Connect with us

News

Joe Biden says Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘hurting Israel’ with high death toll in Gaza

Published

on

Joe Biden says Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘hurting Israel’ with high death toll in Gaza

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Joe Biden has accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of “hurting Israel” through his administration’s treatment of Palestinians, but added the US would not set a “red line” limiting his actions against Hamas.

The US president also said in an interview with MSNBC that he would not “give up” on the possibility of a ceasefire ahead of Ramadan, which begins on Monday. The CIA’s director William Burns was still in the region, he said.

Biden said the Israeli prime minister had the “right to defend Israel and a right to continue to pursue Hamas, but he must, he must, he must pay more attention to the innocent lives being lost”.

Advertisement

“In my view he is hurting Israel, more than helping Israel,” said Biden, referring to Israel’s treatment of Palestinians, reiterating that he wanted “to see a ceasefire”.

Asked what his “red line” with Netanyahu would be, Biden said: “The defence of Israel is still critical. So there’s no red line [where] I’m going to cut off all weapons so they don’t have the Iron Dome to protect them.”

However, the US president suggested that Israel’s planned invasion of Rafah, the last remaining population centre in southern Gaza that the Israel Defense Forces have yet to occupy, would further strain relations between Washington and the war cabinet.

He also added that “they cannot have 30,000 more Palestinians dead as a consequence of going after [Hamas]” and reiterated his calls for a ceasefire.

Asked about Biden’s criticism, Netanyahu said on Sunday that a majority of Israelis supported his policies of seeking to destroy Hamas’s remaining battalions, opposing a return of the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority to govern Gaza and rejecting any attempt “to ram down our throats a Palestinian state”.

Advertisement

“The majority of Israelis understand that if we don’t do this, what we’ll have is a repetition of the October 7 massacre,” Netanyahu added in an interview with Politico and the German publications Bild and Welt.

Israel’s response to Hamas’s attack on October 7, in which 1,200 Israelis were killed, has led to a humanitarian crisis in Gaza and sparked increasing tensions between the Middle Eastern country and the US and Europe.

Biden confirmed in this week’s State of the Union address that the administration would build a temporary port in Gaza to provide humanitarian aid after Israel restricted deliveries of food, water, medicine and other assistance to Gaza’s 2.3mn population.

Vice-president Kamala Harris has described the conditions in Gaza as “inhumane”.

The soaring civilian death toll and dire conditions inside Gaza have been a source of increasing frustration for the US president. It has also led to criticism of the Biden administration, including from within the Democratic party.

Advertisement

In the swing state of Michigan, 100,000 Democrats voted “uncommitted” in the party’s recent primary as a protest against US support for Israel.

On Sunday, Raphael Warnock, the Democratic senator from Georgia, cited warnings from aid workers that an Israeli incursion into Rafah could kill “up to 85,000 more Palestinians in six months”.

“I think that that is morally unjustifiable and unconscionable,” he said on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Biden said on Saturday that he did not “blame voters for being upset”, adding: “That’s why I’m doing everything I can to try to stop it.”

The US president also reiterated the terms under which a ceasefire deal could take place, saying that he wanted to see “a major exchange of prisoners for a six-week period”, and that there should be “nothing happening during Ramadan”.

Advertisement

 

News

Video: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

Published

on

Video: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

new video loaded: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

A once-steady decline in pedestrian deaths in the United States has reversed, even as other countries have grown safer. Michael Keller, a New York Times investigative reporter, used crash test results, 3-D visibility scans and real-world reconstructions to explore how the boom in taller, heavier trucks and S.U.V.s has changed what happens when a person is struck.

By Michael H. Keller, Danielle Ivory, Irineo Cabreros, Eli Murray, Gabriel Blanco and Joey Sendaydiego

June 22, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

Published

on

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

Demonstrators hold a sign saying “PROTECT MINORITY VOTING RIGHTS” outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., in 2025.

Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Legal Defense Fund


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Legal Defense Fund

By declining to take up a lower court ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt another blow to the Voting Rights Act.

The court announced Monday that it will not review an Arkansas-based lawsuit, leaving in place a 2025 appeals panel ruling that ends a long-used tool for protecting minority voters from discrimination under the landmark law in seven mainly Midwestern states.

That ruling found that in the states covered by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota — private individuals and groups do not have the right to sue to enforce what’s known as Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, which generally allows voters with a disability or inability to read or write to get help with voting from a person of their choice.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court’s move comes almost two months after its conservative supermajority issued a major ruling that further weakened the Voting Rights Act, setting off a groundswell in redistricting across the country.

In May, shortly after that undermining of Section 2 protections against racial discrimination in redistricting, the high court decided not to weigh in on what the legal world calls a “private right of action,” sending back to lower courts two cases brought by Black voters in Mississippi and Native American voters in North Dakota.

For decades, enforcement of these sections of the Voting Rights Act has mainly been driven by lawsuits by private individuals and groups.

But after conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a single-paragraph opinion in 2021 questioning a private right of action, Republican officials in multiple states have raised a novel legal argument: Only the U.S. attorney general, they contend, has the right to bring lawsuits under these parts of the Voting Rights Act.

Such an interpretation of the law is likely to lead to a dramatic decline in voting rights lawsuits because of the Justice Department’s limited resources and shifting priorities under different presidential administrations.

Advertisement

The case that the justices decided not to take up was brought by the immigrant advocacy group Arkansas United, which has provided Spanish-language interpreters at polling sites to assist voters with limited English proficiency. The group challenged an Arkansas law that bans a person who is not a poll worker from helping more than six voters cast ballots. In 2022, a federal judge ruled that the state law violates Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act. But after GOP state officials appealed, an 8th Circuit panel found last year that private groups, like Arkansas United, do not have the right to bring this kind of lawsuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

Published

on

Video: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

new video loaded: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

transcript

transcript

California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

A fire that broke out on Wednesday at a cold storage facility in Los Angeles continued to burn on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom declared an emergency.

We do realize that at times there are large amounts of smoke coming off this building, and that is to be expected. Now, the good news is, all of our air monitoring has shown that there are no additional toxic chemicals or hazards within that smoke other than normal structure fire smoke. That said, no smoke is good smoke. There are smoke advisories and particulate matter advisories out there around the community, spanning for several miles around this incident. We are going to continue to aggressively fight this fire and minimize the impact to the community as much as possible.

Advertisement
A fire that broke out on Wednesday at a cold storage facility in Los Angeles continued to burn on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom declared an emergency.

By Cynthia Silva

June 21, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending