Connect with us

News

Japan’s JSR in patent dispute with US university over breakthrough chip technology

Published

on

Japan’s JSR in patent dispute with US university over breakthrough chip technology

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A multibillion-dollar patent fight has broken out over a technology that could transform the future of chipmaking, pitting the State University of New York against a company that is set to be owned by a Japanese government-backed fund.

The university’s research foundation alleges that Inpria, a US subsidiary of Japan’s JSR, has been selling chip materials products that are based on technology invented by one of its professors, according to a filing made last week. It could seek damages of up to $4.3bn for alleged infringement of its intellectual property.

The legal battle has erupted as JSR is seeking a buyout by a state-backed fund in a controversial deal that has raised questions about whether Japan is entering a new era of state interventionism to protect technologies of strategic importance. 

Advertisement

JSR is a leading provider of photoresists — specialist chemicals used for printing circuit designs on chip wafers — to the world’s largest chipmakers, including Samsung Electronics, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Intel.

At the heart of the intellectual property dispute is technology commercialised by Inpria, a chemical materials start-up spun out of Oregon State University that JSR acquired for $514mn in 2021.

The company is known for its metal-containing photoresists, which researchers see as a potential game changer for developing highly sophisticated and cost-effective extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines, critical to the production of high-end chips.

Analysts believe the technology Inpria is working on is one reason the Japanese government is keen to prevent JSR from falling into foreign ownership.

The complaint filed with the US District Court in New York claims the metal oxide resists were originally invented by research foundation professor Robert Brainard and his team. It accuses Inpria of selling products and filing new patents using its IP — valued between $2.4bn and $4.3bn — in violation of a contract signed between the foundation and JSR’s subsidiary.

Advertisement

It also seeks a preliminary injunction to prevent JSR and Inpria from continuing with their alleged activities and asks for an escrow account to be established to ensure its financial claims will be protected even after the state-backed Japan Investment Corporation launches its $6.4bn offer for JSR as early as this month.

Noting that the JIC deal is expected to be completed in early March, the filing says: “In less than five weeks, Inpria and its parent company, JSR, will try to make righting these wrongs impossible.”

The lawsuit from the State University of New York points to what it says are previous claims by JSR and JIC that call into question whether the research foundation would still be able to pursue legal action against Inpria once JIC acquires JSR.

A person close to JSR said the company had not previously suggested it would be outside the jurisdiction of US courts and that Inpria’s IP was not expected to be transferred to either JSR or JIC.

The research foundation said it became aware of its IP issue with Inpria when a legal dispute over patents broke out between Inpria and chip manufacturing equipment supplier Lam Research in October 2022. It notified Inpria that it was considering legal action last November, shortly before JSR approached JIC for a take-private deal.

Advertisement

In an emailed statement, JSR said it considered the lawsuit without merit and internal investigations it conducted had not uncovered any improper activities involving Inpria or implicating JSR.

“The patents in question are in patent families filed prior to the full acquisition of Inpria by JSR in 2021,” the company said.

“Inpria is a former university spinout with deep roots in academic research on metal oxides stretching back two decades,” it added.

News

Video: Americans Exposed to Hantavirus on Cruise Ship Arrive in United States

Published

on

Video: Americans Exposed to Hantavirus on Cruise Ship Arrive in United States

new video loaded: Americans Exposed to Hantavirus on Cruise Ship Arrive in United States

transcript

transcript

Americans Exposed to Hantavirus on Cruise Ship Arrive in United States

Eighteen passengers who were aboard the MV Hondius, a cruise ship with a deadly hantavirus outbreak, landed in Omaha on a U.S. government medical flight. The passengers were being monitored at medical facilities in Nebraska and Georgia.

We’re working diligently to ensure no one leaves the security in an unsecured way at an inappropriate time. No one who poses a risk to public health is walking out the front door of the streets of Omaha or beyond.

Advertisement
Eighteen passengers who were aboard the MV Hondius, a cruise ship with a deadly hantavirus outbreak, landed in Omaha on a U.S. government medical flight. The passengers were being monitored at medical facilities in Nebraska and Georgia.

By Axel Boada

May 11, 2026

Continue Reading

News

White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting suspect pleads not guilty in federal court

Published

on

White House Correspondents’ Dinner shooting suspect pleads not guilty in federal court

The man charged with attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Association dinner last month pleaded not guilty at a Monday arraignment in federal court.

Cole Tomas Allen, 31, wearing an orange shirt and trousers, was handcuffed and shackled as he was brought into the courtroom in Washington, D.C., federal court. His handcuffs were attached to a chain around his waist, which clanked as he was led to the defense table.

Advertisement

Speaking on behalf of Allen, federal public defender Tezira Abe said her client “pleads not guilty to all four counts as charged,” including attempting to assassinate the president of the United States, in connection with the April 25 incident at the Washington Hilton hotel.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles Jones advised the court that they plan to start producing their first tranche of discovery to the defense by the end of the week.

Officials said Allen, a California teacher and engineer, was armed with multiple guns, as well as knives, when he sprinted through a security checkpoint near the event where Trump and other White House officials had gathered with journalists.

He was arrested after an exchange of gunfire with a U.S. Secret Service officer who fired at him multiple times, a criminal complaint said. Allen was not shot during the exchange. The officer, who was wearing a ballistic vest, was shot once in the chest, treated at a hospital and released.

Trump and top members of his Cabinet and Congress were quickly evacuated from the room as others ducked under tables.

Advertisement

Allen was initially charged with attempting to assassinate the president, transportation of a firearm and ammunition through interstate commerce with intent to commit a felony, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence. On Tuesday, a federal grand jury indicted him on a new charge in the shooting of a Secret Service agent.

Moments before the attack, Allen had sent his family members a note apologizing and criticizing Trump without mentioning the president by name, according to a transcript of some of his writings provided to NBC News by a senior administration official. Allen also wrote that “administration officials (not including Mr. Patel)” were “targets.”

He also appeared to have taken a selfie in his hotel room. Prosecutors said Allen, who was dressed in a black button-down shirt and black pants, was “wearing a small leather bag consistent in appearance with the ammunition-filled bag later recovered from his person,” as well as a shoulder holster, a sheathed knife, pliers and wire cutters.

Officials have said they believe Allen had traveled by train from California to Washington, D.C., before checking into the hotel.

Allen’s sister, Avriana Allen, told law enforcement that her brother would make radical comments and constantly referenced a plan to fix the world, but said their parents were unaware that he had firearms in the home and that he would regularly train at shooting ranges.

Advertisement

Records show that he had purchased a Maverick 12-gauge shotgun in August 2025 and an Armscor Precision .38 semiautomatic pistol in October 2023.

After his arrest, Allen told the FBI that he did not expect to survive the incident, according to Assistant U.S. Attorney Jocelyn Ballantine. He was briefly placed on suicide watch at the Washington, D.C., jail, where he’s being held.

Allen is expected to appear in court for a June 29 hearing.

At Monday’s arraignment, his legal team said they plan on asking for the “entire office” of the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia to be recused because of U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s apparent involvement in the case in a “supervisory role.” Federal public defender Eugene Ohm said some of the evidence they receive from the government will further inform that decision.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Maps: Earthquakes Shake Southern California

Published

on

Maps: Earthquakes Shake Southern California

Advertisement

Shake intensity

Advertisement

Pop. density

Note: Map shows the area with a shake intensity of 3 or greater, which U.S.G.S. defines as “weak,” though the earthquake may be felt outside the areas shown.  All times on the map are Pacific time. The New York Times

A cluster of earthquakes have struck near the U.S.-Mexico border, including ones with a 4.5 and 4.7 magnitude, according to the United States Geological Survey.

Advertisement

As seismologists review available data, they may revise the earthquake’s reported magnitude. Additional information collected about the earthquake may also prompt U.S.G.S. scientists to update the shake-severity map.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Aftershocks detected

Subsequent quakes have been reported in the same area. Such temblors are typically aftershocks caused by minor adjustments along the portion of a fault that slipped at the time of the initial earthquake.

Quakes and aftershocks within 100 miles

Advertisement

Aftershocks can occur days, weeks or even years after the first earthquake. These events can be of equal or larger magnitude to the initial earthquake, and they can continue to affect already damaged locations.

Advertisement

When quakes and aftershocks occurred

 All times are Pacific time. The New York Times

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sources: United States Geological Survey (epicenter, aftershocks, shake intensity); LandScan via Oak Ridge National Laboratory (population density) | Notes: Shaking categories are based on the Modified Mercalli Intensity scale. When aftershock data is available, the corresponding maps and charts include earthquakes within 100 miles and seven days of the initial quake. All times above are Pacific time. Shake data is as of Saturday, May 9 at 11:55 p.m. Eastern. Aftershocks data is as of Sunday, May 10 at 11:54 p.m. Eastern.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending