mail-in ballots or chose to vote in person. That’s the reverse of recent elections, which saw more Democrats voting by mail and Republicans tending to vote in person on Election Day.

Advertisement

The uncertainty on election night capped a race that remained crowded and unsettled to the end. To some extent, the race was defined by who wasn’t running.

Some of the state’s most high-profile Democrats — former Vice President Kamala Harris, U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla and California Attorney General Rob Bonta — all passed on a potential bid to succeed Newsom.

The race was disrupted in April when then-U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell’s campaign for governor imploded amid allegations of sexual assault and harassment. Swalwell resigned from Congress shortly after the accusations surfaced and has denied assault allegations.

Swalwell had been gaining in polls and racking up high-profile endorsements, and his exit seemed to primarily benefit Becerra, who had been stuck in single digits in many polls. Ultimately, it quieted fears among Democrats who worried that the messy Democratic field could result in Bianco and Hilton winning the top spots in the June primary.

Marisa Lagos covers California politics at KQED and co-hosts the Political Breakdown show and podcast.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

Published

on

Supreme Court reinstates Republican-favored Alabama congressional districts

The U.S. Supreme Court

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images

The Supreme Court on Tuesday cleared the way for Alabama to use a congressional district map favored by Republicans.

The court, in an unsigned order, overturned a three-judge district court panel that found that the map is “tainted by intentional race-based discrimination.” The court’s three liberals publicly dissented.

The ruling means that Alabama’s 2026 midterm elections will feature six Republican-leaning districts and one Democratic-leaning one, as opposed to a map with only five safe Republican seats. Democrat Shomari Figures, who represents Alabama’s Second District, will likely lose his seat as a result of the high court’s ruling.

Advertisement

The story of Alabama’s congressional map is long and tortured. It began in 2021, when the state implemented a new map to account for population changes in the census. The map featured only one majority-black district out of seven, even though the state is more than one-quarter Black.

Voters immediately sued, claiming the map illegally diluted minority votes in violation of the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution. Lower court judges agreed, ruling that the state must draw a map with two districts where Black voters have a realistic chance of electing their candidate of choice. The Supreme Court more than once has ordered Alabama to draw a compliant map.

But the state has refused and instead continued to litigate the case. On Tuesday, that tactic paid off.

What changed? In April, the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority all but gutted what remains of the Voting Rights Act, ruling that states cannot purposefully draw districts that are majority-minority.

Alabama then asked the high court to reinstate the state’s old map, under the theory that this new ruling meant that it was permissible to use a map with only one majority-Black district. In an unsigned, unexplained order in May, the high court essentially reversed its previous opinions, and allowed Alabama to use the old map for the upcoming midterm elections.

Advertisement

This set off a flurry of activity in Alabama. By the time the Supreme Court issued its May order, absentee balloting had already begun, using the court-drawn map. So Republican Governor Kay Ivey cancelled elections and scheduled a special primary for August for the affected congressional races.

The case, however, was not over.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court had ordered a lower court panel to continue evaluating Alabama’s map in light of its recent Voting Rights Act decision. And just 15 days after that order, the panel, composed of three Republican judges—two of them Trump appointees—concluded unanimously that even under the Supreme Court’s new standards, the plan for a single black district was “intentionally discriminatory.”

So, once again, Alabama returned to the Supreme Court, arguing that the map was partisan, not racially discriminatory. In short, that the Republican legislature simply drew the map to elect more Republicans. And that under the Supreme Court’s new interpretation of the Voting Rights Act, the GOP map should be allowed to stand.

The court’s conservative agreed, writing that the lower court “did not heed the presumption of legislative good faith.”

Advertisement

The court’s three liberals publicly dissented, castigating the conservative majority for failing to abide by its 2006 decision in the case of Purcell v. Gonzalez. That decision declared that courts should not change election rules too close to an election.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in her dissent, said the court “debases the democratic process” and “corrodes the rule of law by rewarding Alabama’s gamesmanship and outright defiance of court orders.”

Tuesday’s decision is the latest in a series of Supreme Court rulings that could well reshape the 2026 midterm elections, making it much harder for Democrats to prevail.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending