Connect with us

News

Israel launches strikes in Lebanon

Published

on

Israel launches strikes in Lebanon

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Israel’s military launched a wave of air strikes in southern Lebanon in the early hours of Sunday, in what it said was an attempt to foil an “extensive attack” by the militant group Hizbollah.

The exchange of fire was the biggest between Israel and Iran-backed Hizbollah since they fought a 34-day war in 2006, and marked a sharp escalation of the hostilities that have simmered between the two sides since the start of the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza last year.

Hassan Nasrallah, Hizbollah’s leader, sought to draw a line under the exchange on Sunday evening, saying the attack was over, although its impact would still have to be assessed.

Advertisement

“If the result is satisfactory and the intended goal is achieved, we will consider the response operation has ended,” Nasrallah said in a televised address. “If the result is not enough, we will reserve the right to respond at another time.”

Nasrallah said Lebanese people who had fled their homes in fear of a wider war could return, adding that they could now “take a breath and relax”. 

Israel began its attack shortly before 5am local time, deploying 100 jets to bomb about 40 sites in Lebanon after identifying what it said were preparations by Hizbollah “to fire missiles and rockets”.

Nasrallah said the group had shortly afterward launched more than 340 Katyusha rockets and a large number of drones at 11 military targets in Israel’s north and the occupied Golan Heights, triggering air raid sirens across the area.

Speaking at a cabinet meeting on Sunday afternoon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel’s strike had destroyed thousands of short-range rockets and all the drones launched by Hizbollah — which he said had been meant to hit a “strategic target” in the centre of Israel.

Advertisement

“[Hizbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah in Beirut and [Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali] Khamenei in Tehran need to know that this is an additional step in changing the situation in the north, and returning our residents securely to their homes,” Netanyahu said. “And I reiterate — this is not the end of the story.”

Hizbollah said its barrage was retaliation for Israel’s assassination last month of Fuad Shukr, one of its most senior commanders, in an air strike in Beirut.

The killing of Shukr was followed the next day by the assassination in Tehran of Ismail Haniyeh, political leader of the Palestinian militant group Hamas. It prompted both Hizbollah and Iran to pledge retaliation against Israel, fuelling fears the region could slide towards all-out conflict.

Nasrallah acknowledged that Hizbollah’s retaliation had been delayed in part because of the mobilisation of Israeli and American military forces. He said a response from Iran and its Yemeni Houthi allies was yet to come.

As the exchange of fire unfolded early on Sunday, Ben Gurion airport in Tel Aviv suspended flights, and Israel’s defence minister Yoav Gallant declared a “special situation” across the country, giving him powers to restrict gatherings and limit access to certain areas.

Advertisement

However, according to initial assessments by Israel’s military, the barrage caused “very little” damage. Casualties on both sides were limited. One Israeli soldier was killed — by debris from Israeli missile interceptors, according to the country’s ambassador to the US — and two wounded. Three people — all presumed to be militants — were killed in Lebanon.

By early afternoon, flights to and from Tel Aviv had resumed, and most restrictions in Israel had been lifted. Some flights to and from Beirut were cancelled or delayed, but the airport remained open.

In Lebanon, the Israeli strikes hit around 30 different targets in the south, mostly in areas close to the border, but some further inland. Images circulated in local media showed smoke rising above various wooded areas, likely to be where Hizbollah’s static launchers are positioned, and villages along the border.

Smoke rises from the southern Lebanese town of Khiam. Israel hit around 30 targets in the south of the country © Karamallah Daher/Reuters

Nasrallah said Hizbollah’s attack had gone “as planned” and denied Israeli claims the group had intended to fire thousands of projectiles. Neither Israel nor Hizbollah provided evidence for their claims.

The Hizbollah leader spent much of a one-hour speech seeking to convince his audience the attack had been effective, stressing the decision to strike only military targets and avoid civilian casualties. The speech appeared designed to assuage a domestic audience weary of a war that has displaced more than 100,000 from border areas and killed more than 120 civilians.

Advertisement

Nasrallah said the group’s main target was the Glilot military intelligence base on the outskirts of Tel Aviv. This is about 110km inside Israeli territory, making the attack the deepest yet into the country. The Israeli military said Glilot had not been hit.

The attacks came as officials gathered in Egypt for the latest talks aimed at ending the war. The US and Arab states see the talks as the best chance of preventing a full-on conflict.

The White House said US President Joe Biden was “closely monitoring events in Israel and Lebanon”. Washington has deployed additional warships and fighter aircraft to deter Hizbollah and Iran and help defend Israel.

News

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

Published

on

Video: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

new video loaded: F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

transcript

transcript

F.A.A. Ignored Safety Concerns Prior to Collision Over Potomac, N.T.S.B. Says

The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

“I imagine there will be some difficult moments today for all of us as we try to provide answers to how a multitude of errors led to this tragedy.” “We have an entire tower who took it upon themselves to try to raise concerns over and over and over and over again, only to get squashed by management and everybody above them within F.A.A. Were they set up for failure?” “They were not adequately prepared to do the jobs they were assigned to do.”

Advertisement
The National Transportation Safety Board said that a “multitude of errors” led to the collision between a military helicopter and a commercial jet, killing 67 people last January.

By Meg Felling

January 27, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

Published

on

Families of killed men file first U.S. federal lawsuit over drug boat strikes

President Trump speaks as U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth looks on during a meeting of his Cabinet at the White House in December 2025.

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Relatives of two Trinidadian men killed in an airstrike last October are suing the U.S. government for wrongful death and for carrying out extrajudicial killings.

The case, filed in Massachusetts, is the first lawsuit over the strikes to land in a U.S. federal court since the Trump administration launched a campaign to target vessels off the coast of Venezuela. The American government has carried out three dozen such strikes since September, killing more than 100 people.

Among them are Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, who relatives say died in what President Trump described as “a lethal kinetic strike” on Oct. 14, 2025. The president posted a short video that day on social media that shows a missile targeting a ship, which erupts in flame.

Advertisement

“This is killing for sport, it’s killing for theater and it’s utterly lawless,” said Baher Azmy, legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “We need a court of law to rein in this administration and provide some accountability to the families.”

The White House and Pentagon justify the strikes as part of a broader push to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the U.S. The Pentagon declined to comment on the lawsuit, saying it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.

But the new lawsuit described Joseph and Samaroo as fishermen doing farm work in Venezuela, with no ties to the drug trade. Court papers said they were headed home to family members when the strike occurred and now are presumed dead.

Neither man “presented a concrete, specific, and imminent threat of death or serious physical injury to the United States or anyone at all, and means other than lethal force could have reasonably been employed to neutralize any lesser threat,” according to the lawsuit.

Advertisement

Lenore Burnley, the mother of Chad Joseph, and Sallycar Korasingh, the sister of Rishi Samaroo, are the plaintiffs in the case.

Their court papers allege violations of the Death on the High Seas Act, a 1920 law that makes the U.S. government liable if its agents engage in negligence that results in wrongful death more than 3 miles off American shores. A second claim alleges violations of the Alien Tort Statute, which allows foreign citizens to sue over human rights violations such as deaths that occurred outside an armed conflict, with no judicial process.

The American Civil Liberties Union, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Jonathan Hafetz at Seton Hall University School of Law are representing the plaintiffs.

“In seeking justice for the senseless killing of their loved ones, our clients are bravely demanding accountability for their devastating losses and standing up against the administration’s assault on the rule of law,” said Brett Max Kaufman, senior counsel at the ACLU.

U.S. lawmakers have raised questions about the legal basis for the strikes for months but the administration has persisted.

Advertisement

—NPR’s Quil Lawrence contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

News

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

Published

on

Video: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

new video loaded: New Video Analysis Reveals Flawed and Fatal Decisions in Shooting of Pretti

A frame-by-frame assessment of actions by Alex Pretti and the two officers who fired 10 times shows how lethal force came to be used against a target who didn’t pose a threat.

By Devon Lum, Haley Willis, Alexander Cardia, Dmitriy Khavin and Ainara Tiefenthäler

January 26, 2026

Continue Reading

Trending