Connect with us

News

HUD is bracing as DOGE seeks to cut waste, fraud. Union leaders have a suggestion

Published

on

HUD is bracing as DOGE seeks to cut waste, fraud. Union leaders have a suggestion

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development building is seen in Washington, D.C.

Alastair Pike/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Alastair Pike/AFP via Getty Images

The Trump administration is asking employees at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to justify hundreds of contracts across the agency. One email sent Monday afternoon included a spreadsheet to fill out asking whether a contract was “critical,” whether it had a DEI component and if the contractor was competent.

The email also asked for a name on each form, a “contract champion within the bureau who will personally vouch for the answers.” It was sent by Scott Langmack, senior adviser to Government Efficiency, and said it was “urgent” that answers be sent by end of day Tuesday, Feb. 11.

The request has added to worries among workers that HUD might be the next target for major downsizing by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a unit in the Trump administration led by Elon Musk.

Advertisement

During his first term, President Trump repeatedly proposed dramatic cuts to HUD’s budget, though they did not pass Congress. The conservative policy agenda Project 2025 calls for reigning in HUD’s “bureaucratic overreach” and transferring its functions to other agencies, states and localities.

The agency manages rental assistance for millions, provides funding to house homeless people, helps lower-income families buy homes, and builds and repairs affordable housing.

HUD contracts include services such as property management, inspections and appraisals on housing it oversees, credit analysis for its mortgage insurance arm, and research on how its programs perform and ways to improve them.

One department staffer also said future funding grants are now effectively on pause, and that permission is needed to move ahead with anything. “It’s impossible to plan in this totally chaotic environment,” this person said.

Another worker said the idea that entire parts of HUD might be wound down was “devastating.” A third said leadership was reminding people that the agency’s work is important and bipartisan, but the erosion of support for government aid has been demoralizing.

Advertisement

All three employees asked that their names not be used because they feared for their jobs.

Two HUD union leaders with the American Federation of Government Employees expressed similar concerns. But mixed with that was also hope that DOGE scrutiny could lead to much-needed change in the agency.

“If we really want to get to the bulk of fraud, waste and abuse, let’s take a close look at a federal procurement system, because this has been broken for years,” said Antonio Gaines, president of AFGE National Council 222.

HUD’s union has been alleging fraud, waste and abuse since last year

Gaines knows the stereotype that federal workers are lazy and said front-line employees take the blame for a slow bureaucracy. But often, he said, they are hamstrung by decisions made higher up.

One such decision, he said, was implementing a new tool for inspecting public housing that has been disastrously slow and clunky to use. “The app is woefully dysfunctional, but we spent $40 million on it already,” Gaines said.

Advertisement

Last year, AFGE Council 222 filed a complaint with HUD’s Inspector General and members of Congress. It said the app made it impossible for HUD to inspect nearly all of its five million housing units across the country every five years, as required by law.

There hasn’t been much response so far. But Gaines hopes that will change now that DOGE has asked for a review of all contracts.

“This is something that really will shed light on the lack of oversight.” said Erik Jetmir, the legislative and political chair for Council 222.

On the other hand, both officials said, it’s too early to know which way things will go. The Trump administration “can just as easily take a look at the contracts and replace them with loyalists and cronies,” Jetmir said.

Gaines was surprised that Trump and Musk, who “consider themselves to be elite business people,” had not made a business case for dramatic downsizing. “They’re making a political case for it, and I think that’s very dangerous,” he said.

Advertisement

HUD staff feel stressed and left in the dark

Several HUD employees said they’ve been given almost no information on what changes to expect. One called the situation a “nightmare.” A union survey this month found 80% of respondents reported very high stress levels.

Gaines said the Trump administration’s repeated digs at federal employees — like saying public sector jobs are “lower productivity” — are offensive. And the offer to pay people for months to sit home and do nothing? “It seems to me that is the epitome of fraud, waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars,” he said.

Several people expressed a visceral fear of getting fired. There is also worry about how many people might choose to retire or leave if the Trump administration’s offer is upheld in court. One source was concerned that losing many people in the same department could make it tough to “carry out our mission.”

News

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

Published

on

National Park Service will void passes with stickers over Trump’s face

The Interior Department’s new “America the Beautiful” annual pass for U.S. national parks.

Department of Interior


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Department of Interior

The National Park Service has updated its policy to discourage visitors from defacing a picture of President Trump on this year’s pass.

The use of an image of Trump on the 2026 pass — rather than the usual picture of nature — has sparked a backlash, sticker protests, and a lawsuit from a conservation group.

The $80 annual America the Beautiful pass gives visitors access to more than 2,000 federal recreation sites. Since 2004, the pass has typically showcased sweeping landscapes or iconic wildlife, selected through a public photo contest. Past winners have featured places like Arches National Park in Utah and images of bison roaming the plains.

Advertisement

Instead, of a picture of nature, this year’s design shows side-by-side portraits of Presidents George Washington and Trump. The new design has drawn criticism from parkgoers and ignited a wave of “do-it-yourself” resistance.

Photos circulating online show that many national park cardholders have covered the image of Trump’s face with stickers of wildlife, landscapes, and yellow smiley faces, while some have completely blocked out the whole card. The backlash has also inspired a growing sticker campaign.

Jenny McCarty, a longtime park volunteer and graphic designer, began selling custom stickers meant to fit directly over Trump’s face — with 100% of proceeds going to conservation nonprofits. “We made our first donation of $16,000 in December,” McCarty said. “The power of community is incredible.”

McCarty says the sticker movement is less about politics and more about preserving the neutrality of public lands. “The Interior’s new guidance only shows they continue to disregard how strongly people feel about keeping politics out of national parks,” she said.

Advertisement

The National Park Service card policy was updated this week to say that passes may no longer be valid if they’ve been “defaced or altered.” The change, which was revealed in an internal email to National Park Service staff obtained by SFGATE, comes just as the sticker movement has gained traction across social media.

In a statement to NPR, the Interior Department said there was no new policy. Interagency passes have always been void if altered, as stated on the card itself. The agency said the recent update was meant to clarify that rule and help staff deal with confusion from visitors.

The Park Service has long said passes can be voided if the signature strip is altered, but the updated guidance now explicitly includes stickers or markings on the front of the card.

It will be left to the discretion of park service officials to determine whether a pass has been “defaced” or not. The update means park officials now have the leeway to reject a pass if a sticker leaves behind residue, even if the image underneath is intact.

In December, conservation group the Center for Biological Diversity filed a lawsuit in Washington, D.C., opposing the new pass design.

Advertisement

The group argues that the image violates a federal requirement that the annual America the Beautiful pass display a winning photograph from a national parks photo contest. The 2026 winning image was a picture of Glacier National Park.

“This is part of a larger pattern of Trump branding government materials with his name and image,” Kierán Suckling, the executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity, told NPR. “But this kind of cartoonish authoritarianism won’t fly in the United States.”

The lawsuit asks a federal court to pull the current pass design and replace it with the original contest winner — the Glacier National Park image. It also seeks to block the government from featuring a president’s face on future passes.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

The America the Beautiful National Parks Annual Pass for 2025, showing one of the natural images which used to adorn the pass. Its picture, of a Roseate Spoonbill taken at Everglades National Park, was taken by Michael Zheng.

Department of Interior


hide caption

Advertisement

toggle caption

Department of Interior

Not everyone sees a problem with the new design. Vince Vanata, the GOP chairman of Park County, Wyoming, told the Cowboy State Daily that Trump detractors should “suck it up” and accept the park passes, saying they are a fitting tribute to America’s 250th birthday this July 4.

Advertisement

“The 250th anniversary of our country only comes once. This pass is showing the first president of the United States and the current president of the United States,” Vanata said.

But for many longtime visitors, the backlash goes beyond design.

Erin Quinn Gery, who buys an annual pass each year, compared the image to “a mug shot slapped onto natural beauty.”

She also likened the decision to self-glorification: “It’s akin to throwing yourself a parade or putting yourself on currency,” she said. “Let someone else tell you you’re great — or worth celebrating and commemorating.”

When asked if she plans to remove her protest sticker, Gery replied: “I’ll take the sticker off my pass after Trump takes his name off the Kennedy Center.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

Published

on

Federal immigration agents shoot 2 people in Portland, Oregon, police say

PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) — Federal immigration officers shot and wounded two people in a vehicle outside a hospital in Portland, Oregon, on Thursday, a day after an officer shot and killed a driver in Minnesota, authorities said.

The Department of Homeland Security described the vehicle’s passenger as “a Venezuelan illegal alien affiliated with the transnational Tren de Aragua prostitution ring” who had been involved in a recent shooting in Portland. When agents identified themselves to the vehicle occupants Thursday afternoon, the driver tried to run them over, the department said in a written statement.

“Fearing for his life and safety, an agent fired a defensive shot,” the statement said. “The driver drove off with the passenger, fleeing the scene.”

There was no immediate independent corroboration of those events or of any gang affiliation of the vehicle’s occupants. During prior shootings involving agents involved in President Donald Trump’s surge of immigration enforcement in U.S. cities, including Wednesday’s shooting by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer in Minneapolis, video evidence cast doubt on the administration’s initial descriptions of what prompted the shootings.

READ MORE: What we know so far about the ICE shooting in Minneapolis

Advertisement

According to the the Portland Police bureau, officers initially responded to a report of a shooting near a hospital at about 2:18 p.m.

A few minutes later, police received information that a man who had been shot was asking for help in a residential area a couple of miles away. Officers then responded there and found the two people with apparent gunshot wounds. Officers determined they were injured in the shooting with federal agents, police said.

Their conditions were not immediately known. Council President Elana Pirtle-Guiney said during a Portland city council meeting that Thursday’s shooting took place in the eastern part of the city and that two Portlanders were wounded.

“As far as we know both of these individuals are still alive and we are hoping for more positive updates throughout the afternoon,” she said.

The shooting escalates tensions in an city that has long had a contentious relationship with President Donald Trump, including Trump’s recent, failed effort to deploy National Guard troops in the city.

Advertisement

Portland police secured both the scene of the shooting and the area where the wounded people were found pending investigation.

“We are still in the early stages of this incident,” said Chief Bob Day. “We understand the heightened emotion and tension many are feeling in the wake of the shooting in Minneapolis, but I am asking the community to remain calm as we work to learn more.”

Portland Mayor Keith Wilson and the city council called on U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement to end all operations in Oregon’s largest city until a full investigation is completed.

“We stand united as elected officials in saying that we cannot sit by while constitutional protections erode and bloodshed mounts,” a joint statement said. “Portland is not a ‘training ground’ for militarized agents, and the ‘full force’ threatened by the administration has deadly consequences.”

The city officials said “federal militarization undermines effective, community‑based public safety, and it runs counter to the values that define our region. We’ll use every legal and legislative tool available to protect our residents’ civil and human rights.”

Advertisement

They urged residents to show up with “calm and purpose during this difficult time.”

“We respond with clarity, unity, and a commitment to justice,” the statement said. “We must stand together to protect Portland.”

U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, an Oregon Democrat, urged any protesters to remain peaceful.

“Trump wants to generate riots,” he said in a post on the X social media platform. “Don’t take the bait.”

A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy.

Advertisement

Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue.


Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

Published

on

Video: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

new video loaded: What Trump Told Us About the ICE Shooting

The New York Times sat down with President Trump in the Oval Office for an exclusive interview just hours after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent shot a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis. Our White House correspondent Zolan Kanno-Youngs explains how the president reacted to the shooting.

By Zolan Kanno-Youngs, Alexandra Ostasiewicz, Nikolay Nikolov and Coleman Lowndes

January 8, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending